Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention

Patency of Perforating Arteries after Stent Placement? A Study Using an In Vivo Experimental Atherosclerosis-Induced Model

Osamu Masuo, Tomoaki Terada, Gary Walker, Mitsuharu Tsuura, Kunio Nakai and Toru Itakura
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2005, 26 (3) 543-548;
Osamu Masuo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomoaki Terada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gary Walker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mitsuharu Tsuura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kunio Nakai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toru Itakura
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The recent advent of flexible stents has enabled their application in intracranial atherosclerotic disease. However, it is unclear whether perforating artery occlusion occurs after stent placement in atherosclerotic stenotic vessels. We investigated this issue by using experimental atherosclerosis-induced rabbits.

METHODS: A stainless steel balloon-expandable stent was deployed into the atherosclerosis-induced abdominal aorta across the lumbar artery in six New Zealand white rabbits. This model system is suitable because the diameter of the abdominal aorta is similar to that of human intracranial arteries. We evaluated the patency of the lumbar artery by using angiography and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) 3 months after stent placement. Histopathologic evaluation also was performed in one rabbit.

RESULTS: The lumbar artery was patent in five of six rabbits per angiography. The lumbar artery was occluded with an intraluminal thrombus in one rabbit. However, SEM findings demonstrated that the stent struts were covered completely with a thick neointima and the ostium of the lumbar artery became narrowed in all cases. In the one lumbar artery that was occluded at angiography, histopathologic findings confirmed that intraluminal thrombus surrounded the stent struts crossing the ostium.

CONCLUSION: We observed luminal narrowing after stent placement in an atherosclerotic stenotic vessel, although patency of the perforating arteries was generally maintained.

Intracranial atherosclerotic diseases are known to cause future strokes with a high rate, despite anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy (1–3). Moreover, an international randomized trial proved that surgical bypass surgery was not effective for the prevention of future strokes (4). However, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, which can recover anterograde blood flow, is a candidate as a treatment for intracranial atherosclerotic disease. In addition, the development of flexible stents has permitted the endovascular treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic diseases, and many successful cases have been reported (5–14). Stent placement for intracranial atherosclerotic vessels, however, is not yet widely used, owing in part to a number of unresolved problems. One major issue is whether perforating arteries remain patent after stent placement. Using a normal rabbit model, we previously reported that stent placement does not compromise the patency of the perforating artery if the stent struts do not completely cover the ostium of the perforating arteries (15). However, the neointimal response after stent placement in atherosclerotic vessels is quite different from the response of normal vessels (16). Thus, we investigated whether the patency of the perforating arteries will be maintained after stent placement in atherosclerotic vessels.

Methods

We previously reported that the spatial relationship between the abdominal aorta and the lumbar arteries in rabbit is anatomically similar to that of the major intracranial arteries and perforating arteries in humans, with regard to the diameter and branching angle (15). Thus, we placed stents across the ostium of the lumbar artery in the atherosclerosis-induced abdominal aorta in rabbits and evaluated the patency of the lumbar arteries by using angiography and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as histopathologic methods. All animal care conformed to the institutional guidelines of Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.

Induction of Atherosclerosis

To induce atherosclerotic changes in rabbit aorta, we used previously described methods with modifications (17–19). Six New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2–3 kg were initially fed a high-cholesterol diet (2% cholesterol, 3% coconut oil) for 4 weeks. Afterward, the rabbits underwent balloon denudation of their abdominal aorta. For this procedure, the rabbits were anesthetized by means of an intravenous injection of pentobarbital 4 mg/kg. The right femoral artery was exposed, and a 4F sheath was inserted through a femoral arteriotomy. After angiography was performed as a control, the endothelium of the abdominal aorta was denuded by withdrawing an inflated 3F Fogarty balloon catheter (Baxter, Irvine, CA) three times. Postprocedural angiography was performed, and the surgical procedure was finished. Before balloon denudation, heparin 100 U/kg was given intravenously. Aspirin 5 mg/kg was administered orally from 1 day before the surgery to 1 month after stent placement. All rabbits were continuously fed a high-cholesterol diet for 6 weeks after balloon denudation.

Stent Placement

Stents were implanted 6 weeks after balloon denudation. The atherosclerotic rabbits underwent follow-up angiography through the left femoral artery. First, the stenosis ratio was determined by using a measure wire placed in the aorta. The stenosis ratio was defined as follows: 1 minus the diameter of the vessel before stent placement divided by the diameter of the vessel before denudation. The stainless steel balloon expandable stent (3.0 x 15 mm, Multi-Link; Guidant/Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc., Temecula, CA) was deployed through a femoral artery by using a 0.014-inch guidewire (Transend; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) at the most severely stenotic portion of the abdominal aorta that involved the lumbar artery. The characteristics of this stent include good conformability due to the very thin flat strut. The rabbits were systemically heparinized (100 U/Kg) before stent placement. The stent was deployed at 6–8 atm for 15 seconds. Postprocedural angiography was performed, and the surgery was completed.

Follow-up Angiography

Follow-up angiography was performed through the left common carotid artery 3 months after stent placement to evaluate the lumbar artery patency.

Scanning Electron Microscopy

After follow-up angiography, five of the six rabbits were euthanized for SEM analysis, as previously described. Inferior vena cava exsanguination was performed by perfusion with 0.2 mol/L phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with heparin through the left ventricular puncture. The arteries with stents then were harvested and fixed with 0.1 mol/L PBS, containing 1% paraformaldehyde and 1.25% glutaraldehyde. After rinsing with 0.1 mol/L PBS, the arteries with stents were gently opened with tungsten scissors to prevent intraluminal damage, and the specimens were postfixed with 1% OsO4 at 4°C for 1 hour. The arteries with stents were then dehydrated with graded ethanol and t-butyl alcohol, and then freeze-dried. The specimens were coated with 20 nm of gold, and the patency of the lumbar artery and the neointimal thickness were examined.

Histopathologic Evaluation

The aorta with stent in one rabbit was examined at the level of the lumbar artery ostium by using histopathologic methods. After exsanguination, the artery with stent was harvested and fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin. This artery was carefully sectioned with a tungsten knife at 4–5 μm thickness. The sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Masson-Trichrome to examine the cellular composition.

Results

Induced Aortic Atherosclerosis

The vessel wall of the denuded aorta increased in thickness macroscopically 6 weeks after balloon denudation. Microscopic findings revealed neointimal hyperplasia with disruption of the internal elastic lamina. The neointima consisted mainly of hypertrophic smooth muscle cells and connective tissue (data not shown). The denuded aorta demonstrated atherosclerotic changes with segmental stenotic lesions at angiography.

Angiographic Findings of the Aorta with Stent

The angiographic results are summarized in the Table. The average stenosis ratio of the most severely affected abdominal aorta involving the lumbar artery was 25%. In all cases, the lumbar arteries were patent without late filling before and just after stent placement per angiography. Follow-up angiography demonstrated that the lumbar arteries in five of six rabbits were still patent without late filling. However, the lumbar artery in one rabbit was completely occluded. Except for this one case, restenosis of the aorta with stent was not encountered at follow-up angiography. The angiographic changes of a representative case are shown in Figure 1.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Angiographic change in a representative case (case 1).

A–D, Angiograms obtained after denudation (A), 6 weeks after denudation but before stent placement (B), immediately after stent placement (C), and at follow-up 3 months after stent placement (D). Arrow in B indicates stenotic lesion before stent placement.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Summary of experimental cases

SEM Findings

SEM was performed in five rabbits to investigate the pathomorphologic status at the lumbar artery ostium. The stent strut crossed the lumbar artery ostium in all cases. Although the ostium of the lumbar artery remained patent, luminal narrowing was shown in all cases and the stent strut was completely covered with a thick neointima. In addition, the small ostial space, bridged by the stent strut, became stenotic due to the neointimal proliferation. The angiographic and SEM findings of the same rabbit are shown in Figure 2, and the SEM findings in another rabbit are shown in Figure 3.

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Angiographic change and SEM findings in a representative case (case 2).

A, Prestenting angiogram shows stenotic change at the level of the lumbar artery orifice (arrow).

B, Angiogram obtained after stent placement shows that the stenotic lesion is improved and the lumbar artery is patent.

C, SEM image (original magnification, X40) shows that the stent struts crossing the orifice of the lumbar artery are covered with thick neointima, and the lumbar artery orifice becomes narrow.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Representative SEM findings (case 3). SEM image (original magnification, X40) shows that the ostium of the lumbar artery has luminal narrowing due to a thick neointima.

Histopathologic Findings

Histopathologic evaluation was performed in one rabbit. In this rabbit, follow-up angiography showed occlusion of the lumbar artery (Fig 4A). Histopathologic findings demonstrated that the thrombus surrounded the stent strut crossing the lumbar artery ostium and extended into the lumbar artery (Fig 4B and C). This thrombus was relatively new, because the infiltration of macrophages was devoid of fibrous changes.

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Case of intraluminal thrombus (case 6).

A, Follow-up angiogram demonstrates intraluminal thrombus at the L4 level and occlusion of the L4 lumbar artery. Arrow indicates intraluminal thrombus.

B and C, Microscopic analysis shows intraluminal thrombus surrounding the stent struts that cross the ostium. (B, hematoxylin-eosin staining, original magnification, X12.5. C, hematoxylin-eosin staining, original magnification, X40.)

Microscopic analysis of arteries with stents showed that the stent strut was covered with a thickened neointima. This neointima was composed mainly of proliferating smooth muscle cells (data not shown).

Discussion

Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenoses often have a poor prognosis with severe neurologic deficits, despite optimal medical treatment (1–3). Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty or stent placement is expected to be an attractive treatment for this disease (5–14). However, intracranial stent placement has not been widely used because intracranial vessels have unique characteristics, including the presence of numerous perforating arteries serving important brain tissue with limited collateral vessels. Our previous report confirmed that these perforating arteries remain patent after stent placement in normal parent arteries (15). However, it is well known that atherosclerotic vessels, in comparison to normal vessels, have different characteristics such as endothelial cell defects and smooth muscle cell hyperactivity. Thus, we speculated that a differential response of atherosclerotic vessels after stent placement might result in occlusive changes to the perforating arteries. The occlusion of side branches after coronary stent placement has also been a major concern since its inception. Several clinical reports about side-branch occlusion have already been published. Poerner et al (20) examined whether or not small- and medium-sized side branches occlude after coronary stent placement. In their clinical study, chronic side-branch occlusion occurred in 13.5% of cases. The factor most strongly contributing to side-branch occlusion was a side-branch diameter of less than 1.4 mm. However, the occlusion of neurovascular perforating arteries may result in significant neurologic deficits, despite the diameters of the perforating arteries typically being much smaller than that of the coronary artery side branches. Levy et al (21) demonstrated, with angiography, that the perforating arteries were patent after stent placement of intracranial nonatherosclerotic arteries in dogs, consistent with our previous results (15). However, there are few clinical or experimental reports of the effect on perforating arteries after stent placement for intracranial atherosclerotic arteries. In only one single-center, retrospective case review, all perforating arteries remained patent after stent placement for the atherosclerotic lesions (22).

In our study, we used the rabbit abdominal aorta and lumbar artery as a proxy for intracranial arteries and perforators. The spatial relationship between the major intracranial arteries and perforating arteries in humans was similar to that of the abdominal aorta and lumbar arteries in rabbits, as described previously (15). This study demonstrates that the response of experimental atherosclerosis-induced vessels after stent placement is quite different from that of nonatherosclerotic vessels. Although the lumbar artery was patent in five of six rabbits on follow-up angiograms, the stent struts that crossed the ostium of the lumbar artery were covered with a thick neointima in SEM findings. In one case, the lumbar artery was completely occluded due to an intraluminal thrombus. In this study, the small ostial space enclosed by the stent strut was stenotic.

Recently, more suitable stents have been developed, such as drug-eluting stents that inhibit neointimal growth (23–25). Sirolimus-coated stents could completely control the proliferation of smooth muscle cells. Tanabe et al (26), however, reported that the occlusion rate of side branches after placing sirolimus-coated stents was similar to that with uncoated stents. To achieve the objective of preserving the perforating artery, a stent that can suppress the proliferation of smooth muscle cells as well as promote the reendothelialization is the most ideal. Intracranial stent placement should be further developed as a treatment for cerebrovascular revascularization, if these stents can promote perforating artery patency.

Study Limitation and Future Direction

The main limitation of this study is that it involves a small number of stents in rabbits with experimentally induced atherosclerosis. Also, we used Multi-Link stents in this experiment, because this type of stent is composed of a very thin, flat strut. However, stent design is one factor that affects restenosis rate (17). Thus, it is necessary that various stents be tried for the fate of perforating arteries after stent placement in the future.

Conclusion

Our study revealed ostial narrowing of perforating arteries following stent placement, but complete occlusion was observed in only one case. Our results suggest that despite luminal narrowing, atherosclerotic perforating arteries generally maintain their patency after stent placement. The significance of such luminal narrowing remains to be determined.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Guidant Corporation for providing the Multi-Link stents, and Prof. Yukihisa Hirao, Department of Biology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan, for technical support with SEM.

References

  1. ↵
    WASID Study Group. Prognosis of patients with symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis: the warfarin-aspirin symptomatic intracranial disease (WASID) study group. Stroke 1998;29:1389–1392
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. Chimowitz MI, Kokkinos J, Strong J, et al. The warfarin-aspirin symptomatic intracranial disease study. Neurology 1995;45:1488–1493
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Thijs VN, Albers GW. Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: outcome of patients who fail antithrombotic therapy. Neurology 2000;55:490–497
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    The EC/IC Bypass Study Group. Failure of extra-cranial/intracranial arterial bypass to reduce the risk of ischemic stroke: result of an international randomized trial. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1191–1200
    PubMed
  5. ↵
    Lanzino G, Fessler RD, Miletich RS, Guterman LR, Hopkins LN. Angioplasty and stenting of basilar artery stenosis: technical case report. Neurosurgery 1999;45:404–408
    PubMed
  6. Horowitz MB, Pride GL, Graybeal DF, Purdy PD. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of midbasilar stenoses: three technical case reports and literature review. Neurosurgery 1999;45:925–931
    PubMed
  7. Mori T, Kazita K, Mori K. Cerebral angioplasty and stenting for intracranial vertebral atherosclerotic stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:787–789
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. Gomez CR, Misra VK, Liu MW, et al. Elective stenting of symptomatic basilar artery stenosis. Stroke 2000;31:95–99
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. Gomez CR, Misra VK, Cambell MS, Soto RD. Elective stenting of symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:971–973
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. Levy EI, Horowitz MB, Koebbe CJ, et al. Transluminal stent-assisted angioplasty of the intracranial vertebrobasilar system for medically refractory, posterior circulation ischemia. Neurosurgery 2001;48:1215–1223
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. Uchiyama N, Kida S, Watanabe T, Yamashita J, Matsui O. Improved cerebral perfusion and metabolism after stenting for basilar artery stenosis: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2001;48:1386–1392
    PubMed
  12. Lylyk P, Cohen JE, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Miranda C. Endovascular reconstruction of intracranial arteries by stent placement and combined techniques. J Neurosurg 2002;97:1306–1313
    PubMed
  13. Levy EI, Hanel RA, Bendok BR, et al. Staged stent-assisted angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis. J Neurosurg 2002;97:1294–1301
    PubMed
  14. ↵
    Shin YS, Kim SY, Bang OY, et al. Early experiences of elective stenting for symptomatic stenosis of the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery: reports of three cases and review of the literature. J Clin Neurosci 2003;10:53–59
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Masuo O, Terada T, Walker G, et al. Study of the patency of small arterial branches after stent placement with an experimental in vivo model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:706–710
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Geary RL, Williams JK, Golden D, Brown DG, Benjamin ME, Adams MR. Time course of cellular proliferation, intimal hyperplasia, and remodeling following angioplasty in monkeys with established atherosclerosis: a nonhuman primate model of restenosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996;16:34–43
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Carter AJ, Farb A, Gould KE, Taylor AJ, Virmani R. The degree of neointimal formation after stent placement in atherosclerotic rabbit iliac arteries is dependent on the underlying plaque. Cardiovasc Pathol 1999;8:73–80
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. Tominaga R, Harasaki H, Sutton C, Emoto H, Kambic H, Hollman J. Effects of stent design and serum cholesterol level on the restenosis rate in atherosclerotic rabbits. Am Heart J 1993;126:1049–1058
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Welt FG, Woods TC, Edelman ER. Oral heparin prevents neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury. Circulation 2001;104:3121–3124
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Poerner TC, Kralev S, Voelker W, et al. Natural history of small and medium-sized side branches after coronary stent implantation. Am Heart J 2002;143:627–635
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Levy EI, Boulos AS, Hanel RA, et al. In vivo model of intracranial stent implantation: a pilot study to examine the histological response of cerebral vessels after randomized implantation of heparin-coated and uncoated endoluminal stents in a blinded fashion. J Neurosurg 2003;98:544–553
    PubMed
  22. ↵
    Lopes DK, Ringer AJ, Boulos AS, et al. Fate of branch arteries after intracranial stenting. Neurosurgery 2003;52:1275–1279
    PubMed
  23. ↵
    Sousa JE, Costa MA, Sousa AG, et al. Two-year angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up after implantation of sirolimus-eluting stents in human coronary arteries. Circulation 2003;107:381–383
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  24. Park SJ, Shim WH, Ho DS, et al. A parlitaxel-eluting stent for prevention of coronary restenosis. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1537–1545
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Schofer J, Schluter M, Gershlick AH, et al, E-SIRIUS Investivators. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of patients with long atherosclerotic lesions in small coronary arteries: double-blind randomized controlled trial (E-SIRIUS). Lancet 2003;362:1093–1099
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Tanabe K, Serruys PW, Degertekin M, et al. Fate of side branches after coronary arterial sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:937–941
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received April 19, 2004.
  • Accepted after revision June 16, 2004.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 3
1 Mar 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patency of Perforating Arteries after Stent Placement? A Study Using an In Vivo Experimental Atherosclerosis-Induced Model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Osamu Masuo, Tomoaki Terada, Gary Walker, Mitsuharu Tsuura, Kunio Nakai, Toru Itakura
Patency of Perforating Arteries after Stent Placement? A Study Using an In Vivo Experimental Atherosclerosis-Induced Model
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2005, 26 (3) 543-548;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Patency of Perforating Arteries after Stent Placement? A Study Using an In Vivo Experimental Atherosclerosis-Induced Model
Osamu Masuo, Tomoaki Terada, Gary Walker, Mitsuharu Tsuura, Kunio Nakai, Toru Itakura
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2005, 26 (3) 543-548;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Apollo Stent for Symptomatic Atherosclerotic Intracranial Stenosis: Study Results
  • Perforator stroke after elective stenting of symptomatic intracranial stenosis
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Factors Associated with Major Re-Recanalization following Second Coiling for Recanalized Aneurysms: A Multicenter Experience over 20 Years during Long-Term Follow-up
  • A Key Factor Shapes LS-DAVFs EVT Outcome
  • Optimizing Voxel Size in 3D Rotational Angiography
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire