Academy of Reviewers
Publicly Available to the AJNR Community
This initiative provides publicly available resources to any member of the AJNR community who is interested in learning about the review process.
Goals:
- Increase familiarity with the AJNR submission process
- Increase familiarity with the AJNR review process
- Provide peer review training
Resources:
Explanation of AJNR peer review process
- PowerPoint presentation describing the peer review process
- Tips for Reviewing a Video Article
- A New Era for AJNR - Dr. Max Wintermark discusses the AJNR peer review process
Part 1
Part 2
\
Seasoned AJNR reviewers' insights and tips on how to perform a review
- Interview with Dr. Mauricio Castillo
- Part 1
- Part 2
- Part 1
- Good example #1: Detailed review containing all necessary information
- Good example #2: Detailed review containing all necessary information
- Good example #3: Concise and clear review of the strengths and limitations of the study
- Good example #4: Detailed review containing all necessary information
- Bad example #1: Vague review without helpful guidance for the editor
- Bad example #2: Vague review without helpful guidance for the editor
- Bad example #3: Short review without helpful guidance for the editor
- Bad example #4: Short review without helpful guidance for the editor
- Bad example #5: Harsh review without helpful guidance for the editor
- Bad example #6: Harsh review without helpful guidance for the editor
Additional Resources:
- Resource #1: Example of a step-by-step guide to performing a review
