Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence–Powered Identification of Large-Vessel Occlusions in a Comprehensive Stroke Center

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Malhotra K,
   2. Gornbein J,
   3. Saver JL

   . Ischemic strokes due to large-vessel occlusions contribute disproportionately to stroke-related dependence and death: a review. Front Neurol 2017;8:1–5 doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00651 pmid:29250029

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Smith WS,
   2. Lev MH,
   3. English JD, et al

   . Significance of large vessel intracranial occlusion causing acute ischemic stroke and TIA. Stroke 2009;40:3834–40 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.561787 pmid:19834014

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Berkhemer OA,
   2. Fransen PSS,
   3. Beumer D, et al

   ; MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:11–20 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 pmid:25517348

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Jovin TG,
   2. Chamorro A,
   3. Cobo E, et al

   ; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2296–306 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 pmid:25882510

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Malhotra K,
   2. Liebeskind D

   . Imaging in endovascular stroke trials. J Neuroimaging 2015;25:517–27 doi:10.1111/jon.12272 pmid:26179500

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Broderick JP,
   2. Palesch Y,
   3. Demaerschalk B, et al

   ; Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III Investigators, Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke. N Engl J Med 2013;368:893–903 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214300 pmid:23390923

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Saver JL,
   2. Jahan R,
   3. Levy EI, et al

   . Solitaire Flow Restoration Device versus the Merci Retriever in Patients with Acute Ischaemic Stroke (SWIFT): a randomised, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2012;380:1241–49 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61384-1 pmid:22932715

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Powers WJ,
   2. Rabinstein AA,
   3. Ackerson T, et al

   ; American Heart Association Stroke Council. Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2018;49:e46–e110 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000158] pmid:29367334

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Albers GW,
   2. Marks MP,
   3. Kemp S, et al

   . Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018;378:708–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713973 pmid:29364767

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Nogueira RG,
    2. Jadhav AP,
    3. Haussen DC, et al

    . Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018;378:11–21 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1706442 pmid:29129157

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Zaharchuk G,
    2. Gong E,
    3. Wintermark M, et al

    . Deep learning in neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1776–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5543 pmid:29419402

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Hosny A,
    2. Parmar C,
    3. Quackenbush J, et al

    . Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer 2018;18:500–10 doi:10.1038/s41568-018-0016-5 pmid:29777175

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Ronneberger O,
    2. Fischer P,
    3. Brox T

    . U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. 2015. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.04597.pdf. Accessed November 19, 2019
14. 14.↵
    1. Shrout PE,
    2. Fleiss JL

    . Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420–28 doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 pmid:18839484

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Rice ME,
    2. Harris GT

    . Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC area, Cohen’s d, and r. Law Hum Behav 2005;29:615–20 doi:10.1007/s10979-005-6832-7 pmid:16254746

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Erickson BJ,
    2. Korfiatis P,
    3. Akkus Z, et al

    . Machine learning for medical imaging. Radiographics 2017;37:505–15 doi:10.1148/rg.2017160130 pmid:28212054

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Lee EJ,
    2. Kim YH,
    3. Kim N, et al

    . Deep into the brain: artificial intelligence in stroke imaging. J Stroke 2017;19:277–85 doi:10.5853/jos.2017.02054 pmid:29037014

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Hinman JD,
    2. Rost NS,
    3. Leung TW, et al

    . Principles of precision medicine in stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2017;88:54–61 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2016-314587 pmid:27919057

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Murray NM,
    2. Unberath M,
    3. Hager GD, et al

    . Artificial intelligence to diagnose ischemic stroke and identify large vessel occlusions: a systematic review. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:156v64 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015135 pmid:31594798

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Chatterjee A,
    2. Somayaji N,
    3. Kabakis IM

    . Abstract WMP16: artificial intelligence detection of cerebrovascular large vessel occlusion: nine month, 650 patient evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy and performance of the Viz.ai LVO algorithm. Stroke 2019;50 (Suppl 1) doi:10.1161/str.50.suppl_1.WMP16

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    1. Barreira CM,
    2. Bouslama M,
    3. Al-Bayati AR, et al

    . E-108 Aladin study: automated large artery occlusion detection in stroke imaging: a multicenter analysis. J Neurointerv Surg 2018(Suppl 2):101–02 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-SNIS.184

    CrossRef
22. 22.↵
    1. Lima FO,
    2. José F,
    3. Mont A, et al

    . Pre-hospital assessment of large vessel occlusion strokes: implications for modeling and planning stroke systems of care. Front Neurol 2019;10:955 doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00955 pmid:31572286

    CrossRefPubMed