Automated Segmentation of MRI White Matter Hyperintensities in 8421 Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Debette S,
   2. Markus HS

   . The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2010;341:c3666 doi:10.1136/bmj.c3666 pmid:20660506

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Ryu WS,
   2. Schellingerhout D,
   3. Hong KS, et al

   . White matter hyperintensity load on stroke recurrence and mortality at 1 year after ischemic stroke. Neurology 2019;93:e578–89 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007896 pmid:31308151

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Ryu WS,
   2. Woo SH,
   3. Schellingerhout D, et al

   . Stroke outcomes are worse with larger leukoaraiosis volumes. Brain 2017;140:158–70 doi:10.1093/brain/aww259 pmid:28008000

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Prins ND,
   2. Scheltens P

   . White matter hyperintensities, cognitive impairment and dementia: an update. Nat Rev Neurol 2015;11:157–65 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.10 pmid:25686760

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Herrmann LL,
   2. Le Masurier M,
   3. Ebmeier KP

   . White matter hyperintensities in late life depression: a systematic review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;79:619–24 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2007.124651

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Wardlaw JM,
   2. Smith EE,
   3. Biessels GJ, et al

   . Neuroimaging; STandards for ReportIng Vascular changes on nEuroimaging (STRIVE v1). standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:822–38 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70124-8 pmid:23867200

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. 7.↵
   1. Xiong Y,
   2. Yang J,
   3. Wong A, et al

   . Operational definitions improve reliability of the age-related white matter changes scale. Eur J Neurol 2011;18:744–49 doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03272.x pmid:21138503

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Rost NS,
   2. Brodtmann A,
   3. Pase MP, et al

   . Post-stroke cognitive impairment and dementia. Circ Res 2022;130:1252–71 doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.319951 pmid:35420911

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Alber J,
   2. Alladi S,
   3. Bae HJ, et al

   . White matter hyperintensities in vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID): knowledge gaps and opportunities. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2019;5:107–17 doi:10.1016/j.trci.2019.02.001 pmid:31011621

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Black S,
    2. Gao F,
    3. Bilbao J

    . Understanding white matter disease: imaging-pathological correlations in vascular cognitive impairment. Stroke 2009;40:S48–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.537704 pmid:19064767

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Carass A,
    2. Roy S,
    3. Gherman A, et al

    . Evaluating white matter lesion segmentations with refined Sorensen-Dice analysis. Sci Rep 2020;10:8242 doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64803-w pmid:32427874

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Park G,
    2. Hong J,
    3. Duffy BA, et al

    . White matter hyperintensities segmentation using the ensemble U-Net with multi-scale highlighting foregrounds. Neuroimage 2021;237:118140 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118140 pmid:33957235

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Ryu WS,
    2. Kang YR,
    3. Noh YG, et al

    . Acute infarct segmentation on diffusion-weighted imaging using deep learning algorithm and RAPID MRI. J Stroke 2023;25:425–29 doi:10.5853/jos.2023.02145 pmid:37813675

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Noh YG,
    2. Ryu WS,
    3. Schellingerhout D, et al

    . Deep learning algorithms for automatic segmentation of acute cerebral infarcts on diffusion-weighted images: effects of training data sample size, transfer learning, and data features. 2023. medRxiv https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2023/07/09/2023.07.02.23292150.full.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2023
15. 15.↵
    1. Li X,
    2. Zhao Y,
    3. Jiang J, et al

    . White matter hyperintensities segmentation using an ensemble of neural networks. Hum Brain Mapp 2022;43:929–39 doi:10.1002/hbm.25695 pmid:34704337

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Sundaresan V,
    2. Zamboni G,
    3. Rothwell PM, et al

    . Triplanar ensemble U-Net model for white matter hyperintensities segmentation on MR images. Med Image Anal 2021;73:102184 doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102184 pmid:34325148

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Ryu WS,
    2. Woo SH,
    3. Schellingerhout D, et al

    . Grading and interpretation of white matter hyperintensities using statistical maps. Stroke 2014;45:3567–75 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006662 pmid:25388424

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Guerrero R,
    2. Qin C,
    3. Oktay O, et al

    . White matter hyperintensity and stroke lesion segmentation and differentiation using convolutional neural networks. Neuroimage Clin 2018;17:918–34 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.022 pmid:29527496

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Lee AR,
    2. Woo I,
    3. Kang DW, et al

    . Fully automated segmentation on brain ischemic and white matter hyperintensities lesions using semantic segmentation networks with squeeze-and-excitation blocks in MRI. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 2020;21:100440 doi:10.1016/j.imu.2020.100440

    CrossRef
20. 20.↵
    1. Zhou K,
    2. Liu Z,
    3. Qiao Y, et al

    . Domain generalization: a survey. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2022;45:4396–415 doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3195549 pmid:35914036

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Mehrtash A,
    2. Wells WM,
    3. Tempany CM, et al

    . Confidence calibration and predictive uncertainty estimation for deep medical image segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2020;39:3868–78 doi:10.1109/TMI.2020.3006437 pmid:32746129

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. van Erven T,
    2. Harremoes P

    . Rényi divergence and Kullback-Leibler divergence. IEEE Trans Inform Theory 2014;60:3797–820 doi:10.1109/TIT.2014.2320500

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    1. Ryu WS,
    2. Schellingerhout D,
    3. Hong KS, et al

    . Relation of pre-stroke aspirin use with cerebral infarct volume and functional outcomes. Ann Neurol 2021;90:763–76 doi:10.1002/ana.26219 pmid:34536234

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Kim DE,
    2. Park JH,
    3. Schellingerhout D, et al

    . Mapping the supratentorial cerebral arterial territories using 1160 large artery infarcts. JAMA Neurol 2019;76:72–80 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.2808 pmid:30264158

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Kim DE,
    2. Ryu WS,
    3. Schellingerhout D, et al

    . Estimation of acute infarct volume with reference maps: a simple visual tool for decision making in thrombectomy cases. J Stroke 2019;21:69–77 doi:10.5853/jos.2018.03202 pmid:30732442

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Ryu WS,
    2. Schellingerhout D,
    3. Ahn HS, et al

    . Hemispheric asymmetry of white matter hyperintensity in association with lacunar infarction. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e010653 doi:10.1161/JAHA.118.010653 pmid:30571500

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Chityala R,
    2. Pudipeddi S

    . Image Processing and Acquisition using Python. CRC Press; 2020; 89–107
28. 28.↵
    1. Hu J,
    2. Shen L,
    3. Sun G

    . Squeeze-and-excitation networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2018:7132–41
29. 29.↵
    1. Huang H,
    2. Lin L,
    3. Tong R, et al

    . Unet 3+: a full-scale connected unet for medical image segmentation. In: Proceedings of the 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). May 4–8, 2020. Barcelona, Spain; 10555–59
30. 30.↵
    1. Lakshminarayanan B,
    2. Pritzel A,
    3. Blundell C

    . Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference Neural Information Processing Systems. December 4–8, 2017. Long Beach, California
31. 31.↵
    1. Jungo A,
    2. Reyes M

    . Assessing reliability and challenges of uncertainty estimations for medical image segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2019. Springer-Verlag; 2019:48–56
32. 32.↵
    1. Tuohy S,
    2. O’Cualain D,
    3. Jones E, et al

    . Distance determination for an automobile environment using inverse perspective mapping in OpenCV. In: Proceedings of the IET Irish Signals and Systems Conference. June14, 2010. Belfast, Northern Ireland
33. 33.↵
    1. Lin LI

    . A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255–68 doi:10.2307/2532051

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. 34.↵
    1. Altman D

    . Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall/CRC Texts in Statistical Science. 1991; 396–439
35. 35.↵
    1. Kapeller P,
    2. Barber R,
    3. Vermeulen RJ, et al

    ; European Task Force of Age-Related White Matter Changes.Visual rating of age-related white matter changes on magnetic resonance imaging: scale comparison, interrater agreement, and correlations with quantitative measurements. Stroke 2003;34:441–45 doi:10.1161/01.str.0000049766.26453.e9 pmid:12574557

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. van den Heuvel DM,
    2. ten Dam VH,
    3. de Craen AJ, et al

    ; PROSPER Study Group. Measuring longitudinal white matter changes: comparison of a visual rating scale with a volumetric measurement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:875–78 pmid:16611781

    PubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Seo H,
    2. Badiei Khuzani M,
    3. Vasudevan V, et al

    . Machine learning techniques for biomedical image segmentation: an overview of technical aspects and introduction to state-of-art applications. Med Phys 2020;47:e148–67 doi:10.1002/mp.13649 pmid:32418337

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Wang X,
    3. Yang D, et al

    . Generalizing deep learning for medical image segmentation to unseen domains via deep stacked transformation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2020;39:2531–40 doi:10.1109/TMI.2020.2973595 pmid:32070947

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Çiçek Ö,
    2. Abdulkadir A,
    3. Lienkamp SS, et al

    . 3D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotation. Springer-Verlag International Publishing; 2016:424–32
40. 40.↵
    1. Isensee F,
    2. Jaeger PF,
    3. Kohl SAA, et al

    . nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods 2021;18:203–11 doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z pmid:33288961

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Morrison C,
    2. Dadar M,
    3. Manera AL, et al

    . Racial differences in white matter hyperintensity burden in older adults. Neurobiol Aging 2023;122:112–19 doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2022.11.012 pmid:36543016

    CrossRefPubMed