Stable and Discriminatory Radiomic Features from the Tumor and Its Habitat Associated with Progression-Free Survival in Glioblastoma: A Multi-Institutional Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Haralick RM,
   2. Shanmugam K,
   3. Dinstein I

   . Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1973;SMC-3:610–21 doi:10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Huang LL,
   2. Shimizu A,
   3. Hagihara Y, et al

   . Gradient feature extraction for classification-based face detection. Pattern Recognition 2003;36:2501–11 doi:10.1016/S0031-3203(03)00130-4

   CrossRefWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Laws KI

   . Rapid texture identification. Image Processing for Missile Guidance 1980;0238:376–81 doi:10.1117/12.959169

   CrossRef
4. 4.↵
   1. Manjunath BS,
   2. Ma WY

   . Texture features for browsing and retrieval of image data. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 996;18:837–42 doi:10.1109/34.531803

   CrossRef
5. 5.↵
   1. Prasanna P,
   2. Tiwari P,
   3. Madabhushi A

   . Co-occurrence of Local Anisotropic Gradient Orientations (CoLlAGe): a new radiomics descriptor. Sci Rep 2016;6:37241 doi:10.1038/srep37241 pmid:27872484

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Coroller TP,
   2. Grossmann P,
   3. Hou YC, et al

   . CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2015;114:345–50 doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.015 pmid:25746350

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Lao J,
   2. Chen Y,
   3. Li Z-C, et al

   . A deep learning-based radiomics model for prediction of survival in glioblastoma multiforme. Sci Rep 2017;7:10353 doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10649-8 pmid:28871110

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Styner MA,
   2. Charles HC,
   3. Park J, et al

   . Multisite validation of image analysis methods: assessing intra- and intersite variability. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2002;46841:278–86 doi:10.1117/12.467167

   CrossRef
9. 9.↵
   1. Um H,
   2. Tixier F,
   3. Bermudez D, et al

   . Impact of image preprocessing on the scanner dependence of multi-parametric MRI radiomic features and covariate shift in multi-institutional glioblastoma datasets. Phys Med Biol 2019;64:165011 doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab2f44 pmid:31272093

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Zhao B,
    2. Tan Y,
    3. Tsai WY, et al

    . Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging. Sci Rep 2016;6:23428 doi:10.1038/srep23428 pmid:27009765

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Bakas S,
    2. Akbari H,
    3. Sotiras A, et al

    . Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. Sci Data 2017;4:170117 doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.117 pmid:28872634

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Shiri I,
    2. Hajianfar G,
    3. Sohrabi A, et al

    . Repeatability of radiomic features in magnetic resonance imaging of glioblastoma: test-retest and image registration analyses. Med Phys 2020;47:4265–80 doi:10.1002/mp.14368 pmid:32615647

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Leo P,
    2. Lee G,
    3. Shih NC, et al

    . Evaluating stability of histomorphometric features across scanner and staining variations: prostate cancer diagnosis from whole slide images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2016;3:047502 doi:10.1117/1.JMI.3.4.047502 pmid:27803941

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Khorrami M,
    2. Bera K,
    3. Leo P, et al

    . Stable and discriminating radiomic predictor of recurrence in early stage non-small cell lung cancer: multi-site study. Lung Cancer 2020;142:90–97 doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.02.018 pmid:32120229

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Hiremath A,
    2. Shiradkar R,
    3. Merisaari H, et al

    . Test-retest repeatability of a deep learning architecture in detecting and segmenting clinically significant prostate cancer on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Eur Radiol 2021;31:379–91 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07065-4 pmid:32700021

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Merisaari H,
    2. Taimen P,
    3. Shiradkar R, et al

    . Repeatability of radiomics and machine learning for DWI: short-term repeatability study of 112 patients with prostate cancer. Magn Reson Med 2020;83:2293–309 doi:10.1002/mrm.28058 pmid:31703155

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Tixier F,
    2. Um H,
    3. Young RJ, et al

    . Reliability of tumor segmentation in glioblastoma: impact on the robustness of MRI‐radiomic features. Med Phys 2019;46:3582–91 doi:10.1002/mp.13624

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Pati S,
    2. Verma R,
    3. Akbari H, et al

    . Reproducibility analysis of multi-institutional paired expert annotations and radiomic features of the Ivy Glioblastoma Atlas Project (Ivy GAP) dataset. Med Phys 2020;47:6039–52 doi:10.1002/mp.14556 pmid:33118182

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Clark K,
    2. Vendt B,
    3. Smith K, et al

    . The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J Digit Imaging 2013;26:1045–57 doi:10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7 pmid:23884657

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Shah N,
    2. Feng X,
    3. Lankerovich M, et al

    . Data from Ivy GAP. The Cancer Imaging Archive 2016 doi:10.7937/K9/TCIA.2016.XLwaN6nL

    CrossRef
21. 21.↵
    1. Jain A,
    2. Nandakumar K,
    3. Ross A

    . Score normalization in multimodal biometric systems. Pattern Recognition 2005;38:2270–85 doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2005.01.012

    CrossRef
22. 22.↵
    1. Lee M,
    2. Woo B,
    3. Kuo MD, et al

    . Quality of radiomic features in glioblastoma multiforme: impact of semi-automated tumor segmentation software. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:498–509 doi:10.3348/kjr.2017.18.3.498 pmid:28458602

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Rastegar S,
    2. Beigi J,
    3. Saeedi E, et al

    . Radiographic image radiomics feature reproducibility: a preliminary study on the impact of field size. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2020;51:128–36 doi:10.1016/j.jmir.2019.11.006 pmid:32089514

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Suter Y,
    2. Knecht U,
    3. Alão M, et al

    . Radiomics for glioblastoma survival analysis in pre-operative MRI: exploring feature robustness, class boundaries, and machine learning techniques. Cancer Imaging 2020;20:55 doi:10.1186/s40644-020-00329-8 pmid:32758279

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Moradmand H,
    2. Aghamir SMR,
    3. Ghaderi R

    . Impact of image preprocessing methods on reproducibility of radiomic features in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020;21:179–90 doi:10.1002/acm2.12795 pmid:31880401

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.
    1. Aerts HJ,
    2. Velazquez ER,
    3. Leijenaar RTH, et al

    . Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 2014;5:4006 doi:10.1038/ncomms5006 pmid:24892406

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.
    1. Verma R,
    2. Correa R,
    3. Hill VB, et al

    . Tumor habitat-derived radiomic features at pretreatment MRI that are prognostic for progression-free survival in glioblastoma are associated with key morphologic attributes at histopathologic examination: a feasibility study. Radiol Artif Intell 2020;2:190168 doi:10.1148/ryai.2020190168 pmid:33330847

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.
    1. Balagurunathan Y,
    2. Gu Y,
    3. Wang H, et al

    . Reproducibility and prognosis of quantitative features extracted from CT images. Transl Oncol 2014;7:72–87 doi:10.1593/tlo.13844 pmid:24772210

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Peng H,
    2. Long F,
    3. Ding C

    . Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2005;27:1226–38 doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159 pmid:16119262

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science