Hybrid 3D/2D Convolutional Neural Network for Hemorrhage Evaluation on Head CT

References

1. 1.↵
   2. van Asch CJ,
   3. Luitse MJ,
   4. Rinkel GJ, et al

   . Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:167–76 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70340-0 pmid:20056489

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Goldstein JN,
   3. Gilson AJ

   . Critical care management of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2011;13:204–16 doi:10.1007/s11940-010-0109-2 pmid:21222062

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Heit JJ,
   3. Iv M,
   4. Wintermark M

   . Imaging of intracranial hemorrhage. J Stroke 2017;19:11–27 doi:10.5853/jos.2016.00563 pmid:28030895

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Glover M 4th.,
   3. Almeida RR,
   4. Schaefer PW, et al

   . Quantifying the impact of noninterpretive tasks on radiology report turn-around times. J Am Coll Radiol 2017;14:1498–1503 doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.07.023 pmid:28916177

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Davis SM,
   3. Broderick J,
   4. Hennerici M, et al

   . Recombinant Activated Factor VII Intracerebral Hemorrhage Trial Investigators. Hematoma growth is a determinant of mortality and poor outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 2006;66:1175–81 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000208408.98482.99 pmid:16636233

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Kazui S,
   3. Naritomi H,
   4. Yamamoto H, et al

   . Enlargement of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: incidence and time course. Stroke 1996;27:1783–87 doi:10.1161/01.STR.27.10.1783 pmid:8841330

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Qureshi A,
   3. Palesch Y

   , ATACH II Investigators. Expansion of recruitment time window in antihypertensive treatment of acute cerebral hemorrhage (ATACH) II trial. J Vasc Interv Neurol 2012;5:6–9 pmid:23230458

   PubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Broderick JP,
   3. Brott TG,
   4. Duldner JE, et al

   . Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage: a powerful and easy-to-use predictor of 30-day mortality. Stroke 1993;24:987–93 doi:10.1161/01.STR.24.7.987 pmid:8322400

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Butcher K,
   3. Laidlaw J

   . Current intracerebral haemorrhage management. J Clin Neurosci 2003;10:158–67 doi:10.1016/S0967-5868(02)00324-7 pmid:12637041

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Scherer M,
    3. Cordes J,
    4. Younsi A, et al

    . Development and validation of an automatic segmentation algorithm for quantification of intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 2016;47:2776–82 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013779 pmid:27703089

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Goodfellow I,
    3. Bengio Y,
    4. Courville A

    . Deep Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press; November 2016. ISBN: 9780262035613
12. 12.↵
    2. Prevedello LM,
    3. Erdal BS,
    4. Ryu JL, et al

    . Automated critical test findings identification and online notification system using artificial intelligence in imaging. Radiology 2017;285:923–31 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162664 pmid:28678669

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. He K,
    3. Gkioxari G,
    4. Dollár P, et al

    . Mask R-CNN. arXiv:1703.06870. 2017. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy. October 22–29, 2017
14. 14.↵
    2. Lin TY,
    3. Dollár P,
    4. Girshick R, et al

    . Feature pyramid networks for object detection. arXiv:1612.03144. 2017. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, Hawaii. July 21–27, 2017
15. 15.↵
    2. He K,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Ren S, et al

    . Deep residual learning for image recognition. arXiv:1512.03385. 2016. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vagas, Nevada. June 27–30, 2016
16. 16.↵
    2. Ren S,
    3. He K,
    4. Girshick R, et al

    . Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2017;39:1137–49 doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 pmid:27295650

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. He K,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Ren S, et al

    . Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. arXiv:1502.01852. 2015. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Santiago, Chile. December 7–13, 2015:1026–34
18. 18.↵
    2. Kingma DP,
    3. Adam Ba J

    . A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980. 2015. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for Learning Representations, San Diego, California. May 7–9, 2015
19. 19.↵
    2. Abadi M,
    3. Agarwal A,
    4. Barham P, et al

    . Tensorflow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. http://download.tensorflow.org/paper/whitepaper2015.pdf. Accessed March 25, 2018.
20. 20.↵
    2. Yuh EL,
    3. Gean AD,
    4. Manley GT, et al

    . Computer-aided assessment of head computed tomography (CT) studies in patients with suspected traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2008;25:1163–72 doi:10.1089/neu.2008.0590 pmid:18986221

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Keravnou E,
    2. Garbay C,
    3. Baud R, et al.

    2. Cósić D,
    3. Lončarić S

    . Rule-based labeling of CT head image. In: Keravnou E, Garbay C, Baud R, et al., eds. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: 6th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Europe, AIME'97 Grenoble, France, March 23–26, 1997 Proceedings. Berlin: Springer-Verlag;1997:453–56
22. 22.↵
    2. Li YH,
    3. Zhang L,
    4. Hu QM, et al

    . Automatic subarachnoid space segmentation and hemorrhage detection in clinical head CT scans. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2012;7:507–16 doi:10.1007/s11548-011-0664-3 pmid:22081264

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Prakash KN,
    3. Zhou S,
    4. Morgan TC, et al

    . Segmentation and quantification of intra-ventricular/cerebral hemorrhage in CT scans by modified distance regularized level set evolution technique. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2012;7:785–98 doi:10.1007/s11548-012-0670-0 pmid:22293946

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Rajapakse JC,
    2. Schmidt B,
    3. Volkert G

    2. Gong T,
    3. Liu R,
    4. Tan CL, et al

    . Classification of CT brain images of head trauma. In: Rajapakse JC, Schmidt B, Volkert G, eds. Pattern Recognition in Bioinformatics: Second IAPR International Workshop, PRIB 2007, Singapore, October 1–2, 2007 Proceedings. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2007:401–08
25. 25.↵
    2. Shen W,
    3. Zhou M,
    4. Yang F, et al

    . Multi-scale convolutional neural networks for lung nodule classification. Inf Process Med Imaging 2015;24:588–99 pmid:26221705

    PubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Wang J,
    3. Ding H,
    4. Bidgoli FA, et al

    . Detecting cardiovascular disease from mammograms with deep learning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2017;36:1172–81 doi:10.1109/TMI.2017.2655486 pmid:28113340

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Wang J,
    3. Fang Z,
    4. Lang N, et al

    . A multi-resolution approach for spinal metastasis detection using deep Siamese neural networks. Comput Biol Med 2017;84:137–46 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.03.024 pmid:28364643

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    2. Phong TD,
    3. Duong HN,
    4. Nguyen HT, et al

    . Brain hemorrhage diagnosis by using deep learning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Soft Computing, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. January 13–16, 2017:34–39
29. 29.↵
    2. Simonyan K,
    3. Vedaldi A,
    4. Zisserman A

    . Deep inside convolutional networks: visualising image classification models and saliency maps. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6034. Accessed March 25, 2018.
30. 30.↵
    2. Selvaraju RR,
    3. Das A,
    4. Vedantam R, et al

    . Grad-CAM: why did you say that? visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308964930_GradCAM_Why_did_you_say_that_Visual_Explanations_from_Deep_Networks_via_Gradient-based_Localization. Accessed March 25, 2018.
31. 31.↵
    2. Nataraj S

    . 2013 Imaging Turnaround Times Survey Results. 2014. https://www.advisory.com/research/imaging-performance-partnership/expert-insights/2014/2013-turnaround-times-survey-results. Accessed March 25, 2018.
32. 32.↵
    2. Anderson CS,
    3. Heeley E,
    4. Huang Y, et al

    ; INTERACT2 Investigators. Rapid blood-pressure lowering in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2355–65 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214609 pmid:23713578

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    2. Jung SW,
    3. Lee CY,
    4. Yim MB

    . The relationship between subarachnoid hemorrhage volume and development of cerebral vasospasm. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2012;14:186–91 doi:10.7461/jcen.2012.14.3.186 pmid:23210046

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Bullock MR,
    3. Chesnut R,
    4. Ghajar J, et al

    ; Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury Author Group. Surgical management of acute epidural hematomas. Neurosurgery 2006;58:S7–S15; discussion Si-iv pmid:16710967

    PubMed
35. 35.↵
    2. Kwak R,
    3. Kadoya S,
    4. Suzuki T

    . Factors affecting the prognosis in thalamic hemorrhage. Stroke 1983;14:493–500 doi:10.1161/01.STR.14.4.493 pmid:6606870

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    2. Goodfellow IJ,
    3. Shlens J,
    4. Szegedy C

    . Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In: Proceedings of the International Conference for Learning Representations, San Diego, California. May 7–9, 2015
37. 37.↵
    2. Gu S,
    3. Rigazio L

    . Towards deep neural network architectures robust to adversarial examples. https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5068. Accessed March 25, 2018.