Site and Rate of Occlusive Disease in Cervicocerebral Arteries: A CT Angiography Study of 2209 Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Michel P,
   3. Odier C,
   4. Rutgers M, et al

   . The Acute STroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne (ASTRAL): design and baseline analysis of an ischemic stroke registry including acute multimodal imaging. Stroke 2010;41:2491–98 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.596189 pmid:20930152

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. González RG

   . Current state of acute stroke imaging. Stroke 2013;44:3260–64 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003229 pmid:24072005

   FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Schramm P,
   3. Schellinger PD,
   4. Klotz E, et al

   . Comparison of perfusion computed tomography and computed tomography angiography source images with perfusion-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke of less than 6 hours' duration. Stroke 2004;35:1652–58 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000131271.54098.22 pmid:15155964

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Bash S,
   3. Villablanca JP,
   4. Jahan R, et al

   . Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1012–21 pmid:15891154

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Josephson SA,
   3. Bryant SO,
   4. Mak HK, et al

   . Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology 2004;63:457–60 doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000135154.53953.2C pmid:15304575

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Obach V,
   3. Oleaga L,
   4. Urra X, et al

   . Multimodal CT-assisted thrombolysis in patients with acute stroke: a cohort study. Stroke 2011;42:1129–31 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605766 pmid:21330631

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Lansberg MG,
   3. Thijs VN,
   4. Bammer R, et al

   . The MRA-DWI mismatch identifies patients with stroke who are likely to benefit from reperfusion. Stroke 2008;39:2491–96 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.508572 pmid:18635861

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Knauth M,
   3. von Kummer R,
   4. Jansen O, et al

   . Potential of CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1001–10 pmid:9194425

   Abstract
9. 9.↵
   2. Deipolyi AR,
   3. Hamberg LM,
   4. Gonzaléz RG, et al

   . Diagnostic yield of emergency department arch-to-vertex CT angiography in patients with suspected acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:265–68 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4112 pmid:25258370

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Adams HP Jr.,
    3. Bendixen BH,
    4. Kappelle LJ, et al

    . Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1993;23:35–41 pmid:7678184

    PubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Vanacker P,
    3. Lambrou D,
    4. Eskandari A, et al

    . Improving prediction of recanalization in acute large-vessel occlusive stroke. J Thromb Haemost 2014;12:814–21 doi:10.1111/jth.12561 pmid:24628853

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53 doi:10.1056/NEJM199108153250701 pmid:1852179

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Chimowitz MI,
    3. Lynn MJ,
    4. Howlett-Smith H, et al

    ; Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Trial Investigators. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1305–16 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043033 pmid:15800226

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    Calculator for confidence intervals of odds ratio in an unmatched case control study. http://www.hutchon.net/confidor.htm. Accessed June 18, 2013.
15. 15.↵
    2. Medlin F,
    3. Amiguet M,
    4. Vanacker P, et al

    . Influence of arterial occlusion on outcome after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2015;46:126–31 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006408 pmid:25424477

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Libman R,
    3. Kwiatkowski T,
    4. Hansen MD, et al

    . Differences between anterior and posterior circulation stroke in TOAST. Cerebrovasc Dis 2001;11:311–16 doi:10.1159/000047659 pmid:11385210

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Wang Y,
    3. Zhao X,
    4. Liu L, et al

    ; CICAS Study Group. Prevalence and outcomes of symptomatic intracranial large artery stenoses and occlusions in China: the Chinese Intracranial Atherosclerosis (CICAS) study. Stroke 2014;45:663–69 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003508 pmid:24481975

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Goyal M,
    3. Menon BK,
    4. Van Zwam WH, et al

    ; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016;387:1723–31 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X pmid:26898852

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Fiehler J,
    3. Cognard C,
    4. Gallitelli M, et al

    . European recommendations on organisation of interventional care in acute stroke (EROICAS). Eur Stroke J 2016;11:155–70 doi:10.1177/2396987316659033 pmid:27462090

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Powers WJ,
    3. Derdeyn CP,
    4. Biller J, et al

    ; American Heart Association Stroke Council. 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Focused Update of the 2013 Guidelines for the Early Management of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Regarding Endovascular Treatment: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2015;46:3020–35 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000074 pmid:26123479

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Vanacker P,
    3. Lambrou D,
    4. Eskandari A, et al

    . Improving the prediction of spontaneous and post-thrombolytic recanalization in ischemic stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24:1781–86 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.04.002 pmid:26015095

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Bill O,
    3. Zufferey P,
    4. Faouzi M, et al

    . Severe stroke: patient profile and predictors of favorable outcome. J Thromb Haemost 2013;11:92–99 doi:10.1111/jth.12066 pmid:23140236

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Vanacker P,
    3. Heldner MR,
    4. Seiffge D, et al

    . ASTRAL-R score predicts non-recanalisation after intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. Thromb Haemost 2015;113:1121–26 doi:10.1160/TH14-06-0482 pmid:25589216

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. van der Hoeven EJ,
    3. Schonewille WJ,
    4. Vos JA, et al

    ; BASICS Study Group. The Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study (BASICS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2013;14:200 doi:10.1186/1745-6215-14-200 pmid:23835026

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Vanacker P,
    3. Lambrou D,
    4. Eskandari A, et al

    . Eligibility and predictors for acute revascularization procedures in a stroke center. Stroke 2016;47:1844–49 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.012577 pmid:27301945

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Vanacker P,
    3. Heldner M,
    4. Amiguet M, et al

    . Prediction of large vessel occlusions in acute stroke: National Institute of Health Stroke Scale is hard to beat. Crit Care Med 2016;44:336–43 doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001630 pmid:26958750

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Michel P

    . Prehospital scales for large vessel occlusion: closing in on a moving target. Stroke 2017 Jan 13. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:28087805

    FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Kassem-Moussa H,
    3. Graffagnino C

    . Nonocclusion and spontaneous recanalization rates in acute ischemic stroke: a review of cerebral angiography studies. Arch Neurol 2002;59:1870–73 doi:10.1001/archneur.59.12.1870 pmid:12470173

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Schramm P,
    3. Schellinger PD,
    4. Fiebach JB, et al

    . Comparison of CT and CT angiography source images with diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke within 6 hours after onset. Stroke 2002;33:2426–32 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000032244.03134.37 pmid:12364733

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Nguyen-Huynh MN,
    3. Wintermark M,
    4. English J, et al

    . How accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease? Stroke 2008;39:1184–88 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.502906 pmid:18292376

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.↵
    2. Ntaios G,
    3. Papavasileiou V,
    4. Faouzi M, et al

    . Acute imaging does not improve ASTRAL score's accuracy despite having a prognostic value. Int J Stroke 2014;9:926–31 doi:10.1111/ijs.12304 pmid:24894405

    CrossRefPubMed