Persistent Opacification of the Woven EndoBridge Device: A Conebeam CT Analysis of the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 Phenomenon

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Liebig T,
   2. Kabbasch C,
   3. Strasilla C, et al

   . Intrasaccular flow disruption in acutely ruptured aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective review of the use of the WEB. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1721–27 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4347 pmid:26138139

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Pierot L,
   2. Moret J,
   3. Barreau X, et al

   . Safety and efficacy of aneurysm treatment with WEB in the cumulative population of three prospective, multicenter series. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:553–59 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013448 pmid:28965106

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Arthur AS,
   2. Molyneux A,
   3. Coon AL, et al

   ; WEB-IT Study Investigators. The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) Study. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:924–30 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014815 pmid:30992395

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Nguyen HA,
   2. Soize S,
   3. Manceau PF, et al

   . Persistent blood flow inside the Woven EndoBridge device more than 6 months after intracranial aneurysm treatment: frequency, mechanisms, and management: a retrospective single-center study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:1225–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6593 pmid:32527839

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Nawka MT,
   2. Lohse A,
   3. Bester M, et al

   . Residual flow inside the Woven EndoBridge device at follow-up: potential predictors of the Bicêtre Occlusion Scale Score 1 Phenomenon. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:1232–37 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6605 pmid:32586965

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Caroff J,
   2. Mihalea C,
   3. Tuilier T, et al

   . Occlusion assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. Neuroradiology 2016;58:887–91 doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1715-9 pmid:27312475

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Cognard C,
   2. Januel AC

   . Remnants and recurrences after the use of the WEB intrasaccular device in large-neck bifurcation aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;76:522–30; discussion 530 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000669 pmid:25710103

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Aguiar G,
   2. Caroff J,
   3. Mihalea C, et al

   . WEB device for treatment of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14:362–65 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017405 pmid:33975921

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Caroff J,
   2. Mihalea C,
   3. Neki H, et al

   . Role of C-arm VasoCT in the use of endovascular WEB flow disruption in intracranial aneurysm treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1353–57 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3860 pmid:24524918

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Caroff J,
    2. Aubert L,
    3. Lavenu-Bombled C, et al

    ; JENI Research Collaboration. Antithrombotic therapies for neurointerventional surgery: a 2021 French comprehensive national survey. J Neurointerv Surg 2022 Mar 28 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018601 pmid:35347058

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Caroff J,
    2. Cortese J,
    3. Girot JB, et al

    . Woven EndoBridge device shape modification can be mitigated with an appropriate oversizing strategy: a VasoCT based study. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14:neurintsurg-2020-017232 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017232] pmid:33727411

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Nawka MT,
    2. Sedlacik J,
    3. Frölich A, et al

    . Multiparametric MRI of intracranial aneurysms treated with the Woven EndoBridge (WEB): a case of Faraday’s cage? J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:988–94 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013625 pmid:29440326

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Raoult H,
    2. Eugene F,
    3. Le Bras A, et al

    . CT angiography for one-year follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device: utility in evaluating aneurysm occlusion and WEB compression at one year. J Neuroradiol 2018;45:343–48 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2018.02.010 pmid:29524499

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Bomberger RA,
    2. DePalma RG,
    3. Ambrose TA, et al

    . Aspirin and dipyridamole inhibit endothelial healing. Arch Surg 1982;117:1459–64 doi:10.1001/archsurg.1982.01380350057008 pmid:7138304

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Caroff J,
    2. King RM,
    3. Ughi GJ, et al

    . Longitudinal monitoring of flow-diverting stent tissue coverage after implant in a bifurcation model using neurovascular high-frequency optical coherence tomography. Neurosurgery 2020;87:1311–19 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyaa208 pmid:32463884

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Mihalea C,
    2. Caroff J,
    3. Pagiola I, et al

    . Safety and efficiency of the fifth generation Woven EndoBridge device: technical note. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:511–15 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014343 pmid:30655358

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Cortese J,
    2. Caroff J,
    3. Chalumeau V, et al

    . Determinants of cerebral aneurysm occlusion after embolization with the WEB device: a single-institution series of 215 cases with angiographic follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2022 Apr 15 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018780 pmid:35428742

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Paliwal N,
    2. Tutino VM,
    3. Shallwani H, et al

    . Ostium ratio and neck ratio could predict the outcome of sidewall intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverters. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:288–94 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5953 pmid:30679216

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Spelle L,
    2. Herbreteau D,
    3. Caroff J, et al

    . CLinical Assessment of WEB device in Ruptured aneurYSms (CLARYS): 12-month angiographic results of a multicenter study. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14:807–14 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017416 pmid:34493578

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Pierot L

    . Letter: WEB aneurysm treatment—occlusion stability and “compression.” Neurosurgery 2015;77:E666–67 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000880 pmid:26132284

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Caroff J,
    2. Mihalea C,
    3. Da Ros V, et al

    . A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study of WEB-treated aneurysms: can CFD predict WEB “compression” during follow-up? AJNR J Neuroradiol 2017;44:262–68 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2017.03.005 pmid:28478112

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Lee D,
    2. Yuki I,
    3. Murayama Y, et al

    . Thrombus organization and healing in the swine experimental aneurysm model, Part I: a histological and molecular analysis. J Neurosurg 2007;107:94–108 doi:10.3171/jns-07/07/0094 pmid:17639879

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.
    1. Caroff J,
    2. Mihalea C,
    3. Klisch J, et al

    . Single-layer WEBs: Intrasaccular flow disrupters for aneurysm treatment–feasibility results from a European study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1942–6 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4369 pmid:26159516

    Abstract/FREE Full Text