Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleExtracranial Vascular

Comparison of 30-Day Outcomes after Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Near-Occlusion and Severe Stenosis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

C. Štěchovský, K. Hulíková Tesárková, P. Hájek, M. Horváth, E. Hansvenclová and J. Veselka
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7598
C. Štěchovský
aFrom the Department of Cardiology (C.Š., P.H., M.H., E.H., J.V.), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C. Štěchovský
K. Hulíková Tesárková
bDepartment of Demography and Geodemography (K.H.T.), Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. Hulíková Tesárková
P. Hájek
aFrom the Department of Cardiology (C.Š., P.H., M.H., E.H., J.V.), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Hájek
M. Horváth
aFrom the Department of Cardiology (C.Š., P.H., M.H., E.H., J.V.), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Horváth
E. Hansvenclová
aFrom the Department of Cardiology (C.Š., P.H., M.H., E.H., J.V.), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E. Hansvenclová
J. Veselka
aFrom the Department of Cardiology (C.Š., P.H., M.H., E.H., J.V.), Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Veselka
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Fox AJ,
    2. Eliasziw M,
    3. Rothwell PM, et al
    . Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2086–94 pmid:16155163
    PubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Johansson E,
    2. Fox AJ
    . Carotid near-occlusion: a comprehensive review, Part 1: definition, terminology, and diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4432 pmid:26316571
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Morgenstern LB,
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Sharpe BL, et al
    . The risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in patients with near occlusion of the carotid artery: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) group. Neurology 1997;48:911–15 doi:10.1212/WNL.48.4.911 pmid:9109876
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bartlett ES,
    2. Walters TD,
    3. Symons SP, et al
    . Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:13–19 pmid:16418349
    PubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Ringelstein EB,
    2. Berg-Dammer E,
    3. Zeumer H
    . The so-called atheromatous pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery: a diagnostic and therapeutical challenge. Neuroradiology 1983;25:147–55 doi:10.1007/BF00455734 pmid:6888715
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. O’Leary DH,
    2. Mattle H,
    3. Potter JE
    . Atheromatous pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery. Stroke 1989;20:1168–73 doi:10.1161/01.str.20.9.1168 pmid:2772977
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Rothwell PM,
    2. Gutnikov SA,
    3. Warlow CP
    . Reanalysis of the final results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial. Stroke 2003;34:514–23 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000054671.71777.C7 pmid:12574569
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bonati LH,
    2. Kakkos S,
    3. Berkefeld J, et al
    . European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Eur Stroke J 2021;6:I–XLVII doi:10.1177/23969873211012121 pmid:34414302
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kleindorfer DO,
    2. Towfighi A,
    3. Chaturvedi S, et al
    . 2021 Guideline for the Prevention of Stroke in Patients with Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack: a Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2021;52:e364–467 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000375 pmid:34024117
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Johansson E,
    2. Fox AJ
    . Carotid near-occlusion: a comprehensive review, Part 2: prognosis and treatment, pathophysiology, confusions, and areas for improvement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:200–04 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4429 pmid:26338908
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Meershoek AJ,
    2. de Vries EE,
    3. Veen D, et al
    ; NEON study group. Meta-analysis of the outcomes of treatment of internal carotid artery near occlusion. Br J Surg 2019;106:665–71 doi:10.1002/bjs.11159 pmid:30973990
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Veselka J,
    2. Hajek P,
    3. Štěchovský C, et al
    . Long-term survival of carotid stenting patients with regard to single- or double-vessel carotid artery disease: a propensity score matching analysis. Arch Med Sci 2021;17:849–55 doi:10.5114/aoms.2020.98167 pmid:34336012
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.
    1. Štěchovský C,
    2. Hájek P,
    3. Horváth M, et al
    . Near-infrared spectroscopy combined with intravascular ultrasound in carotid arteries. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;32:181–88 doi:10.1007/s10554-015-0687-x pmid:26044524
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.
    1. Štěchovský C,
    2. Hájek P,
    3. Horváth M, et al
    . Effect of stenting on the near-infrared spectroscopy-derived lipid core burden index of carotid artery plaque. Eurointervention 2019;15:e289–96 doi:10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01054 pmid:29957596
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.
    1. Veselka J,
    2. Špaček M,
    3. Horváth M, et al
    . Impact of coexisting multivessel coronary artery disease on short-term outcomes and long-term survival of patients treated with carotid stenting. Arch Med Sci 2016;12:760–65 doi:10.5114/aoms.2016.60964 pmid:27478456
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Veselka J,
    2. Cerná D,
    3. Zimolová P, et al
    . Feasibility, safety, and early outcomes of direct carotid artery stent implantation with use of the FilterWire EZ Embolic Protection System. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009;73:733–38 doi:10.1002/ccd.21936 pmid:19198010
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Rosenbaum PR,
    2. Rubin DB
    . Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistican 1985;39:33–38 doi:10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383
    CrossRef
  18. 18.↵
    1. Fraeman KH
    . An introduction to implementing propensity score matching with SAS. NESUG 2010: Applications Development. https://www.lexjansen.com/nesug/nesug10/ad/ad05.pdf. Accessed September 07, 2021
  19. 19.↵
    1. Rothwell PM,
    2. Eliasziw M,
    3. Gutnikov SA, et al
    . Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;361:107–16 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12228-3 pmid:12531577
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Hirata Y,
    2. Sakata N,
    3. Inoue T, et al
    . Histopathological features with angiographic correlates of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion: impact of plaque compositions—clinical article. J Neurosurg 2011;115:350–58 doi:10.3171/2011.3.JNS101434 pmid:21548749
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Oka F,
    2. Ishihara H,
    3. Kato S, et al
    . Cerebral hemodynamic benefits after carotid artery stenting in patients with near occlusion. J Vasc Surg 2013;58:1512–17 doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2013.05.103 pmid:23891492
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.
    1. González A,
    2. Gil-Peralta A,
    3. Mayol A, et al
    . Internal carotid artery stenting in patients with near occlusion: 30-day and long-term outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:252–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2285 pmid:21051515
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.
    1. Matsuda Y,
    2. Terada T,
    3. Okada H, et al
    . Angiographic characteristics of pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery before and after stenting. Neurosurgery 2016;79:832– 38 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001345 pmid:27870819
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.
    1. Son S,
    2. Choi DS,
    3. Kim SK, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting in patients with near occlusion: a single-center experience and comparison with recent studies. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:1976–81 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.06.001 pmid:23820331
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Sakamoto S,
    2. Kiura Y,
    3. Kajihara Y, et al
    . Carotid artery stenting using the proximal or dual protection method for near occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery. Neurosurg Rev 2013;36:551–58 doi:10.1007/s10143-013-0481-y pmid:23793616
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Halliday A,
    2. Bulbulia R,
    3. Bonati LH
    , et al. ACST-2 Collaborative Group. Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy. Lancet 2021;398:1065–73 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01910-3 pmid:34469763
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Jalbert JJ,
    2. Nguyen LL,
    3. Gerhard-Herman MD, et al
    . Outcomes after carotid artery stenting in Medicare beneficiaries, 2005 to 2009. JAMA Neurol 2015;72:276–86 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3638 pmid:25580726
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Aboyans V,
    2. Ricco JB,
    3. Bartelink MEL
    , ESC Scientific Document Group, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases, in collaboration with the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS): document covering atherosclerotic disease of extracranial carotid and vertebral, mesenteric, renal, upper and lower extremity arteries endorsed by: the European Stroke Organization (ESO), the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur Heart J 2018;39:763–816 doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx095 pmid:28886620
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Meershoek AJ,
    2. Vonken EP,
    3. Nederkoorn PJ, et al
    . Carotid endarterectomy in patients with recurrent symptoms associated with an ipsilateral carotid artery near occlusion with full collapse. J Neurol 2018;265:1900–05 doi:10.1007/s00415-018-8939-z pmid:29916130
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kallmayer MA,
    2. Tsantilas P,
    3. Knappich C, et al
    . Patient characteristics and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting: analysis of the German mandatory national quality assurance registry - 2003 to 2014. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2015;56:827–36 pmid:26381216
    PubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of 30-Day Outcomes after Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Near-Occlusion and Severe Stenosis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
C. Štěchovský, K. Hulíková Tesárková, P. Hájek, M. Horváth, E. Hansvenclová, J. Veselka
Comparison of 30-Day Outcomes after Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Near-Occlusion and Severe Stenosis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2022, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7598

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Comparison of 30-Day Outcomes after Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients with Near-Occlusion and Severe Stenosis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
C. Štěchovský, K. Hulíková Tesárková, P. Hájek, M. Horváth, E. Hansvenclová, J. Veselka
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2022, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7598
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Proximal Vertebral Artery Variants and Embryology
  • High-Risk Plaque Features in Carotid MRI
  • Nonstenotic Carotid Plaques and Stroke Review
Show more Extracranial Vascular

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire