The First Examination of Diagnostic Performance of Automated Measurement of the Callosal Angle in 1856 Elderly Patients and Volunteers Indicates That 12.4% of Exams Met the Criteria for Possible Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Bradley WG

   . Normal pressure hydrocephalus: new concepts on etiology and diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1586–90 pmid:11039335

   PubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Hakim S,
   2. Adams RD

   . The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure: observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci 1965;2:307–27 doi:10.1016/0022-510X(65)90016-X pmid:5889177

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Ng SE,
   2. Low A,
   3. Tang KK, et al

   . Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: correlating magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers with clinical response. Ann Acad Med Singap 2009;38:803–08 pmid:19816640

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Halperin JJ,
   2. Kurlan R,
   3. Schwalb JM, et al

   . Practice guideline: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: response to shunting and predictors of response. Neurology 2015;85:2063–71 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002193 pmid:26644048

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Thakur SK,
   2. Serulle Y,
   3. Miskin NP, et al

   . Lumbar puncture test in normal pressure hydrocephalus: does the volume of CSF removed affect the response to tap? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1456–60 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5187 pmid:28473344

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Damasceno BP

   . Normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and predictive evaluation. Dement Neuropsychol 2009;3:8–15 doi:10.1590/S1980-57642009DN30100003 pmid:29213603

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Craven CL,
   2. Toma AK,
   3. Mostafa T, et al

   . The predictive value of DESH for shunt responsiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci 2016;34:294– 98 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.004 pmid:27692614

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Palm WM,
   2. Walchenbach R,
   3. Bruinsma B, et al

   . Intracranial compartment volumes in normal pressure hydrocephalus: volumetric assessment versus outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:76–79 pmid:16418361

   PubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Virhammar J,
   2. Laurell K,
   3. Cesarini KG, et al

   . The callosal angle measured on MRI as a predictor of outcome in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2014;120:178–84 doi:10.3171/2013.8.JNS13575 pmid:24074491

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Ishii K,
    2. Kanda T,
    3. Harada A, et al

    . Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2678–83 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1044-4 pmid:18500524

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Baroncini M,
    2. Balédent O,
    3. Ardi CE, et al

    . Ventriculomegaly in the elderly: who needs a shunt? A MRI study on 90 patients. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2018;126:221–28 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_45 pmid:29492565

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Miskin N,
    2. Patel H,
    3. Franceschi AM, et al

    . Diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus: use of traditional measures in the era of volumetric MR imaging. Radiology 2017;285:197–205 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161216 pmid:28498794

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Gunter NB,
    2. Schwarz CG,
    3. Graff-Radford J, et al

    . Automated detection of imaging features of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus using machine learning methods. NeuroImage Clin 2019;21:101605 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.11.015 pmid:30497983

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Amato SG,
    2. Petrick NA

    1. Takahashi N,
    2. Kinoshita T,
    3. Ohmura T, et al

    . Automated method to compute Evans index for diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus on brain CT images. In: Amato SG, Petrick NA, eds. Medical Imaging 2017: Computer-Aided Diagnosis. Vol 10134. International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2017:101342C doi:10.1117/12.2251322

    CrossRef
15. 15.↵
    1. Szczepek E,
    2. Czerwosz LT,
    3. Nowiński K, et al

    . Analysis of intracranial volume ratios by means of cerebrospinal fluid deployment indicators. Folia Neuropathol 2015;53:121–27 doi:10.5114/fn.2015.52408 pmid:26216114

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. LaMontagne PJ,
    2. Benzinger TL,
    3. Morris JC, et al

    . OASIS-3: longitudinal neuroimaging, clinical, and cognitive dataset for normal aging and Alzheimer disease. medRxiv 2019. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.13.19014902v1.full.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2020
17. 17.↵
    1. Marcus DS,
    2. Fotenos AF,
    3. Csernansky JG, et al

    . Open access series of imaging studies: longitudinal MRI data in nondemented and demented older adults. J Cogn Neurosci 2010;22:2677–84 doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21407 pmid:19929323

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Jack CR,
    2. Bernstein MA,
    3. Fox NC, et al

    . The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI): MRI methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:685–91 doi:10.1002/jmri.21049 pmid:18302232

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Morris JC

    . Clinical dementia rating: a reliable and valid diagnostic and staging measure for dementia of the Alzheimer type. Int Psychogeriatr 1997;9(Suppl 1):173–76 doi:10.1017/s1041610297004870 pmid:9447441

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Fischl B

    . FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 2012;62:774–81 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 pmid:22248573

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Hiraoka K,
    2. Meguro K,
    3. Mori E

    . Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus in the elderly population of a Japanese rural community. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2008;48:197–200 doi:10.2176/nmc.48.197 pmid:18497491

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.
    1. Jaraj D,
    2. Rabiei K,
    3. Marlow T, et al

    . Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology 2014;82:1449–54 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000342 pmid:24682964

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Andersson J,
    2. Rosell M,
    3. Kockum K, et al

    . Prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective, population-based study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0217705 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217705 pmid:31141553

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Hebert LE,
    2. Weuve J,
    3. Scherr PA, et al

    . Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010–2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology 2013;80:1778–83 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828726f5 pmid:23390181

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Sabbagh MN,
    2. Lue L-F,
    3. Fayard D, et al

    . Increasing precision of clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease using a combined algorithm incorporating clinical and novel biomarker data. Neurol Ther 2017;6:83–95 doi:10.1007/s40120-017-0069-5 pmid:28733959

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Silverberg G,
    2. Mayo M,
    3. Saul T, et al

    . Elevated cerebrospinal fluid pressure in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Fluids Barriers CNS 2006;3:7 doi:10.1186/1743-8454-3-7

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Jinkins JR

    . Clinical manifestations of hydrocephalus caused by impingement of the corpus callosum on the falx: an MR study in 40 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:331–40 pmid:1902038

    Abstract/FREE Full Text