Comparison of Hippocampal Subfield Segmentation Agreement between 2 Automated Protocols across the Adult Life Span

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Raji CA,
   2. Lopez OL,
   3. Kuller LH, et al

   . Age, Alzheimer disease, and brain structure. Neurology 2009;73:1899–905 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181c3f293 pmid:19846828

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Han KM,
   2. Kim A,
   3. Kang W, et al

   . Hippocampal subfield volumes in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Eur Psychiatry 2019;57:70–77 doi:10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.01.016 pmid:30721801

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Battaglia FP,
   2. Benchenane K,
   3. Sirota A, et al

   . The hippocampus: hub of brain network communication for memory. Trends Cogn Sci 2011;15:310–18 doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.008 pmid:21696996

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Buzsáki G,
   2. Moser EI

   . Memory, navigation and theta rhythm in the hippocampal-entorhinal system. Nat Neurosci 2013;16:130–38 doi:10.1038/nn.3304 pmid:23354386

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Amaral DG,
   2. Witter MP

   . The three-dimensional organization of the hippocampal formation: a review of anatomical data. Neuroscience 1989;31:571–91 doi:10.1016/0306-4522(89)90424-7 pmid:2687721

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Dimsdale-Zucker HR,
   2. Ritchey M,
   3. Ekstrom AD, et al

   . CA1 and CA3 differentially support spontaneous retrieval of episodic contexts within human hippocampal subfields. Nat Commun 2018;9:294 doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02752-1 pmid:29348512

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Mueller SG,
   2. Weiner MW

   . Selective effect of age, Apo e4, and Alzheimer’s disease on hippocampal subfields. Hippocampus 2009;19:558–64 doi:10.1002/hipo.20614 pmid:19405132

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Apostolova LG,
   2. Dutton RA,
   3. Dinov ID, et al

   . Conversion of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease predicted by hippocampal atrophy maps. Arch Neurol 2006;63:693–99 doi:10.1001/archneur.63.5.693 pmid:16682538

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Hanseeuw BJ,
   2. Van Leemput K,
   3. Kavec M, et al

   . Mild cognitive impairment: differential atrophy in the hippocampal subfields. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1658–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2589 pmid:21835940

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Hett K,
    2. Ta VT,
    3. Catheline G, et al

    . Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Multimodal hippocampal subfield grading for Alzheimer’s disease classification. Sci Rep 2019;9:13845 doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49970-9 pmid:31554909

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Iglesias JE,
    2. Augustinack JC,
    3. Nguyen K, et al

    . Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: application to adaptive segmentation of in vivo MRI. Neuroimage 2015;115:117–37 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.042 pmid:25936807

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Romero JE,
    2. Coupé P,
    3. Manjón JV

    . HIPS: a new hippocampus subfield segmentation method. Neuroimage 2017;163:286–95 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.049 pmid:28958881

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Sämann PG,
    2. Inglesias JE,
    3. Gutman B, et al

    . FreeSurfer-based segmentation of hippocampal subfields: a review of methods and applications, with a novel quality control procedure for ENIGMA studies and other collaborative efforts. Hum Brain Mapp 2020 Dec 27. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1002/hbm.25326 pmid:33368865

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Wisse LE,
    2. Biessels GJ,
    3. Geerlings MI

    . A critical appraisal of the hippocampal subfield segmentation package in FreeSurfer. Front Aging Neurosci 2014;6:261 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00261 pmid:25309437

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. de Flores R,
    2. La Joie R,
    3. Landeau B, et al

    . Effects of age and Alzheimer’s disease on hippocampal subfields: comparison between manual and FreeSurfer volumetry. Hum Brain Mapp 2015;36: 463–74 doi:10.1002/hbm.22640 pmid:25231681

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Moghaddam HS,
    2. Aarabi MH,
    3. Mehvari-Habibabadi J, et al

    . Distinct patterns of hippocampal subfield volume loss in left and right mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurol Sci 2021;42:1411–21 doi:10.1007/s10072-020-04653-6 pmid:32783160

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Kim S,
    2. Greene DJ,
    3. D’Andrea CB, et al

    . Hippocampal volume in provisional tic disorder predicts tic severity at 12-month follow-up. J Clin Med 2020;9:1715 doi:10.3390/jcm906171]5 pmid:32503289

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Van Leemput K,
    2. Bakkour A,
    3. Benner T, et al

    . Automated segmentation of hippocampal subfields from ultra-high resolution in vivo MRI. Hippocampus 2009;19:549–57 doi:10.1002/hipo.20615 pmid:19405131

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Despotović I,
    2. Goossens B,
    3. Philips W

    . MRI segmentation of the human brain: challenges, methods, and applications. Comput Math Methods Med 2015;2015:450341 doi:10.1155/2015/450341 pmid:25945121

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Manjón JV,
    2. Coupé P

    . volBrain: an online MRI brain volumetry system. Front Neuroinform 2016;10:30 doi:10.3389/fninf.2016.00030 pmid:27512372

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Winterburn JL,
    2. Pruessner JC,
    3. Chavez S, et al

    . A novel in vivo atlas of human hippocampal subfields using high-resolution 3 T magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 2013;74:254–65 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.003 pmid:23415948

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. van Eijk L,
    2. Hansell NK,
    3. Strike LT, et al

    . Region-specific sex differences in the hippocampus. Neuroimage 2020;215:116781 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116781 pmid:32278894

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Yushkevich PA,
    2. Amaral RS,
    3. Augustinack JC, et al

    . Hippocampal Subfields Group (HSG). Quantitative comparison of 21 protocols for labeling hippocampal subfields and parahippocampal subregions in in vivo MRI: towards a harmonized segmentation protocol. Neuroimage 2015;111:526–41 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.004 pmid:25596463

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Wisse LE,
    2. Chételat G,
    3. Daugherty AM, et al

    . Hippocampal subfield volumetry from structural isotropic 1 mm³ MRI scans: a note of caution. Hum Brain Mapp 2021;42:539–50 doi:10.1002/hbm.25234 pmid:33058385

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Pintzka CW,
    2. Hansen TI,
    3. Evensmoen HR, et al

    . Marked effects of intracranial volume correction methods on sex differences in neuroanatomical structures: a HUNT MRI study. Front Neurosci 2015;9:238 doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00238 pmid:26217172

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Voevodskaya O,
    2. Simmons A,
    3. Nordenskjöld R, et al.

    , Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. The effects of intracranial volume adjustment approaches on multiple regional MRI volumes in healthy aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Front Aging Neurosci 2014;6:264 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00264 pmid:25339897

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Sanfilipo MP,
    2. Benedict RH,
    3. Zivadinov R, et al

    . Correction for intracranial volume in analysis of whole brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: the proportion vs. residual method. Neuroimage 2004;22:1732–43 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.037 pmid:15275929

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Gur RC,
    2. Turetsky BI,
    3. Matsui M, et al

    . Sex differences in brain gray and white matter in healthy young adults: correlations with cognitive performance. J Neurosci 1999;19: 4065–72 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-10-04065.1999 pmid:10234034

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Chow N,
    2. Hwang KS,
    3. Hurtz S, et al

    . Comparing 3T and 1.5T MRI for mapping hippocampal atrophy in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:653–60 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4228 pmid:25614473

    Abstract/FREE Full Text