Reducing False-Positives in CT Perfusion Infarct Core Segmentation Using Contralateral Local Normalization

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   1. Demeestere J,
   2. Wouters A,
   3. Christensen S, et al

   . Review of perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2020;51:1017–24 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028337 pmid:32008460

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Albers GW,
   2. Marks MP,
   3. Kemp S

   , DEFUSE 3 Investigators, et al. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018;378:708–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713973 pmid:29364767

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Nogueira RG,
   2. Jadhav AP,
   3. Haussen DC

   , DAWN Trial Investigators, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 2018;378:11–21 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1706442 pmid:29129157

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Powers WJ,
   2. Rabinstein AA,
   3. Ackerson T, et al

   . Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke. 2019 Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2019;50:e344–e418 doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 pmid:31662037

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Sarraj A,
   2. Hassan AE,
   3. Abraham MG

   , SELECT2 Investigators, et al. Trial of endovascular thrombectomy for large ischemic strokes. N Engl J Med 2023;388:1259–71 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2214403 pmid:36762865

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Huo X,
   2. Ma G,
   3. Tong X

   , ANGEL-ASPECT Investigators, et al. Trial of endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke with large infarct. N Engl J Med 2023;388:1272–83 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2213379 pmid:36762852

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Konstas AA,
   2. Goldmakher GV,
   3. Lee TY, et al

   . Theoretic basis and technical implementations of CT perfusion in acute ischemic stroke: 1. Theoretic basis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:662–68 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1487 pmid:19270105

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Olivot JM,
   2. Mlynash M,
   3. Inoue M

   , DEFUSE 2 Investigators, et al. Hypoperfusion intensity ratio predicts infarct progression and functional outcome in the DEFUSE 2 cohort. Stroke 2014;45:1018–23 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003857 pmid:24595591

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Campbell BC,
   2. Christensen S,
   3. Levi CR, et al

   . Cerebral blood flow is the optimal CT perfusion parameter for assessing infarct core. Stroke 2011;42:3435–40 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.618355 pmid:21980202

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Falcao AL,
    2. Reutens DC,
    3. Markus R, et al

    . The resistance to ischemia of white and gray matter after stroke. Ann Neurol 2004;56:695–701 doi:10.1002/ana.20265 pmid:15505775

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Chen C,
    2. Bivard A,
    3. Lin L, et al

    . Thresholds for infarction vary between gray matter and white matter in acute ischemic stroke: a CT perfusion study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2019;39:536–46 doi:10.1177/0271678X17744453 pmid:29172990

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Arakawa S,
    2. Wright PM,
    3. Koga M, et al

    . Ischemic thresholds for gray and white matter: a diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance study. Stroke 2006;37:1211–16 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000217258.63925.6b pmid:16574931

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Marstrand JR,
    2. Garde E,
    3. Rostrup E, et al

    . Cerebral perfusion and cerebrovascular reactivity are reduced in white matter hyperintensities. Stroke 2002;33:972–76 doi:10.1161/01.str.0000012808.81667.4b pmid:11935046

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Shi Y,
    2. Thrippleton MJ,
    3. Makin SD, et al

    . Cerebral blood flow in small vessel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016;36:1653–67 doi:10.1177/0271678X16662891 pmid:27496552

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Hoving JW,
    2. Marquering HA,
    3. Majoie CB, et al

    . Volumetric and spatial accuracy of computed tomography perfusion estimated ischemic core volume in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2018;49:2368–75 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020846 pmid:30355095

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Boned S,
    2. Padroni M,
    3. Rubiera M, et al

    . Admission CT perfusion may overestimate initial infarct core: the ghost infarct core concept. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:66–69 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012494 pmid:27566491

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Martins N,
    2. Aires A,
    3. Mendez B, et al

    . Ghost infarct core and admission computed tomography perfusion: redefining the role of neuroimaging in acute ischemic stroke. Interv Neurol 2018;7:513–21 doi:10.1159/000490117 pmid:30410531

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Rodrigues GM,
    2. Mohammaden MH,
    3. Haussen DC, et al

    . Ghost infarct core following endovascular reperfusion: a risk for computed tomography perfusion misguided selection in stroke. Int J Stroke 2021 Nov 19 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/17474930211056228 pmid:34796765

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Ballout AA,
    2. Oh SY,
    3. Huang B, et al

    . Ghost infarct core: a systematic review of the frequency, magnitude, and variables of CT perfusion overestimation. J Neuroimaging 2023;33:716–24 doi:10.1111/jon.13127 pmid:37248074

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Fazekas F,
    2. Chawluk JB,
    3. Alavi A, et al

    . MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:351–56 doi:10.2214/ajr.149.2.351 pmid:3496763

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Lin L,
    2. Bivard A,
    3. Krishnamurthy V, et al

    . Whole-brain CT perfusion to quantify acute ischemic penumbra and core. Radiology 2016;279:876–87 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150319 pmid:26785041

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Olivot JM,
    2. Mlynash M,
    3. Thijs VN, et al

    . Optimal T_max threshold for predicting penumbral tissue in acute stroke. Stroke 2009;40:469–75 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.526954 pmid:19109547

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Psychogios MN,
    2. Sporns PB,
    3. Ospel J, et al

    . Automated perfusion calculations vs. visual scoring of collaterals and CBV-ASPECTS: has the machine surpassed the eye? Clin Neuroradiol 2021;31:499–506

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Kellner E,
    2. Urbach H

    . Machine outputs must be checked. Clin Neuroradiol 2021;31:507–08 doi:10.1007/s00062-021-01012-6 pmid:33835191

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Amukotuwa S,
    2. Straka M,
    3. Aksoy D, et al

    . Cerebral blood flow predicts the infarct core: new insights from contemporaneous diffusion and perfusion imaging. Stroke 2019;50:2783–89 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026640 pmid:31462191

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Veldsman M,
    2. Kindalova P,
    3. Husain M, et al

    . Spatial distribution and cognitive impact of cerebrovascular risk-related white matter hyperintensities. Neuroimage Clin 2020;28:102405 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102405 pmid:32971464

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Kellner E,
    2. Rau A,
    3. Demerath T, et al

    . Contrast bolus interference in a multimodal CT stroke protocol. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:1807–14 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7247 pmid:34413063

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Georgakis MK,
    2. Duering M,
    3. Wardlaw JM, et al

    . WMH and long-term outcomes in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2019;92:e1298–308 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000007142 pmid:30770431

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Bristow MS,
    2. Simon JE,
    3. Brown RA, et al

    . MR perfusion and diffusion in acute ischemic stroke: human gray and white matter have different thresholds for infarction. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005;25:1280–87 doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600135 pmid:15889043

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Schaefer PW,
    2. Roccatagliata L,
    3. Ledezma C, et al

    . First-pass quantitative CT perfusion identifies thresholds for salvageable penumbra in acute stroke patients treated with intra-arterial therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:20–25 pmid:16418350

    PubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Eilaghi A,
    2. d’Esterre CD,
    3. Lee TY, et al

    . Toward patient-tailored perfusion thresholds for prediction of stroke outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:472–77 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3740 pmid:24113471

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. d’Esterre CD,
    2. Boesen ME,
    3. Ahn SH, et al

    . Time-dependent computed tomographic perfusion thresholds for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2015;46:3390–97 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009250 pmid:26514186

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Clèrigues A,
    2. Valverde S,
    3. Bernal J, et al

    . Acute ischemic stroke lesion core segmentation in CT perfusion images using fully convolutional neural networks. Comput Biol Med 2019;115:103487 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103487 pmid:31629272

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Rava RA,
    2. Podgorsak AR,
    3. Waqas M, et al

    . Investigation of convolutional neural networks using multiple computed tomography perfusion maps to identify infarct core in acute ischemic stroke patients. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2021;8:014505 doi:10.1117/1.JMI.8.1.014505 pmid:33585662

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Soltanpour M,
    2. Greiner R,
    3. Boulanger P, et al

    . Improvement of automatic ischemic stroke lesion segmentation in CT perfusion maps using a learned deep neural network. Comput Biol Med 2021;137:104849 doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104849 pmid:34530336

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Werdiger F,
    2. Parsons MW,
    3. Visser M, et al

    . Machine learning segmentation of core and penumbra from acute stroke CT perfusion data. Front Neurol 2023;14:1098562 doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1098562 pmid:36908587

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Shi T,
    2. Jiang H,
    3. Zheng B

    . C2MA-Net: cross-modal cross-attention network for acute ischemic stroke lesion segmentation based on CT perfusion scans. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2022;69:108–18 doi:10.1109/TBME.2021.3087612 pmid:34101581

    CrossRefPubMed