Frequency of Coexistent Spinal Segment Variants: Retrospective Analysis in Asymptomatic Young Adults

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Malanga GA,
   3. Cooke PM

   . Segmental anomaly leading to wrong level disc surgery in cauda equina syndrome. Pain Physician 2004;7:107–10 pmid:16868621

   PubMedGoogle Scholar
2. 2.↵
   2. Shah M,
   3. Halalmeh DR,
   4. Sandio A, et al

   . Anatomical variations that can lead to spine surgery at the wrong level, Part III: lumbosacral spine. Cureus 2020;12:e9433 doi:10.7759/cureus.9433 pmid:32864257

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
3. 3.↵
   2. Thawait GK,
   3. Chhabra A,
   4. Carrino JA

   . Spine segmentation and enumeration and normal variants. Radiol Clin North Am 2012;50:587–98 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2012.04.003 pmid:22643386

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
4. 4.↵
   2. Redenbach DM,
   3. Nelems B

   . A comparative study of structures comprising the thoracic outlet in 250 human cadavers and 72 surgical cases of thoracic outlet syndrome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;13:353–60 doi:10.1016/s1010-7940(98)00037-2 pmid:9641331

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
5. 5.↵
   2. Wigh RE

   . The thoracolumbar and lumbosacral transitional junctions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1980;5:215–22 doi:10.1097/00007632-198005000-00003 pmid:7394660

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
6. 6.↵
   2. Castellvi AE,
   3. Goldstein LA,
   4. Chan DP

   . Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984;9:493–95 doi:10.1097/00007632-198407000-00014 pmid:6495013

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
7. 7.↵
   2. Furman MB,
   3. Wahlberg B,
   4. Cruz EJ

   . Lumbosacral transitional segments: an interventional spine specialist's practical approach. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2018;29:35–48 doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2017.08.004 pmid:29173663

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
8. 8.↵
   2. Carrino JA,
   3. Campbell PD Jr.,
   4. Lin DC, et al

   . Effect of spinal segment variants on numbering vertebral levels at lumbar MR imaging. Radiology 2011;259:196–202 doi:10.1148/radiol.11081511 pmid:21436097

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
9. 9.↵
   2. Henry BM,
   3. Vikse J,
   4. Sanna B, et al

   . Cervical rib prevalence and its association with thoracic outlet syndrome: a meta-analysis of 141 studies with surgical considerations. World Neurosurg 2018;110:e965–78 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.148 pmid:29203316

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
10. 10.↵
    2. Shaikh A,
    3. Khan SA,
    4. Hussain M, et al

    . Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra in individuals with low back pain: evaluation using plain radiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Asian Spine J 2017;11:892–97 doi:10.4184/asj.2017.11.6.892 pmid:29279743

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
11. 11.↵
    2. Galis F

    . Why do almost all mammals have seven cervical vertebrae? Developmental constraints, Hox genes, and cancer. J Exp Zool 1999;285:19–26 pmid:10327647

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
12. 12.↵
    2. Brewin J,
    3. Hill M,
    4. Ellis H

    . The prevalence of cervical ribs in a London population. Clin Anat 2009;22:331–36 doi:10.1002/ca.20774 pmid:19280652

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
13. 13.↵
    2. Yan YZ,
    3. Li QP,
    4. Wu CC, et al

    . Rate of presence of 11 thoracic vertebrae and 6 lumbar vertebrae in asymptomatic Chinese adult volunteers. J Orthop Surg Res 2018;13:124 doi:10.1186/s13018-018-0835-9 pmid:29792213

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
14. 14.↵
    2. Ibrahim DA,
    3. Myung KS,
    4. Skaggs DL

    . Ten percent of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have variations in the number of thoracic or lumbar vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:828–33 doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00461 pmid:23636190

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
15. 15.↵
    2. Doo AR,
    3. Lee J,
    4. Yeo GE, et al

    . The prevalence and clinical significance of transitional vertebrae: a radiologic investigation using whole spine spiral three-dimensional computed tomographic images. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul) 2020;15:103–10 doi:10.17085/apm.2020.15.1.103 pmid:33329798

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
16. 16.↵
    2. Hanhivaara J,
    3. Määttä JH,
    4. Niinimäki J, et al

    . Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae are associated with lumbar degeneration: retrospective evaluation of 3855 consecutive abdominal CT scans. Eur Radiol 2020;30:3409–16 doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06691-2 pmid:32072261

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
17. 17.↵
    2. Grimm BD,
    3. Laxer EB,
    4. Blessinger BJ, et al

    . Wrong-level spine surgery. JBJS Reviews 2014;2:e2 doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.M.00052 pmid:27490754

    FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
18. 18.↵
    2. Tureli D,
    3. Ekinci G,
    4. Baltacioglu F

    . Is any landmark reliable in vertebral enumeration? A study of 3.0-Tesla lumbar MRI comparing skeletal, neural, and vascular markers. Clin Imaging 2014;38:792–96 doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.05.001 pmid:24928822

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
19. 19.↵
    2. Farshad-Amacker NA,
    3. Lurie B,
    4. Herzog RJ, et al

    . Is the iliolumbar ligament a reliable identifier of the L5 vertebra in lumbosacral transitional anomalies? Eur Radiol 2014;24:2623–30 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3277-8 pmid:24962830

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
20. 20.↵
    2. Tokgoz N,
    3. Ucar M,
    4. Erdogan AB, et al

    . Are spinal or paraspinal anatomic markers helpful for vertebral numbering and diagnosing lumbosacral transitional vertebrae? Korean J Radiol 2014;15:258–66 doi:10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.258 pmid:24644411

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
21. 21.↵
    2. Kornreich L,
    3. Hadar H,
    4. Sulkes J, et al

    . Effect of normal ageing on the sites of aortic bifurcation and inferior vena cava confluence: a CT study. Surg Radiol Anat 1998;20:63–68 doi:10.1007/BF01628118 pmid:9574492

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar