Evaluation of 2 Novel Ratio-Based Metrics for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Deyo RA,
   2. Gray D,
   3. Kreuter W, et al

   . United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:1441–45 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000166503.37969.8a pmid:15959375

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Cowley P

   . Neuroimaging of spinal canal stenosis. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2016;24:523–29 doi:10.1016/j.mric.2016.04.009 pmid:27417399

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Arnoldi CC,
   2. Brodsky AE,
   3. Cauchoix J, et al

   . Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes: definition and classification. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1976;115:4–5 pmid:1253495

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Lee GY,
   2. Lee JW,
   3. Choi HS, et al

   . A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40:1033–39 doi:10.1007/s00256-011-1153-z pmid:21286714

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Schroeder GD,
   2. Kurd MF,
   3. Vaccaro AR

   . Lumbar spinal stenosis: how is it classified? J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2016;24:843–52 doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00034 pmid:27849674

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Lurie J,
   2. Tomkins-Lane C

   . Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ 2016;352:h6234 doi:10.1136/bmj.h6234 pmid:26727925

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Katz JN,
   2. Zimmerman ZE,
   3. Mass H, et al

   . Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review. JAMA 2022;327:1688–99 doi:10.1001/jama.2022.5921 pmid:35503342

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Morita M,
   2. Miyauchi A,
   3. Okuda S, et al

   . Comparison between MRI and myelography in lumbar spinal canal stenosis for the decision of levels of decompression surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24:31–36 doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181d4c993 pmid:20625326

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Alsaleh K,
   2. Ho D,
   3. Rosas-Arellano MP, et al

   . Radiographic assessment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: is MRI superior to CT? Eur Spine J 2017;26:362–67 doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4724-9 pmid:27663702

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Arana E,
    2. Royuela A,
    3. Kovacs FM, et al

    . Lumbar spine: agreement in the interpretation of 1.5-T MR images by using the Nordic Modic Consensus Group classification form. Radiology 2010;254:809–17 doi:10.1148/radiol.09090706 pmid:20123897

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Schizas C,
    2. Theumann N,
    3. Burn A, et al

    . Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:1919–24 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd pmid:20671589

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    1. Khalsa SS,
    2. Kim HS,
    3. Singh R, et al

    . Radiographic outcomes of endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Neurosurg Focus 2019;46:E10 doi:10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18617 pmid:31042651

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Andreisek G,
    2. Imhof M,
    3. Wertli M, et al

    ; Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Outcome Study Working Group Zurich. A systematic review of semiquantitative and qualitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:W735–46 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.10163 pmid:24147503

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Steurer J,
    2. Roner S,
    3. Gnannt R, et al

    . Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:175 doi:10.1186/1471-2474-12-175 pmid:21798008

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Fukusaki M,
    2. Kobayashi I,
    3. Hara T, et al

    . Symptoms of spinal stenosis do not improve after epidural steroid injection. Clin J Pain 1998;14:148–51 doi:10.1097/00002508-199806000-00010 pmid:9647457

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.
    1. Koc Z,
    2. Ozcakir S,
    3. Sivrioglu K, et al

    . Effectiveness of physical therapy and epidural steroid injections in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:985–89 doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c0a6b pmid:19404172

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Hamanishi C,
    2. Matukura N,
    3. Fujita M, et al

    . Cross-sectional area of the stenotic lumbar dural tube measured from the transverse views of magnetic resonance imaging. J Spinal Disord 1994;7:388–93 pmid:7819638

    PubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.
    1. Mariconda M,
    2. Fava R,
    3. Gatto A, et al

    . Unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective comparative study with conservatively treated patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15:39–46 doi:10.1097/00024720-200202000-00006 pmid:11891449

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Jönsson B,
    2. Annertz M,
    3. Sjöberg C, et al

    . A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis, Part I: clinical features related to radiographic findings. Spine 1997;22:2932–37 doi:10.1097/00007632-199712150-00016 pmid:9431629

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    1. Dora C,
    2. Wälchli B,
    3. Elfering A, et al

    . The significance of spinal canal dimensions in discriminating symptomatic from asymptomatic disc herniations. Eur Spine J 2002;11:575–81 doi:10.1007/s00586-002-0448-0 pmid:12522716

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Aalto TJ,
    2. Malmivaara A,
    3. Kovacs F, et al

    . Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:E648–63 doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000231727.88477.da pmid:16915081

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Andreisek G,
    2. Hodler J,
    3. Steurer J

    . Uncertainties in the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. Radiology 2011;261:681–84 doi:10.1148/radiol.11111086 pmid:22095990

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.
    1. Friedly JL,
    2. Jarvik JG

    . Agreeing (or not) on how to describe spinal stenosis: expanding a narrow mindset. Radiology 2012;264:3–4 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120861 pmid:22723557

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Miskin N,
    2. Gaviola GC,
    3. Huang RY, et al

    . Intra- and intersubspecialty variability in lumbar spine MRI interpretation: a multireader study comparing musculoskeletal radiologists and neuroradiologists. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2020;49:182–87 doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.05.003 pmid:31133459

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Mamisch N,
    2. Brumann M,
    3. Hodler J, et al

    . Radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis: results of a Delphi survey. Radiology 2012;264:174–79 doi:10.1148/radiol.12111930 pmid:22550311

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Downie WW,
    2. Leatham PA,
    3. Rhind VM, et al

    . Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1978;37:378–81 doi:10.1136/ard.37.4.378 pmid:686873

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Breiman L,
    2. Friedman JH,
    3. Olshen RA, et al

    . Classification and Regression Trees. Routledge; 1984:368
28. 28.↵
    1. Huber FA,
    2. Stutz S,
    3. Martini IVd, et al

    . Qualitative versus quantitative lumbar spinal stenosis grading by machine learning supported texture analysis: experience from the LSOS study cohort. Eur J Radiol 2019;114:45–50 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.023 pmid:31005175

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Pedregosa F,
    2. Varoquaux G,
    3. Gramfort A, et al

    . Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 2011;12:2825–30

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Virtanen P,
    2. Gommers R,
    3. Oliphant TE, et al

    ; SciPy 1.0 Contributors. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 2020;17:261–72 doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 pmid:32015543

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. DeLong ER,
    2. DeLong DM,
    3. Clarke-Pearson DL

    . Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837–45 doi:10.2307/2531595 pmid:3203132

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Buser Z,
    2. Ortega B,
    3. D’Oro A, et al

    . Spine degenerative conditions and their treatments: national trends in the United States of America. Global Spine J 2018;8:57–67 doi:10.1177/2192568217696688 pmid:29456916

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Nuttall FQ

    . Body mass index obesity, BMI, and health: a critical review. Nutr Today 2015;50:117–28 doi:10.1097/NT.0000000000000092 pmid:27340299

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Laurencin CT,
    2. Lipson SJ,
    3. Senatus P, et al

    . The stenosis ratio: a new tool for the diagnosis of degenerative spinal stenosis. Int J Surg Investig 1999;1:127–31 pmid:11341632

    PubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Kitab S,
    2. Lee BS,
    3. Benzel EC

    . Redefining lumbar spinal stenosis as a developmental syndrome: an MRI-based multivariate analysis of findings in 709 patients throughout the 16- to 82-year age spectrum. J Neurosurg Spine 2018;29:654–60 doi:10.3171/2018.5.SPINE18100 pmid:30215592

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Pavlov H,
    2. Torg JS,
    3. Robie B, et al

    . Cervical spinal stenosis: determination with vertebral body ratio method. Radiology 1987;164:771–75 doi:10.1148/radiology.164.3.3615879 pmid:3615879

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
37. 37.↵
    1. Bajwa NS,
    2. Toy JO,
    3. Ahn NU

    . Application of a correlation between the lumbar Torg ratio and the area of the spinal canal to predict lumbar stenosis: a study of 420 postmortem subjects. J Orthopaed Traumatol 2013;14:207–12 doi:10.1007/s10195-013-0237-z pmid:23575641

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Thomé C,
    2. Börm W,
    3. Meyer F

    . Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: current strategies in diagnosis and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008;105:373–79 doi:10.3238/arztebl.2008.0373 pmid:19626175

    CrossRefPubMed
39. 39.↵
    1. Knirsch W,
    2. Kurtz C,
    3. Häffner N, et al

    . Normal values of the sagittal diameter of the lumbar spine (vertebral body and dural sac) in children measured by MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2005;35:419–24 doi:10.1007/s00247-004-1382-6 pmid:15635468

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Pierro A,
    2. Cilla S,
    3. Maselli G, et al

    . Sagittal normal limits of lumbosacral spine in a large adult population: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis. J Clin Imaging Sci 2017;7:35 doi:10.4103/jcis.JCIS_24_17 pmid:28904831

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Fagerlund MK,
    2. Thelander U,
    3. Friberg S

    . Size of lumbar disc hernias measured using computed tomography and related to sciatic symptoms. Acta Radiol 1990;31:555–58 doi:10.1177/028418519003100604 pmid:2278776

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Carragee EJ,
    2. Kim DH

    . A prospective analysis of magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with sciatica and lumbar disc herniation: correlation of outcomes with disc fragment and canal morphology. Spine 1997;22:1650–60 doi:10.1097/00007632-199707150-00025 pmid:9253102

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. Varlotta CG,
    2. Manning JH,
    3. Ayres EW, et al

    . Preoperative MRI predictors of health-related quality of life improvement after microscopic lumbar discectomy. Spine J 2020;20:391–98 doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.020 pmid:31580903

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Singh K,
    2. Helms CA,
    3. Fiorella D, et al

    . Disc space-targeted angled axial MR images of the lumbar spine: a potential source of diagnostic error. Skeletal Radiol 2007;36:1147–53 doi:10.1007/s00256-007-0383-6 pmid:17912516

    CrossRefPubMed