Variability of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Imaging Biomarkers with Respect to Section Plane Angulation: How Wrong a Radiologist Can Be?

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Brean A,
   2. Eide PK

   . Prevalence of probable idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in a Norwegian population. Acta Neurol Scand 2008;118:48–53 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0404.2007.00982.x pmid:18205881

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Isaacs AM,
   2. Riva-Cambrin J,
   3. Yavin D, et al

   . Age-specific global epidemiology of hydrocephalus: systematic review, metanalysis and global birth surveillance. PLoS ONE 2018;13:e0204926 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0204926 pmid:30273390

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Miskin N,
   2. Patel H,
   3. Franceschi AM, et al

   . Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Diagnosis of normal-pressure hydrocephalus: use of traditional measures in the era of volumetric MR imaging. Radiology 2017;285:197–205 doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161216 pmid:28498794

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Ambarki K,
   2. Israelsson H,
   3. Wåhlin A, et al

   . Brain ventricular size in healthy elderly: comparison between Evans Index and volume measurement. Neurosurgery 2010;67:94–99 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000370939.30003.D1 pmid:20559096

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Ishii K,
   2. Kanda T,
   3. Harada A, et al

   . Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2678–83 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1044-4 pmid:18500524

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Cagnin A,
   2. Simioni M,
   3. Tagliapietra M, et al

   . A simplified callosal angle measure best differentiates idiopathic-normal pressure hydrocephalus from neurodegenerative dementia. J Alzheimers Dis 2015;46:1033–38 doi:10.3233/JAD-150107 pmid:26402630

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Yamada S,
   2. Ishikawa M,
   3. Yamamoto K

   . Optimal diagnostic indices for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus based on the 3D quantitative volumetric analysis for the cerebral ventricle and subarachnoid space. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:2262–69 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4440 pmid:26359148

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Kojoukhova M,
   2. Koivisto AM,
   3. Korhonen R, et al

   . Feasibility of radiological markers in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir 2015;157:1709–18 doi:10.1007/s00701-015-2503-8 pmid:26190755

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Toma AK,
   2. Holl E,
   3. Kitchen ND, et al

   . Evans’ index revisited: the need for an alternative in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2011;68:939–44 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318208f5e0 pmid:21221031

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Bao J,
    2. Gao Y,
    3. Cao Y, et al

    . Feasibility of simple linear measurements to determine ventricular enlargement in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:e462–65 doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000002779 pmid:27315311

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Reinard K,
    2. Basheer A,
    3. Phillips S, et al

    . Simple and reproducible linear measurements to determine ventricular enlargement in adults. Surg Neurol Int 2015;6:59 doi:10.4103/2152-7806.154777 pmid:25883851

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Yamada S,
    2. Ishikawa M,
    3. Yamamoto K

    . Comparison of CSF distribution between idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:1249–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4695 pmid:26915568

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Sasaki M,
    2. Honda S,
    3. Yuasa T, et al

    . Narrow CSF space at high convexity and high midline areas in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus detected by axial and coronal MRI. Neuroradiology 2008;50:117–22 doi:10.1007/s00234-007-0318-x pmid:17992524

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Bradley WG Jr..

    CSF flow in the brain in the context of normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:831–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4124 pmid:25355813

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Benedetto N,
    2. Gambacciani C,
    3. Aquila F, et al

    . A new quantitative method to assess disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space (DESH) in patients with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: the SILVER index. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2017;158:27–32 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.04.015 pmid:28448824

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Evans WA Jr..

    An encephalographic ratio for estimating ventricular enlargement and cerebral atrophy. Arch NeurPsych 1942;47:931–37

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    1. Synek V,
    2. Reuben JR,
    3. Du Boulay GH

    . Comparing Evans’ index and computerized axial tomography in assessing relationship of ventricular size to brain size. Neurology 1976;26:231–33 doi:10.1212/wnl.26.3.231 pmid:1082559

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Relkin N,
    2. Marmarou A,
    3. Klinge P, et al

    . Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57:S4–16 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000168185.29659.c5 pmid:16160425

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Kitagaki H,
    2. Mori E,
    3. Ishii K, et al

    . CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1277–84 pmid:9726467

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Hashimoto M,
    2. Ishikawa M,
    3. Mori E, et al

    . Study of INPH on neurological improvement (SINPHONI). Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2010;7:18 doi:10.1186/1743-8454-7-18 pmid:21040519

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Ryska P,
    2. Slezak O,
    3. Eklund A, et al

    . Radiological markers of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: relative comparison of their diagnostic performance. J Neurol Sci 2020;408:116581 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2019.116581 pmid:31760225

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Agerskov S,
    2. Wallin M,
    3. Hellström P, et al

    . Absence of disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space hydrocephalus, a sharp callosal angle, or other morphologic MRI markers should not be used to exclude patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus from shunt surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:74–79 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5910 pmid:30523139

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Virhammar J,
    2. Laurell K,
    3. Cesarini KG, et al

    . The callosal angle measured on MRI as a predictor of outcome in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2014;120:178–84 doi:10.3171/2013.8.JNS13575 pmid:24074491

    CrossRefPubMed