Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Variability of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Imaging Biomarkers with Respect to Section Plane Angulation: How Wrong a Radiologist Can Be?

P. Ryska, O. Slezak, A. Eklund, J. Salzer, J. Malm and J. Zizka
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2021, 42 (7) 1201-1207; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7095
P. Ryska
aFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (P.R., O.S.), University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P. Ryska
O. Slezak
aFrom the Department of Diagnostic Radiology (P.R., O.S.), University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
bDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology (O.S.), Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for O. Slezak
A. Eklund
cDepartments of Radiation Sciences (A.E.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Eklund
J. Salzer
dPharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (J.S., J.M.), Section of Neurology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Salzer
J. Malm
dPharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience (J.S., J.M.), Section of Neurology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Malm
J. Zizka
eImaging and Functional Medicine (J.Z.), University Hospital of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Zizka
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 1.

    Definition of standard transverse imaging planes: bicallosal (yellow), bicommissural (blue), Hy-Fa (green), and perpendicular to the posterior brain stem margin (red), shown on midsagittal MR images of 2 different individuals. Note the differences in their mutual alignment between the 2 subjects.

  • FIG 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 2.

    Graphic representation of biomarker measurements. A, Maximum frontal horn diameter (FHD) and inner skull diameter (ISD). B, Frontal horn vertical diameter (FHVD) measured to the midpoint of the foramen of Monro. C, Maximum supratentorial intracranial diameter (MSID) measured perpendicular to the bicommissural line (dotted line). D, Maximum vertical widths of the supraventricular brain (SVW), cella media (CMW), and temporal horn (THW), respectively; callosal angle (CA); and DESH (curved dashed lines, rated as severe, grade 2 in this case) measured on the coronal section passing through the posterior commissure. E, Simplified callosal angle (simpCA) measured at the corpus callosum midpoint on the coronal section paralleling the PBSM (F, dotted line). Note that for each biomarker, 4 measurement values have been obtained from 4 different sections (as defined in Fig 1). To keep the illustration simple, we show measurements on sections aligned parallel and perpendicular to the bicommissural line, except for the simpCA (E and F). For details, see the Materials and Methods section.

  • FIG 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG 3.

    Variability of the CA (middle row) and EI (lower row) as measured on bicallosal (yellow), bicommissural (blue), Hy-Fa (green), and PBSM (red) sections of a single subject with iNPH. The CA yields 73°, 69°, 70°, and 103° in the 4 respective planes (maximum percentage difference of 39.5%). The EI shows a less variable range of values: 0.364, 0.361, 0.359, and 0.380, respectively (maximum difference of 5.7%). Color lines on the sagittal sections (upper row) refer to the alignment of the respective coronal and transverse sections below. The disproportion between Sylvian and parasagittal convexity subarachnoid spaces (DESH) has been rated moderate in this case (grade 1).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Variability of iNPH biomarkers with respect to imaging plane angulationa

    BiomarkerMeanRepeated Measures ANOVA (P Values)
    HCiNPHiNPH/HCAngulationAngulation iNPH/HC
    DESH0.121.31<.001.463.463
    simpCA129.898.2<.001.264.950
    FHD39.151.2<.001.151.757
    ZEI0.2860.420<.001.075.792
    CMW17.434.5<.001.056.49
    BVR2.440.92<.001.005.106
    THW7.612.5<.001.002.026
    CTR2.332.86<.001.002.235
    EI0.2930.384<.001<.001.971
    FHVD25.738.8<.001<.001.059
    CA116.674.7<.001<.001<.001
    SVW39.630.9<.001<.001.288
    • Note:—HC indicates healthy control; iNPH, idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

    • ↵a Please refer to the Results section for detailed explanation. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA: angulation is a within-subjects factor (Angulation), and disease status is a between-subjects factor (iNPH/HC). Angulation by disease status interaction term (Angulation iNPH/HC) is significant for THW and CA only, with larger effects observed in the iNPH group for both biomarkers. Data are sorted in descending angulation P value order (column 5: “Angulation”). Decreasing P values indicate increasing statistical differences between measurements obtained at different section planes.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Pair-wise comparisons between different planes performed with Bonferroni correction for biomarkers showing significant dependence on angulation (P < .05) in the repeated measures ANOVA (as per Table 1)a

    BiomarkerBi-Call, Bi-CommBi-Call, Hy-FaBi-Call, PBSMBi-Comm, Hy-FaBi-Comm, PBSMHy-Fa, PBSM
    DESHNSNSNSNSNSNS
    simpCANSNSNSNSNSNS
    FHDNSNSNSNSNSNS
    ZEINSNSNSNSNSNS
    CMWNSNSNSNSNSNS
    BVRNS.007.009NSNS<.001
    –0.04 ± 0.010.07 ± 0.020.11 ± 0.02
    THWNSNSNS.002.014NS
    0.24 ± 0.060.32 ± 0.10
    CTRNSNSNSNS.004NS
    –0.12 ± 0.03
    EINSNS<.001NS<.001<.001
    –0.005 ± 0.001–0.005 ± 0.001–0.005 ± 0.001
    FHVDNSNS.014NS<.001<.001
    –0.52 ± 0.17–0.92 ± 0.20–0.79 ± 0.17
    CA.013NS<.001NS<.001<.001
    –1.94 ± 0.61–7.06 ± 0.87–9.01 ± 1.07–8.24 ± 0.91
    SVW.034NS.005NS<.001.001
    –0.45 ± 0.160.97 ± 0.281.42 ± 0.301.26 ± 0.32
    • Note:—Bi-Call indicates bicallosal; Bi-Comm, bicommissural; Hy-Fa, hypophysis-fastigium; PBSM, posterior brain stem margin; NS, not significant.

    • ↵a P values (upper digit) and means ± standard errors of paired differences are calculated (n = 80) and presented for those paired tests that are statistically significant.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 42 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 42, Issue 7
1 Jul 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Variability of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Imaging Biomarkers with Respect to Section Plane Angulation: How Wrong a Radiologist Can Be?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
P. Ryska, O. Slezak, A. Eklund, J. Salzer, J. Malm, J. Zizka
Variability of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Imaging Biomarkers with Respect to Section Plane Angulation: How Wrong a Radiologist Can Be?
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2021, 42 (7) 1201-1207; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7095

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Variability of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Imaging Biomarkers with Respect to Section Plane Angulation: How Wrong a Radiologist Can Be?
P. Ryska, O. Slezak, A. Eklund, J. Salzer, J. Malm, J. Zizka
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2021, 42 (7) 1201-1207; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A7095
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (10)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Application of Evans Index in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Patients: A Mini Review
    Xi Zhou, Jun Xia
    Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 2022 13
  • Value of MRI-based semi-quantitative structural neuroimaging in predicting the prognosis of patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after shunt surgery
    Jiakuan Chen, Wenjie He, Xiejun Zhang, Minrui Lv, Xi Zhou, Xiaolin Yang, Haihua Wei, Haiqin Ma, Hongbing Li, Jun Xia
    European Radiology 2022 32 11
  • Imaging Markers for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: An Overview
    Efstratios-Stylianos Pyrgelis, Georgios Velonakis, Sokratis G. Papageorgiou, Leonidas Stefanis, Elisabeth Kapaki, Vasilios C. Constantinides
    Biomedicines 2023 11 5
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
    Ciccolo Giorgio, Longo Marcello, Mormina Enricomaria, Alafaci Concetta, Curcio Antonello, Germanò Antonino, Galletta Karol, Gaeta Michele, Granata Francesca
    World Neurosurgery 2024 181
  • Efficacy and safety of shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: can we predict shunt response by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)?
    S.Y. Yun, C.H. Suh, J.H. Byun, S.Y. Jo, S.J. Chung, J-S. Lim, J-H. Lee, M.J. Kim, H.S. Kim, S.J. Kim
    Clinical Radiology 2024 79 7
  • Imaging biomarkers for detection and longitudinal monitoring of ventricular abnormalities from birth to childhood
    Antonio Navarro-Ballester, Rosa Álvaro-Ballester, Miguel Á Lara-Martínez
    World Journal of Radiology 2025 17 5
  • Incidence of Ventriculomegaly in Patients With Craniosynostosis
    Baihui Liu, Jun Li, Songchunyuan Zhang, Yueqing Wang, Chenbin Dong
    Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2023
  • Instrumental assessment of INPH: structural and functional neuroimaging
    Chifumi ISEKI, Kazunari ISHII, Nicolò G. POZZI, Massimiliano TODISCO, Claudio PACCHETTI
    Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences 2025 69 1
  • Neuroimaging of Adult Hydrocephalus
    Shigeki Yamada
    Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 2025 36 2
  • Splenial angle on axial T1 and fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MRI images and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
    Samantha Lee, Robert Chen, Sumeet Kumar, Weiling Lee, Huihua Li, Louis C S Tan, Eng King Tan, Nicole C H Keong, Ling Ling Chan
    British Journal of Radiology 2025 98 1170

More in this TOC Section

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Clinical Outcomes After Chiari I Decompression
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
Show more ADULT BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire