3D Quantitative Synthetic MRI in the Evaluation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Brownlee WJ,
   2. Hardy TA,
   3. Fazekas F, et al

   . Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges. Lancet 2017;389:1336–46 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30959-X pmid:27889190

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Reich DS,
   2. Lucchinetti CF,
   3. Calabresi PA

   . Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2018;378:169–80 doi:10.1056/NEJMra1401483 pmid:29320652

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Filippi M,
   2. Preziosa P,
   3. Banwell BL, et al

   . Assessment of lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis: practical guidelines. Brain 2019;142:1858–75 doi:10.1093/brain/awz144 pmid:31209474

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Calabrese M,
   2. Filippi M,
   3. Gallo P

   . Cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 2010;6:438–44 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2010.93 pmid:20625376

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   1. Harrison DM,
   2. Roy S,
   3. Oh J, et al

   . Association of cortical lesion burden on 7-T magnetic resonance imaging with cognition and disability in multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol 2015;72:1004–12 doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1241 pmid:26192316

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Traboulsee A,
   2. Simon JH,
   3. Stone L, et al

   . Revised Recommendations of the Consortium of MS Centers Task Force for a Standardized MRI Protocol and Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Multiple Sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:394–401 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4539 pmid:26564433

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Sethi V,
   2. Yousry TA,
   3. Muhlert N, et al

   . Improved detection of cortical MS lesions with phase-sensitive inversion recovery MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012;83:877–82 doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-303023 pmid:22807559

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Geurts JJ,
   2. Pouwels PJW,
   3. Uitdehaag BM, et al

   . Intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: improved detection with 3D double inversion-recovery MR imaging. Radiology 2005;236:254–60 doi:10.1148/radiol.2361040450 pmid:15987979

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Wallaert L,
   2. Hagiwara A,
   3. Andica C, et al

   . The advantage of synthetic MRI for the visualization of anterior temporal pole lesions on double inversion recovery (DIR), phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR), and myelin images in a patient with CADASIL. Magn Reson Med Sci 2018;17:275–76 doi:10.2463/mrms.ci.2017-0110 pmid:29238005

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Forslin Y,
    2. Bergendal A,
    3. Hashim F, et al

    . Detection of leukocortical lesions in multiple sclerosis and their association with physical and cognitive impairment: a comparison of conventional and synthetic phase-sensitive inversion recovery MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1995–2000 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5815 pmid:30262646

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Hagiwara A,
    2. Hori M,
    3. Yokoyama K, et al

    . Synthetic MRI in the detection of multiple sclerosis plaques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:257–63 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5012 pmid:27932506

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Hagiwara A,
    2. Warntjes M,
    3. Hori M, et al

    . SyMRI of the brain: rapid quantification of relaxation rates and proton density, with synthetic MRI, automatic brain segmentation, and myelin measurement. Invest Radiol 2017;52:647–57 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000365 pmid:28257339

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Warntjes JBM,
    2. Leinhard OD,
    3. West J, et al

    . Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: optimization for clinical usage. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:320–29 doi:10.1002/mrm.21635 pmid:18666127

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Krauss W,
    2. Gunnarsson M,
    3. Nilsson M, et al

    . Conventional and synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. Eur Radiol 2018;28:1692–700 doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5100-9 pmid:29134354

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Fujita S,
    2. Hagiwara A,
    3. Hori M, et al

    . 3D quantitative synthetic MRI-derived cortical thickness and subcortical brain volumes: scan-rescan repeatability and comparison with conventional T₁-weighted images. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019;50:1834–42 doi:10.1002/jmri.26744 pmid:30968991

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Fujita S,
    2. Hagiwara A,
    3. Hori M, et al

    . Three-dimensional high-resolution simultaneous quantitative mapping of the whole brain with 3D-QALAS: an accuracy and repeatability study. Magn Reson Imaging 2019;63:235–43 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2019.08.031 pmid:31445118

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Kvernby S,
    2. Warntjes MJB,
    3. Haraldsson H, et al

    . Simultaneous three-dimensional myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in one breath hold with 3D-QALAS. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014;16:102 doi:10.1186/s12968-014-0102-0 pmid:25526880

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Thompson AJ,
    2. Banwell BL,
    3. Barkhof F, et al

    . Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:162–73 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 pmid:29275977

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Krupa K,
    2. Bekiesińska-Figatowska M

    . Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Pol J Radiol 2015;80:93–106 doi:10.12659/PJR.892628 pmid:25745524

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Tanenbaum LN,
    2. Tsiouris AJ,
    3. Johnson AN, et al

    . Synthetic MRI for clinical neuroimaging: results of the magnetic resonance image compilation (MAGiC) prospective, multicenter, multireader trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1103–10 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5227 pmid:28450439

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Schmidt P,
    2. Gaser C,
    3. Arsic M, et al

    . An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2012;59:3774–83 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.032 pmid:22119648

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Fenster A,
    2. Chiu B

    . Evaluation of segmentation algorithms for medical imaging. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2005;2005:7186–89 doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616166 pmid:17281935

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Landis JR,
    2. Koch GG

    . The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–74 doi:10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616166 pmid:843571

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Finck T,
    2. Li H,
    3. Grundl L, et al

    . Deep-learning generated synthetic double inversion recovery images improve multiple sclerosis lesion detection. Invest Radiol 2020;55:318–23 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000640 pmid:31977602

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Hagiwara A,
    2. Otsuka Y,
    3. Hori M, et al

    . Improving the quality of synthetic FLAIR images with deep learning using a conditional generative adversarial network for pixel-by-pixel image translation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:224–30 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5927 pmid:30630834

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Fujita S,
    2. Hagiwara A,
    3. Otsuka Y, et al

    . Deep learning approach for generating MRA images from 3D quantitative synthetic MRI without additional scans. Invest Radiol 2020;55:249–56 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000628 pmid:31977603

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Hagiwara A,
    2. Fujita S,
    3. Ohno Y, et al

    . Variability and standardization of quantitative imaging: monoparametric to multiparametric quantification, radiomics, and artificial intelligence. Invest Radiol 2020;55:601–16 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000666 pmid:32209816

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Blystad I,
    2. Hakansson I,
    3. Tisell A, et al

    . Quantitative MRI for analysis of active multiple sclerosis lesions without gadolinium-based contrast agent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:94–100 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4501 pmid:26471751

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Rovira A,
    2. Wattjes MP,
    3. Tintore M

    , MAGNIMS study group, et al. Evidence-based guidelines: MAGNIMS consensus guidelines on the use of MRI in multiple sclerosis-clinical implementation in the diagnostic process. Nat Rev Neurol 2015;11:471–82 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.106 pmid:26149978

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Lustig M,
    2. Donoho D,
    3. Pauly JM

    . Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1182–95 doi:10.1002/mrm.21391 pmid:17969013

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science