Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleAdult Brain
Open Access

Convolutional Neural Network for Automated FLAIR Lesion Segmentation on Clinical Brain MR Imaging

M.T. Duong, J.D. Rudie, J. Wang, L. Xie, S. Mohan, J.C. Gee and A.M. Rauschecker
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2019, 40 (8) 1282-1290; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6138
M.T. Duong
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.T. Duong
J.D. Rudie
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.D. Rudie
J. Wang
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. Wang
L. Xie
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L. Xie
S. Mohan
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Mohan
J.C. Gee
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.C. Gee
A.M. Rauschecker
aFrom the Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.M. Rauschecker
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Performance of the CNN compared with human manual segmentation and other automated FLAIR segmentation methods. A, Median Dice scores across all validation cases. The asterisks denotes P < .05 for paired 2-tailed t tests compared with the CNN. The hashtag denotes P < .05 for human performance compared with the CNN. B, Median Dice scores across validation cases separated by underlying diagnosis. The asterisk denotes P < .05 (FDR-corrected for multiple comparisons) for the CNN compared with 1 method, and double asterisks denote P < .05 (FDR-corrected for multiple comparisons) for CNN compared with both methods using paired 2-tailed t tests. The hashtag separately denotes P < .05 (FDR-corrected for multiple comparisons) for human performance compared with the CNN. Error bars represent 1 standard error of the mean) across cases. ADEM indicates acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; PRES, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; NMO, neuromyelitis optica.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Schematic of the CNN U-net architecture. The architecture uses a 3D region-based approach for training and validation. The sample MR FLAIR images are from a patient with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Max indicates maximum.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Representative slices from validation samples of FLAIR MR brain images (A) with CNN-based (B) and manual lesion segmentations (C), with predicted or ground truth lesion segmentations overlaid in red. The CNN performs well on a variety of different neurologic disorders, here shown in cases of multiple sclerosis, SVID, low grade-glioma, primary CNS lymphoma, adrenoleukodystrophy, and toxic leukoencephalopathy.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Performance of segmentation methods according to lesion characteristics. A, Scatterplot of predicted-versus-true total lesion volume with CNN (green circle) (Spearman correlation ρ = 0.985, best fit line slope β = 0.958), LST (gray square) ρ = 0.862, β = 0.490), and BIANCA (white triangle) (ρ = 0.655, β = 0.277) with the y = x line. Note clustering of CNN points along the y = x line, representing low deviation of CNN-based volume estimates from manual lesion volumes. B, Median Dice scores of cases stratified by total lesion volume. C, False discovery rate stratified by total lesion volume. D, Scatterplot of median CNN Dice score versus median true total lesion volume per diagnostic group. E, Median Dice scores of cases grouped by mean individual lesion volume. F, Histogram of lesion volumes in training and validation datasets. Error bars in all panels represent ±1 standard error of the mean across cases. The asterisk denotes P < .01 for the CNN compared with 1 method, and double asterisks denote P < .01 for CNN compared with both methods using 1-way group ANOVA and paired 2-tailed t tests. The hashtag separately denotes P < .05 for human performance compared with the CNN. ADEM indicates acute disseminated encephalomyelitis; ALD, adrenoleukodystrophy; TLE, toxic leukoencephalopathy; aMS, active MS: tMS, tumefactive MS; PRES, posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; iMS, inactive MS; NMO, neuromyelitis optica; Vasc, Vascular disease (ischemia); CNSL, CNS lymphoma; Susac S, Susac syndrome; lg, low-grade; hg, high-grade; PML, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Performance of the CNN segmentation method according to technical characteristics. A, Median Dice scores on validation cases across different scanner models, grouped by MR imaging manufacturer. The dashed line indicates overall mean Dice score. There was no significant difference in Dice scores according to scanner model or manufacturer (P > .05 by 1-way ANOVA, see Results). B, Median Dice scores according to the number of training cases from that scanner model, with the best fit line. There is no significant correlation between the number of training cases and Dice scores (P > .05). C, Median Dice scores on validation cases grouped by field strength (left panel), acquisition dimension (middle panel), and hospital system where images were acquired (right panel). Error bars in all panels represent ± 1 standard error of the mean across cases. The asterisk denotes P < .05 for the 2-tailed t test among groups. See Table 1 for manufacturers' information. Ess indicates Essenza.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Heterogeneous scanning parameters used for FLAIR sequences in training and validation samples, showing the number of study subjects in each categorya

    SummaryTraining (n = 295)Validation (n = 92)
    Field strength
        1.5T230 (78.0%)57 (62.0%)
        3T65 (22.0%)35 (38.0%)
    Dimension
        2D287 (97.3%)81 (88.0%)
        3D8 (2.7%)11 (12.0%)
    Manufacturer/model
        GE Healthcareb
            Discovery MR750w4 (1.4%)3 (3.3%)
            Genesis Signa20 (6.8%)6 (6.5%)
            Optima MR450w15 (5.1%)1 (1.1%)
            Signa Excite20 (6.8%)7 (7.6%)
            Signa HDxt14 (4.7%)7 (7.6%)
        Phillipsc
            Intera2 (0.7%)1 (1.1%)
        Siemensd
            Magnetom Aera15 (5.1%)2 (2.2%)
            Avanto39 (13.2%)8 (8.7%)
            Magnetom Espree83 (28.1%)19 (20.1%)
            Magnetom Essenza9 (3.1%)1 (1.1%)
            Magnetom Skyra8 (2.7%)8 (8.7%)
            Magnetom Symphony4 (1.4%)3 (3.3%)
            Magnetom Symphony Tim5 (1.7%)1 (1.1%)
            Tim Trio37 (12.5%)11 (20.0%)
            Magnetom Verio16 (5.4%)13 (14.1%)
    Toshibae
            Titan4 (1.4%)1 (1.1%)
    TE (ms)
        Minimum8682
        Median136136
        Maximum396398
    TR (ms)
        Minimum50005000
        Median90009000
        Maximum12,00012,000
    • ↵a The percentage of the total training or validation sample is in parentheses.

    • ↵b Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

    • ↵c Best, the Netherlands.

    • ↵d Erlangen, Germany.

    • ↵e Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    Summary measures of accuracy (Dice, voxelwise sensitivity, specificity, FDR, PPV/NPV) and comparisons of true and predicted lesion volumes by forecasting RMdSPE and Spearman correlation r of methodsa

    HumanCNNLSTBIANCA
    Dice
        Median0.8050.7890.5620.410
        SEM0.0170.0220.0260.027
    Sensitivity (1-FNR)
        Median0.8000.7670.5990.556
        SEM0.0170.0250.0260.020
    Specificity (1-FPR)
        Median0.9990.9990.9990.997
        SEM0.0000.0000.0000.000
    PPV
        Median0.8240.7690.6900.335
        SEM0.0180.0180.0300.034
    NPV
        Median0.9990.9990.9990.999
        SEM0.0000.0000.0010.001
    RMdSPE0.97%1.38%3.80%6.56%
    Spearman r0.9910.9850.8620.655
    • Note:—PPV indicates positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; FNR, false negative rate; FPR, false positive rate; SEM, standard error of the mean.

    • ↵a Methods: Human, CNN, LST, and BIANCA.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (8)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 8
1 Aug 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Convolutional Neural Network for Automated FLAIR Lesion Segmentation on Clinical Brain MR Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M.T. Duong, J.D. Rudie, J. Wang, L. Xie, S. Mohan, J.C. Gee, A.M. Rauschecker
Convolutional Neural Network for Automated FLAIR Lesion Segmentation on Clinical Brain MR Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2019, 40 (8) 1282-1290; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6138

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Convolutional Neural Network for Automated FLAIR Lesion Segmentation on Clinical Brain MR Imaging
M.T. Duong, J.D. Rudie, J. Wang, L. Xie, S. Mohan, J.C. Gee, A.M. Rauschecker
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2019, 40 (8) 1282-1290; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6138
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • 3D Capsule Networks for Brain Image Segmentation
  • 3D Capsule Networks for Brain Image Segmentation
  • Development of Gestational Age-Based Fetal Brain and Intracranial Volume Reference Norms Using Deep Learning
  • A Stacked Generalization of 3D Orthogonal Deep Learning Convolutional Neural Networks for Improved Detection of White Matter Hyperintensities in 3D FLAIR Images
  • Crossref (52)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Artificial intelligence for precision education in radiology
    Michael Tran Duong, Andreas M. Rauschecker, Jeffrey D. Rudie, Po-Hao Chen, Tessa S. Cook, R. Nick Bryan, Suyash Mohan
    The British Journal of Radiology 2019 92 1103
  • Artificial Intelligence System Approaching Neuroradiologist-level Differential Diagnosis Accuracy at Brain MRI
    Andreas M. Rauschecker, Jeffrey D. Rudie, Long Xie, Jiancong Wang, Michael Tran Duong, Emmanuel J. Botzolakis, Asha M. Kovalovich, John Egan, Tessa C. Cook, R. Nick Bryan, Ilya M. Nasrallah, Suyash Mohan, James C. Gee
    Radiology 2020 295 3
  • Comparing 3D, 2.5D, and 2D Approaches to Brain Image Auto-Segmentation
    Arman Avesta, Sajid Hossain, MingDe Lin, Mariam Aboian, Harlan M. Krumholz, Sanjay Aneja
    Bioengineering 2023 10 2
  • A multi-path 2.5 dimensional convolutional neural network system for segmenting stroke lesions in brain MRI images
    Yunzhe Xue, Fadi G. Farhat, Olga Boukrina, A.M. Barrett, Jeffrey R. Binder, Usman W. Roshan, William W. Graves
    NeuroImage: Clinical 2020 25
  • Three-dimensional U-Net Convolutional Neural Network for Detection and Segmentation of Intracranial Metastases
    Jeffrey D. Rudie, David A. Weiss, John B. Colby, Andreas M. Rauschecker, Benjamin Laguna, Steve Braunstein, Leo P. Sugrue, Christopher P. Hess, Javier E. Villanueva-Meyer
    Radiology: Artificial Intelligence 2021 3 3
  • Enhancing head and neck tumor management with artificial intelligence: Integration and perspectives
    Nian-Nian Zhong, Han-Qi Wang, Xin-Yue Huang, Zi-Zhan Li, Lei-Ming Cao, Fang-Yi Huo, Bing Liu, Lin-Lin Bu
    Seminars in Cancer Biology 2023 95
  • Comparison and validation of seven white matter hyperintensities segmentation software in elderly patients
    Quentin Vanderbecq, Eric Xu, Sebastian Ströer, Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne, Mauricio Diaz Melo, Didier Dormont, Olivier Colliot
    NeuroImage: Clinical 2020 27
  • Diverse Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Neuroradiology
    Michael Tran Duong, Andreas M. Rauschecker, Suyash Mohan
    Neuroimaging Clinics of North America 2020 30 4
  • Multi-Disease Segmentation of Gliomas and White Matter Hyperintensities in the BraTS Data Using a 3D Convolutional Neural Network
    Jeffrey D. Rudie, David A. Weiss, Rachit Saluja, Andreas M. Rauschecker, Jiancong Wang, Leo Sugrue, Spyridon Bakas, John B. Colby
    Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 2019 13
  • Automatic intraprostatic lesion segmentation in multiparametric magnetic resonance images with proposed multiple branch UNet
    Yizheng Chen, Lei Xing, Lequan Yu, Hilary P. Bagshaw, Mark K. Buyyounouski, Bin Han
    Medical Physics 2020 47 12

More in this TOC Section

Adult Brain

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology of Monoclonal Antibodies
  • Segmentation of Brain Metastases with BLAST
  • Cerebral ADC Changes in Fabry Disease
Show more Adult Brain

Functional

  • Kurtosis and Epileptogenic Tubers: A Pilot Study
  • Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: DK vs. Conventional MRI
  • Multiparametric MRI in PEDS Pontine Glioma
Show more Functional

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire