Association of Fractional Flow on 3D-TOF-MRA with Cerebral Perfusion in Patients with MCA Stenosis

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   2. Holmstedt CA,
   3. Turan TN,
   4. Chimowitz MI

   . Atherosclerotic intracranial arterial stenosis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:1106–14 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70195-9 pmid:24135208

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Pu Y,
   3. Lan L,
   4. Leng X, et al

   . Intracranial atherosclerosis: from anatomy to pathophysiology. Int J Stroke 2017;12:236–45 doi:10.1177/1747493016685716 pmid:28067615

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Lan L,
   3. Leng X,
   4. Ip V, et al

   . Prolonged perfusion predicts recurrent ischemic stroke but not transient ischemic attack in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis. Curr Neurovasc Res 2017;14:149–57 doi:10.2174/1567202614666170413143203 pmid:28412909

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Lu SS,
   3. Ge S,
   4. Su CQ, et al

   . MRI of plaque characteristics and relationship with downstream perfusion and cerebral infarction in patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018;48:66–73 doi:10.1002/jmri.25879 pmid:29083523

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Lan L,
   3. Leng X,
   4. Abrigo J, et al

   . Diminished signal intensities distal to intracranial arterial stenosis on time-of-flight MR angiography might indicate delayed cerebral perfusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;42:232–39 doi:10.1159/000445842 pmid:27173386

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Leng X,
   3. Wong KS,
   4. Soo Y, et al

   . Magnetic resonance angiography signal intensity as a marker of hemodynamic impairment in intracranial arterial stenosis. PLoS One 2013;8:e80124 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080124 pmid:24302997

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Liebeskind DS,
   3. Kosinski AS,
   4. Lynn MJ, et al

   . Noninvasive fractional flow on MRA predicts stroke risk of intracranial stenosis. J Neuroimaging 2015;25:87–91 doi:10.1111/jon.12101 pmid:24593693

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Liebeskind DS,
   3. Feldmann E

   . Fractional flow in cerebrovascular disorders. Intervent Neurol 2012;1:87–99 doi:10.1159/000346803

   CrossRef
9. 9.↵
   2. Cianfoni A,
   3. Colosimo C,
   4. Basile M, et al

   . Brain perfusion CT: principles, technique and clinical applications. Radiol Med 2007;112:1225–43 doi:10.1007/s11547-007-0219-4 pmid:18074193

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Siemund R,
    3. Cronqvist M,
    4. Andsberg G, et al

    . Cerebral perfusion imaging in hemodynamic stroke: be aware of the pattern. Interv Neuroradiol 2009;15:385–94 doi:10.1177/159101990901500402 pmid:20465874

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Sacco RL,
    3. Kasner SE,
    4. Broderick JP, et al

    ; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2013;44:2064–89 doi:10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca pmid:23652265

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. Greene TC,
    3. Rong XJ

    . Evaluation of techniques for slice sensitivity profile measurement and analysis. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014;15:4042 doi:10.1120/jacmp.v15i2.4042 pmid:24710429

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Wintermark M,
    3. Flanders AE,
    4. Velthuis B, et al

    . Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2006;37:979–85 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000209238.61459.39 pmid:16514093

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Christensen S,
    4. Levi CR, et al

    . Cerebral blood flow is the optimal CT perfusion parameter for assessing infarct core. Stroke 2011;42:3435–40 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.618355 pmid:21980202

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Samuels OB,
    3. Joseph GJ,
    4. Lynn MJ, et al

    . A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:643–46 pmid:10782772

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Menon BK,
    3. D'Esterre CD,
    4. Qazi EM, et al

    . Multiphase CT angiography: a new tool for the imaging triage of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Radiology 2015;275:510–20 doi:10.1148/radiol.15142256 pmid:25633505

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Leng X,
    3. Ip HL,
    4. Soo Y, et al

    . Interobserver reproducibility of signal intensity ratio on magnetic resonance angiography for hemodynamic impact of intracranial atherosclerosis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013;22:e615–19 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.07.036 pmid:24075586

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Markus H,
    3. Cullinane M

    . Severely impaired cerebrovascular reactivity predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis and occlusion. Brain 2001;124:457–67 doi:10.1093/brain/124.3.457 pmid:11222446

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Jongen LM,
    3. Hendrikse J,
    4. Moll FL, et al

    . Cerebral perfusion affects the risk of ischemia during carotid artery stenting. Cerebrovasc Dis 2010;29:538–45 doi:10.1159/000306639 pmid:20375495

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Kodama T,
    3. Watanabe K

    . Influence of imaging parameters, flow velocity, and pulsatile flow on three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography: experimental studies. Eur J Radiol 1997;26:83–91 doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(96)01152-7 pmid:9481591

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Wilcock DJ,
    3. Jaspan T,
    4. Worthington BS

    . Problems and pitfalls of 3-D TOF magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial circulation. Clin Radiol 1995;50:526–32 doi:10.1016/S0009-9260(05)83186-1 pmid:7656518

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Mustert BR,
    3. Williams DM,
    4. Prince MR

    . In vitro model of arterial stenosis: correlation of MR signal dephasing and trans-stenotic pressure gradients. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:301–10 doi:10.1016/S0730-725X(97)00304-4 pmid:9621971

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    2. Ginsberg MD

    . The cerebral collateral circulation: Relevance to pathophysiology and treatment of stroke. Neuropharmacology 2018;134:280–92 doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.08.003 pmid:28801174

    CrossRefPubMed