Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Index by author

July 01, 2019; Volume 40,Issue 7
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z

  1. Aboab, J.

    1. FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBAdult Brain
      You have access
      Diagnosis and Prediction of Relapses in Susac Syndrome: A New Use for MR Postcontrast FLAIR Leptomeningeal Enhancement
      S. Coulette, A. Lecler, E. Saragoussi, K. Zuber, J. Savatovsky, R. Deschamps, O. Gout, C. Sabben, J. Aboab, A. Affortit, F. Charbonneau and M. Obadia
      American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1184-1190; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6103

      From January 2011 to December 2017, nine consecutive patients with Susac syndrome and a control group of 73 patients with multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome were included. Two neuroradiologists blinded to the clinical and ophthalmologic data independently reviewed MRIs and assessed leptomeningeal enhancement and parenchymal abnormalities. Follow-up MRIs of patients with Susac syndrome were reviewed and compared with clinical and retinal fluorescein angiographic data evaluated by an independent ophthalmologist. Patients with Susac syndrome were significantly more likely to present with leptomeningeal enhancement: 5/9 (56%) versus 6/73 (8%) in the control group. They had a significantly higher leptomeningeal enhancement burden with ≥3 lesions in 5/9 patients versus 0/73. Regions of leptomeningeal enhancement were significantly more likely to be located in the posterior fossa. The authors conclude that leptomeningeal enhancement occurs frequently in Susac syndrome and could be helpful for diagnosis and prediction of clinical relapse.

  2. Adams, M.

    1. Spine
      You have access
      Quantification of DTI in the Pediatric Spinal Cord: Application to Clinical Evaluation in a Healthy Patient Population
      B.B. Reynolds, S. By, Q.R. Weinberg, A.A. Witt, A.T. Newton, H.R. Feiler, B. Ramkorun, D.B. Clayton, P. Couture, J.E. Martus, M. Adams, J.C. Wellons, S.A. Smith and A. Bhatia
      American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1236-1241; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6104
  3. Affortit, A.

    1. FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBAdult Brain
      You have access
      Diagnosis and Prediction of Relapses in Susac Syndrome: A New Use for MR Postcontrast FLAIR Leptomeningeal Enhancement
      S. Coulette, A. Lecler, E. Saragoussi, K. Zuber, J. Savatovsky, R. Deschamps, O. Gout, C. Sabben, J. Aboab, A. Affortit, F. Charbonneau and M. Obadia
      American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1184-1190; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6103

      From January 2011 to December 2017, nine consecutive patients with Susac syndrome and a control group of 73 patients with multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome were included. Two neuroradiologists blinded to the clinical and ophthalmologic data independently reviewed MRIs and assessed leptomeningeal enhancement and parenchymal abnormalities. Follow-up MRIs of patients with Susac syndrome were reviewed and compared with clinical and retinal fluorescein angiographic data evaluated by an independent ophthalmologist. Patients with Susac syndrome were significantly more likely to present with leptomeningeal enhancement: 5/9 (56%) versus 6/73 (8%) in the control group. They had a significantly higher leptomeningeal enhancement burden with ≥3 lesions in 5/9 patients versus 0/73. Regions of leptomeningeal enhancement were significantly more likely to be located in the posterior fossa. The authors conclude that leptomeningeal enhancement occurs frequently in Susac syndrome and could be helpful for diagnosis and prediction of clinical relapse.

  4. Algra, A.

    1. Adult Brain
      You have access
      Gadolinium Enhancement of the Aneurysm Wall in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Aneurysm Instability: A Follow-Up Study
      M.D.I. Vergouwen, D. Backes, I.C. van der Schaaf, J. Hendrikse, R. Kleinloog, A. Algra and G.J.E. Rinkel
      American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1112-1116; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6105
  5. Alhilali, L.M.

    1. Adult Brain
      Open Access
      Assessing Postconcussive Reaction Time Using Transport-Based Morphometry of Diffusion Tensor Images
      S. Kundu, A. Ghodadra, S. Fakhran, L.M. Alhilali and G.K. Rohde
      American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1117-1123; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6087
  6. Amirabadi, A.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICEPediatrics
      You have access
      Predictive Value of MRI in Diagnosing Brain AVM Recurrence after Angiographically Documented Exclusion in Children
      A. Jhaveri, A. Amirabadi, P. Dirks, A.V. Kulkarni, M.M. Shroff, N. Shkumat, T. Krings, V.M. Pereira, V. Rea and P. Muthusami
      American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1227-1235; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6093

      The authors sought to determine the predictive values of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and TOF-MRA for brain AVM recurrence in children, compared with conventional angiography, in 39 patients (mean 10.8 years of age, mean Spetzler-Martin grade, 1.9). Features predictive of recurrence included a tuft of vessels on TOF-MRA and nodular juxtamural/linear enhancement with a draining vein on contrast-enhanced MR imaging. MR imaging is useful for surveillance after brain AVM treatment in children, but conventional angiography is required for definitive diagnosis of recurrence. TOF-MRA and contrast-enhanced MR imaging provide complementary information for determining brain AVM recurrence and should be interpreted in conjunction.

  7. Arnold, D.L.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICEAdult Brain
      Open Access
      Comparison of Multiple Sclerosis Cortical Lesion Types Detected by Multicontrast 3T and 7T MRI
      J. Maranzano, M. Dadar, D.A. Rudko, D. De Nigris, C. Elliott, J.S. Gati, S.A. Morrow, R.S. Menon, D.L. Collins, D.L. Arnold and S. Narayanan
      American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1162-1169; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6099

      The aim of the authors was: 1) to compare multicontrast cortical lesion detection using 3T and 7T MR imaging, 2) to compare cortical lesion type frequency in relapsing-remitting and secondary-progressive MS, and 3) to assess whether detectability is related to the magnetization transfer ratio, an imaging marker sensitive to myelin content. Multicontrast 3T and 7T MR images from 10 patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 10 with secondary-progressive MS were evaluated with the following 3T contrasts: 3D-T1-weighted, quantitative T1, FLAIR and magnetization-transfer, and 2D proton density- and T2-weighted. The following 7T contrasts were used: 3D-T1-weighted, quantitative T1, and 2D-T2*-weighted. Cortical lesion counts at 7T were the following: 720 total cortical lesions, 420 leukocortical lesions (58%), 27 intracortical lesions (4%), and 273 subpial lesions (38%). Cortical lesion counts at 3T were the following: 424 total cortical, 393 leukocortical (93%), 0intracortical, and 31 subpial (7%) lesions. Total, intracortical, and subpial 3T lesion counts were significantly lower than the 7Tcounts. The authors conclude that detection of leukocortical lesions at 3T is comparable with that at 7T MR imaging. Imaging at 3T is less sensitive to intracortical and subpial lesions.

  8. Asai, K.

    1. FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBNeurointervention
      You have access
      Long-Term Results and Follow-Up Examinations after Endovascular Embolization for Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms
      T. Murakami, T. Nishida, K. Asai, Y. Kadono, H. Nakamura, T. Fujinaka and H. Kishima
      American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1191-1196; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6101

      The appropriate period of follow-up examinations after endovascular embolization for cerebral aneurysms using time-of-flight MR angiography is not well-known. Between April 2006 and March 2011, one hundred forty-eight unruptured aneurysms were treated with endovascular coil embolization. Among them, the authors investigated 116 unruptured aneurysms, which were followed up for >5 years. Time-of-flight MRA was performed at 1 day, 3–6 months, 1 year after the procedure, and every year thereafter. The mean follow-up period was 7.0 years. Recanalization was observed in 19 (16.3%) aneurysms within 2 years. Among them, retreatment was performed in 8 (6.8%) aneurysms. No recanalization was detected in any aneurysms that had been stable in the first 2 years after embolization. They conclude that aneurysms in which recanalization was not observed within 2 years after endovascular coil embolization were stable during a mean follow-up of 7 years. This result may be helpful in considering the appropriate span or frequency of follow-up imaging for embolized cerebral aneurysms.

  9. Backes, D.

    1. Adult Brain
      You have access
      Gadolinium Enhancement of the Aneurysm Wall in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Aneurysm Instability: A Follow-Up Study
      M.D.I. Vergouwen, D. Backes, I.C. van der Schaaf, J. Hendrikse, R. Kleinloog, A. Algra and G.J.E. Rinkel
      American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1112-1116; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6105
  10. Bansal, A.G.

    1. Adult Brain
      You have access
      Extent of Surgical Resection in Lower-Grade Gliomas: Differential Impact Based on Molecular Subtype
      S.H. Patel, A.G. Bansal, E.B. Young, P.P. Batchala, J.T. Patrie, M.B. Lopes, R. Jain, C.E. Fadul and D. Schiff
      American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1149-1155; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6102
« Previous (Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 21) Next »
Back to top
PreviousNext

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 7
1 Jul 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Sign up for alerts
Advertisement
  • Letters
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
Loading
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire