Flow-Diversion Treatment of Unruptured Saccular Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Hernesniemi J,
   3. Dashti R,
   4. Lehecka M, et al

   . Microneurosurgical management of anterior communicating artery aneurysms. Surg Neurol 2008;70:8–28; discussion 29 doi:10.1016/j.surneu.2008.01.056 pmid:18452980

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Colby GP,
   3. Bender MT,
   4. Lin LM, et al

   . Endovascular flow diversion for treatment of anterior communicating artery region cerebral aneurysms: a single-center cohort of 50 cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:679–85 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012946 pmid:28130501

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Bijlenga P,
   3. Ebeling C,
   4. Jaegersberg M, et al

   ; @neurIST Investigators. Risk of rupture of small anterior communicating artery aneurysms is similar to posterior circulation aneurysms. Stroke 2013;44:3018–26 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001667 pmid:23899912

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Cagnazzo F,
   3. Mantilla D,
   4. Lefevre PH, et al

   . Treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:2289–94 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5388 pmid:28982785

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Cagnazzo F,
   3. Cappucci M,
   4. Dargazanli C, et al

   . Treatment of distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:1100–06 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5615 pmid:29650782

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Moher D,
   3. Liberati A,
   4. Tetzlaff J, et al

   . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336–41 doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007 pmid:20171303

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. O'Kelly CJ,
   3. Krings T,
   4. Fiorella D, et al

   . A novel grading scale for the angiographic assessment of intracranial aneurysms treated using flow diverting stents. Interv Neuroradiol 2010;16:133–37 doi:10.1177/159101991001600204 pmid:20642887

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Wells GA,
   3. Shea B,
   4. O'Connell D, et al

   . The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonradomized studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2011. http://www.evidencebasedpublichealth.de/download/Newcastle_Ottowa_Scale_Pope_Bruce.pdf. Accessed September 5, 2018.
9. 9.↵
   2. Fang S,
   3. Brinjikji W,
   4. Murad MH, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:943–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3802 pmid:24287090

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Gherasim DN,
    3. Gory B,
    4. Sivan-Hoffmann R, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of wide-neck anterior communicating artery aneurysms using WEB-DL and WEB-SL: short-term results in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1150–54 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4282 pmid:25792534

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Labeyrie PE,
    3. Gory B,
    4. Aguilar-Perez M, et al

    . The pCONus device for treatment of complex wide-neck anterior communicating artery aneurysms. World Neurosurg 2017;101:498–505 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.045 pmid:28216394

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Ko JK,
    3. Han IH,
    4. Cho WH, et al

    . Crossing Y-stent technique with dual open-cell stents for coiling of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2015;132:54–60 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.02.002 pmid:25777137

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Limbucci N,
    3. Renieri L,
    4. Nappini S, et al

    . Y-stent assisted coiling of bifurcation aneurysms with Enterprise stent: long-term follow-up. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:158–62 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011483 pmid:25501447

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    2. Lin LM,
    3. Iyer RR,
    4. Bender MT, et al

    . Rescue treatment with Pipeline embolization for postsurgical clipping recurrences of anterior communicating artery region aneurysms. Interv Neurol 2017;6:135–46 doi:10.1159/000460264 pmid:29118790

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Daou B,
    3. Starke RM,
    4. Chalouhi N, et al

    . The use of the Pipeline Embolization Device in the management of recurrent previously coiled cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;77:692–97; discussion 697 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000901 pmid:26186670

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Szikora I,
    3. Berentei Z,
    4. Kulcsar Z, et al

    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline Embolization Device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1139–47 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2023 pmid:20150304

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Lin N,
    3. Brouillard AM,
    4. Krishna C, et al

    . Use of coils in conjunction with the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2015;76:142–49 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000579 pmid:25255261

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Yan Y,
    3. Zhu D,
    4. Tang H, et al

    . Safety and efficacy of flow diverter treatment for aneurysm in small cerebral vessels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018;115:54–64 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.009 pmid:29653275

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Gawlitza M,
    3. Januel AC,
    4. Tall P, et al

    . Flow diversion treatment of complex bifurcation aneurysms beyond the circle of Willis: a single-center series with special emphasis on covered cortical branches and perforating arteries. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:481–87 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011682 pmid:25878068

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Pierot L,
    3. Spelle L,
    4. Berge J, et al

    . Feasibility, complications, morbidity, and mortality results at 6 months for aneurysm treatment with the Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device: report of SAFE study. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:765–70 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013559 pmid:29352057

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Cagnazzo F,
    3. Lefevre PH,
    4. Mantilla D, et al

    . Patency of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery branches after flow-diversion treatment: a meta-analysis. J Neuroradiol 2018 Aug 9. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2018.07.006 pmid:30099016

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Pistocchi S,
    3. Blanc R,
    4. Bartolini B, et al

    . Flow diverters at and beyond the level of the circle of Willis for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Stroke 2012;43:1032–38 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.636019 pmid:22282890

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Saleme S,
    3. Iosif C,
    4. Ponomarjova S, et al

    . Flow-diverting stents for intracranial bifurcation aneurysm treatment. Neurosurgery 2014;75:623–31; quiz 631 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000522 pmid:25121791

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Texakalidis P,
    3. Bekelis K,
    4. Atallah E, et al

    . Flow diversion with the Pipeline Embolization Device for patients with intracranial aneurysms and antiplatelet therapy: a systematic literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2017;161:78–87 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.08.003 pmid:28863286

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.
    2. Toma AK,
    3. Robertson F,
    4. Wong K, et al

    . Early single centre experience of flow diverting stents for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Br J Neurosurg 2013;27:622–28 doi:10.3109/02688697.2013.793292 pmid:23705577

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.
    2. Clarencon F,
    3. Di Maria F,
    4. Gabrieli J, et al

    . Flow diverter stents for the treatment of anterior cerebral artery aneurysms: safety and effectiveness. Clin Neuroradiol 2017;27:51–56 doi:10.1007/s00062-015-0441-8 pmid:26250557

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.
    2. Dabus G,
    3. Grossberg JA,
    4. Cawley CM, et al

    . Treatment of complex anterior cerebral artery aneurysms with Pipeline flow diversion: mid-term results. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:147–51 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012519 pmid:27382125

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.
    2. Möhlenbruch MA,
    3. Kizilkilic O,
    4. Killer-Oberpfalzer M, et al

    . Multicenter experience with FRED Jr flow re-direction endoluminal device for intracranial aneurysms in small arteries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:1959–65 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5332 pmid:28798217

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.
    2. Wakhloo AK,
    3. Lylyk P,
    4. de Vries J, et al

    ; Surpass Study Group. Surpass flow diverter in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:98–107 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4078 pmid:25125666

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.
    2. Lin LM,
    3. Bender MT,
    4. Colby GP, et al

    . Use of a next-generation multi-durometer long guide sheath for triaxial access in flow diversion: experience in 95 consecutive cases. J Neurointerv Surg 2018;10:137–42 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013184 pmid:28710081

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
31. 31.
    2. Sultan-Qurraie A,
    3. Sattar A,
    4. Wazni W, et al

    . Anterior communicating artery aneurysm treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up. Interv Neurol 2017;6:126–34 doi:10.1159/000456552 pmid:29118789

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.
    2. Lin LM,
    3. Jiang B,
    4. Bender MT, et al

    . 47 consecutive cases of Pipeline Flex flow diversion utilizing a novel large-bore intracranial intermediate catheter: nuances and institutional experience with the Syphontrak. Interv Neurol 2018;7:153–63 doi:10.1159/000486538 pmid:29719553

    CrossRefPubMed