Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticlePediatrics
Open Access

Signal Change in the Mammillary Bodies after Perinatal Asphyxia

M. Molavi, S.D. Vann, L.S. de Vries, F. Groenendaal and M. Lequin
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2019, 40 (11) 1829-1834; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6232
M. Molavi
aFrom the Departments of Radiology and Neonatology (M.M., L.S.d.V., F.G., M.L.), Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Molavi
S.D. Vann
bSchool of Psychology (S.D.V.), Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.D. Vann
L.S. de Vries
aFrom the Departments of Radiology and Neonatology (M.M., L.S.d.V., F.G., M.L.), Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for L.S. de Vries
F. Groenendaal
aFrom the Departments of Radiology and Neonatology (M.M., L.S.d.V., F.G., M.L.), Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F. Groenendaal
M. Lequin
aFrom the Departments of Radiology and Neonatology (M.M., L.S.d.V., F.G., M.L.), Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. Lequin
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Research into memory deficits associated with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy has typically focused on the hippocampus, but there is emerging evidence that the medial diencephalon may also be compromised. We hypothesized that mammillary body damage occurs in perinatal asphyxia, potentially resulting in mammillary body atrophy and subsequent memory impairment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed brain MRIs of 235 clinically confirmed full-term patients with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy acquired at a single center during 2004–2017. MRIs were performed within 10 days of birth (median, 6; interquartile range, 2). Two radiologists independently assessed the mammillary bodies for abnormal signal on T2-weighted and DWI sequences. Follow-up MRIs were available for 9 patients; these were examined for evidence of mammillary body and hippocampal atrophy.

RESULTS: In 31 neonates (13.2%), abnormal high mammillary body signal was seen on T2-weighted sequences, 4 with mild, 25 with moderate, and 2 with severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. In addition, restricted diffusion was seen in 6 neonates who had MR imaging between days 5 and 7. For these 31 neonates, the most common MR imaging pattern (41.9%) was abnormal signal restricted to the mammillary bodies with the rest of the brain appearing normal. Follow-up MRIs were available for 9 patients: 8 acquired between 3 and 19 months and 1 acquired at 7.5 years. There was mammillary body atrophy in 8 of the 9 follow-up MRIs.

CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 13% of full-term infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy showed abnormal high mammillary body signal on T2-weighted images during the acute phase, which progressed to mammillary body atrophy in all but 1 of the infants who had follow-up MR imaging. This mammillary body involvement does not appear to be related to the severity of encephalopathy, MR imaging patterns of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, or pathology elsewhere in the brain.

ABBREVIATIONS:

MB
mammillary body
HIE
hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy
IQ
intelligent quotient

The mammillary bodies (MBs) are a pair of small projections situated at the posterior margin of the hypothalamus at the base of the brain, named “mammillary” because of their shape. They have repeatedly been implicated in mnemonic processes and are particularly important for episodic (ie, event) memory.1⇓–3 MB damage is typically associated with conditions linked to thiamine deficiency, in particular Korsakoff syndrome;4 however, it appears that the MBs may be implicated in a greater number of neurologic conditions than previously appreciated.5⇓–7

In infants, brain areas typically vulnerable to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) include the deep gray nuclei, cortex, and white matter, depending on the severity and duration of the insult.8 In addition, the limbic system is involved in some patients, showing diffusion restriction on DWI, particularly in the hippocampal region.9,10 Full-term neonates with perinatal asphyxia can exhibit hippocampal volume loss from childhood onward as a consequence of possible cytotoxic injury at the time of hypoxia-ischemia.11 Developmental amnesia, a disorder primarily affecting episodic memory, typically occurs as a result of early-onset hypoxia-induced damage to the hippocampus.12 However, the extent of hippocampal pathology does not always predict the severity of subsequent memory impairment.13 Consistent with this finding, a recent study by Dzieciol et al14 examined MR images of 18 patients with developmental amnesia (11–35 years of age) and uncovered a marked degree of atrophy in the MBs in two-thirds of the patients. However, because the MR images were acquired a number of years following the hypoxic-ischemic event, the authors were unable to conclude whether the MB atrophy was directly related to the hypoxic-ischemic episode or due to subsequent degeneration.14,15

The aim of the present study, therefore, was to examine whether the MBs are affected in infants with HIE. Given previous reports of MB sensitivity to hypoxia in adults,16,17 we hypothesized that the MBs would be directly compromised in HIE in neonates with changes evident on MRIs acquired during the neonatal period. We assessed MR imaging signal change in the MBs of infants with perinatal asphyxia. The sample group included infants treated with therapeutic hypothermia and those who did not undergo hypothermia treatment. In infants with abnormal MB signal, the wider Papez circuit (eg, hippocampal formation, fornix, cingulate gyri, and the anterior thalamic nuclei; Fig 1) was also examined for abnormalities. When possible, follow-up MR images were evaluated to determine whether abnormal MB signal during the acute phase was associated with subsequent MB atrophy.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Schematic of the extended Papez system highlighting the principal connections of the mammillary bodies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

In this retrospective, observational, single-center study, a total of 235 full-term neonates were enrolled, meeting the previously described clinical criteria of HIE18 and having undergone brain MR imaging at the University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, during 2004–2017. The patients have been included in previous studies.8,9,19⇓⇓–22 A waiver of informed consent was obtained, according to European regulations, because the present study involved the analysis of anonymized data.

The total group included 2 subsets. The first subset comprised 70 neonates, born between 2004 and January 2008, who did not receive therapeutic hypothermia. The second subset comprised 165 neonates, born between February 2008 and 2017, who were treated with whole-body hypothermia. Clinical data were retrieved from the patients' records.

MR Imaging Acquisition and Assessment

Cerebral MR imaging was performed within 3–10 days of birth (median, 6; interquartile range, 2), on days 3–9 (infants with normothermia), and days 5–10 (infants with hypothermia).20,23 MR imaging protocols have been described previously.19 Briefly, MR imaging was performed on a 1.5T or 3T MR imaging system (Achieva Philips Healthcare Best, the Netherlands). The scanning protocol included sagittal T1 before 2013 and sagittal T2-weighted imaging after 2013 (sagittal T2-weighted images were available for 64 patients). This was followed by axial T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences with 2-mm section thickness. In addition, an echo-planar imaging technique was used for diffusion-weighted imaging, with axial 4-mm section thickness, 0-mm section gap, and b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm2 (1.5T) or b-values of 0 and 800 s/mm2 (3T).

All MRIs were retrospectively screened, independently, by 2 radiologists (M.L. and M.M., with experience in reporting neonatal MRIs for 20 years and 3 years, respectively). The MBs were assessed for abnormal high signal on the T2-weighted images and/or abnormal signal on DWI (high signal on the trace maps and low signal on the ADC maps). Given the size and location of the MBs, it was important to reduce the likelihood of identifying artifactual signal due to partial volume effects. Therefore, an increased signal intensity had to be clearly visible over 2 consecutive T2-weighted slices. This increased signal intensity was then confirmed by subjectively assessing swelling in MBs and/or observing decreased signal intensity on T1-weighted images. All available sections and directions were evaluated. DWI was considered to have positive findings when signal changes (high signal on trace maps and low signal on ADC maps) were present over 2 consecutive slices. The section thickness in DWI sequences was 4 mm; therefore, they were more prone to artifactual signals. Thus, only infants with obvious signal changes on T2-weighted images were included (Fig 2). In addition to examining the MBs, images were examined for abnormal signal intensity in other constituents of the extended Papez circuit (Fig 1):24,25 hippocampi, fornices, anterior nuclei of the thalamus, and cingulate gyri. The tegmental nuclei in the brain stem were too small to assess due to a section thickness of 2 mm (T2) or more (DWI).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Arrows indicate the following: abnormally high-signal MBs on an axial T2-weighted image (A); abnormally low-signal MBs on an axial T1-weighted image (B); and abnormally high-signal MBs on DWI, b-value = 1000, accompanied by low ADC (not shown) (C).

Nine patients underwent follow-up MR imaging: 8 at 3–19 months and 1 at 7.5 years. Two radiologists (M.L. and M.M.) independently assessed the scans for evidence of subjectively judged MB atrophy. The MBs were considered atrophic if there was a lack of protrusion clearly seen on sagittal sections (Fig 3). The hippocampi were also examined for signs of atrophy.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

Sagittal T1-weighted MR imaging. The arrows indicate abnormal, low signal in MBs at 6 days (A) and MB atrophy at 3 (B) and 19 (C) months.

Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up

Clinical follow-up data were reviewed, when available, which focused on intelligence quotient (IQ) and motor and neurologic functions. The assessments provide a general evaluation of development but do not specifically measure memory. The tests administered were the following: Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Griffiths Mental Development Scales, Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scales of Intelligence, and Movement Assessment Battery for Children. Patients were tested with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development and Griffiths Mental Development Scales at 24 months and the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scales of Intelligence and Movement Assessment Battery for Children test at 5 years.

Descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS, Version 21 (IBM, Armonk, New York).

RESULTS

An increased T2-weighted signal was noted in the MBs in 31 of the 235 infants (13.2%) (Fig 2). Details of these patients are presented in Table 1. T2-weighted hyperintensity was observed in the MBs of 18 infants (10.9%) with therapeutic hypothermia and 13 infants (18.6%) without therapeutic hypothermia. Concomitant diffusion restriction was found in 6 of these infants (4 with therapeutic hypothermia and 2 without). The day of the MR imaging acquisition is shown in Fig 4; abnormal MB signal could be identified across imaging days 3–10.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

General demographic and clinical findings of neonates with high MB signal on T2-weighted images

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Day (postbirth) of initial MR imaging in patients with hypothermia treatment or without (normothermia). The day of scanning was typically days 5–7 for the hypothermia-treated patients, whereas there was a greater range of scanning days for patients with normothermia.

In 13 (41.9%) of these 31 patients, the MR imaging findings appeared otherwise normal. The occurrence rates of common pathology patterns associated with hypoxia are summarized in Table 2. When additional damage was present, the watershed predominant pattern of damage occurred most commonly (in 29% of infants). Involvement of other structures within the Papez circuit is shown in Table 3; hippocampal involvement was the most common presentation, occurring in approximately one-third of infants.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

MR imaging pattern of hypoxic-ischemic lesions

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3:

Involvement of additional structures within the Papez circuit

Of the 31 patients, 8 patients had at least 1 follow-up MR scan ranging between 3 and 19 months after the first MR scan and 1 patient had follow-up MR imaging at 7.5 years. Clinical findings for patients with available follow-up MRIs are provided in Table 4. MB atrophy was observed in 8 of 9 infants with follow-up MR imaging (the On-line Table); hippocampal atrophy was present in 6 of these patients.

Clinical Follow-Up Results

Of the 31 identified neonates with abnormal MB signal, 4 died before discharge due to redirection of care because of severe brain injury or associated multiorgan failure. Most (n = 21) were assessed as “healthy” at early follow-up. Five patients had an abnormal outcome. Three of these patients had a total IQ on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scales of Intelligence of <85 at 5 years. In one of these patients, this low IQ was associated with hearing loss and concentration problems. The fourth patient had cerebral visual impairment, though normal performance on IQ tests. One patient showed some behavioral problems but was otherwise healthy. The final patient was younger than 12 months, too young to be assessed.

DISCUSSION

Improvements in medical care have resulted in an increasing number of children surviving perinatal asphyxia. Therefore, there is a growing need to identify the sites of neuropathology following hypoxic-ischemic episodes in neonates and how this may contribute to subsequent cognitive impairments.

The present study focused on the MBs because atrophy in this region has been reported in an older group of patients who had a hypoxic-ischemic episode in childhood.14 However, the suggestion from this earlier study was that MB atrophy was a result of degeneration following primary damage to the hippocampus or limbic cortex.14 Contrary to this explanation, we found evidence of MR imaging signal change in the MBs of neonates with HIE with a T2 signal rise in 13% of patients with HIE. In 13/31 infants, the signal intensity abnormalities were seen only in the MBs, making them almost certain to be the site of primary injury. It is, therefore, possible to conclude that the MBs can be directly affected in HIE. Where signal change is observed in multiple regions, it is possible that the MB involvement is secondary. However, if this were the case, on the basis of known connectivity, the most likely site of primary pathology would be the hippocampal formation.1 A study in rhesus monkeys found no abnormal MB signal 6 days following experimental hippocampal lesions,26 again suggesting that in the timescale of the current study, the MB involvement is likely to be a primary effect. Together, the implication is that while secondary degeneration may cause additional pathology within the MBs at longer time periods, this structure is nonetheless sensitive to direct effects of hypoxic-ischemic episodes in neonates.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess MB MR imaging signal changes in neonates with HIE. Therefore, the current findings add to the increasing body of literature from adult patients in whom there is antemortem and postmortem evidence of MB necrosis following severe HIE.17,27 Reduced MB volume has also been reported in patients with obstructive sleep apnea6 and those with heart failure,28 again conditions linked to both acute and chronic hypoxia. The findings from both neonatal and adult patients further highlight the need to assess MB status in conditions with both acute and chronic low brain oxygen levels.

MB pathology is most commonly associated with, or exaggerated by, thiamine deficiency.4,29⇓–31 Thiamine is essential for intracellular metabolism and acts as a neuroprotective agent against oxidative stress. Reduced thiamine may exacerbate the effects of hypoxia on MBs and has been indicated as a possible contributing factor in a number of studies in which adult MB atrophy has been found following hypoxic-ischemic episodes.6,17,27,28 However, thiamine deficiency is not a prerequisite for hypoxia-related MB atrophy in adults.16 Furthermore, all patients in the present study were administered thiamine following birth; therefore, thiamine deficiency is unlikely to be a contributing factor to the increased signal intensity observed in the current cohort.

We also checked for signs of cerebritis, which may be a possible cause of MB signal rise and DWI restriction. No evidence of cerebral infection was found either on MR images or clinically, except in 3 patients with signs of a systemic infection. None of the 31 patients underwent a lumbar puncture, so a CNS infection cannot be ruled out completely. However, it seems unlikely, looking at the clinical outcome and, in some patients, follow-up MR imaging findings.

Surprisingly, we noticed MB involvement not only in patients with severe HIE but also in those with milder HIE. On the other hand, it was of interest that some infants with severe HIE did not show any MB abnormality on T2 or DWI series. These preliminary findings would suggest that MB involvement does not directly correspond to HIE severity. Furthermore, in some patients, the MB were the only structure that showed a signal change, again suggesting that this region has a different sensitivity to hypoxia than other brain structures. The duration and severity of the hypoxic-ischemic episode may be key determinants of the MBs sensitivity. For example, a short acute moment of hypoperfusion of the brain due to HIE-triggered cardiac malfunctioning may be sufficient to cause damage to the MBs. This could explain those patients with abnormal MB signal but otherwise normal MR imaging. The lack of MB pathology in some severely asphyxiated patients would, however, suggest some degree of neuroprotection in these patients, which needs to be investigated further.

Given the importance of the MBs for episodic memory,32 it is likely that MB pathology in patients with HIE contributes to memory impairment that can be associated with this patient group. However, the concomitant hippocampal damage makes it difficult to attribute specific impairment to the MBs. In the current study, there were 13 patients (42%) in whom the initial scan showed MB signal rise without any visible signal changes of other structures within the Papez circuit. These patients would be of particular interest in terms of neuropsychological follow-up. While there are reports of localized MB infarcts causing amnesia in adults,33,34 it is not known whether developmentally acquired MB damage would produce similar neuropsychological outcomes.

In 1 case, we noted an acute T2-weighted signal change in the MBs, but there was no observable atrophy on follow-up MR imaging. Unfortunately, long-term clinical follow-up was not available in this case. It is possible that the MBs were dysfunctional despite no obvious cell loss; alternatively, it is possible that there was some degree of neuroprotection against subsequent cell loss. Again, this case highlights the importance of assessing individual differences in response to HIE because this could prove critical in generating treatment that provides additional neuroprotection to those populations most at risk.

While 13% of examined cases were found to have signal change in the MBs, this is likely to be an underestimation of total occurrence. Given the size of the MBs, particularly in neonates, a 4-mm section thickness results in the MBs being poorly visualized.3 Furthermore, the location of the MBs at the base of the brain can produce artifacts, which obscure imaging details. This problem was exacerbated further with the ADC maps, but in some patients, we noted low ADC signal at the MBs suggesting ischemia. This emphasizes the need to focus on the T2 sequence because in all 6 patients in whom the DWI was positive, the T2 imaging findings were also positive, but the reverse was not found to be true.

In summary, this study has shown that abnormal MB signal can be found in the acute period following HIE in neonates, and this abnormal signal appears an effective predictor of subsequent MB atrophy. The sensitivity for damage to the MBs does not seem to be directly related to the severity of hypoxia, as indicated by standard measures, and does not appear to be affected by treatment involving whole-body cooling. Given the importance of the MBs for memory, this further highlights the need to more closely examine this structure in patient groups with both HIE and other conditions associated with reduced brain oxygen levels.

Conclusions

This study highlights the need to carefully assess the MBs in neonates with HIE. For the most accurate assessment of the MBs, high-resolution images are needed using the thinnest slices possible (≤2 mm for the T2-weighted sequence). Furthermore, the use of a dedicated thin-section DWI sequence, adjusted for the skull base, would improve the accuracy of identifying MB involvement in this patient group. Repeated scanning for a range of days after birth could also be informative for identifying the time window most sensitive to MB signal change. With detailed clinical assessment and subsequent MR imaging and neurocognitive follow-up at school age, it may be possible to determine the consequences of early-onset MB pathology and identify those patients most at risk during the acute phase.

Footnotes

  • S.D. Vann is funded by a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship in Biomedical Sciences (WT 12273/Z/18/Z).

  • Disclosures: Seralynne D. Vann—RELATED: Grant: Wellcome Trust, Comments: My salary is supported by the Wellcome Trust by way of a Senior Research Fellowship*; UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: Wellcome Trust, Comments: I am supported by a Wellcome Trust Fellowship.* *Money paid to the institution.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Vann SD
    . Re-evaluating the role of the mammillary bodies in memory. Neuropsychologia 2010;48:2316–27 doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.019 pmid:19879886
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Sziklas V,
    2. Petrides M
    . Memory and the region of the mammillary bodies. Prog Neurobiol 1998;54:55–70 doi:10.1016/S0301-0082(97)00064-6 pmid:9460793
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Vann SD,
    2. Aggleton JP
    . The mammillary bodies: two memory systems in one? Nat Rev Neurosci 2004;5:35–44 doi:10.1038/nrn1299 pmid:14708002
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Kopelman MD
    . The Korsakoff syndrome. Br J Psychiatry 1995;166:154–73 doi:10.1192/bjp.166.2.154 pmid:7728359
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Tsivilis D,
    2. Vann SD,
    3. Denby C, et al
    . A disproportionate role for the fornix and mammillary bodies in recall versus recognition memory. Nat Neurosci 2008;11:834–42 doi:10.1038/nn.2149 pmid:18552840
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Kumar R,
    2. Birrer BVX,
    3. Macey PM, et al
    . Reduced mammillary body volume in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Neurosci Lett 2008;438:330–34 doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.04.071 pmid:18486338
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bernstein HG,
    2. Krause S,
    3. Krell D, et al
    . Strongly reduced number of parvalbumin-immunoreactive projection neurons in the mammillary bodies in schizophrenia: further evidence for limbic neuropathology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1096:120–27 doi:10.1196/annals.1397.077 pmid:17405923
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. de Vries LS,
    2. Groenendaal F
    . Patterns of neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic brain injury. Neuroradiology 2010;52:555–66 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0674-9 pmid:20390260
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Alderliesten T,
    2. Nikkels PG,
    3. Benders MJ, et al
    . Antemortem cranial MRI compared with postmortem histopathologic examination of the brain in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy following perinatal asphyxia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013;98:F304–09 doi:10.1136/archdischild-2012-301768 pmid:23172767
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kasdorf E,
    2. Engel M,
    3. Heier L, et al
    . Therapeutic hypothermia in neonates and selective hippocampal injury on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Neurol 2014;51:104–08 doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.03.002 pmid:24810874
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Maneru C,
    2. Serra-Grabulosa JM,
    3. Junque C, et al
    . Residual hippocampal atrophy in asphyxiated term neonates. J Neuroimaging 2003;13:68–74 doi:10.1111/j.1552-6569.2003.tb00159.x pmid:12593134
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Gadian DG,
    2. Aicardi J,
    3. Watkins KE, et al
    . Developmental amnesia associated with early hypoxic-ischaemic injury. Brain 2000;123(Pt 3):499–507 doi:10.1093/brain/123.3.499 pmid:10686173
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Cooper JM,
    2. Gadian DG,
    3. Jentschke S, et al
    . Neonatal hypoxia, hippocampal atrophy, and memory impairment: evidence of a causal sequence. Cereb Cortex 2015;25:1469–76 doi:10.1093/cercor/bht332 pmid:24343890
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Dzieciol AM,
    2. Bachevalier J,
    3. Saleem KS, et al
    . Hippocampal and diencephalic pathology in developmental amnesia. Cortex 2017;86:33–44 doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.09.016 pmid:27880886
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Loftus M,
    2. Knight RT,
    3. Amaral DG
    . An analysis of atrophy in the medial mammillary nucleus following hippocampal and fornix lesions in humans and nonhuman primates. Exp Neurol 2000;163:180–190 doi:10.1006/exnr.2000.7361 pmid:10785457
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Johkura K,
    2. Naito M
    . Wernicke's encephalopathy-like lesions in global cerebral hypoxia. J Clin Neurosci 2008;15:318–319 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2006.10.022 pmid:18178437
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Schmidtke K
    . Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome following attempted hanging. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1993;149:213–16 pmid:8235215
    PubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Cowan F,
    2. Rutherford M,
    3. Groenendaal F, et al
    . Origin and timing of brain lesions in term infants with neonatal encephalopathy. Lancet 2003;361:736–42 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12658-X pmid:12620738
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Alderliesten T,
    2. de Vries LS,
    3. Benders MJ, et al
    . MR imaging and outcome of term neonates with perinatal asphyxia: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopy. Radiology 2011;261:235–42 doi:10.1148/radiol.11110213 pmid:21828190
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Alderliesten T,
    2. de Vries LS,
    3. Staats L, et al
    . MRI and spectroscopy in (near) term neonates with perinatal asphyxia and therapeutic hypothermia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2017;102:F147–52 doi:10.1136/archdischild-2016-310514 pmid:27553589
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Alderliesten T,
    2. de Vries LS,
    3. Khalil Y, et al
    . Therapeutic hypothermia modifies perinatal asphyxia-induced changes of the corpus callosum and outcome in neonates. PLoS One 2015;10:e0123230 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123230
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Weeke LC,
    2. Groenendaal F,
    3. Mudigonda K, et al
    . A novel magnetic resonance imaging score predicts neurodevelopmental outcome after perinatal asphyxia and therapeutic hypothermia. J Pediatrics 2018;192:33–40.e2 doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.09.043 pmid:29246356
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Bednarek N,
    2. Mathur A,
    3. Inder T, et al
    . Impact of therapeutic hypothermia on MRI diffusion changes in neonatal encephalopathy. Neurology 2012;78:1420–27 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e318253d589 pmid:22517107
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Papez JW
    . A proposed mechanism of emotion. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry 1937;38:725–43 doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1937.02260220069003
    CrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Vann SD,
    2. Nelson AJ
    . The mammillary bodies and memory: more than a hippocampal relay. Prog Brain Res 2015;219:163–85 doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.03.006 pmid:26072239
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Froudist-Walsh S,
    2. Browning PGF,
    3. Croxson PL, et al
    . The rhesus monkey hippocampus critically contributes to scene memory retrieval, but not new learning. J Neurosci 2018;38:7800–08 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0832-18.2018 pmid:30049888
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Vortmeyer AO,
    2. Hagel C,
    3. Laas R
    . Hypoxia-ischemia and thiamine deficiency. Clin Neuropathol 1993;12:184–90 pmid:8403626
    PubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Kumar R,
    2. Woo MA,
    3. Birrer BVX, et al
    . Mammillary bodies and fornix fibers are injured in heart failure. Neurobiol Dis 2009;33:236–42 doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2008.10.004 pmid:19022386
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Beh SC,
    2. Frohman TC,
    3. Frohman EM
    . Isolated mammillary body involvement on MRI in Wernicke's encephalopathy. J Neurol Sci 2013;334:172–75 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2013.07.2516 pmid:23953677
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kornreich L,
    2. Bron-Harlev E,
    3. Hoffmann C, et al
    . Thiamine deficiency in infants: MR findings in the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1668–74 pmid:16091511
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Zuccoli G,
    2. Siddiqui N,
    3. Bailey A, et al
    . Neuroimaging findings in pediatric Wernicke encephalopathy: a review. Neuroradiology 2010;52:523–29 doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0604-x pmid:19844698
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Dillingham CM,
    2. Milczarek MM,
    3. Perry JC, et al
    . Mammillothalamic disconnection alters hippocampo-cortical oscillatory activity and microstructure: implications for diencephalic amnesia. J Neurosci 2019;39:6696–6713 doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0827-19.2019 pmid:31235646
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Amuluru K,
    2. Filippi CG,
    3. Lignelli A
    . Acute amnesia due to isolated mammillary body infarct. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24:e303–05 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.06.038 pmid:26303790
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Male S,
    2. Zand R
    . Isolated mammillary body infarct causing global amnesia: a case report. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2017;26:e50–52 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.11.115 pmid:28007327
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.
    1. Denby CE,
    2. Vann SD,
    3. Tsivilis D, et al
    . The frequency and extent of mammillary body atrophy associated with surgical removal of a colloid cyst. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:736–43 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1424 pmid:19164441
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received April 17, 2019.
  • Accepted after revision August 8, 2019.
  • © 2019 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (11)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 11
1 Nov 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Signal Change in the Mammillary Bodies after Perinatal Asphyxia
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
M. Molavi, S.D. Vann, L.S. de Vries, F. Groenendaal, M. Lequin
Signal Change in the Mammillary Bodies after Perinatal Asphyxia
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2019, 40 (11) 1829-1834; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6232

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Signal Change in the Mammillary Bodies after Perinatal Asphyxia
M. Molavi, S.D. Vann, L.S. de Vries, F. Groenendaal, M. Lequin
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2019, 40 (11) 1829-1834; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A6232
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Impairments in the early consolidation of spatial memories via group II mGluR agonism in the mammillary bodies
  • Outcome of non-cooled asphyxiated infants with under-recognised or delayed-onset encephalopathy
  • The Mammillary Bodies: A Review of Causes of Injury in Infants and Children
  • Crossref (5)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • The Mammillary Bodies: A Review of Causes of Injury in Infants and Children
    K.M.E. Meys, L.S. de Vries, F. Groenendaal, S.D. Vann, M.H. Lequin
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2022 43 6
  • Outcome of non-cooled asphyxiated infants with under-recognised or delayed-onset encephalopathy
    Corline E J Parmentier, Sylke J Steggerda, Lauren C Weeke, Monique Rijken, Linda S De Vries, Floris Groenendaal
    Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 2022 107 4
  • Impairments in the early consolidation of spatial memories via group II mGluR agonism in the mammillary bodies
    Michal M. Milczarek, James C. Perry, Eman Amin, Salma Haniffa, Thomas Hathaway, Seralynne D. Vann
    Scientific Reports 2024 14 1
  • Mammillary Body and Hippocampal Injury After Acute Perinatal Arterial Ischemic Stroke
    Maarten Lequin, Lisanne M. Baak, Jeroen Dudink, Seralynne Vann, Floris Groenendaal, Linda S. de Vries, Manon J.N.L. Benders, Cora H.A. Nijboer, Nienke Wagenaar, Niek E. van der Aa
    Neurology Open Access 2025 1 1
  • Update on MRI Assessment of Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy
    Katsumi HAYAKAWA, Koichi TANDA, Akira NISHIMURA, Daisuke KINOSHITA, Masakazu NISHIMOTO, Yuko SANO
    Japanese Journal of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2022 42 4

More in this TOC Section

  • SyMRI & MR Fingerprinting in Brainstem Myelination
  • Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Pediatric Temporal Bone CT Using Photon-Counting Detector CT and Energy-Integrating Detector CT
  • Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome: Neuroimaging Findings
Show more Pediatrics

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire