Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticlePediatric Neuroimaging
Open Access

Diffusion Tensor Imaging of White Matter in Children Born from Preeclamptic Gestations

E.A. Figueiró-Filho, B.A. Croy, J.N. Reynolds, F. Dang, D. Piro, M.T. Rätsep, N.D. Forkert, A. Paolozza, G.N. Smith and P.W. Stroman
American Journal of Neuroradiology April 2017, 38 (4) 801-806; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5064
E.A. Figueiró-Filho
aFrom the Departments of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences (E.A.F.-F., B.A.C., J.N.R., F.D., D.P., N.D.F., G.N.S.)
cCentre for Neuroscience Studies (E.A.F.-F., J.N.R., P.W.S.), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
dFaculty of Medicine (E.A.F.-F.), Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for E.A. Figueiró-Filho
B.A. Croy
aFrom the Departments of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences (E.A.F.-F., B.A.C., J.N.R., F.D., D.P., N.D.F., G.N.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B.A. Croy
J.N. Reynolds
aFrom the Departments of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences (E.A.F.-F., B.A.C., J.N.R., F.D., D.P., N.D.F., G.N.S.)
cCentre for Neuroscience Studies (E.A.F.-F., J.N.R., P.W.S.), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J.N. Reynolds
F. Dang
aFrom the Departments of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences (E.A.F.-F., B.A.C., J.N.R., F.D., D.P., N.D.F., G.N.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for F. Dang
D. Piro
aFrom the Departments of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences (E.A.F.-F., B.A.C., J.N.R., F.D., D.P., N.D.F., G.N.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Piro
M.T. Rätsep
bObstetrics and Gynecology (M.T.R., G.N.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M.T. Rätsep
N.D. Forkert
aFrom the Departments of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences (E.A.F.-F., B.A.C., J.N.R., F.D., D.P., N.D.F., G.N.S.)
eDepartment of Radiology and Hotchkiss Brain Institute (N.D.F.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for N.D. Forkert
A. Paolozza
fLaboratory for Infant Studies (A.P.), University of Toronto Scarborough, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Paolozza
G.N. Smith
aFrom the Departments of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences (E.A.F.-F., B.A.C., J.N.R., F.D., D.P., N.D.F., G.N.S.)
bObstetrics and Gynecology (M.T.R., G.N.S.)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for G.N. Smith
P.W. Stroman
cCentre for Neuroscience Studies (E.A.F.-F., J.N.R., P.W.S.), Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for P.W. Stroman
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Individuals born from pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia have an elevated risk for cognitive impairment. Deviations in maternal plasma angiokines occur for prolonged intervals before clinical signs of preeclampsia. We hypothesized that fetal brain vascular and nervous tissue development become deviated during maternal progression toward preeclampsia and that such deviations would be detectable by MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this pilot study, 10 matched (gestational and current ages) pairs (5 boys/5 girls, 7–10 years of age) from preeclampsia or control pregnancies were examined by using diffusion tensor MR imaging. An unbiased voxel-based analysis was conducted on fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity parametric maps. Six brain ROIs were identified for subsequent analysis by tractography (middle occipital gyrus, caudate nucleus and precuneus, cerebellum, superior longitudinal fasciculus, and cingulate gyrus).

RESULTS: Statistical differences were present between groups for fractional anisotropy in the caudate nucleus (offspring from preeclamptic gestation > controls), volume of the tract for the superior longitudinal fasciculus (offspring from preeclamptic gestation > controls) and the caudate nucleus (offspring from preeclamptic gestation > controls), and for parallel diffusivity of the cingulate gyrus (offspring from preeclamptic gestation > controls).

CONCLUSIONS: These novel preliminary results along with previous results from the same children that identified altered cerebral vessel calibers and increased regional brain volumes justify fully powered MR imaging studies to address the impact of preeclampsia on human fetal brain development.

ABBREVIATIONS:

FA
fractional anisotropy
MD
mean diffusivity
PE
preeclampsia
PE-F1
offspring from preeclamptic gestation
PGF
placental growth factor

Hypertensive disorders during human pregnancy include acute-onset emergency preeclampsia (PE), seen at a frequency of 2%–8% of all gestations.1 PE is a systemic vascular inflammatory syndrome occurring between midpregnancy and term and is the leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Up to 12% of annual maternal deaths2 and up to 25% of annual fetal and neonatal deaths globally3 are PE-associated. Leading hypotheses addressing the pathophysiology of PE focus on progressive deficits in uteroplacental angiogenesis and maternal vascular remodeling well before the onset of clinical signs, due to an imbalance in angiokines and soluble angiokine receptors, which are predominantly products of the placenta.4

A recent systematic review of the impact of maternal hypertension (all forms) during pregnancy on offspring addressed outcomes after 6 months of life. The review identified cardiovascular, immune, metabolic, and behavioral/neurologic effects on individuals born from preeclamptic mothers (PE-F1s). For PE-F1s, lower cognitive function was the prominent, reliable association.5 The deficits in cognitive functions reported for PE-F1s5⇓–7 include lower intelligence quotient scores,8,9 reduced verbal and nonverbal abilities,10,11 and reduced arithmetic reasoning.12,13

Recently, we conducted a pilot study to determine whether clinical cognitive function test outcomes and brain MR imaging findings differed between PE-F1s and typical 7- to 10-year-old children.14 The hypothesis driving this research posits that the progressive dysregulation of angiokines that is clinically associated with maternal PE development reflects conditions occurring not only in placental but also in all fetal tissues and impacts fetal cerebrovascular development. This hypothesis15 predicts that brain anatomy and function differ between PE-F1s and children born from normotensive mothers due to the use of common molecular pathways during vascular and neuronal cell differentiation (vascular endothelial growth factor pathways) and to the importance of cerebral blood flow for anatomic and functional brain development. Our pilot study suggested specific deficits in cognitive testing and in eye-movement control.16 Initial volumetric analyses of brain anatomic regions by using high-resolution T1-weighted MR imaging datasets identified 5 regions of anatomic enlargement in PE-F1s (cerebellum, temporal lobe, left amygdala, right amygdala, and brain stem). In addition, reduced vascular radii were identified from time-of-flight MR angiography datasets in the occipital and parietal lobes.14 These preliminary results were the first reported MR imaging/MRA findings in PE-F1s of any age group.

The aim of the current study was to determine whether microstructural properties, including myelination patterns and white matter connectivity analyzed by diffusion tensor MR imaging, differ between PE-F1s and matched typical children. A further goal was to assess whether DTI findings overlapped the previously identified anatomic or vascular deviations in these children.14

Materials and Methods

Participants

Twenty white children were recruited between July 2014 and February 2015 from the established Preeclampsia New Emerging Team birth cohort developed at Kingston General Hospital between September 2003 and October 2009.17 Race was not a condition for recruitment. Half of the children had experienced a PE gestation, while typical controls, matched for sex (5 males/5 females), gestational age, and current age, had experienced a normal pregnancy. PE was clinically defined by using the 2002 criteria of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.17 All births were singleton and not complicated by diabetes and preexisting cardiovascular or other diseases. Lower weight was the sole difference between the participant groups.14,16 During a single half-day of study, each participant undertook multiple cognitive function tests and eye-movement control testing to analyze regional brain function, plus MR imaging and angiography protocols, including DTI, that did not require sedation or contrast medium enhancement.14 These participants have been fully described previously.14,16 Here, analyses of the DTI data collection are reported. The study was reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Board, Queen's University and Kingston General Hospital.

MR Imaging/DTI

Brain MR imaging was performed by using a 3T Magnetom Trio MR imaging scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) as reported previously.14 DTI used in this work was a single-shot balanced echo-planar imaging sequence with timing parameters of TR = 6000 ms and TE = 94 ms and flip angle = 90°. Fifty contiguous transverse sections with a section thickness of 2.2 mm were aligned parallel to the anterior/posterior commissure plane and covered the entire brain. The FOV was 211 × 211 mm, and the acquisition matrix was 96 × 96, giving a reconstructed in-plane resolution of 2.2 × 2.2 mm. For each section, 1 image without diffusion gradients (b=0 s/mm2) and 30 images with diffusion gradients (b=1000 s/mm2) applied along 30 noncollinear directions were acquired.

Voxel-Based Analysis, ROIs, and Tractography

DTI data were analyzed by using custom software developed in Matlab (R2009b; MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts) and ExploreDTI (http://exploredti.com/).18 A 3-step analytic protocol was developed because no previous workflow has been reported for DTI analysis of juvenile PE-F1s, to our knowledge.

In the first step, to compensate for any potential motion artifacts, we registered the 30 DTI acquisitions for each subject to the first b=0 s/mm2 dataset by using an affine transformation by maximization of the mutual information cost function and linear interpolation. After motion correction, parametric maps of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) were calculated. To enable voxelwise statistical analysis, we transformed the FA and MD parametric maps for each subject nonlinearly to a common reference space by registering the b=0 s/mm2 dataset. For this purpose, a custom brain atlas was created on the basis of the anatomic images from all 20 children enrolled in this study by using the Individual Brain Atlases Using Statistical Parametric Mapping Software (http://thomaskoenig.ch/Lester/ibaspm.htm) atlas-based automatic segmentation toolbox19 to account for the pediatric population.

In the second step, voxel-based analysis was performed to compare white matter measurements between PE-F1s and control children. Voxelwise statistical comparisons of FA and MD parameters between the 10 PE-F1s and 10 typical children were performed by using Matlab and analysis of variance. Differences were considered statistically significant at P ≤ .01 (Fig 1). From the voxel-based analysis, 6 ROIs were identified and used as seeds for subsequent tractography analysis by using ExploreDTI18 with standard parameters. More precisely, the 3 largest connected regions of significant voxels visible in at least 3 adjacent sections, determined by voxel-based analysis, were selected for each parameter (FA or MD) and used for further analysis after back-propagation to the original DTI space.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Voxel-based analysis comparing the brains of children born from preeclamptic pregnancies with the brains of children born from typical healthy pregnancies (controls). A custom template was created on the basis of the anatomic images of all 20 children enrolled in this study. Voxel-based analysis was performed to compare white matter measurements in PE-F1s and control children. The blue and red dots represent areas where there might have been differences between the fractional anisotropy values (A and C) or mean diffusivity values (B and D). From the voxel-based analysis, areas in which a cluster of voxels persisted through at least ≥3 sections were identified and used to define the specific ROIs to be used as seeds for tractography. Magnification of an area (C and D) is used as an example of how ROIs were defined. The 3 most dot-clustered regions in voxel-based analysis for FA and MD were selected, yielding 6 ROIs for more detailed analysis. The ROIs identified on FA were the following: 2, middle occipital gyrus; 7, caudate nucleus; and 9, precuneus. The ROIs identified on MD were the following: 1, cerebellum; 6, superior longitudinal fasciculus; and 7, cingulate gyrus.

In the third step, tracts identified in ExploreDTI18 were used to calculate average FA, MD, parallel diffusivity, perpendicular diffusivity, and tract volume (averaging across all voxels in a given tract). The results between PE-F1s and typical children were compared in Matlab by using 1-way analysis of covariance, with age as a covariate. At this third step, differences in tractography were considered significant at P ≤ .05.

At a significance level of P ≤ .05, voxel-based analysis isolated too many tracts of interest. Therefore, voxel-based analyses in the second step were evaluated at a significance level of P ≤ .01 to narrow down the search to white matter regions of possible interest. In the third step, tractography was performed at the P ≤ .05 level as a standard value, because these data represent the first study of this kind on this defined group of individuals of any age and there were no previously published analyses for guidance.

Results

Voxel-Based Analysis

Voxel-based analysis of differences between PE-F1s and typical children statistically identified 10 regions of difference in FA and 8 regions of difference in MD. The final ROIs selected for tractography analysis were the 3 most different on the basis of voxel-based analysis of FA (middle occipital gyrus, caudate nucleus, and precuneus) and the 3 most different identified by voxel-based analysis of MD (cerebellum, superior longitudinal fasciculus, and cingulate gyrus; Fig 1).

Tractography in ROIs

From the 6 identified ROIs, 3 differed between PE-F1s and control children. The regions for which statistical differences in any tractography parameter could not be established with this small study group were the middle occipital gyrus (P = .26–0.47), precuneus (P = .12–0.48), and cerebellum (P = .47–0.77). The regions showing differences were the caudate nucleus, superior longitudinal fasciculus, and cingulate gyrus. Multivariate statistical analysis revealed differences for FA in the caudate nucleus (PE-F1 > control, P = .008), tract volumes for the caudate nucleus (PE-F1 > control, P = .05) and the superior longitudinal fasciculus (PE-F1 > control, P = .03), and parallel diffusion for the cingulate gyrus (PE-F1 > control, P = .04). Complete comparisons of the DTI parameters between the PE-F1 and typical children are summarized in the On-line Table.

Integration with MR Imaging/MRA Outcomes

The Table summarizes the overlap in findings between the DTI analyses and our previous analyses of brain images from these PE-F1s.14 The independent DTI analyses identified differences in brain areas between the groups that corresponded with results from our previous analyses. For example, the larger brain anatomic areas described previously in PE-F1 (temporal lobe, right and left amygdalae) were coincident with a higher volume of bundles of white matter (superior longitudinal fasciculus and caudate nucleus) and also with higher values of FA (caudate nucleus). Most important, the right and left amygdalae are part of the limbic area, and they are localized at the end point of the caudate nucleus. Although larger tissue volumes were described in the cerebellum, and smaller vascular radii in the parietal and occipital lobes, we did not find any significant deviations in these regions in the advanced DTI analysis. However, the voxel-based analysis of FA and MD parametric maps did identify regions that are part of or correspond to the cerebellum, parietal lobe, and occipital lobe.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Comparison of DTI, MRI, and MRA findings by brain region for PE-F1

Discussion

This is the first report of DTI analyses of the PE-F1 brain. In this small pilot study, unbiased comparisons identified some brain areas with significant differences in DTI parameters between PE-F1s and children matched except for gestationally experienced maternal health status.

The origins of the impacts of PE defined in our study are unclear. Possibilities include effects that are direct consequences of maternal hypertension or that result from disturbed placental metabolism or function. However, we postulate that the effects arise from angiogenic dysregulation in the fetus itself that mirrors the angiogenic dysregulation displayed in the conceptus-derived placenta and are reflected in measurements of maternal gestational plasma. Thus, we predict that the legacy effects of the preeclamptic gestational experience are not restricted in brains of PE-F1 but are present in multiple vascular beds. This postulate was recently supported by studies of capillaries in early postnatal infant skin.20

The PE-F1 deviations of increased brain regional volumes or globally reduced vascular diameters suggest that the legacy impact of PE occurred in regions associated with memory and visual spatial processing.14,16 Our previous findings that the temporal lobe and right and left amygdalae in PE-F1 are larger than in control children were coincident with the larger DTI volume of white matter in 2 ROIs: the caudate nucleus and superior longitudinal fasciculus (Table).

In our PE-F1 study participants, increased tract volumes were identified in the superior longitudinal fasciculus, which is a large bundle of association fibers in the white matter that connects the parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes with the frontal lobe.21 The superior longitudinal fasciculus is strongly related to language and communication pathways.21 Due to a small sample, we could not establish a statistical correlation between these findings; larger, future studies are needed to address possible relationships.

PE-F1s had higher FA values and thicker white matter bundles over tracts in the caudate nucleus. The limbic area, represented mainly by the caudate nucleus, has an important role in learning and memory involving goal-directed actions.22 The brain circuits that underlie spatial working memory include the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebellum.23 PE-F1 presented with higher parallel diffusion values in the cingulate gyrus (On-line Table), which corresponds to additional support for differences in the PE-F1 limbic area. DTI identification of higher FA values and a higher volume of white matter tracts on the caudate nucleus plus higher parallel diffusion on the cingulate gyrus predict an impact on spatial working memory in PE-F1 compared with control children. Again, due to the limited sample size, it is not possible to infer whether the observed changes would have a positive or negative impact on this group of children. Similarly, future assessment of a larger number of individuals will be needed to verify possible associations between the limbic area and spatial working memory.

In animal models, placental growth factor (PGF)–deficient mice (PGF mutant knockout mice) display altered fetal brain vascular development from midpregnancy.24 Key deviations identified were in vessels of the hindbrain and circle of Willis.25 PGF is expressed in all stages of mouse and human preimplantation embryos and throughout brain development.26,27 In women who proceed to PE, subnormal maternal plasma levels of PGF, predominantly a placental product, are reported by the end of first trimester when significant elevations first appear in healthy pregnancies.28,29 Consistent with this finding, PGF was deficient in the available term plasma samples of the mothers of the children studied in this report while soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and soluble endoglin were comparable (n = 4 PE/8 controls).14 Our hypothesis is that in PE, downregulation of PGF and/or related angiogenic signaling molecules is initiated at or before embryo implantation. This predicts PGF downregulation in both the placenta and embryo/fetus during the interval of brain development. Indeed, in cattle blastocysts in which data are available, PGF transcripts are more than twice as numerous in the inner cell mass (fetal primordium) than in the trophectoderm, the primordium for the placenta.30

We speculate that neurologic and vascular development of the embryonic/fetal brain is already deviated before differences in PGF and/or other molecules regulating angiogenesis are detectable in maternal plasma or before maternal hypertension is clinically observed. Vascular and neurologic imaging of neonatal human and mice brains has identified early life capacities for significant structural reorganization. If validation studies with a large number of participants confirm our pilot data, development of preclinical models to assess methods of stimulating neonatal brain angiogenesis to reduce cognitive impairment may be appropriate.31⇓⇓–34 It will also be important to compare PE-F1 brain images and functioning with similar data associated with other types of pediatric brain developmental anomalies to understand whether the PE-F1 brain is unique and whether imaging data could be clinically valuable for long-term health management of these individuals.

Conclusions

Our continuing analyses of brain MR imaging datasets from a small number of 7- to 10-year-old PE-F1s strongly suggest that neurologic differences underlie the intellectual deviations reported in pediatric and adult PE-F1 populations.5⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–14 The brain regions with statistically significant DTI differences were previously identified in an independent analysis as having anatomic variances in volume or global vessel width compared with children born from typical pregnancies.14 Our studies, though limited by a small sample size and racial homogeneity (white), strongly suggest that PE causes deviation of fetal brain structures during early development before the onset of maternal hypertension and that these deviations might have functional consequences postpartum.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Brandon Maser (Queen's University) for helpful discussions and collaboration and Mr Don Brien (Queen's University) for technical support. We additionally thank all of the participants and their parents who volunteered for this study.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Ernesto A. Figueiró-Filho—RELATED: Grant: Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Comments: Postdoctoral Training Award–Estágio Sênior, grant No. 99999.002771/2015-02. I was granted a 1-year postdoctoral fellowship from Brazil to accomplish this research project; UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: Kingston General Hospital Research Foundation, Comments: internal institutional award administered through Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, for the Kingston General Hospital Research Foundation. The amount of the award was Can$10,000. B. Anne Croy—RELATED: Principal Investigator on the 1-year internal institutional award administered through Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, for the Kingston General Hospital Research Foundation made June 1, 2014. These funds covered the MRI user fees for the studies reported in the article*; Other: Garfield Kelly and Harry Botterell Foundation for the Neurological Sciences, Comments: internal competitive funds of Can$10,000 from Queen's University for June 1, 2015, from the Garfield Kelly Award (Can$2500) and the Botterell Foundation (Can$7500).* *Money paid to the institution.

  • This work was supported by the Harry Botterell Foundation for the Neurological Sciences award and the Garfield Kelly Cardiovascular Research Development Fund from Kingston General Hospital Foundation, the Canada Research Chairs Program (P.W.S., B.A.C.), and a Postdoctoral Training Award–Estágio Sênior, grant No. 99999.002771/2015-02 from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brazil (E.A.F.-F.).

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in pregnancy: report of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122:1122–31 doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000437382.03963.88 pmid:24150027
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Kenny LC,
    2. Black MA,
    3. Poston L, et al
    . Early pregnancy prediction of preeclampsia in nulliparous women, combining clinical risk and biomarkers: the Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints (SCOPE) international cohort study. Hypertension 2014;64:644–52 doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03578 pmid:25122928
    CrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Lo JO,
    2. Mission JF,
    3. Caughey AB
    . Hypertensive disease of pregnancy and maternal mortality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013;25:124–32 doi:10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835e0ef5 pmid:23403779
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Verdonk K,
    2. Saleh L,
    3. Lankhorst S, et al
    . Association studies suggest a key role for endothelin-1 in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia and the accompanying renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system suppression. Hypertension 2015;65:1316–23 doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.05267 pmid:25870197
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Pinheiro TV,
    2. Brunetto S,
    3. Ramos JG, et al
    . Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and health outcomes in the offspring: a systematic review. J Dev Orig Health Dis 2016;7:391–407 doi:10.1017/S2040174416000209 pmid:27168118
    CrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ehrenstein V,
    2. Rothman KJ,
    3. Pedersen L, et al
    . Pregnancy-associated hypertensive disorders and adult cognitive function among Danish conscripts. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170:1025–31 doi:10.1093/aje/kwp223 pmid:19726495
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Tuovinen S,
    2. Eriksson JG,
    3. Kajantie E, et al
    . Maternal hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and self-reported cognitive impairment of the offspring 70 years later: the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:200.e1–9 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.12.017 pmid:23246316
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. van Wassenaer AG,
    2. Westera J,
    3. van Schie PE, et al
    . Outcome at 4.5 years of children born after expectant management of early-onset hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;204:510.e1–9 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.02.032 pmid:21459356
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Heikura U,
    2. Hartikainen AL,
    3. Nordström T, et al
    . Maternal hypertensive disorders during pregnancy and mild cognitive limitations in the offspring. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2013;27:188–98 doi:10.1111/ppe.12028 pmid:23374064
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Morsing E,
    2. Maršál K
    . Pre-eclampsia- an additional risk factor for cognitive impairment at school age after intrauterine growth restriction and very preterm birth. Early Hum Dev 2014;90:99–101 doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.12.002 pmid:24388669
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Whitehouse AJ,
    2. Robinson M,
    3. Newnham JP, et al
    . Do hypertensive diseases of pregnancy disrupt neurocognitive development in offspring? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2012;26:101–08 doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01257.x pmid:22324495
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Tuovinen S,
    2. Räikkönen K,
    3. Kajantie E, et al
    . Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and intellectual abilities in the offspring in young adulthood: the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study. Ann Med 2012;44:394–403 doi:10.3109/07853890.2011.573497 pmid:21495787
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Tuovinen S,
    2. Räikkönen K,
    3. Kajantie E, et al
    . Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and cognitive decline in the offspring up to old age. Neurology 2012;79:1578–82 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826e2606 pmid:23035059
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Rätsep MT,
    2. Paolozza A,
    3. Hickman AF, et al
    . Brain structural and vascular anatomy is altered in offspring of pre-eclamptic pregnancies: a pilot study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:939–45 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4640 pmid:26721772
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Rätsep MT,
    2. Hickman AF,
    3. Croy BA
    . The Elsevier trophoblast research award lecture: impacts of placental growth factor and preeclampsia on brain development, behaviour, and cognition. Placenta 2016;48(suppl 1):S40–S46 doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2016.02.001 pmid:26880207
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Rätsep MT,
    2. Hickman AF,
    3. Maser B, et al
    . Impact of preeclampsia on cognitive function in the offspring. Behav Brain Res 2016;302:175–81 doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2016.01.030 pmid:26784561
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Smith GN,
    2. Walker MC,
    3. Liu A, et al
    . A history of preeclampsia identifies women who have underlying cardiovascular risk factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;200:58:e1–8 doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.035 pmid:18691690
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Leemans A,
    2. Jeurissen B,
    3. Sijbers J, et al
    . ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii. April 18–24, 2009:3537
  19. 19.↵
    1. Garcia-Vazquez V,
    2. Reig S,
    3. Janssen J, et al
    . Use of IBASPM atlas based automatic segmentation toolbox in pathological brains: effect of template selection. In: Proccedings of the IEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference, October 19–25, 2008. Dresden, Germany
  20. 20.↵
    1. Yu GZ,
    2. Aye CY,
    3. Lewandowski AJ, et al
    . Association of maternal antiangiogenic profile at birth with early postnatal loss of microvascular density in offspring of hypertensive pregnancies. Hypertension 2016;68:749–59 doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07586 pmid:27456522
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Kamali A,
    2. Flanders AE,
    3. Brody J, et al
    . Tracing superior longitudinal fasciculus connectivity in the human brain using high resolution diffusion tensor tractography. Brain Struct Funct 2014;219:269–81 doi:10.1007/s00429-012-0498-y pmid:23288254
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Grahn JA,
    2. Parkinson JA,
    3. Owen AM
    . The role of the basal ganglia in learning and memory: neuropsychological studies. Behav Brain Res 2009;199:53–60 doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.11.020 pmid:19059285
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Luna B,
    2. Velanova K,
    3. Geier CF
    . Development of eye-movement control. Brain Cogn 2008;68:293–308 doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.019 pmid:18938009
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Rätsep MT,
    2. Carmeliet P,
    3. Adams MA, et al
    . Impact of placental growth factor deficiency on early mouse implant site angiogenesis. Placenta 2014;35:772–75 doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2014.07.006 pmid:25106880
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Rätsep MT,
    2. Felker AM,
    3. Kay VR, et al
    . Uterine natural killer cells: supervisors of vasculature construction in early decidua basalis. Reproduction 2015;149:R91–102 doi:10.1530/REP-14-0271 pmid:25342175
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Luna RL,
    2. Kay VR,
    3. Rätsep MT, et al
    . Placental growth factor deficiency is associated with impaired cerebral vascular development in mice. Mol Hum Reprod 2016;22:130–42 doi:10.1093/molehr/gav069 pmid:25342175
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Miller JA,
    2. Ding SL,
    3. Sunkin SM, et al
    . Transcriptional landscape of the prenatal human brain. Nature 2014;508:199–206 doi:10.1038/nature13185 pmid:24695229
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Levine RJ,
    2. Maynard SE,
    3. Qian C, et al
    . Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2004;350:672–83 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa031884 pmid:14764923
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Zeisler H,
    2. Llurba E,
    3. Chantraine F, et al
    . Predictive value of the sFlt-1:PlGF ratio in women with suspected preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2016;374:13–22 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414838 pmid:26735990
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Khan DR,
    2. Fournier É,
    3. Dufort I, et al
    . Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in granulosa cells during folliculogenesis. Reproduction 2016;151:R103–10 doi:10.1530/REP-15-0594 pmid:26980808
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Harb R,
    2. Whiteus C,
    3. Freitas C, et al
    . In vivo imaging of cerebral microvascular plasticity from birth to death. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013;33:146–56 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.152 pmid:23093067
    CrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Whiteus C,
    2. Freitas C,
    3. Grutzendler J
    . Perturbed neural activity disrupts cerebral angiogenesis during a postnatal critical period. Nature 2014;505:407–11 doi:10.1038/nature12821 pmid:24305053
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Panigrahy A,
    2. Borzage M,
    3. Blüml S
    . Basic principles and concepts underlying recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging of the developing brain. Semin Perinatol 2010;34:3–19 doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2009.10.001 pmid:20109968
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Staudt M
    . Brain plasticity following early life brain injury: insights from neuroimaging. Semin Perinatol 2010;34:87–92 doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2009.10.009 pmid:20109976
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received July 6, 2016.
  • Accepted after revision November 6, 2016.
  • © 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 38 (4)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 38, Issue 4
1 Apr 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Diffusion Tensor Imaging of White Matter in Children Born from Preeclamptic Gestations
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
E.A. Figueiró-Filho, B.A. Croy, J.N. Reynolds, F. Dang, D. Piro, M.T. Rätsep, N.D. Forkert, A. Paolozza, G.N. Smith, P.W. Stroman
Diffusion Tensor Imaging of White Matter in Children Born from Preeclamptic Gestations
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2017, 38 (4) 801-806; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5064

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Diffusion Tensor Imaging of White Matter in Children Born from Preeclamptic Gestations
E.A. Figueiró-Filho, B.A. Croy, J.N. Reynolds, F. Dang, D. Piro, M.T. Rätsep, N.D. Forkert, A. Paolozza, G.N. Smith, P.W. Stroman
American Journal of Neuroradiology Apr 2017, 38 (4) 801-806; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5064
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Linking Pregnancy- and Birth-Related Risk Factors to a Multivariate Fusion of Child Cortical Structure
  • Crossref (29)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Prenatal Preeclampsia Exposure
    Serena B. Gumusoglu, Akanksha S.S. Chilukuri, Donna A. Santillan, Mark K. Santillan, Hanna E. Stevens
    Trends in Neurosciences 2020 43 4
  • Preeclampsia and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes: Potential Pathogenic Roles for Inflammation and Oxidative Stress?
    Aaron Barron, Cathal M. McCarthy, Gerard W. O’Keeffe
    Molecular Neurobiology 2021 58 6
  • Neurological function in children born to preeclamptic and hypertensive mothers – A systematic review
    Ernesto A. Figueiró-Filho, Lauren E. Mak, James N. Reynolds, Patrick W. Stroman, Graeme N. Smith, Nils D. Forkert, Angelina Paolozza, Matthew T. Rätsep, B. Anne Croy
    Pregnancy Hypertension 2017 10
  • Resting-state functional connectivity in children born from gestations complicated by preeclampsia: A pilot study cohort
    Lauren E. Mak, B. Anne Croy, Vanessa Kay, James N. Reynolds, Matthew T. Rätsep, Nils D. Forkert, Graeme N. Smith, Angelina Paolozza, Patrick W. Stroman, Ernesto A. Figueiró-Filho
    Pregnancy Hypertension 2018 12
  • Are the Cognitive Alterations Present in Children Born From Preeclamptic Pregnancies the Result of Impaired Angiogenesis? Focus on the Potential Role of the VEGF Family
    Evelyn Lara, Jesenia Acurio, José Leon, Jeffrey Penny, Pablo Torres-Vergara, Carlos Escudero
    Frontiers in Physiology 2018 9
  • Brain Vascular Dysfunction in Mothers and Their Children Exposed to Preeclampsia
    Carlos Escudero, Ellen Kupka, Belen Ibañez, Hermes Sandoval, Felipe Troncoso, Anna-Karin Wikström, Daniela López-Espíndola, Jesenia Acurio, Pablo Torres-Vergara, Lina Bergman
    Hypertension 2023 80 2
  • A perspective on pre‐eclampsia and neurodevelopmental outcomes in the offspring: Does maternal inflammation play a role?
    Gillian M. Maher, Fergus P. McCarthy, Cathal M. McCarthy, Louise C. Kenny, Patricia M. Kearney, Ali S. Khashan, Gerard W. O'Keeffe
    International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience 2019 77 1
  • Preeclampsia may influence offspring neuroanatomy and cognitive function: a role for placental growth factor†
    Vanessa R Kay, Matthew T Rätsep, Ernesto A Figueiró-Filho, B Anne Croy
    Biology of Reproduction 2019 101 2
  • Altered offspring neurodevelopment in an arginine vasopressin preeclampsia model
    Serena Banu Gumusoglu, Akanksha Sri Satya Chilukuri, Benjamin Wen Qing Hing, Sabrina Marie Scroggins, Sreelekha Kundu, Jeremy Anton Sandgren, Mark Kharim Santillan, Donna Ann Santillan, Justin Lewis Grobe, Hanna Elizabeth Stevens
    Translational Psychiatry 2021 11 1
  • Impaired Maternal‐Fetal Environment and Risk for Preoperative Focal White Matter Injury in Neonates With Complex Congenital Heart Disease
    Daniel J. Licht, Marin Jacobwitz, Jennifer M. Lynch, Tiffany Ko, Timothy Boorady, Mahima Devarajan, Kristina N. Heye, Kobina Mensah‐Brown, John J. Newland, Alexander Schmidt, Peter Schwab, Madeline Winters, Susan C. Nicolson, Lisa M. Montenegro, Stephanie Fuller, Christopher Mascio, J. William Gaynor, Arjun G. Yodh, Juliana Gebb, Arastoo Vossough, Grace H. Choi, Mary E. Putt
    Journal of the American Heart Association 2023 12 7

More in this TOC Section

  • FRACTURE MR in Congenital Vertebral Anomalies
  • Neuroimaging Delineation and Progression of SLSMD
  • fetal brain development of 10 weeks gestation
Show more PEDIATRIC NEUROIMAGING

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire