Toward Precision and Reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Multicenter Diffusion Phantom and Traveling Volunteer Study

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Collins FS,
   3. Varmus H

   . A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med 2015;372:793–95 doi:10.1056/NEJMp1500523 pmid:25635347

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Niogi SN,
   3. Mukherjee P,
   4. Ghajar J, et al

   . Extent of microstructural white matter injury in postconcussive syndrome correlates with impaired cognitive reaction time: a 3T diffusion tensor imaging study of mild traumatic brain injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:967–73 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0970 pmid:18272556

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Newcombe V,
   3. Chatfield D,
   4. Outtrim J, et al

   . Mapping traumatic axonal injury using diffusion tensor imaging: correlations with functional outcome. PLoS One 2011;6:e19214 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019214 pmid:21573228

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Palacios EM,
   3. Sala-Llonch R,
   4. Junque C, et al

   . White matter integrity related to functional working memory networks in traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2012;78:852–60 doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31824c465a pmid:22345222

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Yuh EL,
   3. Cooper SR,
   4. Mukherjee P, et al

   ; TRACK-TBI INVESTIGATORS. Diffusion tensor imaging for outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: a TRACK-TBI study. J Neurotrauma 2014;31:1457–77 doi:10.1089/neu.2013.3171 pmid:24742275

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Yue JK,
   3. Vassar MJ,
   4. Lingsma HF, et al

   ; TRACK-TBI Investigators. Transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury pilot: multicenter implementation of the common data elements for traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2013;30:1831–44 doi:10.1089/neu.2013.2970 pmid:23815563

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Hsu W,
   3. Markey MK,
   4. Wang MD

   . Biomedical imaging informatics in the era of precision medicine: progress, challenges, and opportunities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2013;20:1010–13 doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002315 pmid:24114330

   FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Walker L,
   3. Curry M,
   4. Nayak A, et al

   ; Brain Development Cooperative Group. A framework for the analysis of phantom data in multicenter diffusion tensor imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 2013;34:2439–54 doi:10.1002/hbm.22081 pmid:22461391

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Pagani E,
   3. Hirsch JG,
   4. Pouwels PJ, et al

   . Intercenter differences in diffusion tensor MRI acquisition. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;31:1458–68 doi:10.1002/jmri.22186 pmid:20512899

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Vollmar C,
    3. O'Muircheartaigh J,
    4. Barker GJ, et al

    . Identical, but not the same: intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0T scanners. Neuroimage 2010;51:1384–94 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.046 pmid:20338248

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. Jansen JF,
    3. Kooi ME,
    4. Kessels AG, et al

    . Reproducibility of quantitative cerebral T2 relaxometry, diffusion tensor imaging, and 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy at 3.0 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2007;42:327–37 doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000262757.10271.e5 pmid:17507802

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Bisdas S,
    3. Bohning DE,
    4. Besenski N, et al

    . Reproducibility, interrater agreement, and age-related changes of fractional anisotropy measures at 3T in healthy subjects: effect of the applied b-value. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1128–33 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1044 pmid:18372415

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Takao H,
    3. Hayashi N,
    4. Kabasawa H, et al

    . Effect of scanner in longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging studies. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;33:466–77 doi:10.1002/hbm.21225 pmid:21391276

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Magnotta VA,
    3. Matsui JT,
    4. Liu D, et al

    . Multicenter reliability of diffusion tensor imaging. Brain Connect 2012;2:345–55 doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0112 pmid:23075313

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Huang L,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Baliki MN, et al

    . Reproducibility of structural, resting-state BOLD and DTI data between identical scanners. PLoS One 2012;7:e47684 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047684 pmid:23133518

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Veenith TV,
    3. Carter E,
    4. Grossac J, et al

    . Inter subject variability and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging within and between different imaging sessions. PLoS One 2013;8:e65941 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065941 pmid:23840380

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Kamagata K,
    3. Shimoji K,
    4. Hori M, et al

    . Intersite reliability of diffusion tensor imaging on two 3T scanners. Magn Reson Med Sci 2015;14:227–33 doi:10.2463/mrms.2014-0077 pmid:25740241

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Polders DL,
    3. Leemans A,
    4. Hendrikse J, et al

    . Signal to noise ratio and uncertainty in diffusion tensor imaging at 1.5, 3.0, and 7.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:1456–63 doi:10.1002/jmri.22554 pmid:21591016

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Fox RJ,
    3. Sakaie K,
    4. Lee JC, et al

    . A validation study of multicenter diffusion tensor imaging: reliability of fractional anisotropy and diffusivity values. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:695–700 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2844 pmid:22173748

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Mirzaalian H,
    3. de Pierrefeu A,
    4. Savadjiev P, et al

    . Harmonizing diffusion MRI data across multiple sites and scanners. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2015;9349:12–19 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9_2 pmid:27754499

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Zhu T,
    3. Hu R,
    4. Qiu X, et al

    . Quantification of accuracy and precision of multi-center DTI measurements: a diffusion phantom and human brain study. Neuroimage 2011;56:1398–411 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.010 pmid:21316471

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Grech-Sollars M,
    3. Hales PW,
    4. Miyazaki K, et al

    . Multi-centre reproducibility of diffusion MRI parameters for clinical sequences in the brain. NMR Biomed 2015;28:468–85 doi:10.1002/nbm.3269 pmid:25802212

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Mukherjee P,
    3. Berman JI,
    4. Chung SW, et al

    . Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: theoretic underpinnings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:632–41 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1051 pmid:18339720

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Mukherjee P,
    3. Chung SW,
    4. Berman JI, et al

    . Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: technical considerations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:843–52 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1052 pmid:18339719

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Pierpaoli C,
    3. Sarlls J,
    4. Nevo U, et al

    . Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) water solutions as isotropic phantoms for diffusion MRI studies. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, Hawaii. April 18–24, 2009:1414
26. 26.↵
    2. Behrens TE,
    3. Johansen-Berg H,
    4. Woolrich MW, et al

    . Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Nat Neurosci 2003;6:750–57 doi:10.1038/nn1075 pmid:12808459

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Jenkinson M,
    4. Johansen-Berg H, et al

    . Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006;31:1487–505 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 pmid:16624579

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Smith SM,
    3. Jenkinson M,
    4. Woolrich MW, et al

    . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23(suppl 1):S208–19 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 pmid:15501092

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Andersson JL,
    3. Jenkinson M,
    4. Smith S

    . Non-linear registration, aka spatial normalisation. http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/analysis/techrep/. FMRIB technical report TR07JA2. Published June 28, 2007
30. 30.↵
    2. Galanaud D,
    3. Perlbarg V,
    4. Gupta R, et al

    ; Neuro Imaging for Coma Emergence and Recovery Consortium. Assessment of white matter injury and outcome in severe brain trauma: a prospective multicenter cohort. Anesthesiology 2012;117:1300–10 doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182755558 pmid:23135261

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Dinkel J,
    3. Drier A,
    4. Khalilzadeh O, et al

    ; for NICER (Neuro Imaging for Coma Emergence and Recovery) Consortium. Long-term white matter changes after severe traumatic brain injury: a 5-year prospective cohort. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:23–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3616 pmid:23846796

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Venkatraman VK,
    3. Gonzalez CE,
    4. Landman B, et al

    . Region of interest correction factors improve reliability of diffusion imaging measures within and across scanners and field strengths. Neuroimage 2015;119:406–16 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.078 pmid:26146196

    CrossRefPubMed