Testing Stenting and Flow Diversion Using a Surgical Elastase-Induced Complex Fusiform Aneurysm Model

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Murad MH,
   4. Lanzino G, et al

   . Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2013;44:442–47 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.678151 pmid:23321438

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   2. Darsaut TE,
   3. Bing F,
   4. Salazkin I, et al

   . Flow diverters can occlude aneurysms and preserve arterial branches: a new experimental model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:2004–09 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3075 pmid:22555582

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   2. Bouzeghrane F,
   3. Naggara O,
   4. Kallmes DF, et al

   ; International Consortium of Neuroendovascular Centres. In vivo experimental intracranial aneurysm models: a systematic review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:418–23 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1853 pmid:19875466

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   2. Naggara O,
   3. Darsaut TE,
   4. Salazkin I, et al

   . A new canine carotid artery bifurcation aneurysm model for the evaluation of neurovascular devices. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:967–71 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1929 pmid:20019111

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Fahed R,
   3. Gentric JC,
   4. Salazkin I, et al

   . Flow diversion of bifurcation aneurysms is more effective when the jailed branch is occluded: an experimental study in a novel canine model. J Neurointerv Surg 2016 Apr 11. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-012240 pmid:27067714

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   2. Fahed R,
   3. Raymond J,
   4. Ducroux C, et al

   . Testing flow diversion in animal models: a systematic review. Neuroradiology 2016;58:375–82 doi:10.1007/s00234-015-1635-0 pmid:26747181

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Cloft HJ,
   3. Altes TA,
   4. Marx WF, et al

   . Endovascular creation of an in vivo bifurcation aneurysm model in rabbits. Radiology 1999;213:223–28 doi:10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc15223 pmid:10540666

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. Brinjikji W,
   3. Ding YH,
   4. Kallmes DF, et al

   . From bench to bedside: utility of the rabbit elastase aneurysm model in preclinical studies of intracranial aneurysm treatment. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:521–25 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011704 pmid:25904642

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Altes TA,
   3. Cloft HJ,
   4. Short JG, et al

   . 1999 ARRS Executive Council Award: creation of saccular aneurysms in the rabbit: a model suitable for testing endovascular devices—American Roentgen Ray Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:349–54 doi:10.2214/ajr.174.2.1740349 pmid:10658703

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
10. 10.↵
    2. Lewis DA,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . Morbidity and mortality associated with creation of elastase-induced saccular aneurysms in a rabbit model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:91–94 pmid:19001536

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Krings T,
    3. Hans FJ,
    4. Möller-Hartmann W, et al

    . Treatment of experimentally induced aneurysms with stents. Neurosurgery 2005;56:1347–59; discussion 1360 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000159887.03290.D1 pmid:15918952

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Hans FJ,
    3. Krings T,
    4. Möller-Hartmann W, et al

    . Endovascular treatment of experimentally induced aneurysms in rabbits using stents: a feasibility study. Neuroradiology 2003;45:430–34 doi:10.1007/s00234-003-1008-y pmid:12761602

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Helm GA,
    4. Hudson SB, et al

    . Histologic evaluation of platinum coil embolization in an aneurysm model in rabbits. Radiology 1999;213:217–22 doi:10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc16217 pmid:10540665

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D,
    4. Lewis DA, et al

    . Angiographic and histologic analysis of experimental aneurysms embolized with platinum coils, Matrix, and HydroCoil. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1757–63 pmid:16091526

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1153–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1530 pmid:19369609

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al

    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479576 pmid:17615366

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Kilkenny C,
    3. Browne W,
    4. Cuthill IC, et al

    ; National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Amimals in Research. Animal research: reporting in vivo—the ARRIVE guidelines. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011;31:991–93 doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2010.220 pmid:21206507

    FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    2. Kamran M,
    3. Yarnold J,
    4. Grunwald IQ, et al

    . Assessment of angiographic outcomes after flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a new grading schema. Neuroradiology 2011;53:501–08 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0767-5 pmid:20838782

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    2. Sadasivan C,
    3. Cesar L,
    4. Seong J, et al

    . An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533760 pmid:19150864

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D,
    4. Danielson MA, et al

    . Control of aneurysm volume by adjusting the position of ligation during creation of elastase-induced aneurysms: a prospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:857–59 pmid:17494656

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    2. Hoh BL,
    3. Rabinov JD,
    4. Pryor JC, et al

    . A modified technique for using elastase to create saccular aneurysms in animals that histologically and hemodynamically resemble aneurysms in human. Acta Neurochir 2004;146:705–11 pmid:15197614

    PubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. Wang K,
    3. Huang Q,
    4. Hong B, et al

    . Neck injury is critical to elastase-induced aneurysm model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1685–87 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1542 pmid:19386733

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Danielson MA,
    4. Kadirvel R, et al

    . Modified technique to create morphologically reproducible elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. Neuroradiology 2006;48:528–32 doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0093-0 pmid:16708202

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Alaqeel A,
    3. Meek C,
    4. Wong J, et al

    . A novel fusiform aneurysmal model in a rabbit carotid: a combination of pericarotid calcium chloride and elastase incubation. Can J Neurol Sci 2015;42:S12 doi:10.1017/cjn.2015.79

    CrossRef
25. 25.↵
    2. Reinald N,
    3. Fournier B,
    4. Naveau A, et al

    . Fusiform aneurysm model in rabbit carotid artery. J Vasc Res 2010;47:61–68 doi:10.1159/000232575 pmid:19672109

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Tieu T,
    4. Kallmes DF

    . Experimental testing of a new generation of flow diverters in sidewall aneurysms in rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:732–36 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4167 pmid:25414000

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Sherif C,
    3. Marbacher S,
    4. Erhardt S, et al

    . Improved microsurgical creation of venous pouch arterial bifurcation aneurysms in rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:165–66 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2235.9 pmid:20966054

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Sherif C,
    3. Herbich E,
    4. Plasenzotti R, et al

    . Very large and giant microsurgical bifurcation aneurysms in rabbits: proof of feasibility and comparability using computational fluid dynamics and biomechanical testing. J Neurosci Method 2016;268:7–13 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.04.020 pmid:27139738

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Bing F,
    4. Makoyeva A, et al

    . Flow diversion of giant curved sidewall and bifurcation experimental aneurysms with very-low-porosity devices. World Neurosurg 2014;82:1120–26 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2013.09.036 pmid:24071065

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Bing F,
    4. Salazkin I, et al

    . Flow diverters failing to occlude experimental bifurcation or curved sidewall aneurysms: an in vivo study in canines. J Neurosurg 2012;117:37–44 doi:10.3171/2012.4.JNS111916 pmid:22559845

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    2. Darsaut TE,
    3. Bing F,
    4. Salazkin I, et al

    . Testing flow diverters in giant fusiform aneurysms: a new experimental model can show leaks responsible for failures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:2175–79 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2657 pmid:21920868

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    2. Raymond J,
    3. Darsaut TE,
    4. Makoyeva A, et al

    . Endovascular treatment with flow diverters may fail to occlude experimental bifurcation aneurysms. Neuroradiology 2013;55:1355–63 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1272-4 pmid:23989462

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Gentric JC,
    3. Darsaut TE,
    4. Makoyeva A, et al

    . The success of flow diversion in large and giant sidewall aneurysms may depend on the size of the defect in the parent artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2119–24 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4010 pmid:24970546

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
34. 34.↵
    2. Ding Y,
    3. Dai D,
    4. Kadirvel R, et al

    . Five-year follow-up in elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1236–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2056 pmid:20223890

    Abstract/FREE Full Text