Angioarchitectures and Hemodynamic Characteristics of Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms and Their Association with Rupture Status

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Kassell NF,
   3. Torner JC,
   4. Haley EC Jr., et al

   . The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. Part 1: overall management results. J Neurosurg 1990;73:18–36 doi:10.3171/jns.1990.73.1.0018 pmid:2191090

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Nishioka H,
   3. Torner JC,
   4. Graf CJ, et al

   . Cooperative study of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage: a long-term prognostic study. II. Ruptured intracranial aneurysms managed conservatively. Arch Neurol 1984;41:1142–46 doi:10.1001/archneur.1984.04050220036011 pmid:6487096

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. White PM,
   3. Wardlaw JM

   . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms. J Neuroradiol 2003;30:336–50 pmid:14752379

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Greving JP,
   3. Wermer MJ,
   4. Brown RD Jr., et al

   . Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:59–66 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70263-1 pmid:24290159

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Weir B

   . Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a review. J Neurosurg 2002;96:3–42 doi:10.3171/jns.2002.96.1.0003 pmid:11794601

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Golshani K,
   3. Ferrell A,
   4. Zomorodi A, et al

   . A review of the management of posterior communicating artery aneurysms in the modern era. Surg Neurol Int 2010;1:88 doi:10.4103/2152-7806.74147 pmid:21206898

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Cebral JR,
   3. Raschi M

   . Suggested connections between risk factors of intracranial aneurysms: a review. Ann Biomed Eng 2013;41:1366–83 doi:10.1007/s10439-012-0723-0 pmid:23242844

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Weir B,
   3. Disney L,
   4. Karrison T

   . Sizes of ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in relation to their sites and the ages of patients. J Neurosurg 2002;96:64–70 doi:10.3171/jns.2002.96.1.0064 pmid:11794606

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Songsaeng D,
   3. Geibprasert S,
   4. Willinsky R, et al

   . Impact of anatomical variations of the circle of Willis on the incidence of aneurysms and their recurrence rate following endovascular treatment. Clin Radiol 2010;65:895–901 doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.06.010 pmid:20933644

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Lv N,
    3. Wang C,
    4. Karmonik C, et al

    . Morphological and hemodynamic discriminators for rupture status in posterior communicating artery aneurysms. PloS One 2016;11:e0149906 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0149906 pmid:26910518

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Appanaboyina S, et al

    . Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:457–67 doi:10.1109/TMI.2005.844159 pmid:15822804

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Ford MD,
    3. Alperin N,
    4. Lee SH, et al

    . Characterization of volumetric flow rate waveforms in the normal internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2005;26:477–88 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/26/4/013 pmid:15886442

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Castro MA,
    4. Putman CM, et al

    . Flow-area relationship in internal carotid and vertebral arteries. Physiol Meas 2008;29:585–94 doi:10.1088/0967-3334/29/5/005 pmid:18460763

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Taylor CA,
    3. Hughes TJR,
    4. Zarins CK

    . Finite element modeling of blood flow in arteries. Comp Meth App Mech Eng 1998;158:155–96 doi:10.1016/S0045-7825(98)80008-X

    CrossRef
15. 15.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Aubry R,
    4. Löhner R, et al

    . Fast numerical solutions of patient-specific blood flows in 3D arterial systems. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2010;26:73–85 doi:10.1002/cnm.1235 pmid:21076685

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Mut F,
    3. Löhner R,
    4. Chien A, et al

    . Computational hemodynamics framework for the analysis of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2011;27:822–39 doi:10.1002/cnm.1424 pmid:21643491

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Byrne G,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Cebral JR

    . Quantifying the large-scale hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:333–38 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3678 pmid:23928142

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2016
19. 19.↵
    2. Sforza DM,
    3. Putman CM,
    4. Cebral JR

    . Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2009;41:91–107 doi:10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102126 pmid:19784385

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Ambekar S,
    3. Madhugiri V,
    4. Bollam P, et al

    . Morphological differences between ruptured and unruptured basilar bifurcation aneurysms. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013;74:91–96 doi:10.1055/s-0033-1333622 pmid:24436894

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Sadatomo T,
    3. Yuki K,
    4. Migita K, et al

    . Morphological differences between ruptured and unruptured cases in middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2008;62:602–09; discussion 602–09 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000311347.35583.0C pmid:18301349

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Sadatomo T,
    3. Yuki K,
    4. Migita K, et al

    . The characteristics of the anterior communicating artery aneurysm complex by three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. Neurosurg Rev 2006;29:201–07 doi:10.1007/s10143-006-0025-9 pmid:16552553

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Duan X,
    4. Chung BJ, et al

    . Wall mechanical properties and hemodynamics of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:1695–703 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4358 pmid:26228891

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    2. Cebral J,
    3. Ollikainen E,
    4. Chung BJ, et al

    . Flow conditions in the intracranial aneurysm lumen are associated with inflammation and degenerative changes of the aneurysm wall. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:119–26 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4951 pmid:27686488

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Cebral JR,
    3. Mut F,
    4. Weir J, et al

    . Quantitative characterization of the hemodynamic environment in ruptured and unruptured brain aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:145–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2419 pmid:21127144

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. Xiang J,
    3. Natarajan SK,
    4. Tremmel M, et al

    . Hemodynamic-morphologic discriminants for intracranial aneurysm rupture. Stroke 2011;42:144–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.592923 pmid:21106956

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Jing L,
    4. Liu J, et al

    . Clinical, morphological, and hemodynamic independent characteristic factors for rupture of posterior communicating artery aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:808–12 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011865 pmid:26253110

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    2. Meng H,
    3. Tutino VM,
    4. Xiang J, et al

    . High WSS or low WSS? Complex interactions of hemodynamics with intracranial aneurysm initiation, growth, and rupture: toward a unifying hypothesis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1254–62 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3558 pmid:23598838

    Abstract/FREE Full Text