Concordance of Time-of-Flight MRA and Digital Subtraction Angiography in Adult Primary Central Nervous System Vasculitis

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Salvarani C,
   3. Brown RD Jr.,
   4. Hunder GG

   . Adult primary central nervous system vasculitis. Lancet 2012;380:767–77 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60069-5 pmid:22575778

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Hajj-Ali RA,
   3. Calabrese LH

   . Central nervous system vasculitis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2009;21:10–18 doi:10.1097/BOR.0b013e32831cf5e6 pmid:19093322

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   2. Birnbaum J,
   3. Hellmann DB

   . Primary angiitis of the central nervous system. Arch Neurol 2009;66:704–09 pmid:19506130

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Hajj-Ali RA,
   3. Singhal AB,
   4. Benseler S, et al

   . Primary angiitis of the CNS. Lancet Neurol 2011;10:561–72 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70081-3 pmid:21601163

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. 5.↵
   2. Calabrese LH,
   3. Mallek JA

   . Primary angiitis of the central nervous system: report of 8 new cases, review of the literature, and proposal for diagnostic criteria. Medicine (Baltimore) 1988;67:20–39 doi:10.1097/00005792-198801000-00002 pmid:3275856

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Alhalabi M,
   3. Moore PM

   . Serial angiography in isolated angiitis of the central nervous system. Neurology 1994;44:1221–26 doi:10.1212/WNL.44.7.1221 pmid:8035919

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Kadkhodayan Y,
   3. Alreshaid A,
   4. Moran CJ, et al

   . Primary angiitis of the central nervous system at conventional angiography. Radiology 2004;233:878–82 doi:10.1148/radiol.2333031621 pmid:15498898

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   2. von Elm E,
   3. Altman DG,
   4. Egger M, et al

   ; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007;4:e296 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 pmid:17941714

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. de Boysson H,
   3. Zuber M,
   4. Naggara O, et al

   ; French Vasculitis Study Group and the French NeuroVascular Society. Primary angiitis of the central nervous system: description of the first fifty-two adults enrolled in the French cohort of patients with primary vasculitis of the central nervous system. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:1315–26 doi:10.1002/art.38340 pmid:24782189

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Miller DV,
    3. Salvarani C,
    4. Hunder GG, et al

    . Biopsy findings in primary angiitis of the central nervous system. Am J Surg Pathol 2009;33:35–43 doi:10.1097/PAS.0b013e318181e097 pmid:18941399

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    2. MacLaren K,
    3. Gillespie J,
    4. Shrestha S, et al

    . Primary angiitis of the central nervous system: emerging variants. QJM 2005;98:643–54 doi:10.1093/qjmed/hci098 pmid:16040668

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Salvarani C,
    3. Brown RD Jr.,
    4. Calamia KT, et al

    . Primary central nervous system vasculitis: analysis of 101 patients. Ann Neurol 2007;62:442–51 doi:10.1002/ana.21226 pmid:17924545

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Hellmann DB,
    3. Roubenoff R,
    4. Healy RA, et al

    . Central nervous system angiography: safety and predictors of a positive result in 125 consecutive patients evaluated for possible vasculitis. J Rheumatol 1992;19:568–72 pmid:1593579

    PubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Choi CG,
    3. Lee DH,
    4. Lee JH, et al

    . Detection of intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease with 3D time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography with sensitivity encoding at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:439–46 pmid:17353309

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    2. Demaerel P,
    3. De Ruyter N,
    4. Maes F, et al

    . Magnetic resonance angiography in suspected cerebral vasculitis. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1005–12 doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2239-y pmid:14872278

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Garg SK,
    3. Mohan S,
    4. Kumar S

    . Diagnostic value of 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in Takayasu's arteritis: a comparative study with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1658–66 doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2090-x pmid:21344303

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Korogi Y,
    3. Takahashi M,
    4. Nakagawa T, et al

    . Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:135–43 pmid:9010532

    Abstract
18. 18.↵
    2. Lee NJ,
    3. Chung MS,
    4. Jung SC, et al

    . Comparison of high-resolution MR imaging and digital subtraction angiography for the characterization and diagnosis of intracranial artery disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:2245–50 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4950 pmid:27659192

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Ozsarlak O,
    3. Van Goethem JW,
    4. Maes M, et al

    . MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications. Neuroradiology 2004;46:955–72 doi:10.1007/s00234-004-1297-9 pmid:15580489

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Benseler SM,
    3. deVeber G,
    4. Hawkins C, et al

    . Angiography-negative primary central nervous system vasculitis in children: a newly recognized inflammatory central nervous system disease. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:2159–67 doi:10.1002/art.21144 pmid:15986347

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Salvarani C,
    3. Brown RD Jr.,
    4. Calamia KT, et al

    . Primary central nervous system vasculitis with prominent leptomeningeal enhancement: a subset with a benign outcome. Arthritis Rheum 2008;58:595–603 doi:10.1002/art.23300 pmid:18240248

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    2. de Boysson H,
    3. Boulouis G,
    4. Aouba A, et al

    . Adult primary angiitis of the central nervous system: isolated small-vessel vasculitis represents distinct disease pattern. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017;56:439–44 doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kew434 pmid:27940585

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Salvarani C,
    3. Brown RD Jr.,
    4. Christianson TJ, et al

    . Adult primary central nervous system vasculitis treatment and course: analysis of one hundred sixty-three patients. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:1637–45 doi:10.1002/art.39068 pmid:25708615

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    2. Mandel DM,
    3. Matouk CC,
    4. Farb RI, et al

    . Vessel wall MRI to differentiate between reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and central nervous system vasculitis: preliminary results. Stroke 2012;43:860–62 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.626184 pmid:22156692

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    2. Obusez EC,
    3. Hui F,
    4. Hajj-Ali RA, et al

    . High-resolution MRI wall imaging: spatial and temporal patterns of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and central nervous system vasculitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1527–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3909 pmid:24722305

    Abstract/FREE Full Text