Advertisement

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleNeurointervention
Open Access

Preclinical Testing of a Novel Thin Film Nitinol Flow-Diversion Stent in a Rabbit Elastase Aneurysm Model

Y. Ding, D. Dai, D.F. Kallmes, D. Schroeder, C.P. Kealey, V. Gupta, A.D. Johnson and R. Kadirvel
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2016, 37 (3) 497-501; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4568

References

  1. 1.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Hanel R,
    4. Lopes D, et al
    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    2. Saatci I,
    3. Yavuz K,
    4. Ozer C, et al
    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    2. Berge J,
    3. Biondi A,
    4. Machi P, et al
    . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2907 pmid:22300924
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    2. Lubicz B,
    3. Van der Elst O,
    4. Collignon L, et al
    . Silk flow-diverter stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a series of 58 patients with emphasis on long-term results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:542–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4143 pmid:25376806
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    2. Briganti F,
    3. Leone G,
    4. Marseglia M, et al
    . p64 flow modulation device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: initial experience and technical aspects. J Neurointerv Surg 2015 Apr 20. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011743 pmid:25895510
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    2. Tan LA,
    3. Keigher KM,
    4. Munich SA, et al
    . Thromboembolic complications with Pipeline embolization device placement: impact of procedure time, number of stents and pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value. J Neurointervent Surg 2015;7:217–21 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011111 pmid:24553344
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    2. Cirillo L,
    3. Leonardi M,
    4. Dall'olio M, et al
    . Complications in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Silk stents: an analysis of 30 consecutive patients. Interv Neuroradiol 2012;18:413–25 pmid:23217636
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    2. De Vries JD,
    3. Boogaarts J,
    4. Van Norden AV, et al
    . New generation of flow diverter (Surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013;44:1567–77 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000434 pmid:23686973
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    2. Shayan M,
    3. Chun Y
    . An overview of thin film nitinol endovascular devices. Acta Biomater 2015;21:20–34 doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.025 pmid:25839120
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    2. Kealey CP,
    3. Chun YJ,
    4. Viñuela FE, et al
    . In vitro and in vivo testing of a novel, hyperelastic thin film nitinol flow diversion stent. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012;100:718–25 doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32504 pmid:22121079
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    2. Kealey CP,
    3. Whelan SA,
    4. Chun YJ, et al
    . In vitro hemocompatibility of thin film nitinol in stenotic flow conditions. Biomaterials 2010;31:8864–71 doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.014 pmid:20810163
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D,
    4. Kadirvel R, et al
    . Five-year follow-up in elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1236–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2056 pmid:20223890
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Pelton AR,
    2. Duerig T
    2. Gupta V,
    3. Johnson AD,
    4. Martynov V, et al
    . Nitinol thin film three-dimensional devices: fabrication and applications. In: Pelton AR, Duerig T, eds. SMST-2003: Proceedings. Materials Park: ASM International 2004;639–50
  14. 14.↵
    2. Mohanchandra KP,
    3. Ho KK,
    4. Carman GP
    . Compositional uniformity in sputter-deposited NiTi shape memory alloy thin films. Materials Lett 2008;62:3481–83 doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2008.03.028
    CrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    2. Chun YJ,
    3. Levi DS,
    4. Mohanchandra KP, et al
    . Novel micro-patterning processes for thin film NiTi vascular devices. Smart Materials and Structures 2010;19:105021 doi:10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/105021
    CrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    2. Brinjikji W,
    3. Lanzino G,
    4. Cloft HJ, et al
    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery after flow diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;120:84–8 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.02.018 pmid:24731582
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al
    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479576 pmid:17615366
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Ding YH,
    4. Dai D, et al
    . A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1153–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1530 pmid:19369609
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    2. Simgen A,
    3. Ley D,
    4. Roth C, et al
    . Evaluation of a newly designed flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in an elastase-induced aneurysm model, in New Zealand white rabbits. Neuroradiology 2014;56:129–37 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1296-9 pmid:24496551
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    2. Struffert T,
    3. Ott S,
    4. Kowarschik M, et al
    . Measurement of quantifiable parameters by time-density curves in the elastase-induced aneurysm model: first results in the comparison of a flow diverter and a conventional aneurysm stent. Eur Radiol 2013;23:521–27 doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2611-2 pmid:22895618
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    2. Ionita CN,
    3. Natarajan SK,
    4. Wang W, et al
    . Evaluation of a second-generation self-expanding variable-porosity flow diverter in a rabbit elastase aneurysm model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1399–407 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2548 pmid:21757527
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    2. Sadasivan C,
    3. Cesar L,
    4. Seong J, et al
    . An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533760 pmid:19150864
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Cite this article
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Bookmark this article
Preclinical Testing of a Novel Thin Film Nitinol Flow-Diversion Stent in a Rabbit Elastase Aneurysm Model
Y. Ding, D. Dai, D.F. Kallmes, D. Schroeder, C.P. Kealey, V. Gupta, A.D. Johnson, R. Kadirvel
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2016, 37 (3) 497-501; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4568
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
Purchase

Jump to section

Advertisement