Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleNeurointervention
Open Access

Preclinical Testing of a Novel Thin Film Nitinol Flow-Diversion Stent in a Rabbit Elastase Aneurysm Model

Y. Ding, D. Dai, D.F. Kallmes, D. Schroeder, C.P. Kealey, V. Gupta, A.D. Johnson and R. Kadirvel
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2016, 37 (3) 497-501; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4568
Y. Ding
aFrom the Department of Neurointerventional Radiology (Y.D., D.D., D.F.K., D.S., R.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Y. Ding
D. Dai
aFrom the Department of Neurointerventional Radiology (Y.D., D.D., D.F.K., D.S., R.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Dai
D.F. Kallmes
aFrom the Department of Neurointerventional Radiology (Y.D., D.D., D.F.K., D.S., R.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.F. Kallmes
D. Schroeder
aFrom the Department of Neurointerventional Radiology (Y.D., D.D., D.F.K., D.S., R.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. Schroeder
C.P. Kealey
bNeuroSigma Inc. (C.P.K., V.G., A.D.J.), Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C.P. Kealey
V. Gupta
bNeuroSigma Inc. (C.P.K., V.G., A.D.J.), Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for V. Gupta
A.D. Johnson
bNeuroSigma Inc. (C.P.K., V.G., A.D.J.), Los Angeles, California.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A.D. Johnson
R. Kadirvel
aFrom the Department of Neurointerventional Radiology (Y.D., D.D., D.F.K., D.S., R.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. Kadirvel
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Thin film nitinol can be processed to produce a thin microporous sheet with a low percentage of metal coverage (<20%) and high pore attenuation (∼70 pores/mm2) for flow diversion. We present in vivo results from the treatment of experimental rabbit aneurysms by using a thin film nitinol–based flow-diversion device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nineteen aneurysms in the rabbit elastase aneurysm model were treated with a single thin film nitinol flow diverter. Devices were also placed over 17 lumbar arteries to model perianeurysmal branch arteries of the intracranial circulation. Angiography was performed at 2 weeks (n = 7), 1 month (n = 8), and 3 months (n = 4) immediately before sacrifice. Aneurysm occlusion was graded on a 3-point scale (grade I, complete occlusion; grade II, near-complete occlusion; grade III, incomplete occlusion). Toluidine blue staining was used for histologic evaluation. En face CD31 immunofluorescent staining was performed to quantify neck endothelialization.

RESULTS: Markedly reduced intra-aneurysmal flow was observed on angiography immediately after device placement in all aneurysms. Grade I or II occlusion was noted in 4 (57%) aneurysms at 2-week, in 6 (75%) aneurysms at 4-week, and in 3 (75%) aneurysms at 12-week follow-up. All 17 lumbar arteries were patent. CD31 staining showed that 75% ± 16% of the aneurysm neck region was endothelialized. Histopathology demonstrated incorporation of the thin film nitinol flow diverter into the vessel wall and no evidence of excessive neointimal hyperplasia.

CONCLUSIONS: In this rabbit model, the thin film nitinol flow diverter achieved high rates of aneurysm occlusion and promoted tissue in-growth and aneurysm neck healing, even early after implantation.

ABBREVIATION:

TFN
thin film nitinol

Flow diverters are a relatively recent advancement in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms and have expanded the types of aneurysms addressable with endovascular techniques.1⇓⇓⇓–5 Numerous different flow diverters have been approved in Europe, and several are either approved for use or under investigation in the United States. Each of the flow-diversion devices in current use is constructed from braided metallic strands, typically nitinol, cobalt chromium, and/or platinum. These devices, while promising, have several relative disadvantages. Aneurysm occlusion may be delayed, precise placement may be challenging because of device shortening, >1 device is often required, and branch arteries covered by the device may undergo occlusion.6⇓–8

Thin film nitinol (TFN) is a biomaterial produced in patterned sheets approximately 5 μm thick by using techniques adapted from the microelectronics industry. Previous reports have demonstrated that TFN has unique mechanical properties, excellent biocompatibility, and a low profile that make it well-suited for use in endovascular devices.9⇓–11 Potential advantages of a flow-diverting stent based on TFN technology include the ability to fabricate devices with much higher pore densities and a lower percentage of metal coverage than is achieved with current-generation devices based on braided wire technology. The purpose of this study was to test a novel TFN-based flow-diverting stent in a rabbit model of saccular aneurysms.

Materials and Methods

Aneurysms (n = 19) were created in New Zealand white rabbits. Our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all animal procedures. The detailed procedure for aneurysm creation has been described previously.12 Briefly, anesthesia was induced with an intramuscular injection of ketamine (35 mg/kg), xylazine (6 mg/kg), and acepromazine (1.0 mg/kg) and was maintained with 2.5%–3.0% isoflurane conveyed in 100% oxygen. Using a sterile technique, we exposed and ligated the right common carotid artery distally. A 1- to 2-mm bevelled arteriotomy was made, and a 5F AVANTI vascular sheath (Cordis, Miami Lakes, Florida) was advanced retrogradely in the right common carotid artery to a point approximately 3 cm cephalad to the origin of right common carotid artery. Fluoroscopy (Advantx; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) was performed by injection of contrast through the sheath retrogradely in the right common carotid artery, to identify the junction between the right common carotid artery and the subclavian and brachiocephalic arteries. A 3F Fogarty balloon (Baxter Healthcare, Irvine, California) was advanced through the sheath to the level of the origin of the right common carotid artery with fluoroscopic guidance and was inflated with iodinated contrast material. Porcine elastase (5.23 units per mg protein, 40.1 mg protein/mL, approximately 200 units/mL; Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, New Jersey) was incubated within the lumen of the right common carotid artery above the inflated balloon for 20 minutes, after which the balloon and sheath were removed and the right common carotid artery was ligated below the sheath entry site.

Three weeks after creation, patency of all the aneurysms and parent arteries was confirmed by DSA before TFN-device deployment. A 5F sheath was advanced on one side of the femoral artery via cutdown, followed by a 5F Envoy guiding catheter with 0.056-inch ID (Codman & Shurtleff, Raynham, Massachusetts). A distal-access catheter with 0.044-inch ID (Concentric Medical, Mountain View, California) was advanced into the distal end of parent artery (right subclavian artery) over a 0.038-inch guidewire with a hydrophilic coating (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) through the guide catheter.

Prototype TFN flow diverters were fabricated and provided for this study by NeuroSigma (Los Angeles, California). Detailed methods for the fabrication of TFN have been published previously.13⇓–15 In brief, TFN is sputter-deposited on 4-inch silicon wafers by using a custom DC magnetron sputter system. Silicon wafers are micropatterned by using deep reactive ion etching before the sputter-deposition process. Following deposition, the TFN is removed from the silicon wafer and annealed at 500°C. This process yields a cylindric TFN micromesh that is subsequently used to cover a laser-cut nitinol backbone stent (Fig 1). The red box outlines an area of 1 mm2. The pore attenuation and percentage of metal coverage of the TFN flow diverter were calculated from scanning electron microscope images of a device at full expansion. The number of pores in an area of 1 mm2 was counted from the scanning electron microscope image, and the percentage of metal coverage was calculated from the following formula: 1 − Percent Metal Coverage of Stent Backbone. At full expansion, the TFN flow diverter had a pore attenuation of approximately 70 pores/mm2 and a percentage of metal coverage of <20%. Results from in vitro and in vivo testing of devices constructed by using similar methods have been reported previously.9⇓–11

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

A, A prototype TFN flow diverter. B, The scanning electron microscopy image of TFN.

The first TFN device (4.5-mm outside diameter × 12 mm) was deployed across the aneurysm neck by pushing the device out of the distal access catheter with the 0.038-inch guidewire with hydrophilic coating. The second device (4.5-mm outside diameter × 12 mm) was deployed across a lumbar artery within the abdominal aorta. DSA was performed through the guide catheter immediately after deployment. No damage to the device occurred during deployment. Aspirin (10 mg/kg) and clopidogrel (10 mg/kg) were given daily 2 days before implantation and continued until 30 days after treatment.

Sacrifice was performed at 2 weeks (n = 7), 4 weeks (n = 8), and 12 weeks (n = 4) after treatment. On the day of sacrifice, anesthesia was administered as a cocktail of ketamine (74 mg/kg), xylazine (5 mg/kg), and acepromazine (1 mg/kg). Surgical access of the left common femoral artery was achieved. DSA was performed for both the brachiocephalic trunk and abdominal aorta. Degrees of aneurysm occlusion immediately after device deployment and before sacrifice were graded on a 3-point scale based on DSA images, including grade I (complete flow cessation, no flow within the aneurysm), grade II (near-complete flow, <10% residual flow), and grade III (incomplete occlusion, ≥10% residual flow).13 Patency of the parent and lumbar arteries (including stenosis or occlusion) was assessed from DSA. Immediately following angiography, the subjects were euthanized by using a lethal injection of pentobarbital. The aneurysm, stented parent artery, and the aorta were harvested and fixed in 10% formalin. Toluidine blue staining was performed to evaluate thrombus organization within the aneurysm and neointima coverage of aneurysm neck and the orifice of lumbar artery.

Gross pathology and en face CD31 immunofluorescent staining were performed on a subset of devices selected at random from each of the follow-up time points to quantify neck endothelialization (1 at 2 weeks, 3 at 4 weeks, 2 at 12 weeks). Whole-mount immunofluorescent staining was performed by using an anti-CD31 antibody. The coverage percentage of endothelialized neointima across the neck was calculated by using the value of the neck area of endothelialization measured under the microscope and the whole neck area. Histopathology of explanted devices was performed on the device at each of the 3 time points by using plastic-section mounting and toluidine blue staining.

Results

Mean aneurysm sizes (including aneurysm neck, width, and height) and angiographic outcomes from the 19 aneurysms are shown in the Table.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Aneurysm size and angiographic outcome

Grades I or II occlusion rates were noted in 57% (n = 4) of aneurysms at the 2-week follow-up time point (Fig 2A–C). At the 4-week time point, 6 (75%) aneurysms had complete or near-complete occlusion (grades I or II) (Fig 3A–C). At the 12-week time point, 3 (75%) aneurysms showed grades I or II occlusion. The distal parent artery was occluded in 1 aneurysm immediately after device deployment but reopened at the 3-month follow-up. Overall, grades I or II occlusion rates were achieved in 13 (68%) of the 19 aneurysms. All other parent and lumbar arteries remained patent without stenosis (Figs 2E–G and 3E–G).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

A, Digital subtraction angiogram shows the aneurysm before treatment (notched right arrow). B, DSA image immediately after device deployment shows blood flow reduction in the aneurysm (left block arrow). C, DSA image at 2 weeks of deployment shows near-complete aneurysm occlusion (grade II) (left arrow). D, Gross pathology along with en face CD 31 immunofluorescent staining (original magnification water lens 20×) shows that 46% of aneurysm neck area is covered by endothelialized tissue (red and yellow arrows). E, DSA image shows the lumbar arteries before deployment in the abdominal aorta (striped right arrow). F, DSA image immediately after device deployment shows patent lumbar arteries (striped right arrow). G, DSA image at 2 weeks of deployment shows that the lumbar arteries remain patent (striped right arrow).

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

A, Digital subtraction angiogram shows the aneurysm before treatment (notched right arrow). B, DSA image immediately after device deployment shows significant blood flow reduction in the aneurysm (left block arrow). C, DSA image at 4 weeks of deployment shows complete aneurysm occlusion (grade I) (left arrow). D, Gross pathology along with en face CD 31 immunofluorescent staining (original magnification water lens 20×) shows that 89% of the aneurysm neck area was covered by endothelialized tissue (areas 1, 2, and 3). E, DSA image shows the lumbar arteries before deployment in the abdominal aorta (striped right arrow). F, DSA image immediately after device deployment shows patent lumbar arteries (striped right arrow). G, DSA image at 4 weeks of deployment shows that the lumbar arteries remain patent (striped right arrow).

For the 6 aneurysms with histologic processing, the average implant duration was 6.3 weeks. The mean neck orifice area was 6.3 ± 2.5 mm2, and 75 ± 16% of the aneurysm neck region was covered by endothelialized tissue at the time of sacrifice (Figs 2D and 3D). Toluidine blue staining of aneurysms with explanted devices confirmed these findings, which included minimal neointimal hyperplasia and good incorporation of the TFN and support stent. Thrombus formation within the aneurysm was also indicated (Fig 4).

Fig 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 4.

Histologic section (toluidine blue staining, original magnification 1.25×) of the TFN flow diverter explanted after 4 weeks. This axial image demonstrates minimal neointimal hyperplasia deep to the TFN (red arrows) and support stent (blue arrows). The aneurysm cavity is partially filled with thrombus in various stages of organization. A small part of the aneurysm lumen is empty (black arrow).

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that a single TFN flow diverter could achieve high rates of complete or near-complete aneurysm occlusion as early as 2 weeks after implantation. Furthermore, rapid and near-complete endothelialization was noted across aneurysm necks, while branch arteries remained patent in all cases. All these results offer evidence that the TFN flow diverter holds substantial promise for clinical use.

Numerous flow-diverting devices have previously been tested in the elastase aneurysm model and have subsequently been applied clinically.16⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–22 Aneurysm occlusion, neointimal hyperplasia of the parent artery (stenosis or occlusion), distal parent artery emboli, and patency of the branch artery can be assessed in this aneurysm model. Compared with current flow-diverter devices, the NeuroSigma TFN flow diverter achieves a very high pore attenuation while, at the same time, allowing a low percentage of metal coverage. Thus, very small distances are needed for endothelial cells to cross between structural elements of the TFN.

This study has several limitations. The number of subjects at each time point was relatively small, and the duration of implantation was limited. The aneurysms in this study were small, even though the mean height of the aneurysm was approximately 10 mm. The longest time point for follow-up was only 3 months in this study. Finally, the morphology of the aneurysms does not provide the range expected clinically, and the tortuosity of the carotid siphon and other vessel territories in humans may cause substantial challenges in achieving adequate wall apposition of the device.

Conclusions

In this rabbit model, the TFN devices achieved high rates of acute angiographic occlusion. Vessel branches covered by the devices remained patent. High degrees of endothelialization across the aneurysm neck were achieved, which indicates that in this model, the TFN can promote tissue in-growth and aneurysm neck healing.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures: Yonghong Ding—RELATED: Grant: This work was partially supported by a National Institutes of Health Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) grant (1R41NS074576). David F. Kallmes—RELATED: Grant: NeuroSigma,* Comments: National Institutes of Health Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant subcontract; UNRELATED: Board Membership: GE Healthcare (cost-effectiveness board); Consultancy: ev3/Covidien/Medtronic, Comments: planning and implementing clinical trials; Grants/Grants Pending: MicroVention,* Sequent,* SurModics,* Codman,* ev3/Covidien/Medtronic,* Comments: preclinical and clinical research; Royalties: University of Virginia Patent Foundation (Spine Fusion); Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: ev3/Covidien/Medtronic,* Comments: travel to the FDA panel meeting. Colin P. Kealey—RELATED: The work was partially funded by a STTR grant from the National Institutes of Health (1R41NS074576)*; UNRELATED: Employment: NeuroSigma (full-time employee); Patents (planned, pending or issued): I am a coinventor on patents related to this technology that are owned and/or licensed by NeuroSigma*; Stock/Stock Options: I have stock options in NeuroSigma. Vikas Gupta—RELATED: Grant: National Institutes of Health *; Consulting Fee or Honorarium: NeuroSigma, Comments: Work during May 2014 to March 2015 was performed as an independent consultant. Since April 2015, the work has been performed as full-time employee; Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: NeuroSigma; UNRELATED: Consultancy: NeuroSigma; Employment: NeuroSigma; Stock/Stock Options: NeuroSigma; Travel/Accommodations/Meeting Expenses Unrelated to Activities Listed: NeuroSigma. Alfred David Johnson—RELATED: Grant: National Institutes of Health (1R41NS074576)*; Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: Travel expenses were paid for experiments at the Mayo Clinic by NeuroSigma; UNRELATED: Other: salary from TiNi Alloy Company for work unrelated to the submitted work. Ramanathan Kadirvel—RELATED: Grant: National Institutes of Health (NS076491).* *Money paid to the institution.

  • This work was supported by NeuroSigma Inc. and a National Institutes of Health Grant (R41 NS074576).

  • Paper previously presented at: American Society of Neuroradiology Annual Meeting and the Foundation of the ASNR Symposium, April 25–30, 2015; Chicago, Illinois.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Hanel R,
    3. Lopes D, et al
    . International retrospective study of the Pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:108–15 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111 pmid:25355814
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Saatci I,
    2. Yavuz K,
    3. Ozer C, et al
    . Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1436–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3246 pmid:22821921
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Berge J,
    2. Biondi A,
    3. Machi P, et al
    . Flow-diverter Silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1150–55 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2907 pmid:22300924
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lubicz B,
    2. Van der Elst O,
    3. Collignon L, et al
    . Silk flow-diverter stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a series of 58 patients with emphasis on long-term results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:542–46 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4143 pmid:25376806
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Briganti F,
    2. Leone G,
    3. Marseglia M, et al
    . p64 flow modulation device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: initial experience and technical aspects. J Neurointerv Surg 2015 Apr 20. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011743 pmid:25895510
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Tan LA,
    2. Keigher KM,
    3. Munich SA, et al
    . Thromboembolic complications with Pipeline embolization device placement: impact of procedure time, number of stents and pre-procedure P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value. J Neurointervent Surg 2015;7:217–21 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011111 pmid:24553344
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Cirillo L,
    2. Leonardi M,
    3. Dall'olio M, et al
    . Complications in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Silk stents: an analysis of 30 consecutive patients. Interv Neuroradiol 2012;18:413–25 pmid:23217636
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. De Vries JD,
    2. Boogaarts J,
    3. Van Norden AV, et al
    . New generation of flow diverter (Surpass) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a prospective single-center study in 37 patients. Stroke 2013;44:1567–77 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000434 pmid:23686973
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Shayan M,
    2. Chun Y
    . An overview of thin film nitinol endovascular devices. Acta Biomater 2015;21:20–34 doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.03.025 pmid:25839120
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kealey CP,
    2. Chun YJ,
    3. Viñuela FE, et al
    . In vitro and in vivo testing of a novel, hyperelastic thin film nitinol flow diversion stent. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2012;100:718–25 doi:10.1002/jbm.b.32504 pmid:22121079
    CrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Kealey CP,
    2. Whelan SA,
    3. Chun YJ, et al
    . In vitro hemocompatibility of thin film nitinol in stenotic flow conditions. Biomaterials 2010;31:8864–71 doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.014 pmid:20810163
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Ding YH,
    2. Dai D,
    3. Kadirvel R, et al
    . Five-year follow-up in elastase-induced aneurysms in rabbits. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1236–39 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2056 pmid:20223890
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Pelton AR,
    2. Duerig T
    1. Gupta V,
    2. Johnson AD,
    3. Martynov V, et al
    . Nitinol thin film three-dimensional devices: fabrication and applications. In: Pelton AR, Duerig T, eds. SMST-2003: Proceedings. Materials Park: ASM International 2004;639–50
  14. 14.↵
    1. Mohanchandra KP,
    2. Ho KK,
    3. Carman GP
    . Compositional uniformity in sputter-deposited NiTi shape memory alloy thin films. Materials Lett 2008;62:3481–83 doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2008.03.028
    CrossRef
  15. 15.↵
    1. Chun YJ,
    2. Levi DS,
    3. Mohanchandra KP, et al
    . Novel micro-patterning processes for thin film NiTi vascular devices. Smart Materials and Structures 2010;19:105021 doi:10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/105021
    CrossRef
  16. 16.↵
    1. Brinjikji W,
    2. Lanzino G,
    3. Cloft HJ, et al
    . Patency of the posterior communicating artery after flow diversion treatment of internal carotid artery aneurysms. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014;120:84–8 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.02.018 pmid:24731582
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D, et al
    . A new endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. Stroke 2007;38:2346–52 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.479576 pmid:17615366
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Kallmes DF,
    2. Ding YH,
    3. Dai D, et al
    . A second-generation, endoluminal, flow-disrupting device for treatment of saccular aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1153–58 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1530 pmid:19369609
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Simgen A,
    2. Ley D,
    3. Roth C, et al
    . Evaluation of a newly designed flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms in an elastase-induced aneurysm model, in New Zealand white rabbits. Neuroradiology 2014;56:129–37 doi:10.1007/s00234-013-1296-9 pmid:24496551
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Struffert T,
    2. Ott S,
    3. Kowarschik M, et al
    . Measurement of quantifiable parameters by time-density curves in the elastase-induced aneurysm model: first results in the comparison of a flow diverter and a conventional aneurysm stent. Eur Radiol 2013;23:521–27 doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2611-2 pmid:22895618
    CrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Ionita CN,
    2. Natarajan SK,
    3. Wang W, et al
    . Evaluation of a second-generation self-expanding variable-porosity flow diverter in a rabbit elastase aneurysm model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:1399–407 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2548 pmid:21757527
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Sadasivan C,
    2. Cesar L,
    3. Seong J, et al
    . An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 2009;40:952–58 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533760 pmid:19150864
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Received June 9, 2015.
  • Accepted after revision August 12, 2015.
  • © 2016 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 37 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 37, Issue 3
1 Mar 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Preclinical Testing of a Novel Thin Film Nitinol Flow-Diversion Stent in a Rabbit Elastase Aneurysm Model
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Y. Ding, D. Dai, D.F. Kallmes, D. Schroeder, C.P. Kealey, V. Gupta, A.D. Johnson, R. Kadirvel
Preclinical Testing of a Novel Thin Film Nitinol Flow-Diversion Stent in a Rabbit Elastase Aneurysm Model
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2016, 37 (3) 497-501; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4568

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Preclinical Testing of a Novel Thin Film Nitinol Flow-Diversion Stent in a Rabbit Elastase Aneurysm Model
Y. Ding, D. Dai, D.F. Kallmes, D. Schroeder, C.P. Kealey, V. Gupta, A.D. Johnson, R. Kadirvel
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2016, 37 (3) 497-501; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A4568
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATION:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Promoting endothelialization of flow-diverting stents: a review
  • Implications of the Collar Sign in Incompletely Occluded Aneurysms after Pipeline Embolization Device Implantation: A Follow-Up Study
  • Endothelialization following Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Connectivity for remote neurovascular procedures
  • Cavernous dural AVF treated by transfacial route
  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire