Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

Research ArticleNEUROINTERVENTION

Impact of Image Latency and Frame Rate on Simulated Remote Robotic-Assisted Neurovascular Procedures

Arturo Consoli, Guillaume Charbonnier, Thais Baena Moura, Khaled Gaber, Alexander O’Neill, Thomas R. Marotta, Julian Spears, Eileen Liu, Nicole Mariantonia Cancelliere and Vitor Mendes Pereira
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8722
Arturo Consoli
aFrom the Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (A.C.), Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
bUniversity of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (A.C.), Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France
cRADIS Lab (A.C., G.C., T.B.M., K.G., A.O., E.L., N.M.C., V.M.P.), St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Arturo Consoli
Guillaume Charbonnier
cRADIS Lab (A.C., G.C., T.B.M., K.G., A.O., E.L., N.M.C., V.M.P.), St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
dInterventional Neuroradiology Department (G.C.), Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thais Baena Moura
cRADIS Lab (A.C., G.C., T.B.M., K.G., A.O., E.L., N.M.C., V.M.P.), St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Khaled Gaber
cRADIS Lab (A.C., G.C., T.B.M., K.G., A.O., E.L., N.M.C., V.M.P.), St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander O’Neill
cRADIS Lab (A.C., G.C., T.B.M., K.G., A.O., E.L., N.M.C., V.M.P.), St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas R. Marotta
eDivision of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging (T.R.M., J.S.), St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas R. Marotta
Julian Spears
eDivision of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, Department of Medical Imaging (T.R.M., J.S.), St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Julian Spears
Eileen Liu
cRADIS Lab (A.C., G.C., T.B.M., K.G., A.O., E.L., N.M.C., V.M.P.), St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole Mariantonia Cancelliere
cRADIS Lab (A.C., G.C., T.B.M., K.G., A.O., E.L., N.M.C., V.M.P.), St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Nicole Mariantonia Cancelliere
Vitor Mendes Pereira
cRADIS Lab (A.C., G.C., T.B.M., K.G., A.O., E.L., N.M.C., V.M.P.), St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada
fDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (V.M.P.), St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The implementation of remote procedures represents the ultimate goal of the robotic development in the neurovascular field. Studies from remote cardiac interventions established a maximum latency threshold of 400 ms, however, no data are available for neurovascular procedures. The aim of this study was to define the maximum acceptable latency and minimum refreshment frame rate (RFR) for neuroendovascular procedures in a simulated remote setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a virtual simulator and an endovascular robotic arm, 7 operators performed 8 simulated aneurysm and stroke treatment interventions (4 manually and 4 robotic-assisted), during which video display of the intervention was randomly altered with different latencies (100, 250, 450, 600, 800 ms) and RFR (10, 15, 25, 30 frames per second [fps]). Operators rated the acceptability of each latency and RFR by using a modified acceptability score (mAS) and an independent observer recorded the number of dangerous uncontrolled movement (DUMs).

RESULTS: Maximum acceptable latency (defined as a minimum mAS of 85%) was defined at 100 ms for manually performed procedures and at 250 ms by using robotic-assistance, whereas minimum acceptable RFR was defined at 15 fps. A total of 55 intracranial DUMs were recorded, most of which occurred at latencies ≥450 ms (49/51) and with RFRs of 10 fps (4/4). Time intervals were shorter for manual procedures, although not significantly, and for experienced operators.

CONCLUSIONS: Latency during simulated neurovascular interventions influences operator performance, judgment, and confidence and maximum thresholds (250 ms) seem to be lower than those previously reported from remote cardiac interventions. In this experimental setting, RFR seemed to have a lower impact in terms of acceptance rates. Latency and RFR represent relevant parameters to define and monitor in remote environments to maximize safety.

ABBREVIATIONS:

AIS
acute ischemic stroke
AR
acceptability rate
DUMs
dangerous uncontrolled movements
EN
extracranial navigation
fps
frames per second
IL
intrinsic latency
IN
intracranial navigation
mAS
modified acceptability score
MT
mechanical thrombectomy
PCI
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
PT
precision task
RFR
refreshment frame rate
SL
simulated latency
VPN
virtual private network

Footnotes

  • Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at www.ajnr.org.

  • © 2025 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Full Text

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Impact of Image Latency and Frame Rate on Simulated Remote Robotic-Assisted Neurovascular Procedures
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Arturo Consoli, Guillaume Charbonnier, Thais Baena Moura, Khaled Gaber, Alexander O’Neill, Thomas R. Marotta, Julian Spears, Eileen Liu, Nicole Mariantonia Cancelliere, Vitor Mendes Pereira
Impact of Image Latency and Frame Rate on Simulated Remote Robotic-Assisted Neurovascular Procedures
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2025, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8722

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Connectivity for remote neurovascular procedures
Arturo Consoli, Guillaume Charbonnier, Thais Baena Moura, Khaled Gaber, Alexander O’Neill, Thomas R. Marotta, Julian Spears, Eileen Liu, Nicole Mariantonia Cancelliere, Vitor Mendes Pereira
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jul 2025, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8722
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • CONCLUSIONS
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Cavernous dural AVF treated by transfacial route
  • A Retrospective Study in Tentorial DAVFs
Show more NEUROINTERVENTION

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire