Optimal Prediction of Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage Using Clinical and Lumen Imaging Markers

REFERENCES

1. 1.↵
   North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–53 doi:10.1056/NEJM199108153250701 pmid:1852179

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995;273:1421–28 doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520420037035 pmid:7723155

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998;351:1379–87 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09292-1 pmid:9593407

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   2. Moody AR,
   3. Murphy RE,
   4. Morgan PS, et al

   . Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation 2003;107:3047–52 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000074222.61572.44 pmid:12796133

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   2. Ota H,
   3. Yarnykh VL,
   4. Ferguson MS, et al

   . Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage imaging at 3.0-T MR imaging: comparison of the diagnostic performance of three T1-weighted sequences. Radiology 2010;254:551–63 doi:10.1148/radiol.09090535 pmid:20093526

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   2. Yamada N,
   3. Higashi M,
   4. Otsubo R, et al

   . Association between signal hyperintensity on T1-weighted MR imaging of carotid plaques and ipsilateral ischemic events. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:287–92 pmid:17296997

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   2. Takaya N,
   3. Yuan C,
   4. Chu B, et al

   . Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI—initial results. Stroke 2006;37:818–23 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000204638.91099.91 pmid:16469957

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. McNally JS,
   3. McLaughlin MS,
   4. Hinckley PJ, et al

   . Intraluminal thrombus, intraplaque hemorrhage, plaque thickness, and current smoking optimally predict carotid stroke. Stroke 2015;46:84–90 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006286 pmid:25406146

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. McNally JS,
   3. Kim SE,
   4. Yoon HC, et al

   . Carotid magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient-echo signal is associated with acute territorial cerebral ischemic events detected by diffusion-weighted MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:376–82 doi:10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.967398 pmid:22495769

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    2. Sun J,
    3. Song Y,
    4. Chen H, et al

    . Adventitial perfusion and intraplaque hemorrhage: a dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI study in the carotid artery. Stroke 2013;44:1031–36 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000435 pmid:23471271

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Zhao X,
    3. Underhill HR,
    4. Zhao Q, et al

    . Discriminating carotid atherosclerotic lesion severity by luminal stenosis and plaque burden: a comparison utilizing high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla. Stroke 2011;42:347–53 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.597328 pmid:21183749

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    2. U-King-Im JM,
    3. Fox AJ,
    4. Aviv RI, et al

    . Characterization of carotid plaque hemorrhage: a CT angiography and MR intraplaque hemorrhage study. Stroke 2010;41:1623–29 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.579474 pmid:20576955

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Zhao XQ,
    3. Hatsukami TS,
    4. Hippe DS, et al

    ; AIM-HIGH Carotid MRI Sub-study Investigators. Clinical factors associated with high-risk carotid plaque features as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with established vascular disease (from the AIM-HIGH Study). Am J Cardiol 2014;114:1412–19 doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.08.001 pmid:25245415

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Zhu DC,
    3. Ferguson MS,
    4. DeMarco JK

    . An optimized 3D inversion recovery prepared fast spoiled gradient recalled sequence for carotid plaque hemorrhage imaging at 3.0 T. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:1360–66 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2008.05.002 pmid:18583079

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Hadley JR,
    3. Roberts JA,
    4. Goodrich KC, et al

    . Relative RF coil performance in carotid imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2005;23:629–39 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2005.04.009 pmid:16051037

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 1991;22:711–20 doi:10.1161/01.STR.22.6.711 pmid:2057968

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    2. Fox AJ

    . How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 1993;186:316–18 doi:10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421726 pmid:8421726

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Bartlett ES,
    3. Walters TD,
    4. Symons SP, et al

    . Quantification of carotid stenosis on CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:13–19 pmid:16418349

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Eliasziw M,
    4. Rothwell PM, et al

    . Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2086–94 pmid:16155163

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    2. Menon BK,
    3. Singh J,
    4. Al-Khataami A, et al

    ; Calgary CTA Study Group. The donut sign on CT angiography: an indicator of reversible intraluminal carotid thrombus? Neuroradiology 2010;52:1055–56 doi:10.1007/s00234-010-0738-x pmid:20625710

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Anzidei M,
    3. Napoli A,
    4. Zaccagna F, et al

    . Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients. Radiol Med 2012;117:54–71 doi:10.1007/s11547-011-0651-3 pmid:21424318

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Buttari B,
    3. Profumo E,
    4. Businaro R, et al

    . Oxidized haemoglobin-driven endothelial dysfunction and immune cell activation: novel therapeutic targets for atherosclerosis. Curr Med Chem 2013;20:4806–14 doi:10.2174/09298673113209990162 pmid:23834168

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Kerwin WS,
    3. O'Brien KD,
    4. Ferguson MS, et al

    . Inflammation in carotid atherosclerotic plaque: a dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging study. Radiology 2006;241:459–68 doi:10.1148/radiol.2412051336 pmid:16966482

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    2. Mendes J,
    3. Parker DL,
    4. McNally S, et al

    . Three-dimensional dynamic contrast enhanced imaging of the carotid artery with direct arterial input function measurement. Magn Reson Med 2014;72:816–22 doi:10.1002/mrm.v72.3 pmid:24375566

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    2. Cheng C,
    3. Tempel D,
    4. van Haperen R, et al

    . Atherosclerotic lesion size and vulnerability are determined by patterns of fluid shear stress. Circulation 2006;113:2744–53 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.590018 pmid:16754802

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    2. McNally JS,
    3. Davis ME,
    4. Giddens DP, et al

    . Role of xanthine oxidoreductase and NAD(P)H oxidase in endothelial superoxide production in response to oscillatory shear stress. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2003;285:H2290–97 doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00515.2003 pmid:12958034

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    2. Davies PF,
    3. Polacek DC,
    4. Shi C, et al

    . The convergence of haemodynamics, genomics, and endothelial structure in studies of the focal origin of atherosclerosis. Biorheology 2002;39:299–306 pmid:12122245

    PubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    2. Pedersen EM,
    3. Oyre S,
    4. Agerbaek M, et al

    . Distribution of early atherosclerotic lesions in the human abdominal aorta correlates with wall shear stresses measured in vivo. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999;18:328–33 doi:10.1053/ejvs.1999.0913 pmid:10550268

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    2. Wentzel JJ,
    3. Kloet J,
    4. Andhyiswara I, et al

    . Shear-stress and wall-stress regulation of vascular remodeling after balloon angioplasty: effect of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Circulation 2001;104:91–96 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.104.1.91 pmid:11435344

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    2. Clarke EM,
    3. Thompson RC,
    4. Allam AH, et al

    . Is atherosclerosis fundamental to human aging? Lessons from ancient mummies. J Cardiol 2014;63:329–34 doi:10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.12.012 pmid:24582386

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    2. Sobenin IA,
    3. Zhelankin AV,
    4. Sinyov VV, et al

    . Mitochondrial aging: focus on mitochondrial DNA damage in atherosclerosis—a mini-review. Gerontology 2015;61:343–49 doi:10.1159/000368923 pmid:25531813

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    2. Akishita M,
    3. Yu J

    . Hormonal effects on blood vessels. Hypertens Res 2012;35:363–69 doi:10.1038/hr.2012.4 pmid:22297478

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    2. Howard BV,
    3. Rossouw JE

    . Estrogens and cardiovascular disease risk revisited: the Women's Health Initiative. Curr Opin Lipidol 2013;24:493–99 doi:10.1097/MOL.0000000000000022 pmid:24184944

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    2. Traish AM,
    3. Kypreos KE

    . Testosterone and cardiovascular disease: an old idea with modern clinical implications. Atherosclerosis 2011;214:244–48 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.08.078 pmid:20869058

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. 35.↵
    2. Roy-O'Reilly M,
    3. McCullough LD

    . Sex differences in stroke: the contribution of coagulation. Exp Neurol 2014;259:16–27 doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.02.011 pmid:24560819

    CrossRefPubMed