3D Quantitative Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Plaque Based on Rotational Angiography

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Harrison MJ,
   2. Marshall J

   . Prognostic significance of severity of carotid atheroma in early manifestations of cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 1982;13:567–69

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Rothwell PM,
   2. Gibson R,
   3. Warlow CP

   . Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis: on behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Stroke 2000;31:615–21

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. 3.↵
   1. Sacco RL,
   2. Kargman DE,
   3. Gu Q,
   4. et al

   . Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke 1995;26:14–20

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Chimowitz MI,
   2. Kokkinos J,
   3. Strong J,
   4. et al

   . The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Study. Neurology 1995;45:1488–93

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Troyer A,
   2. Saloner D,
   3. Pan XM,
   4. et al

   . Major carotid plaque surface irregularities correlate with neurologic symptoms. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:741–47

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. 6.↵
   1. Wyers MC,
   2. Powell RJ,
   3. Fillinger MF,
   4. et al

   . The value of 3D-CT angiographic assessment prior to carotid stenting. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:614–22

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Ryu CW,
   2. Jahng GH,
   3. Kim EJ,
   4. et al

   . High resolution wall and lumen MRI of the middle cerebral arteries at 3 Tesla. Cerebrovasc Dis 2009;27:433–42

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
8. 8.↵
   1. Lewis SJ

   . Prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis: a practitioner's guide for 2008. Am J Med 2009;122:S38–50

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   1. Phan T,
   2. Huston J 3rd.,
   3. Bernstein MA,
   4. et al

   . Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the cervical vessels: experience with 422 patients. Stroke 2001;32:2282–86

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Feldmann E,
    2. Wilterdink JL,
    3. Kosinski A,
    4. et al

    . The Stroke Outcomes and Neuroimaging of Intracranial Atherosclerosis (SONIA) trial. Neurology 2007;68:2099–106

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Saam T,
    2. Ferguson MS,
    3. Yarnykh VL,
    4. et al

    . Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005;25:234–39

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Becker CR

    . Assessment of coronary arteries with CT. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:773–82

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Nahrendorf M,
    2. Keliher E,
    3. Panizzi P,
    4. et al

    . 18F–4V for PET-CT imaging of VCAM-1 expression in atherosclerosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:1213–22

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Spence JD

    . Technology insight: ultrasound measurement of carotid plaque—patient management, genetic research, and therapy evaluation. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2006;2:611–19

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. de Labriolle A,
    2. Mohty D,
    3. Pacouret G,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of degree of stenosis and plaque volume for the assessment of carotid atherosclerosis using 2-D ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009;35:1436–42

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Stumpe KO,
    2. Agabiti-Rosei E,
    3. Zielinski T,
    4. et al

    . Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque volume changes following 2-year angiotensin II-receptor blockade: the Multicentre Olmesartan Atherosclerosis Regression Evaluation (MORE) study. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2007;1:97–106

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Brodoefel H,
    2. Burgstahler C,
    3. Sabir A,
    4. et al

    . Coronary plaque quantification by voxel analysis: dual-source MDCT angiography versus intravascular sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:W84–89

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    1. Isbell DC,
    2. Meyer CH,
    3. Rogers WJ,
    4. et al

    . Reproducibility and reliability of atherosclerotic plaque volume measurements in peripheral arterial disease with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2007;9:71–76

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    Quality improvement guidelines for adult diagnostic neuroangiography: co-operative study between the ASNR, ASITN, and the SCVIR—American Society of Neuroradiology. American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology. Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:146–50

    FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Easton JD,
    2. Saver JL,
    3. Albers GW,
    4. et al

    . Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council—Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and the Interdisciplinary Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this statement as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2009;40:2276–93. Epub 2009 May 7

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Nain D,
    2. Haker S,
    3. Bobick A,
    4. et al

    . Multiscale 3D shape analysis using spherical wavelets. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2005;8(pt 2):459–67
22. 22.↵
    1. Pauly M,
    2. Kobbelt L,
    3. Gross M

    . Point-based multiscale surface representation. ACM Trans Graph 2006;25:177–93

    CrossRef
23. 23.↵
    1. Osher SJ,
    2. Fedkiw RP

    . Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003
24. 24.↵
    1. Esedoglu S,
    2. Ruuth S,
    3. Tsai R

    . Diffusion generated motion using signed distance functions. J Comput Phys 2010;229:1017–42

    CrossRef
25. 25.↵
    1. Antiga L,
    2. Ene-Iordache B,
    3. Remuzzi A

    . Computational geometry for patient-specific reconstruction and meshing of blood vessels from MR and CT angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22:674–84

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Verdera J,
    2. Caselles V,
    3. Bertalmio M,
    4. et al

    . Inpainting surface holes. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. September 14–17, 2003
27. 27.↵
    1. Loh Y,
    2. Duckwiler GR

    . Extracranial stenosis: endovascular treatment. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2007;17:325–36, viii

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Eliasziw M,
    2. Rankin RN,
    3. Fox AJ,
    4. et al

    . Accuracy and prognostic consequences of ultrasonography in identifying severe carotid artery stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group. Stroke 1995;26:1747–52

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Rothwell PM,
    2. Gibson RJ,
    3. Slattery J,
    4. et al

    . Equivalence of measurements of carotid stenosis: a comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms—European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. Stroke 1994;25:2435–39

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Landry A,
    2. Spence JD,
    3. Fenster A

    . Measurement of carotid plaque volume by 3-dimensional ultrasound. Stroke 2004;35:864–69

    Abstract/FREE Full Text