Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleFunctional
Open Access

Age-Related Metabolic Profiles in Cognitively Healthy Elders: Results from a Voxel-Based [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron-Emission Tomography Study with Partial Volume Effects Correction

P.K. Curiati, J.H. Tamashiro-Duran, F.L.S. Duran, C.A. Buchpiguel, P. Squarzoni, D.C. Romano, H. Vallada, P.R. Menezes, M. Scazufca, G.F. Busatto and T.C.T.F. Alves
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2011, 32 (3) 560-565; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2321
P.K. Curiati
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.H. Tamashiro-Duran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F.L.S. Duran
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.A. Buchpiguel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Squarzoni
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.C. Romano
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Vallada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.R. Menezes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Scazufca
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.F. Busatto
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T.C.T.F. Alves
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Functional brain variability has been scarcely investigated in cognitively healthy elderly subjects, and it is currently debated whether previous findings of regional metabolic variability are artifacts associated with brain atrophy. The primary purpose of this study was to test whether there is regional cerebral age-related hypometabolism specifically in later stages of life.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR imaging and FDG-PET data were acquired from 55 cognitively healthy elderly subjects, and voxel-based linear correlations between age and GM volume or regional cerebral metabolism were conducted by using SPM5 in images with and without correction for PVE. To investigate sex-specific differences in the pattern of brain aging, we repeated the above voxelwise calculations after dividing our sample by sex.

RESULTS: Our analysis revealed 2 large clusters of age-related metabolic decrease in the overall sample, 1 in the left orbitofrontal cortex and the other in the right temporolimbic region, encompassing the hippocampus, the parahippocampal gyrus, and the amygdala. The division of our sample by sex revealed significant sex-specific age-related metabolic decrease in the left temporolimbic region of men and in the left dorsolateral frontal cortex of women. When we applied atrophy correction to our PET data, none of the above-mentioned correlations remained significant.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that age-related functional brain variability in cognitively healthy elderly individuals is largely secondary to the degree of regional brain atrophy, and the findings provide support to the notion that appropriate PVE correction is a key tool in neuroimaging investigations.

Abbreviations

AD
Alzheimer disease
APOE
apolipoprotein E
BA
Brodmann area
CERAD
Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease
CMRglc
cerebral metabolic rate for glucose consumption
DARTEL
Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra
FDG
[18F]fluorodeoxyglucose
FCHDR
Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Risk
FWHM
full width at half maximum
GM
gray matter
HWE
Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium
MCI
mild cognitive impairment
MNI
Montreal Neurological Institute
PET
positron-emission tomography
PVE
partial volume effects
SNP
single nucleotide polymorphism
SPAH
São Paulo Ageing and Health study
SPM
statistical parametric mapping
SVC
small-volume correction
VBM
voxel-based morphometry

PET with FDG has emerged as a key tool for examining cerebral processes and is used to measure CMRglc, which indicates the level of neurosynaptic activity.1 A thorough understanding of the influence of age on glucose metabolism is important to ensure a better distinction between normal and pathologic brain changes associated with the process of human aging. The first wave of PET studies designed to investigate normal brain aging was during the 1980s and was characterized by an overall agreement that there is no glucose hypometabolism in individuals without dementia.2–6 Nevertheless, more recent studies have reported decrements in glucose metabolism in several prefrontal, parietal, and temporal areas during the life span, with relative preservation of limbic structures, the cerebellum, and occipital cortex.7–12

One possible explanation for the difference between newer and older reports of aging-associated brain functional variability is the improvement in PET scanners13 and the development of automated methods of analysis,14 which together have clearly increased the power to detect CMRglc changes associated with normal aging. However, it has been suggested that such aging-related CMRglc variability in cognitively healthy individuals could be due to PVE, which cause an apparent metabolic reduction in areas with steep GM atrophy and artificial metabolic preservation in areas with less pronounced GM reduction.6,12,15–17 According to this view, CMRglc decrements that persist after correction of PET images for PVE, representing hypometabolism that exceeds brain atrophy, should be interpreted as indicative of pathologic brain aging,18,19 thus placing PVE correction as a critical methodologic tool to differentiate normal and pathologic brain aging in PET studies. Accordingly, recent PET studies of glucose metabolism using PVE correction have suggested that regional hypometabolism exceeds brain atrophy in patients with MCI or AD,20–22 but not in normal aging.15,16 Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, no PET study has confirmed these findings in a representative sample of cognitively healthy elderly individuals.

With the purpose of dealing with the above-mentioned issue, this study tested whether there is regional cerebral age-related hypometabolism specifically in later stages of life through the analysis of PET images from a sample comprising individuals older than 65 years of age. To ensure that the effects of brain atrophy and demographic variables were taken into consideration, we chose to perform our functional analysis with and without correction for PVE and accounted for the effects of demographic variables through statistical approaches described in the next section.

Materials and Methods

Subjects and Assessment Schedules

The pool of possible participants for our cross-sectional investigation was from a sample of 248 elderly subjects without dementia classified according to their cardiovascular risk and selected for an ongoing morphometric MR imaging study by our research group. They were recruited initially from the data base of the SPAH,23,24 an epidemiologic investigation aimed at determining the incidence and prevalence of dementia, other mental disorders, and risk factors for these conditions. On the day of MR imaging, subjects were assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale25 and the Global Assessment of Function Scale from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV.26

The epidemiologic database from the SPAH was inspected so that we could ascertain the following exclusions: incomplete 2-year clinical follow-up; active hypo- or hyperthyroidism; epilepsy; diabetes mellitus; lung or liver diseases; major psychiatric disorders; and personal or first-degree family history of neurodegenerative disorders, such as AD. Subjects with gross brain lesions identified at MR imaging, such as tumors and silent brain infarcts, were also excluded.

Identification and exclusion of patients with dementia and other major psychiatric disorders followed the protocol developed by the 10/66 Dementia Research Group.27 This protocol included the following instruments: the Community Screening Interview for Dementia28; an adapted version of the CERAD 10-word list29; the animal naming verbal fluency task from the CERAD; the Geriatric Mental State30; a structured neurologic assessment; and a structured cardiology evaluation. The criterion for cognitive impairment was defined as a performance in the cognitive battery 1.5 SDs below the mean performance obtained from all subjects between 65 and 75 years of age from the original SPAH sample.

Data concerning age, blood pressure, smoking, and cholesterol level were extracted to generate the FCHDR score, a summary index that was devised to synthesize the combination of different cardiovascular risk factors.31 This score is especially suitable for the elderly population, which shows several overlapping risk factors,32 and represents a comprehensive and objective measure to be accounted for in the statistical analyses. The FCHDR calculated for each subject was then used to classify them into the following 3 subgroups according to their cardiovascular risk: low (FCHDR score, <9%); medium (FCHDR score, 10%–19%); and high (FCHDR score, >20%).

To reach sufficient statistical power, we used the software G*Power3 (http://www.softpedia.com/get/Science-CAD/G-Power.shtml)33 to perform a priori power analysis for the identification of significant correlations between age and glucose metabolism. Therefore, collection of PET data was devised for a minimum sample size of 34 to reach a power of 0.80 with an α error probability of .05 and an effect size of 0.40. On the basis of this process, we selected 20 elderly subjects from each of 3 subsets divided according to cardiovascular risk. Two subjects were excluded because their performance in the cognitive battery was in the MCI range (slightly lower than 1.5 SDs below the mean performance obtained from all subjects between 65 and 75 years of age from the original SPAH sample); thus, the resulting sample was 19 low-risk, 20 medium-risk, and 19 high-risk individuals from 66 to 79 years of age with available PET data for the current study.

Genomic DNA was extracted from ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid–anticoagulated whole blood. The SNPs (rs429358 and rs7412) that determine the APOE isoforms were genotyped by Prevention Genetics (www.preventiongenetics.com) using the Amplifluor SNPs genotyping system (Chemicon International, Temecula, California). Tests for deviation from the HWE were performed for the whole sample of the SPAH. The 2 loci were tested and did not deviate from the HWE. This study received approval from the local committee for ethics and research, and written consent was obtained from all subjects.

Imaging Data Acquisition

MR imaging data were acquired by using a 1.5T Signa LX CVi scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin). The acquisition protocol included the following: 1) a dual spin-echo sequence of 120 transaxial sections across the entire brain (axial proton attenuation/T2), with TR/TE of 2800 ms/25 ms, 5-mm section thickness; 2) a T2-weighted fast spin-echo transaxial sequence with 88 images, TR/TE of 4200 ms/12.5 ms, echo-train length of 16, and a 5-mm section thickness; 3) a 3D gradient-echo (spoiled gradient-recalled echo acquisition) sequence of 124 sections with TR/TE of 121 ms/4.2 ms, a flip angle of 20°, a 220-mm FOV, 1.5-mm section thickness, NEX of 1 in a 256 × 192 matrix. Datasets were reconstructed and checked visually by an experienced radiologist, with the aim of identifying major artifacts during image acquisition and the presence of any gross brain lesions, such as tumors and silent brain infarcts (stroke or lacunar infarcts).

PET data were acquired on average 354.75 ± 215.84 days after the MR imaging acquisition by using a dedicated lutetium oxyorthosilicate-16-section PET-CT scanner (Biograph-16; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a spatial resolution of 2.5-mm FWHM, 3.38-mm section thickness, and 500-mm axial FOV. Following exactly the same protocol, we determined blood glucose levels after at least 12 hours of fasting; then we administered an intravenous injection of 370 MBq (10 mCi) of FDG. Subjects remained in a quiet dimly lit room with their eyes closed, and PET imaging was initiated 60 minutes after FDG administration, by using 1-bed-position 3D protocol with 15 minutes of acquisition. Data were collected in 256 × 256 matrices, by using a smoothing factor of 5. Voxel size was set to 1.06 × 1.06 × 3.38 mm (x, y, z). Interactive reconstruction was applied by using 6.0 subsets and an interaction number of 16. Images were corrected for attenuation by using the CT algorithm.

Image Processing

All imaging data were processed with SPM software (SPM5; http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm), operating in the Matlab software environment, Version 7.6 (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts).

For VBM analysis, MR images were first resectioned (2 × 2 × 2 mm); then we applied DARTEL,34 an algorithm for accurate diffeomorphic image registration widely validated as a toolbox for SPM5,35,36 to create a set of group-specific templates. The brain images were segmented, normalized, and modulated by using these templates. Additional warping from the MNI space was given to the brain images. Finally, GM probability values were smoothed by using a 12-mm FWHM Gaussian kernel.

The processing of PET datasets without PVE correction used a customized template created specifically for the present study. To build this template, we spatially transformed the original PET images to the standard SPM templates, on the basis of the MNI models.37 Such a spatial normalization step was restricted to linear 12-parameter affine transformations to minimize deformations of the original images. Subsequently, images were smoothed with an isotropic Gaussian kernel of 8-mm FWHM and averaged to provide the mean PET template in stereotactic MNI space. The processing of the original images was then carried out by using the study-specific template and comprised spatial normalization with 12-parameter linear as well as nonlinear (7 × 9 × 7 basis function) transformations. Images were resectioned by using trilinear interpolation to a final voxel size of 2 × 2 × 2 mm and smoothed by using a 12-mm Gaussian kernel.

For the analysis of PET data with correction for PVE, all images underwent a series of preprocessing steps before spatial normalization. First, individual MR images were subjected to coregistration onto their corresponding PET images. Then, coregistered PET images were corrected for PVE through the modified Müller-Gartner method, an optimized voxel-based algorithm that is fully implemented in pvelab software (http://nru.dk/downloads/software). This method is described in detail by Quarantelli et al38 and has been validated against several other algorithms as the most suitable for voxel-based analyses. PET datasets were then normalized with the optimal spatial parameters (7 × 9 ×7 basis function) of their corresponding MR imaging obtained from the DARTEL tool in SPM5 and smoothed with a 12-mm isotropic Gaussian kernel.

Statistical Analysis

Voxel-based linear negative and positive correlations between age and relative GM volume or relative metabolism in the overall sample of cognitively healthy elderly subjects were conducted by using SPM5 with the inclusion of the FCHDR group and the number of APOE ε4 alleles as covariates of no interest. The inclusion of such covariates was based on the fact that demographic variables significantly affect brain metabolic profiles in the general population.10,39,40 For the analysis of PET images, the resulting statistics at each voxel were thresholded at a 1-tailed P < .001 level of significance and displayed as SPMs into standard anatomic space, with a minimum cluster size of 20 voxels. This analysis was conducted by using the “proportional scaling” routine of SPM5 to control for individual variations in total FDG uptake. For the analysis of MR imaging data, which was devised to compare uncorrected metabolic data with GM structural variability, a less stringent 1-tailed P < .005 level of significance was accepted to enhance sensitivity. This analysis was conducted by using the amount of GM in the brain as a covariate.

Each SPM was inspected initially in a hypothesis-driven fashion, searching for clusters of voxels in brain regions where volumetric and metabolic decreases or relative increases due to aging had been described in normal aging (anterior cingulate gyrus, frontal and lateral temporal cortices, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and amygdala). This hypothesis-driven analysis was conducted by using the SVC approach, with the purpose of constraining the total number of voxels included in the analysis. Each region was circumscribed by merging the spatially normalized region-of-interest masks41 that are available within the Anatomical Automatic Labeling SPM toolbox. Five masks were used in each hemisphere, involving, respectively, the anterior cingulate gyrus, dorsolateral frontal cortex, dorsomedial frontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, lateral temporal neocortex (superior, middle, and inferior temporal gyri), and temporolimbic region (amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus). Subsequently, the SPM maps were inspected for metabolic changes in unpredicted regions across the entire brain. For the analysis of PET images, any clusters of voxels with significant findings were reported if they survived family-wise error correction for multiple comparisons or cluster-level correction at the Pcorrected < .05 level.42 For the analysis of MR imaging data, a less stringent uncorrected P < .005 threshold level was accepted.

Finally, with the aim of identifying sex-specific age-related profiles that could be underestimated in the analysis of the overall sample, we repeated voxelwise calculations of linear correlation indices after dividing our sample by sex.

Results

Demographic and Clinical Data

The sample investigated in the current study included 58 cognitively healthy elderly subjects (mean age, 70.72 ± 2.77 years), among whom 3 were excluded from our analysis because of failure in genotyping the APOE isoforms. Thus, the final study sample comprised 55 subjects (33 men and 22 women) spanning 11 years of elderly life (age range, 66–77 years) with a mean age of 70.55 ± 2.56 years. Male and female subgroups did not differ in demographic characteristics such as age, years of education, global assessment of functioning, and APOE genotype. There was a statistically significant difference between men and women regarding the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale for depression scores, but both subgroups scored within the range of normal values in this scale. Men had higher FCHDR than women, with a greater proportion of subjects in the high-risk group. A summary of their demographic and clinical characteristics is given in On-line Table 1.

Voxel-Based Morphometry Analysis of MR Imaging Data for the Effects of Age on Relative GM Volumes

On-line Table 2 summarizes the significant clusters of relative age-related GM changes detected by using VBM. Local areas of negative correlations in the overall sample, indicating accelerated GM volume decrease, were observed in the right temporolimbic region, left dorsolateral frontal cortex, bilateral orbitofrontal cortex, and left temporal neocortex. We found no significant positive correlations indicating relative GM preservation in the overall sample.

The voxelwise search for significant negative correlations between regional GM volumes and age separately in men and women revealed local areas of negative correlations in the bilateral dorsolateral frontal cortex and temporal neocortex in men and in the right temporolimbic region and temporal neocortex in women. We found no significant positive correlations indicating relative GM preservation in male and female subgroups.

Voxel-Based Analysis of PVE Uncorrected FDG-PET Images for the Effects of Age on Relative Metabolism (On-line Table 3 and Fig 1)

The voxelwise search for correlations in the overall sample of cognitively healthy elderly individuals revealed 2 large clusters of age-related metabolic decrease, 1 in the right temporolimbic region, encompassing the hippocampus, the parahippocampal gyrus, and the amygdala; and another in the left orbitofrontal cortex, encompassing BA 47 of the inferior prefrontal gyrus. The division of our sample by sex revealed a significant sex-specific age-related metabolic decrease in 2 different brain structures, the left temporolimbic region of men and the left dorsolateral frontal cortex of women, encompassing BA 9 and the middle frontal gyrus. Our analyses did not yield any statistically significant positive correlations.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

SPMs of the whole-brain search of significant negative correlations between relative metabolism and age in the overall sample of cognitively healthy elderly individuals (n = 55) at the z > 3.09 threshold, corresponding to P < .001, with an extent threshold of 100 voxels. A, Foci of negative correlations with the inclusion of the FCHDR group and number of APOE ε4 alleles as covariates of no interest in the analysis of PET images uncorrected for PVE. B, Lack of foci of negative correlations without the inclusion of covariates of no interest in the analysis of PET images corrected for PVE.

Voxel-Based Analysis of PVE-Corrected FDG-PET Images for the Effects of Age on Relative Metabolism

The voxelwise search for correlations between age and regional metabolism by using the PET datasets corrected for PVE in the overall sample did not yield statistically significant results or trends in any of the statistical analyses, either for positive or negative correlations, even at the uncorrected threshold (Fig 1).

Discussion

This cross-sectional MR imaging and FDG-PET study investigated the relationship between aging, relative GM volume, and relative metabolism in a large sample of cognitively healthy elderly subjects by testing linear correlations in images with and without correction for PVE. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to investigate metabolic profiles in a representative sample of the general elderly population. Also, this is the first neuroimaging investigation to perform PVE correction of PET images strictly in such an elderly population.

The voxelwise analyses of PET data without PVE correction revealed significant negative correlations in several brain structures, involving the orbitofrontal cortex, dorsolateral frontal cortex, and temporolimbic region. The location of these foci of inverse correlation is highly consistent with our current VBM findings and with data obtained in an expanded sample of subjects recruited from the same pool of elderly individuals investigated in the present PET study.43 When we applied PVE correction to our PET data, none of the above-mentioned significant correlations between FDG uptake and aging remained significant. Taken together, our findings of brain metabolic reductions due to aging are largely secondary to GM atrophy and that despite the volume loss that characterizes the aging process, the remaining cerebral tissue is shown to have a normal glucose consumption rate in cognitively healthy elders.

In a previous morphometric MR imaging study, significant foci of negative correlations between GM volumes and aging were found in the parahippocampal gyrus, in the amygdala, in the right orbitofrontal cortex, and in a few other neocortical regions, such as the dorsomedial frontal cortex and the temporal neocortex, even with the use of more stringent statistical thresholds, suggesting that for such a VBM analysis, a higher number of subjects might be needed to achieve adequate statistical power. Regarding the anterior cingulate, in which age-related metabolic reduction has been shown in younger samples,7,8 the lack of negative correlations in our analyses might reflect a specific pattern of the elderly population. According to the study of Fujimoto et al,7 the effect size of this correlation in normal aging during adult life is particularly high. Therefore, a small number of subjects would be necessary to accurately detect it, and it is unlikely that our lack of results is secondary to a type II error.

Although PVE are particularly critical in conditions in which GM atrophy is involved, such as normal aging and AD,16 the PVE correction for functional neuroimaging data has only recently gained a great deal of attention. This is mainly due to recent propositions regarding the potential of PVE correction to accurately differentiate normal and pathologic age-related processes through the dissociation between metabolic changes and brain atrophy.12,44 It has been shown that regional hypometabolism exceeds brain atrophy in patients with MCI,20,21 AD,22,45 and other types of dementia,46 but not in normal aging.12,15,47

Most interesting, the study of Kalpouzos et al8 was the only investigation on normal brain aging that reported areas of metabolic decline or preservation through the analysis of PVE-corrected PET images. Their analysis included 45 subjects with a mean age of 49.4 years, ranging from 20 to 83 years of age, and did not account for demographic variables. Indeed, all of the latter PET studies that used PVE-corrected data have investigated glucose metabolic changes associated with normal brain aging in samples spanning several decades of life,12,15,47 and there is a remarkable lack of information on the effects of PVE correction in PET studies conducted specifically during elderly stages of life. Our results give support to the notion that there is actually no regional brain hypometabolism specifically during the age range investigated and that the analysis of PVE-corrected PET images may play an important role in the differentiation between normal and pathologic brain changes associated with the aging processes.

The lack of cerebral hypometabolism during normal brain aging, assessed through the analysis of PVE-corrected PET data, might be related to the maintenance of global function and cognitive skills in elders without dementia. Further studies are necessary to test the relationship between cognitive deficits and CMRglc decrements that exceed brain atrophy to confirm this hypothesis.

Methodologic Considerations

The present study had methodologic limitations that warrant caution in the interpretation of its results. We cannot discard the presence of underlying degenerative diseases, such as preclinical AD, in some of the subjects included in the sample. To diminish the chance that our findings were secondary to such conditions, we selected the sample investigated among cognitively healthy individuals according to a transcultural protocol developed by the 10/66 Dementia Research Group27 and tested for APOE genotype, which was included in our analysis as a covariate of no interest. One potential factor that could have influenced the results of our study was the inclusion of subjects with conditions that might affect brain volume and function through vascular changes, such as dyslipidemia and hypertension.39,48 However, because we aimed to investigate brain aging in a representative sample of cognitively healthy elderly subjects, the exclusion of individuals with such prevalent chronic diseases would lead to results that might not reflect the reality of the overall elderly population. Because we had a pool of elderly individuals preclassified according to their cardiovascular risk, we were able to select our sample including the same proportion of subjects in each category of low, medium, and high cardiovascular risk. Moreover, the influence of cardiovascular risk was accounted for in our analysis by covarying results to the FCHDR.

This study used a cross-sectional design, in which correlations between CMRglc and age at specific time points were used to make inferences about how the aging process affects the brain structure with time. Therefore, replication of our results is warranted in longitudinal voxel-based studies involving the acquisition of serial PET measurements with time in the same subject samples.49

Finally, the lack of significant correlations in the analysis of PVE-corrected PET images could have been caused by a lack of power to reach a statistically significant threshold after correction of the correlations between age and regional metabolism for family-wise error. Nevertheless, it is not likely that metabolic changes were underestimated in our investigation, once the lack of statistically significant correlations was confirmed with the inspection of all SPMs with a less stringent cluster-level-corrected threshold. Also, the SVC approach, used with the purpose of constraining the total number of voxels included in the analysis, was intended to increase the sensitivity of our analysis in regions where CMRglc variability has been previously described.

Further studies with larger samples of elderly individuals and spanning a broader segment of elderly life are necessary to confirm our findings and are particularly critical to detect subtle age-related metabolic profiles characterized by a low effect size and, therefore, the need for higher statistical power.

In cerebral areas with accelerated brain atrophy, a delay between MR imaging and PET measurements could lead to the classification of white matter and CSF as GM in PVE-corrected data due to an altered proportion of brain tissue components related to brain aging. This misclassification could result in the underestimation of brain relative metabolism in atrophy-corrected images and in the overestimation of age-related metabolic decrease in these analyses. However, in the current study, PVE correction was shown to be effective and unaffected by such factors because none of the negative correlations between age and relative metabolism that were found in uncorrected data remained significant with the use of this methodologic approach.

Conclusions

This study provided evidence that glucose metabolism is not influenced by aging within a narrow age range of elderly life. Our findings indicate that aging-related functional brain variability detected in PET images of cognitively healthy elderly individuals is largely secondary to the degree of regional brain atrophy, and they provide support to the notion that appropriate PVE correction is a key tool in the investigation of biologic markers for the neurodegenerative disorders that are highly prevalent in elderly life. Further research is needed to confirm our findings and to investigate brain metabolic profiles in younger and older samples with narrow age ranges, given that brain aging does not follow a steady pattern across the life span.

Acknowledgments

We thank Paulo Andrade Lotufo, MD, Mauricio Wajngarten MD, and Claudia C. Leite, MD, for assistance in the development of this project.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust, UK (GR066133MA); the “Fundação Amparo a Pequisa Estado São Paulo” (04/15336–5, 04/12694–8, 06/04405–1), Brazil; and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Brasil, to M.S., P.R.M. and G.F.B.

  • indicates article with supplemental on-line tables.

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Small GW,
    2. Bookheimer SY,
    3. Thompson PM,
    4. et al
    . Current and future uses of neuroimaging for cognitively impaired patients. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:161–72
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. de Leon MJ,
    2. George AE,
    3. Ferris SH,
    4. et al
    . Positron emission tomography and computed tomography assessments of the aging human brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984;8:88–94
    PubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. de Leon MJ,
    2. George AE,
    3. Tomanelli J,
    4. et al
    . Positron emission tomography studies of normal aging: a replication of PET III and 18-FDG using PET VI and 11-CDG. Neurobiol Aging 1987;8:319–23
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Duara R,
    2. Margolin RA,
    3. Robertson-Tchabo EA,
    4. et al
    . Cerebral glucose utilization, as measured with positron emission tomography in 21 resting healthy men between the ages of 21 and 83 years. Brain 1983;106(pt 3):761–75
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Rapoport SI,
    2. Duara R,
    3. Haxby JV
    . Positron emission tomography in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Psychopharmacol Bull 1984;20:466–71
    PubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Schlageter NL,
    2. Horwitz B,
    3. Creasey H,
    4. et al
    . Relation of measured brain glucose utilisation and cerebral atrophy in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987;50:779–85
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Fujimoto T,
    2. Matsumoto T,
    3. Fujita S,
    4. et al
    . Changes in glucose metabolism due to aging and gender-related differences in the healthy human brain. Psychiatry Res 2008;164:58–72
    CrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kalpouzos G,
    2. Chetelat G,
    3. Baron JC,
    4. et al
    . Voxel-based mapping of brain gray matter volume and glucose metabolism profiles in normal aging. Neurobiol Aging 2009;30:112–24
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Moeller JR,
    2. Ishikawa T,
    3. Dhawan V,
    4. et al
    . The metabolic topography of normal aging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:385–98
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Willis MW,
    2. Ketter TA,
    3. Kimbrell TA,
    4. et al
    . Age, sex and laterality effects on cerebral glucose metabolism in healthy adults. Psychiatry Res 2002;114:23–37
    PubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Petit-Taboue MC,
    2. Landeau B,
    3. Desson JF,
    4. et al
    . Effects of healthy aging on the regional cerebral metabolic rate of glucose assessed with statistical parametric mapping. Neuroimage 1998;7:176–84
    CrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Yanase D,
    2. Matsunari I,
    3. Yajima K,
    4. et al
    . Brain FDG PET study of normal aging in Japanese: effect of atrophy correction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:794–805
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Townsend DW
    . Positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med 2008;38:152–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Ashburner J
    . Computational anatomy with the SPM software. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:1163–74. Epub 2009 Feb 27
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kochunov P,
    2. Ramage AE,
    3. Lancaster JL,
    4. et al
    . Loss of cerebral white matter structural integrity tracks the gray matter metabolic decline in normal aging. Neuroimage 2009;45:17–28
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Meltzer CC,
    2. Cantwell MN,
    3. Greer PJ,
    4. et al
    . Does cerebral blood flow decline in healthy aging? A PET study with partial-volume correction. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1842–48
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Aston JA,
    2. Cunningham VJ,
    3. Asselin MC,
    4. et al
    . Positron emission tomography partial volume correction: estimation and algorithms. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22:1019–34
    PubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ibanez V,
    2. Pietrini P,
    3. Alexander GE,
    4. et al
    . Regional glucose metabolic abnormalities are not the result of atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 1998;50:1585–93
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Mosconi L,
    2. Sorbi S,
    3. de Leon MJ,
    4. et al
    . Hypometabolism exceeds atrophy in presymptomatic early-onset familial Alzheimer's disease. J Nucl Med 2006;47:1778–86
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Fouquet M,
    2. Desgranges B,
    3. Landeau B,
    4. et al
    . Longitudinal brain metabolic changes from amnestic mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2009;132:2058–67
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Mevel K,
    2. Desgranges B,
    3. Baron JC,
    4. et al
    . Detecting hippocampal hypometabolism in mild cognitive impairment using automatic voxel-based approaches. Neuroimage 2007;37:18–25
    CrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Samuraki M,
    2. Matsunari I,
    3. Chen WP,
    4. et al
    . Partial volume effect-corrected FDG PET and grey matter volume loss in patients with mild Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:1658–69
    CrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Scazufca M,
    2. Menezes PR,
    3. Vallada HP,
    4. et al
    . High prevalence of dementia among older adults from poor socioeconomic backgrounds in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Int Psychogeriatr 2008;20:394–405
    PubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Scazufca M,
    2. Seabra CA
    . Sao Paulo portraits: ageing in a large metropolis. Int J Epidemiol 2008;37:721–23. Epub 2007 Jul 31
    FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Hamilton M
    . Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967;6:278–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994
  27. 27.↵
    1. Prince M,
    2. Ferri CP,
    3. Acosta D,
    4. et al
    . The protocols for the 10/66 dementia research group population-based research programme. BMC Public Health 2007;7:165
    CrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hall KS,
    2. Gao S,
    3. Emsley CL,
    4. et al
    . Community screening interview for dementia (CSI ‘D'): performance in five disparate study sites. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000;15:521–31
    CrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Ganguli M,
    2. Chandra V,
    3. Gilby JE,
    4. et al
    . Cognitive test performance in a community-based nondemented elderly sample in rural India: the Indo-U.S. Cross-National Dementia Epidemiology Study. Int Psychogeriatr 1996;8:507–24
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Copeland JR,
    2. Prince M,
    3. Wilson KC,
    4. et al
    . The Geriatric Mental State Examination in the 21st century. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002;17:729–32
    CrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Wilson PW,
    2. D'Agostino RB,
    3. Levy D,
    4. et al
    . Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998;97:1837–47
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Razay G,
    2. Vreugdenhil A,
    3. Wilcock G
    . The metabolic syndrome and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 2007;64:93–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Faul F,
    2. Erdfelder E,
    3. Lang AG,
    4. et al
    . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175–91
    CrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Ashburner J
    . A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 2007;38:95–113. Epub 2007 Jul 18
    CrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Klein A,
    2. Andersson J,
    3. Ardekani BA,
    4. et al
    . Evaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration. Neuroimage 2009;46:786–802
    CrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Yassa MA,
    2. Stark CE
    . A quantitative evaluation of cross-participant registration techniques for MRI studies of the medial temporal lobe. Neuroimage 2009;44:319–27
    CrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Mazziotta JC,
    2. Toga AW,
    3. Evans A,
    4. et al
    . A probabilistic atlas of the human brain: theory and rationale for its development—The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). Neuroimage 1995;2:89–101
    CrossRefPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Quarantelli M,
    2. Berkouk K,
    3. Prinster A,
    4. et al
    . Integrated software for the analysis of brain PET/SPECT studies with partial-volume-effect correction. J Nucl Med 2004;45:192–201
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Reiman EM,
    2. Chen K,
    3. Langbaum JB,
    4. et al
    . Higher serum total cholesterol levels in late middle age are associated with glucose hypometabolism in brain regions affected by Alzheimer's disease and normal aging. Neuroimage 2010;49:169–76. Epub 2009 Jul 23
    CrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Rimajova M,
    2. Lenzo NP,
    3. Wu JS,
    4. et al
    . Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-PET in APOEepsilon4 carriers in the Australian population. J Alzheimers Dis 2008;13:137–46
    PubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Kennedy KM,
    2. Erickson KI,
    3. Rodrigue KM,
    4. et al
    . Age-related differences in regional brain volumes: a comparison of optimized voxel-based morphometry to manual volumetry. Neurobiol Aging 2009;30:1657–76
    CrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Friston KJ,
    2. Holmes AP,
    3. Worsley KJ,
    4. et al
    . Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 1994;2:189–210
    CrossRef
  43. 43.↵
    1. Curiati PK,
    2. Tamashiro JH,
    3. Squarzoni P,
    4. et al
    . Brain structural variability due to aging and gender in cognitively healthy elders: results from the Sao Paulo Ageing and Health study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1850–56. Epub 2009 Aug 6
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Mosconi L,
    2. De Santi S,
    3. Li J,
    4. et al
    . Hippocampal hypometabolism predicts cognitive decline from normal aging. Neurobiol Aging 2008;29:676–92
    CrossRefPubMed
  45. 45.↵
    1. Meltzer CC,
    2. Zubieta JK,
    3. Brandt J,
    4. et al
    . Regional hypometabolism in Alzheimer's disease as measured by positron emission tomography after correction for effects of partial volume averaging. Neurology 1996;47:454–61
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Drzezga A,
    2. Grimmer T,
    3. Henriksen G,
    4. et al
    . Imaging of amyloid plaques and cerebral glucose metabolism in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 2008;39:619–33
    CrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    1. Inoue K,
    2. Ito H,
    3. Goto R,
    4. et al
    . Apparent CBF decrease with normal aging due to partial volume effects: MR-based partial volume correction on CBF SPECT. Ann Nucl Med 2005;19:283–90
    CrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.↵
    1. Taki Y,
    2. Goto R,
    3. Evans A,
    4. et al
    . Voxel-based morphometry of human brain with age and cerebrovascular risk factors. Neurobiol Aging 2004;25:455–63
    CrossRefPubMed
  49. 49.↵
    1. Raz N,
    2. Lindenberger U,
    3. Rodrigue KM,
    4. et al
    . Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: general trends, individual differences and modifiers. Cereb Cortex 2005;15:1676–89
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.
    1. Talairach J,
    2. Tornoux P
    . Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers. 1998
  • Received June 19, 2010.
  • Accepted after revision August 4, 2010.
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 32 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 32, Issue 3
1 Mar 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Age-Related Metabolic Profiles in Cognitively Healthy Elders: Results from a Voxel-Based [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron-Emission Tomography Study with Partial Volume Effects Correction
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
P.K. Curiati, J.H. Tamashiro-Duran, F.L.S. Duran, C.A. Buchpiguel, P. Squarzoni, D.C. Romano, H. Vallada, P.R. Menezes, M. Scazufca, G.F. Busatto, T.C.T.F. Alves
Age-Related Metabolic Profiles in Cognitively Healthy Elders: Results from a Voxel-Based [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron-Emission Tomography Study with Partial Volume Effects Correction
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2011, 32 (3) 560-565; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2321

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Age-Related Metabolic Profiles in Cognitively Healthy Elders: Results from a Voxel-Based [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose–Positron-Emission Tomography Study with Partial Volume Effects Correction
P.K. Curiati, J.H. Tamashiro-Duran, F.L.S. Duran, C.A. Buchpiguel, P. Squarzoni, D.C. Romano, H. Vallada, P.R. Menezes, M. Scazufca, G.F. Busatto, T.C.T.F. Alves
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2011, 32 (3) 560-565; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2321
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Abbreviations
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Supplemental
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Lower Brain Glucose Metabolism in Normal Ageing is Predominantly Frontal and Temporal: A Systematic Review and Pooled Effect Size and Activation Likelihood Estimates Meta-Analyses
  • Crossref (40)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Resting-state functional connectivity in normal brain aging
    Luiz Kobuti Ferreira, Geraldo F. Busatto
    Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 2013 37 3
  • A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology
    Kjell Erlandsson, Irène Buvat, P Hendrik Pretorius, Benjamin A Thomas, Brian F Hutton
    Physics in Medicine and Biology 2012 57 21
  • Different partial volume correction methods lead to different conclusions: An 18F-FDG-PET study of aging
    Douglas N. Greve, David H. Salat, Spencer L. Bowen, David Izquierdo-Garcia, Aaron P. Schultz, Ciprian Catana, J. Alex Becker, Claus Svarer, Gitte M. Knudsen, Reisa A. Sperling, Keith A. Johnson
    NeuroImage 2016 132
  • Cortical surface-based analysis reduces bias and variance in kinetic modeling of brain PET data
    Douglas N. Greve, Claus Svarer, Patrick M. Fisher, Ling Feng, Adam E. Hansen, William Baare, Bruce Rosen, Bruce Fischl, Gitte M. Knudsen
    NeuroImage 2014 92
  • Different definitions of neurodegeneration produce similar amyloid/neurodegeneration biomarker group findings
    Clifford R. Jack, Heather J. Wiste, Stephen D. Weigand, David S. Knopman, Michelle M. Mielke, Prashanthi Vemuri, Val Lowe, Matthew L. Senjem, Jeffrey L. Gunter, Denise Reyes, Mary M. Machulda, Rosebud Roberts, Ronald C. Petersen
    Brain 2015 138 12
  • Brain fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET in dementia
    Takashi Kato, Yoshitaka Inui, Akinori Nakamura, Kengo Ito
    Ageing Research Reviews 2016 30
  • PETPVC: a toolbox for performing partial volume correction techniques in positron emission tomography
    Benjamin A Thomas, Vesna Cuplov, Alexandre Bousse, Adriana Mendes, Kris Thielemans, Brian F Hutton, Kjell Erlandsson
    Physics in Medicine and Biology 2016 61 22
  • Deep learning-based brain age prediction in normal aging and dementia
    Jeyeon Lee, Brian J. Burkett, Hoon-Ki Min, Matthew L. Senjem, Emily S. Lundt, Hugo Botha, Jonathan Graff-Radford, Leland R. Barnard, Jeffrey L. Gunter, Christopher G. Schwarz, Kejal Kantarci, David S. Knopman, Bradley F. Boeve, Val J. Lowe, Ronald C. Petersen, Clifford R. Jack, David T. Jones
    Nature Aging 2022 2 5
  • Improved longitudinal [18F]-AV45 amyloid PET by white matter reference and VOI-based partial volume effect correction
    Matthias Brendel, Marcus Högenauer, Andreas Delker, Julia Sauerbeck, Peter Bartenstein, John Seibyl, Axel Rominger
    NeuroImage 2015 108
  • Levels of tau protein in plasma are associated with neurodegeneration and cognitive function in a population‐based elderly cohort
    Jeffrey L. Dage, Alexandra M.V. Wennberg, David C. Airey, Clinton E. Hagen, David S. Knopman, Mary M. Machulda, Rosebud O. Roberts, Clifford R. Jack, Ronald C. Petersen, Michelle M. Mielke
    Alzheimer's & Dementia 2016 12 12

More in this TOC Section

  • Kurtosis and Epileptogenic Tubers: A Pilot Study
  • Glutaric Aciduria Type 1: DK vs. Conventional MRI
  • Multiparametric MRI in PEDS Pontine Glioma
Show more FUNCTIONAL

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire