Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tracking in Spinal Cord Arteriovenous Malformations: A Preliminary Study

A. Ozanne, T. Krings, D. Facon, P. Fillard, J.L. Dumas, H. Alvarez, D. Ducreux and P. Lasjaunias
American Journal of Neuroradiology August 2007, 28 (7) 1271-1279; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0541
A. Ozanne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Krings
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Facon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Fillard
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.L. Dumas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. Alvarez
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Ducreux
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Lasjaunias
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 1.

    Venous congestion of the spinal cord and separated tracts (patient 1, DTI25d). This 57-year-old woman presented with a 2-year history of progressive paresthesia in the bilateral lower limbs, followed by further development of leg weakness and sphincter problems. The McCormick score was II. A pial arteriovenous fistula that was fed by the lateral spinal artery arising from the left posteroinferior cerebellar artery was found.

    A, T2-weighted images showed enlargement of the spinal cord at the C6 level with hyperintensity reflecting local venous congestion (arrow).

    B, There was a dilated vessel at the anterior surface of the cord, which corresponded with a vein draining the shunt caudally, as depicted on selective injection during angiography.

    C, Posterior view of the FT25d showed separated fascicles at the level of C6 (arrow), with global enlargement of the beam of tracts. The remaining fibers were grouped together into fascicles. By counting the tracts at the level of the congestion (674) and below it (741; ratio: lesion level/caudal to lesion = 0.91), we were able to show that there was no evidence of focal interruption of the tracts.

  • Fig 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 2.

    Cavity in the cord: thinning of the beam of tracts and separated tracts (patient 2, DTI6d). This 29-year-old woman presented to our service 3 months after she had experienced a sudden complete paraplegia. Subsequently, no clinical improvement was noted.

    A–C, The T2-weighted (A and B) and T1-weighted (C) morphologic sequences showed a central cavity within the thoracic cord, an AVM nidus located at T5, and dilated perimedullary vessels mainly cranial but also caudal to the nidus. There was only a moderate enlargement of the cord, which may have been because of the mass effect of the venous pseudoaneurysm.

    D, Anteroposterior view of the angiogram showed the venous drainage of the arteriovenous shunt. There was a venous false aneurysm at the level of the nidus that was partially thrombosed as depicted on MR imaging (hyperintensity on both T1 and T2) and surrounded by hemosiderin (hypointensity on T1 and T2), indicating a previous hemorrhage, responsible for her initial symptoms.

    E, Posterior view of the FT6d caudal to the nidus (arrow) showed a global thinning but no interruption of the beam of tracts at the level of the cavity in comparison with the normal size of the white matter tracts at C7 (double arrows). The tracts were separated from the midline but still grouped into fascicles.

  • Fig 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 3.

    Nidus and segmental interruption of tracts (patient 3, DTI25d). A 23-year-old man presented with bilateral upper limb paresthesia, predominantly on the right side with a sensory deficit. MR imaging showed edema of the cervical spinal cord around the cervical AVM nidus at C2-C3, without any sign of hemorrhage. Angiography revealed a nidus inside the right hemicord, posteriorly located, fed by the pial network arising from the right vertebral artery. First embolization was followed by a clinical improvement of the right upper limb and regression of the T2 hyperintensity on MR imaging. A second session of embolization was performed 1 year later.

    A, The third (and last) angiogram performed 3 years 9 months after the onset of the symptoms was not followed by embolization.

    B, MR imaging performed at that time with DTI showed T2-hyperintensity inside the inferior part of the nidus corresponding with the embolized part of the nidus.

    C, FT25d showed segmental interruption of the tracts of the right posterior column (arrowhead) as could be verified by counting the tracts at the level of the lesion (681) and below it (1017; ratio: lesion level/caudal to lesion = 0.67). The remaining tracts of the lateral column and the midline were slightly shifted showing a mild mass effect on the midline.

  • Fig 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 4.

    Nidus at the surface of the cord shifting the tracts (patient 5, DTI25d). A 14-year-old boy presented 4 months after he experienced a sudden paraplegia, which secondarily completely resolved (McCormick I).

    A–C, MR imaging showed a nidus located close to the right surface of the thoracic cord, at the level of T8-T9. On these T2-weighted images, no hyperintensity of the cord was visualized.

    D shows the anisotropy that, because of the small remaining volume of the cord at that level, cannot be determined.

    E demonstrates displacement of the beam of fibers to the right without focal interruption (FT25d). Distal to the nidus, the fibers seem to be more separated compared with the proximal part, which may indicate an increased water content of the cord that is not yet visible on T2-weighted images as edema, which in fact suits the decreased FA values that were found in this area (Table 2).

  • Fig 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 5.

    Increase of the tracts (FT6d) after embolization (patient 6, DTI6d). A 21-year-old woman with cervical spinal cord arteriovenous malformation first presented with a sudden tetraplegia when she was 12 years old. The neurologic status gradually improved (the McCormick score was grade I at the time of referral to our hospital). MR imaging, angiograms, fiber tracking before (A, C, and E) and after embolization (B, D, and F), and FA and ADC images (G and H) are shown.

    At the level of the nidus (arrow), located within the cord, there was partial discontinuity of the tracts (E). Above and below the nidus, conventional T2-weighted images (A,B) showed a central cavity in the cord. Here, FT6d showed both a global thinning of the beam (double arrow in E) and separated tracts around the central cavity. When we compared the evolution after embolization, angiography demonstrated decrease of flow inside the nidus and the draining veins (D). T2-weighted images did not show any modification of the appearance of the perinidal cord. The FT6d showed (F) an increased number of tracts at the level (arrow) and just above (double arrow) the nidus, presumably due to a reduction of venous congestion with concomitant higher FA values and therefore better visualization of fiber tracts. Panels G and H demonstrate the FA values and the ADC map with the ROI placements (white areas) at 3 different levels.

  • Fig 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig 6.

    Hemorrhage in the spinal cord (patient 7, DTI6d). An 18-year-old male patient presented with a sudden paraplegia because of hemorrhage in a thoracic AVM. When he was admitted 3 months later, the neurologic status was the same (McCormick IV).

    A, MR imaging showed a nodular heterogeneous signal intensity inside the thoracic cord at the T2 level, corresponding with the point of bleeding.

    B, The cord hemorrhage was located in the vicinity of the nidus that harbored an associated arterial aneurysm in the anterior sulcus of the cord with concomitant mass effect on the anterior spinal artery (arrow). An associated T2 hypointensity corresponding with hemosiderin was located at the anterior part of the cord and spread cranially to the midbrain and caudally to T4 level.

    C, FT6d showed an interruption of all of the tracts at the T2-level (arrow), presumably because of susceptibility artifacts related to hemosiderin.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1:

    Clinical data

    PatientsAge (Years)/ SexPresenting SymptomsTime Elapsed between Onset of Symptom and ImagingClinical Status before ImagingMcCormick ScoreLevel of the NidusMR Hyperintensity T2Hemorrhage
    157/FProgressive paresthesia followed by motor weakness of lower extremities18 monthsSensorimotor deficit of lower extremitiesIIN.A. (peri-medullary fistula)C5-C7−
    229/FParaparesis developed within 48 hours4 monthsParaparesia and sphincterian deficitIVT5T3-T6+
    323/MParesthesia of superior limbs3 monthsParesthesia of superior limbsIC2-C3−−
    419/MParesthesias of all extremities3 yearsNormalIC1−−
    514/MTransitory paraplegia4 monthsDorsalgiasIT8-T9−−
    621/FAcute tetraplegia8 yearsParesis and paresthesias of right inferior limbIC6C4-C5−
    718/MParaplegia developed within 24 hours6 monthsParaplegia and sphincterian deficitIVT2−+
    835/FAcute hemiparesis2 yearsHemiparesisIIC2-C3−−
    913/MAcute hemiparesis2 yearsHemiparesisIIC5-C7C3-T2−
    • Note:—F indicates female; M, male. McCormick clinical functional score: grade I: neurologic examination normal or mild deficit without impairment of the function of any limb and normal walking; grade II: sensitivomotor deficit of limbs and/or severe pains and/or sensitive deficit responsible of an impairment of the quality of life but compatible with independent and self-sufficient walking; grade III: severe sensitivomotor deficit of inferior limbs, enabling not walking anymore, or disabling sensitivomotor deficit of the superior limbs with or without loss of self-sufficient walking; and grade IV: deficit of inferior and/or superior limbs responsible for a total dependence.

    • View popup
    Table 2:

    FA and ADC values, qualitative assessments, and angiomorphology in the 9 investigated patients

    PatientROI PlacementT2 HyperintensityFAZ-FAADC (10−3)Z-ADCQualitative ResultsAVM Type and Comments
    1C6+ (congestion)0.42−11.83*55−0.34SeparatedPerimedullary pial fistula fed by the lateral spinal artery; no measurement at the level of the nidus possible because no nidus-type arteriovenous shunt was present (fistulous AVM)
    T5−0.73−0.25736−2.02*Normal
    2C50.64−3.77*938−0.47NormalGlomerular intramedullary AVM fed by radiculopial and radiculomedullary arteries, false aneurysm, and signs of previous intramedullary hemorrhage present; measurements at the level of the nidus not possible because of artifacts from previous hemorrhage; measurements distal to the nidus not possible because of limited FOV
    T2+ (cavity)0.49−9.21*787−1.63Separated
    T4+ (cavity)0.36−14.18*11961.51Separated
    Nidus T5Partially interrupted
    3C1−0.70−1.50862−1.06NormalGlomerular intramedullary AVM fed by the radiculopial network by posterolateral spinal arteries predominantly from the right side; measurement at the level of the nidus not possible because of previous embolization with glue and subsequent artifacts at that level
    Nidus C2–3Partially interrupted
    C4−0.771.25801−1.53Normal
    C6−0.791.78715−2.11*Normal
    4Nidus C10.59−5.55*11130.87SeparatedGlomerular intramedullary AVM fed by radiculopial arteries; measurement cranial to the nidus not possible because of brain stem location
    C2−0.760.65946−0.42Normal
    C7−0.781.63767−1.79Normal
    5T6−0.781.581011−0.01NormalGlomerular extramedullary AVM fed by radiculopial arteries; measurement at the level of the nidus not possible because of small remaining size of the cord
    T8−0.771.16859−1.08Normal
    Nidus T9Shifted
    T10−0.64−3.57*951−0.38Normal
    6C2−0.64−3.59*873−0.97NormalGlomerular intramedullary AVM fed by the anterior and posterolateral spinal arteries; measurement at the level of the nidus not possible because of small remaining size of the cord
    C5+ (cavity)0.36−14.12*14513.47*Separated
    Nidus C6Partially interrupted
    C7+ (cavity)0.49−9.25*13802.93*Separated
    T3−0.67−2.50*915−0.65Normal
    7C2−0.62−4.45*11391.07NormalGlomerular intramedullary AVM fed by the anterior spinal artery with an associated aneurysm that arose from a sulcal artery and concomitant hemorrhage within the cord; measurement at the level of the nidus not possible because of artifacts because of blood degradation products
    C4−0.65−3.48*11521.18Normal
    T1−0.50−8.72*10770.60Partially interrupted
    Nidus T2Completely interrupted
    T3−0.55−6.88*10140.11Partially interrupted
    • Note:—AVM indicates arteriovenous malformation; FA, fractional anisotropy; ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient.

    • * These values are statistically significantly different from the normal volunteers whose mean values were 0.748 with a range of 0.7–0.8 for FA and 1.00 10−3 with a range of 0.77–1.25 10−3 for the ADC.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 28 (7)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 28, Issue 7
August 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tracking in Spinal Cord Arteriovenous Malformations: A Preliminary Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
A. Ozanne, T. Krings, D. Facon, P. Fillard, J.L. Dumas, H. Alvarez, D. Ducreux, P. Lasjaunias
MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tracking in Spinal Cord Arteriovenous Malformations: A Preliminary Study
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2007, 28 (7) 1271-1279; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0541

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
MR Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tracking in Spinal Cord Arteriovenous Malformations: A Preliminary Study
A. Ozanne, T. Krings, D. Facon, P. Fillard, J.L. Dumas, H. Alvarez, D. Ducreux, P. Lasjaunias
American Journal of Neuroradiology Aug 2007, 28 (7) 1271-1279; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0541
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Management Outcomes For VO Spine Biopsy
  • Characteristics of SIH Type I Culprit Lesions
  • Advanced Imaging of Type 2 Spinal CSF Leaks
Show more Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire