3D Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Cerebrovascular MR Angiography with Subsecond Frame Update Times Using Radial k-Space Trajectories and Highly Constrained Projection Reconstruction

References

1. ↵
   Kwan ES, Hall A, Enzmann DR. Quantitative analysis of intracranial circulation using rapid-sequence DSA. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:1239–45

   PubMedGoogle Scholar
2. ↵
   Wetzel SG, Bilecen D, Lyrer P, et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: detection by dynamic MR projection angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1293–95

   PubMedGoogle Scholar
3. ↵
   Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892–99

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
4. ↵
   Hans FJ, Reinges MH, Reipke P, et al. Clinical applications of 2-D dynamic contrast-enhanced MR subtraction angiography in neurosurgery: preliminary results. Zentralbl Neurochir 2005;66:170–79

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
5. ↵
   Nagaraja S, Capener D, Coley SC, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations: measurement of nidal volume using a combination of static and dynamic magnetic resonance angiography techniques. Neuroradiology 2005;47:387–92

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
6. ↵
   Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345–51

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
7. Carroll TJ, Korosec FR, Pertermann GM, et al. Carotid bifurcation: evaluation of time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2001;220:525–32

   PubMedGoogle Scholar
8. ↵
   Cashen TA, Carr JC, Shin W, et al. Intracranial time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:822–29

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
9. ↵
   Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: initial assessment. Radiology 2001;220:244–51

   PubMedGoogle Scholar
10. ↵
    Duran M, Schoenberg SO, Yuh WT, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2957–64

    PubMedGoogle Scholar
11. ↵
    Gauvrit JY, LeClerc X, Oppenheim C., et al. Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1525–31

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
12. ↵
    Nael K, Michaely H, Villablanca P, et al. Time-resolved contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck at 3.0 tesla: initial results. Invest Radiol 2006;41:116–24

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
13. ↵
    Rabiner LR, Gold B. Theory and Application of Digital Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc;1975 :chaps 6 and 10, 365, 578

    Google Scholar
14. ↵
    Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, et al. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:642–51

    PubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar