Research ArticleBrain
Does High-field MR Imaging Have an Influence on the Classification of Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndromes According to Current Diagnostic MR Imaging Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis?
M.P. Wattjes, M. Harzheim, C.K. Kuhl, J. Gieseke, S. Schmidt, L. Klotz, T. Klockgether, H.H. Schild and G.G. Lutterbey
American Journal of Neuroradiology September 2006, 27 (8) 1794-1798;
M.P. Wattjes
M. Harzheim
C.K. Kuhl
J. Gieseke
S. Schmidt
L. Klotz
T. Klockgether
H.H. Schild

References
- ↵McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121–27
- ↵Dalton CM, Brex PA, Miszkiel KA, et al. Application of the new McDonald criteria to patients with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2002;52:47–53
- ↵Tintoré M, Rovira A, Río J, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: application in first demyelinating episode. Neurology 2003;60:27–30
- ↵Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller DH, et al. Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Brain 1997;120:2059–69
- ↵Tintoré M, Rovira A, Martinez MJ, et al. Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:702–06
- ↵Frohman EM, Goodin DS, Calabresi PA, et al. The utility of MRI in suspected MS: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2003;61:602–11
- ↵Miller DH, Filippi M, Fazekas F, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging within diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2004;56:273–78
- ↵
- ↵Norris DG. High field human imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:519–29
- ↵Schima W, Wimberger D, Schneider B, et al. The importance of magnetic field strength in the MR diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a comparison of 0.5T and 1.5T. RoFo 1993;158:368–71
- Filippi M, van Waesberghe JH, Horsfield MA, et al. Interscanner variation in brain MRI lesion load measurements in MS. Neurology 1997;49:371–77
- ↵Lee DH, Vellet AD, Eliasziw M, et al. MR imaging field: prospective evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of MR for diagnosis of multiple sclerosis at 0.5 and 1.5T. Radiology 1995;194:257–62
- ↵Keiper MD, Grossmann RI, Hirsch JA, et al. MR identification of white matter abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: a comparison between 1.5T and 4T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1489–93
- ↵Sicotte NL, Voskuhl RR, Bouvier S, et al. Comparison of multiple sclerosis lesions at 1.5 and 3.0T. Invest Radiol 2003;38:423–27
- ↵Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444–52
- ↵de Zwart JA, Ledden PJ, Kellman P, et al. Design of a SENSE-optimized high-sensitivity MRI receive coil for brain imaging. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1218–27
- ↵Simon JH, Li D, Traboulsee A, et al. Standarized MR imaging protocol for multiple sclerosis: consortium of MS centers consensus guidelines. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:455–61
- ↵Bakshi R, Ariyaratana S, Benedict RH, et al. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging detects cortical and juxtacortical multiple sclerosis lesions. Arch Neurol 2001;58:742–48
- Molyneux PD, Tubridy N, Parker GJ, et al. The effect of section thickness on MR lesion detection and quantification in multiple sclerosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1715–20
- ↵Filippi M, Horsfield MA, Campi A, et al. Resolution-dependent estimates of lesion volumes in magnetic resonance imaging studies of the brain in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1995;38:749–54
- ↵Jacobs DL, Beck RW, Simon JH, et al. Intramuscular interferon beta-1a therapy initiated during a first demyelinating event in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000;343:898–904
- ↵Comi G, Filippi M, Barkhof F, et al. Effect of early interferon treatment on conversion to definite multiple sclerosis: a randomized study. Lancet 2001;357:1576–82
- ↵Barkhof F, Rocca M, Francis G, et al. Validation of diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis and response to interferon β1a. Ann Neurol 2003;53:718–24
- ↵Stone LA, Albert PS, Smith ME, et al. Changes in the amount of diseased white matter over time in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1995;45:1808–14
In this issue
Advertisement
M.P. Wattjes, M. Harzheim, C.K. Kuhl, J. Gieseke, S. Schmidt, L. Klotz, T. Klockgether, H.H. Schild, G.G. Lutterbey
Does High-field MR Imaging Have an Influence on the Classification of Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndromes According to Current Diagnostic MR Imaging Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis?
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2006, 27 (8) 1794-1798;
0 Responses
Does High-field MR Imaging Have an Influence on the Classification of Patients with Clinically Isolated Syndromes According to Current Diagnostic MR Imaging Criteria for Multiple Sclerosis?
M.P. Wattjes, M. Harzheim, C.K. Kuhl, J. Gieseke, S. Schmidt, L. Klotz, T. Klockgether, H.H. Schild, G.G. Lutterbey
American Journal of Neuroradiology Sep 2006, 27 (8) 1794-1798;
Jump to section
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Cited By...
- Improving Detection of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions in the Posterior Fossa Using an Optimized 3D-FLAIR Sequence at 3T
- Diffuse White Matter Damage Is Absent in Neuromyelitis Optica
- Normal Findings on Brain Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery MR Images at 3T
- Clinical evaluation of a speed optimized T2 weighted fast spin echo sequence at 3.0 T using variable flip angle refocusing, half-Fourier acquisition and parallel imaging
- Can imaging techniques measure neuroprotection and remyelination in multiple sclerosis?
This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.
More in this TOC Section
Similar Articles
Advertisement