Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography of the Carotid and Vertebrobasilar Circulations

References

1. ↵
   Kricheff II. Arteriosclerotic ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Radiology 1987;162:101–109

   PubMed
2. ↵
   Janssens E, Leclerc X, Gautier C, et al. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of proximal vertebral artery stenosis: long-term clinical follow-up of 16 consecutive patients. Neuroradiology 2003;46:81–84
3. Gupta R, Schumacher H, Mangla S, et al. Urgent endovascular revascularization for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Neurology 2003;61:1647–1648

   FREE Full Text
4. Albuquerque F, Fiorella D, Han P, et al. A reappraisal of angioplasty and stenting for the treatment of vertebral origin stenosis. Neurosurgery 2003;53:607–614

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. Levy E, Hanel R, Bendok B, et al. Staged stent-assisted angioplasty for symptomatic intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis. J Neurosurg 2002;97:1294–1301

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. Jenkins J, Subramanian R. Endovascular treatment for vertebrobasilar insufficiency. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2002;4:385–391
7. ↵
   Nakahara T, Sakamoto S, Hamasaki O, Sakoda K. Stent-assisted angioplasty for intracranial atherosclerosis. Neuroradiology 2002;44:706–710

   CrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   Heiserman J, Dean B, Hodak J, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:1401–1407

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology 1992;182:243–246

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    Willinsky R, Taylor S, TerBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–528

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    Koelemay M, Lijmer J, Stoker J, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001;14:1338–1345
12. Grist TM. MRA of the abdominal aorta and lower extremities. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:32–43

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. Grist TM. Magnetic resonance angiography of renal arterial stenosis. Coron Artery Dis 1999;10:151–156

    PubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Holland G, Dougherty L, Carpenter J, et al. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;166:971–981

    PubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Adamis M, Li W, Wielopolski P, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography of the lower extremities: initial evaluation with a multisection two-dimensional time-of-flight sequence. Radiology 1995;196:689–695

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Wutke R, Lang W, Fellner C, et al. High-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-space ordering of supra-aortic arteries compared with selective X-ray angiography. Stroke 2002;33:1522–1529

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. ↵
    Scarabino T, Carriero A, Giannatempo GM, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). J Neuroradiol 1999;25:87–91
18. ↵
    Modaresi KB, Cox TC, Summers PE, et al. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis. Br J Surg 1999;86:1422–1426

    CrossRefPubMed
19. Carriero A, Scarabino T, Magarelli N, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the internal carotid artery: 2D vs 3D TOF in stenotic disease. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1370–1372

    CrossRefPubMed
20. Patel M, Kuntz K, Klufas R, et al. Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation: can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography. Stroke 1995;26:1753–1757

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. Polak J, Kalina P, Donaldson M, et al. Carotid endarterectomy: preoperative evaluation of candidates with combined doppler sonography and MR angiography. Radiology 1993;186:333–338

    PubMed
22. ↵
    Polak J, Bajakian R, O’Leary D, et al. Detection of internal carotid artery stenosis: comparison of MR angiography, color doppler sonography and arteriography. Radiology 1992;182:35–40

    PubMedWeb of Science
23. ↵
    Scarabino T, Carriero A, Magarelli N, et al. MR angiography in carotid stenosis: a comparison of three techniques. Eur J Radiol 1998;28:117–125

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. Leclerc X, Gauvrit J, Nicol L, Pruvo J. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the craniocervical vessels: a review. Neuroradiology 1999;41:867–874

    CrossRefPubMed
25. Leclerc X, Nicol L, Gauvrit J, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: the effect of voxel size on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1021–1027

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. Kollias SS, Blinkert CA, Ruesch S, Valavanis A. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supra-aortic vessels in 24 seconds: a feasibility study. Neuroradiology 1999;41:391–400

    CrossRefPubMed
27. ↵
    Wetzel S, Bongartz G. MR angiography: supra-aortic vessels. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1277–1284

    CrossRefPubMed
28. ↵
    Cosottini M, Pingitore A, Puglioli M, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Stroke 2003;34:660–664

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. Hathout G, Duh M, El-Saden S. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in predicting angiographic stenosis of the internal carotid artery: linear regression analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1747–1756

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. Nederkoorn P, Elgersma O, van der Graaf Y, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced MR angiography for diagnosis. Radiology 2003;228:677–682

    PubMedWeb of Science
31. Lenhart M, Framme N, Volk M, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the carotid arteries: diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer variability compared with selective catheter angiography. Invest Radiol 2002;37:535–541

    CrossRefPubMed
32. Remonda L, Senn P, Barth A, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:213–219

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. Sundgren P, Sunden P, Lindgren A, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 2002;44:592–599

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
34. ↵
    Aoki S, Nakajima H, Kumagai H, Araki T. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography and MR imaging of the carotid artery: high-resolution sequences in different acquisition planes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:381–385

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. ↵
    Ersoy H, Watts R, Sanelli P, et al. Atherosclerotic disease distribution in carotid and vertebrobasilar arteries: clinical experience in 100 patients undergoing fluoro-triggered 3D Gd-MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:545–558

    CrossRefPubMed
36. Carr J, Ma J, Deshpande V, et al. High-resolution breath-hold contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the entire carotid circulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;178:543–549

    PubMedWeb of Science
37. ↵
    Phan T, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein M, et al. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the cervical vessels: experience with 422 patients. Stroke 2001;32:2282–2286

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. ↵
    Leclerc X, Lucas C, Godefroy O, et al. Preliminary experience using contrast-enhanced MR angiography to assess vertebral artery structure for the follow-up of suspected dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1482–1490

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. ↵
    Hollingworth W, Nathens A, Kanne J, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography angiography for traumatic or atherosclerotic lesions of the carotid and vertebral arteries: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol 2003;48:88–102

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. Graf J, Skutta B, Kuhn F, Ferbert A. Computed tomographic angiography findings in 103 patients following vascular events in the posterior circulation: potential and clinical relevance. J Neurol 2000;247:760–766

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. Long A, Lepoutre A, Corbillon E, Branchereau A. Critical review of non- or minimally invasive methods (duplex ultrasonography, MR- and CT-angiography) for evaluating stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;24:43–52

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. ↵
    Patel SG, Collie DA, Wardlaw JM, et al. Outcome, observer reliability, and patient preferences if CTA, MRA, or Doppler ultrasound were used, individually or together, instead of digital subtraction angiography before carotid endarterectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;73:21–28

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
43. ↵
    Riles T, Eidelman E, Litt A, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, conventional angiography and duplex scanning. Stroke 1992;23:341–346

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
44. ↵
    Huston J, Lewis B, Wiebers D, et al. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US. Radiology 1993;186:339–344

    PubMedWeb of Science
45. ↵
    Wentz K, Rother J, Schwartz A, et al. Intracranial vertebrobasilar system: MR angiography. Radiology 1994;190:105–110

    PubMedWeb of Science
46. ↵
    Furuya Y, Isoda H, Hasegawa S, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of extracranial carotid and vertebral arteries, including their origins: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 1992;35:42–45

    CrossRefPubMed
47. ↵
    Bhadelia R, Bengoa F, Gesner L, et al. Efficacy of MR angiography in the detection and characterization of occlusive disease in the vertebrobasilar system. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:458–465

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. ↵
    Craig D, Meguro K, Watridge C, et al. Intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1982;13:825–834

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
49. Kappelle L, Eliasziw M, Fox A, et al. Importance of intracranial atherosclerotic disease in patients with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Stroke 1999;30:282–286

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
50. Marzewski D, Furlan A, St Louis P, et al. Intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis long-term prognosis. Stroke 1982;13:821–824

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
51. Roederer G, Langlois Y, Chan A, et al. Is siphon disease important in predicting outcome of carotid endarterectomy? Arch Surg 1983;118:1177–1181

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
52. Rouleau P, Huston J 3rd, Gilbertson J, et al. Carotid artery tandem lesions: frequency of angiographic detection and consequences for endarterectomy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:621–625

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
53. ↵
    Keagy B, Poole M, Burnham S, Johnson G Jr. Frequency, severity, and physiologic importance of carotid siphon lesions. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:511–515

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
54. ↵
    Weimar C, Kley C, Kraywinkel K, et al. Clinical presentation and prognosis of brain stem infarcts: an evaluation of the Stroke Databank of the German Stroke Foundation. Nervenarzt 2002;73:166–173

    PubMed
55. ↵
    Berguer R, Morasch M, Kline R. A review of 100 consecutive reconstructions of the distal vertebral artery for embolic and hemodynamic disease. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:852–859

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
56. ↵
    Berguer R, Flynn L, Kline R, Caplan L. Surgical reconstruction of the extracranial vertebral artery: management and outcome. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:9–18

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
57. ↵
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–453

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
58. ↵
    The (NASCET) North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Steering Committee. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 1991;22:711–720

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
59. ↵
    Snidow J, Johnson M, Harris V, et al. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for aortoiliac inflow assessment plus renal artery screening in a single breath hold. Radiology 1996;198:725–732

    PubMedWeb of Science
60. De Cobelli F, Vanzulli A, Sironi S, et al. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography. Radiology 1997;205:689–695

    PubMed
61. Hany T, Debatin J, Leung D, Pfammatter T. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 1997;204:357–362

    PubMedWeb of Science
62. ↵
    Bakker J, Beek F, Beutler J, et al. Renal artery stenosis and accessory renal arteries: accuracy of detection and visualization with gadolinium-enhanced breath-hold MR angiography. Radiology 1998;207:497–504

    PubMedWeb of Science
63. ↵
    Carr J, Schirf B, Leloudas N, et al. Temporally-resolved pulmonary MRA with GRAPPA at 3T. ISMRM 2004;7