Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

OtherBRAIN

Dynamic 3D MR Angiography of Intra- and Extracranial Vascular Malformations at 3T: A Technical Note

S. Ziyeh, R. Strecker, A. Berlis, J. Weber, J. Klisch and I. Mader
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2005, 26 (3) 630-634;
S. Ziyeh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Strecker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Berlis
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Weber
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Klisch
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I. Mader
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Summary: Time-resolved, contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography combined with parallel imaging at 3T was applied to an intracranial arteriovenous malformation, a dural arteriovenous fistula, and an extracranial facial arteriovenous malformation. The temporal resolution was one image every 1.5 seconds. Arterial feeders were depicted in all three cases. Early venous drainage was observed in the intracerebral arteriovenous malformation and the dural arteriovenous fistula, but not in the facial arteriovenous malformation. All findings were concordant with conventional angiography.

Spatial resolution of contrast-enhanced 2D projection MR angiography (MRA) is restricted when a temporal resolution of two frames per second is obtained (1–3). This technique has special advantages for MR imaging of vascular malformations, because the hemodynamics of the pathologic process can be assessed (4–9). Contrast-enhanced 3D MRA can achieve a better spatial resolution at the cost of temporal resolution. Parallel imaging techniques allow an additional reduction of acquisition time and, hence, an improvement of temporal resolution at preserved spatial resolution (10, 11). An advance for dynamic 3D contrast-enhanced MRA may derive from a higher magnetic field with increased signal intensity from blood and a better saturation of the brain tissue in the background. Thus, we combined dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MRA at 3T with parallel imaging to evaluate these techniques in view of the efficacy of its temporal resolution of an intracranial arteriovenous malformation (iAVM), a dural arteriovenous fistula (dAVF), and an extracranial facial arteriovenous malformation (eAVM). A comparison with conventional catheter digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was performed.

Description of Techniques

All MR imaging measurements were performed on a 3T whole-body system by using an eight-element phased-array head coil. Dynamic MRA was performed by using a 3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence (12) with the following parameters: TE/TR, 1.62/4.31 ms; bandwidth, 490 Hz/Px; partially sampling a k-space volume of 256 × 256 × 16 data points, with an in-plane image resolution of 0.8 × 0.8 mm and a section resolution of 6 mm. Parallel imaging with a GRAPPA factor (generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions) of two was applied in phase-encoding direction sampling of 24 reference lines in the k-space center (13). This technique allows the acquisition of one 3D data set with the described sequence parameters in 1.5 seconds. The measurements were repeated 22 (dAVF and eAVM) and 25 times (iAVM). Contrast injection was started 7 seconds after start of measurement. To eliminate background nonvascular signal intensity, a mean mask from the first four data sets was calculated and image subtraction of the dynamic data sets from the precontrast mask was performed. Further processing and image evaluation was then done on the subtraction images. A standard dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight gadolinium-gandobenate dimeglumine (Multihance, Altana, Konstanz, Germany) followed by 20 mL of physiologic saline solution was applied via the cubital vein. Because no injection system for a 3T unit was commercially available at this time, a manual injection of about 2 mL/s was performed.

Applications

iAVM

The diagnosis of a high-flow iAVM in the left central region was primarily established by MR imaging and a selective, conventional DSA in a 56-year-old patient presenting with headache and a suspected motor Jacksonian seizure. A partial embolization of the iAVM using Ethibloc had been performed 2 months earlier.

dAVF

The diagnosis of a bilateral dAVF emerging from anterior ethmoidal arteries (dural branches of the ophthalmic arteries) was established by conventional catheter DSA in a 51-year old patient with a pulse synchronous tinnitus. A first embolization of the right side with histoacryl had been performed before.

eAVM

The diagnosis of an eAVM in the region of the right mandible was primarily established by MR imaging and a selective, conventional DSA in this 39-year old patient. A partial embolization of two feeding arteries by using Ethibloc had been performed two months before.

All three patients received dynamic MRA before endovascular intervention, because the routine protocol includes an MR investigation with time-resolved MRA before further endovascular treatment. Catheter DSA was performed, and those series were taken into account for comparison, where the catheter was placed in the internal carotid artery (iAVM and dAVF), and external carotid artery (eAVM), respectively.

Discussion

Dynamic 2D MR projection angiography was primarily described by Wang et al (1) and modified by Hennig et al (2), reaching a temporal resolution in the subsecond domain. One of the major drawbacks of these time-resolved methods is the low signal intensity-to-noise ratio due to the fast acquisition time. Processing strategies derived from functional imaging as correlation analysis can be applied, leading to an increase of the signal intensity-to-noise ratio and a reduction of background noise (3). Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas (5–7), intracranial vascular malformations (4, 8), and extracranial vascular malformations (9) have been investigated by using contrast-enhanced 2D projection techniques. Meanwhile, time-resolved techniques give a better temporal resolution by using modified methods of k-space filling, and 3D acquisitions can be obtained at a higher spatial resolution. Coley et al (14) reached a temporal resolution of one frame per second by using a radial-projection sliding window technique. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MRA of the whole brain could be performed at a temporal resolution of one frame per 1.8–2.1 second by using parallel imaging at 1.5T (15).

In this technical note, dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D MRA at 3T combined with parallel imaging was performed by taking advantage of the reduction of acquisition time established by parallel imaging and the higher signal intensity-to-noise ratio at 3T. A temporal resolution of one 3D data set every 1.5 seconds could be achieved by using a parallel imaging technique. The expected improvement of the signal intensity at 3T in combination with the saturation effects onto the stationary background tissue (due to the prolonged T1 relaxation times at 3T) was additionally advantageous.

The temporal resolution was sufficient for the extracranial and intracranial AVM. In the high-flow iAVM an arteriovenous transit time of 1 second could be detected. A normal transit time of 3 seconds in this case could be established in healthy parts of the vasculature and is confirmed by the findings of Noguchi et al (7). For the high-flow dAVF, the arteriovenous transit time was so fast that a simultaneous and identical time course of affluxion artery and draining vein was found. But this finding could be confirmed by conventional angiography showing a simultaneous appearance of arterial feeder and drainage vein.

The in-plane spatial resolution was only slightly improved from 0.97 × 0.97 mm2 at the 2D MRA (5, 9) to 0.8 × 0.8 mm2 at the herein presented 3D MRA to increase temporal resolution. The section thickness, however, was different: 80 mm for the 2D MRA and 6 mm for the 3D MRA (with 16 sections acquired).

The dominant feeding arteries were sufficiently depicted in the iAVM and the eAVM. The small terminal branch of the affluxion artery of the dAVF could only be suspected. The low diameter of the vessel and the resulting low signal intensity from this feeding artery are accounted as reasons for the missing depiction. The nidus of the eAVM could be clearly depicted, whereas the nidus of the iAVM did not reach sufficient signal intensity to be clearly assessed.

Conclusion

Dynamic 3D MRA combined with parallel imaging could be shown to be advantageous by receiving at temporal resolution of one image per 1.5 seconds which is fast for 3D MRA. Further improvement of temporal resolution may derive from stratified versions of k-space filling into the subsecond domain. For the intracranial and extracranial AVM, the temporal resolution was sufficient by even separating pathologically and normally filled intracranial veins. For the high-flow dural arteriovenous fistula, however, a simultaneous filling of arterial feeder and venous drainage was found by dynamic 3D MRA and conventional angiography.

References

  1. ↵
    Wang Y, Johnston DL, Breen JF, et al. Dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using contrast enhancement, fast data acquisition and complex subtraction. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:551–556
    PubMed
  2. ↵
    Hennig J, Scheffler K, Laubenberger J, Strecker R. Time-resolved projection angiography after bolus injection of contrast agent. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:341–556
    PubMed
  3. ↵
    Strecker R, Scheffler K, Klisch J, et al. Fast functional MRA using time-resolved projection MR angiography with correlation analysis. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:303–309
    CrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. MR digital subtraction angiography for the assessment of cranial arteriovenous malformations and fistulas. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:451–453
    PubMed
  5. ↵
    Wetzel SG, Bilecen D, Lyrer P, et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: detection by dynamic MR projection angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1293–1295
    PubMed
  6. Coley SC, Romanowski CA, Hodgson TJ, Griffith PD. Dural arteriovenous fistulae: non-invasive diagnosis with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:404–407
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Noguchi K, Melhem ER, Kanazawa T, et al. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with combined 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and MR digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:183–190
    PubMed
  8. ↵
    Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892–1899
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Ziyeh S, Schumacher M, Strecker R, et al. Head and neck vascular malformations: time-resolved MR projection angiography. Neuroradiology 2003;45:681–686
    CrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Willinek WA, Gieseke J, von Falkenhausen M, et al. Sensitivity encoding (SENSE) for high spatial resolution time-of-flight MR angiography of the intracranial arteries at 3.0 T. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2004;176:21–26
    PubMed
  11. ↵
    Tsuchiya K, Aoki C, Fujikawa A, Hachiya J. Three-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography using parallel imaging and keyhole data sampling in cerebrovascular diseases: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2004;000:00–00
  12. ↵
    Creasy JL, Price RR, Presbrey T, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1990;175:280–283
    PubMed
  13. ↵
    Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1202–1210
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Coley SC, Wild JM, Wilkinson ID, Griffiths PD. Neurovascular MRI with dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 2003;45:843–850
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Wetzel S, Meckel S, Bilecen D, et al. Whole-brain MR-DSA using time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA and parallel imaging. Proc Int Soc Mag Reson Med 2004;12:415
  • Received July 14, 2004.
  • Accepted after revision September 14, 2004.
Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Conventional catheter DSA (A, B) reveals a high-flow AVM with a left central nidus fed by a central branch of the middle cerebral artery and an enlarged callosomarginal artery. A superficial and cortical vein is draining into the frontoparietal superior sagittal sinus. The time difference between A and B is 0.5 seconds.

The dynamic MRA (D, E) depicts both the arterial feeders and the drainage vein. The nidus itself is poorly depicted and superposed by the early filled enlarged cortical vein. A region-of-interest analysis of the time signal intensity course (C, F) was performed within the internal carotid artery (region 1), the drainage vein (region 2), the parietal superior sagittal sinus (region 3), which was fed by the drainage vein, and the frontal superior sagittal sinus (region 4), showing anterograde flow and no blood supply from the iAVM as established by conventional DSA. The time course of the signal intensity within the region of interest is given in arbitrary units. The difference of contrast arrival time between the internal carotid artery (region 1) and the dominant drainage vein (region 2) was 2 seconds. The difference of time to peak was 1 second, whereas the difference of contrast arrival time between the internal carotid artery and the normally fed frontal superior sagittal sinus was 4 seconds, and the difference of time to peak was 3 seconds. This reflects the flow pattern of the high-flow AVM, where the venous drainage system is already filled in the early arterial perfusion phase. The regular time of the venous perfusion phase is shown by the time course of the frontal sagittal superior sinus, and is in the normal range (4–7 seconds) as given by Noguchi et al (7).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Conventional catheter DSA (A, B) obtained at two frames per second shows an enlarged ophthalmic artery feeding a dural arteriovenous fistula. The anterior ethmoidal artery is the supplying arterial feeder. The fistula point is in the midline at the dural passage. The frontal sagittal superior sinus is immediately filled during the early arterial phase.

Dynamic 3D MRA (D, E) depicted the residual dAVF arising from the ophthalmic artery and a filling of the frontal superior sagittal sinus during the very early arterial phase. The direct point of the fistula can only be suspected, whereas the supplying arteries and their hemodynamics can be observed. A region-of-interest analysis of the signal intensity time course (C, F) was performed within the internal carotid artery (region 1), the ophthalmic artery (region 2), the superior sagittal sinus (region 3), which was fed by the drainage vein, and the sinus rectus (region 4), which was not supplied by blood from the dAVF. The time course of the SI within the region of interest is given in arbitrary units. The differences of the dynamics of contrast enhancement between the internal carotid artery, the ophthalmic artery and the superior sagittal sinus were below the temporal resolution of our sequence. This reflects the very fast hemodynamics of the high-flow dAVF, where the venous drainage system is nearly simultaneously filled with the early arterial perfusion phase. This finding was confirmed by conventional angiography, where arterial and venous contrast appearance was also simultaneous.

Fig 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 3.

In conventional catheter DSA (A, B) a facial AVM is displayed. The infraorbital artery and the facial artery were the arterial feeders; an early draining vein was not present.

Dynamic MRA revealed a facial eAVM consisting of a nidus within the soft tissue below the right mandible. Two feeding arteries, the infraorbital artery and the facial artery were clearly assessed, and the nidus of the eAVM could be clearly depicted in the dynamic 3D MRA (D, E). These findings were consistent with the selective, conventional DSA (A, B). A region-of-interest analysis of the signal intensity time course (C, F) was performed within the external carotid artery (region 1), the nidus (region 2), and the transverse sinus (region 3). The time course of the SI within the region of interest is given in arbitrary units. The difference of contrast arrival time between the external carotid artery and the nidus was 1.5 seconds; the difference of time to peak was 2 seconds. The difference of contrast arrival time between the external carotid artery and the transverse sinus was 4.5 seconds; the difference of time to peak was 7 seconds. The time course of signal intensity showed an intermediate behavior with characteristics of arterial and venous flow. Thus, this example nicely reflects a case of a typical eAVM.

  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 26 (3)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 26, Issue 3
1 Mar 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dynamic 3D MR Angiography of Intra- and Extracranial Vascular Malformations at 3T: A Technical Note
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
S. Ziyeh, R. Strecker, A. Berlis, J. Weber, J. Klisch, I. Mader
Dynamic 3D MR Angiography of Intra- and Extracranial Vascular Malformations at 3T: A Technical Note
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2005, 26 (3) 630-634;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Dynamic 3D MR Angiography of Intra- and Extracranial Vascular Malformations at 3T: A Technical Note
S. Ziyeh, R. Strecker, A. Berlis, J. Weber, J. Klisch, I. Mader
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2005, 26 (3) 630-634;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Description of Techniques
    • Applications
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Noninvasive Follow-up Imaging of Ruptured Pediatric Brain AVMs Using Arterial Spin-Labeling
  • Birthmarks of Medical Significance
  • Detection of residual brain arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced four-dimensional MR angiography at 3.0 T
  • Evaluation of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas with 4D Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T
  • Cranial Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: Diagnosis and Classification with Time-Resolved MR Angiography at 3T
  • High-Resolution 3T MR Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Comparison of Manual and Semiautomated Quantification of Stenosis
  • MR Angiography of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: Diagnosis and Follow-Up after Treatment Using a Time-Resolved 3D Contrast-Enhanced Technique
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
  • Statin Therapy Does Not Affect the Radiographic and Clinical Profile of Patients with TIA and Minor Stroke
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire