Prospective Evaluation of Suspected Stenoocclusive Disease of the Intracranial Artery: Combined MR Angiography and CT Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography

References

1. ↵
   Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, Zamanillo MC. Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke 1995;26:14–20

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. ↵
   Chimowitz MI, Kokkinos J, Strong J, et al. The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Study. Neurology 1995;45:1488–1493

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. ↵
   Heiserman JE, Drayer BP, Keller PJ, Fram EK. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: evaluation with three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1992;185:667–673

   PubMedWeb of Science
4. Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Mabuchi N, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: diagnostic accuracy of three-dimensional, Fourier transform, time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1994;193:187–193

   PubMedWeb of Science
5. Dagirmanjian A, Ross JS, Obuchowski N, et al. High resolution, magnetization transfer saturation, variable flip angle, time-of-flight MRA in the detection of intracranial vascular stenoses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:700–706

   PubMed
6. Fürst G, Hofer M, Steinmetz H, et al. Intracranial stenoocclusive disease: MR angiography with magnetization transfer and variable flip angle. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:1749–1757

   Abstract
7. ↵
   Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Nakagawa T, et al. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: MR angiographic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:135–143

   Abstract
8. ↵
   Katz DA, Marks MP, Napel SA, Bracci PM, Roberts SL. Circle of Willis: evaluation with spiral CT angiography, MR angiography, and conventional angiography. Radiology 1995;195:445–449

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. Ogawa T, Okudera T, Noguchi K, et al. Cerebral aneurysms: evaluation with three-dimensional CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:447–454

   Abstract
10. ↵
    Knauth M, von Kummer R, Jansen O, et al. Potential of CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1001–1010

    Abstract
11. ↵
    Shrier DA, Tanaka H, Numaguchi Y, et al. CT angiography in the evaluation of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1011–1020

    Abstract
12. ↵
    Skutta B, Fürst G, Eilers J, et al. Intracranial stenoocclusive disease: double-detector helical CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:791–799

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    Takagi R, Hayashi H, Kobayashi H, et al. Three dimensional CT angiography for intracranial aneurysm: new semiautomated reconstruction technique. Radiology 1998;209(P):627
14. ↵
    Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989;24:234–245

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    Fleiss JL, ed. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 1981
16. ↵
    Fürst G, Hofer M, Sitzer M, et al. Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995;19:692–699

    PubMed
17. ↵
    Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, et al. Artifacts in maximum intensity projection display of MR angiograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:623–629

    CrossRefPubMed
18. ↵
    Litt AW, Eidelman EM, Pinto RS, et al. Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:149–154

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. ↵
    Schwartz RB, Jones KM, Chernoff DM, et al. Common carotid artery bifurcation: evaluation with spiral CT. Radiology 1992;185:513–519

    PubMedWeb of Science
20. Marks MP, Napel S, Jordan JE, Enzmann DR. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:1267–1271

    PubMedWeb of Science
21. Cumming MJ, Morrow IM. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:517–523

    PubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Link J, Brossmann J, Grabener M, et al. Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:89–94

    Abstract
23. ↵
    Dillon EM, Van Leeuwen MS, Fernandez MA. CT angiography: application to the evaluation carotid artery stenosis. Radiology 1993;189:211–219

    PubMedWeb of Science
24. ↵
    Leclerc X, Godefroy O, Lucas C, et al. Internal carotid arterial stenosis: CT angiography with volume rendering. Radiology 1999;210:673–682

    PubMedWeb of Science