Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleHistorical Article

Neuroradiology Classics

Samuel M. Wolpert
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2000, 21 (3) 605-606;
Samuel M. Wolpert
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Whereas the Nobel Prize committee erred in not awarding their prize in medicine or physiology to Moniz for his discovery of cerebral angiography, they did not compound this error by failing to recognize the value of computed axial tomography. In 1979 they awarded the prize to the Englishman, Godfrey Hounsfield, and the South African-born naturalized American, Alan Cormack, for their development of computerized axial tomography. Each Nobel prize has its winners and losers, and the 1979 award was no exception (1). Many feel that William Oldendorf, an American neurologist, should also have been offered the award for a device he built from junk box parts in 1960. The basic challenge of CT was to develop a machine that could reconstruct the internal points in a three-dimensional object, and portray them in a cross-sectional plane. Oldendorf implemented such a device in 1960 but was unable to obtain commercial funding for its further development. A letter from one of the world's major X-ray manufacturers to him ended, “…even if it could be made to work as you suggest, we cannot imagine a significant market for such an expensive apparatus which would do nothing but make a radiographic cross-section of a head.” (2). A possible factor in the Nobel Committee's decision not to recognize Oldendorf was the consideration of awarding the prize to two Americans and one Englishman while multimillion-dollar litigation was pending between U.S. and British manufacturers of CT scanners (1). Also, there was a conspicuous absence of any mention of mathematics in Oldendorf's paper (3), whereas Cormack, in his papers of 1963 and 1964, described the mathematical algorithm at the core of cross-sectional imaging (4, 5). Another reason for Oldendorf being rejected could have been a reluctance by the Nobel Committee to recognize applied rather than basic research (1). Cormack delayed publication of his results for 6 years because of his belief that someone must have developed an algorithm similar to his, and he did not want to claim priority over another researcher's previously published work. Informed by mathematicians in Boston and in Cape Town that the relevant algorithms were original, he published his articles. In fact, Tetal'baum in 1957 published an article in the Russian literature on line integrals that referred to the mathematical basis of three-dimensional image reconstruction from a two-dimensional plane (6). Cormack was unaware of this publication.*

Hounsfield's totally independent work began 10 years after Cormack's. Both Oldendorf's and Cormack's inspiration came from a medical environment. In the case of Oldendorf, from a distaste for the discomfort experienced by patients with needles in their carotid arteries or in their lumbar subarachnoid spaces, and in the case of Cormack, from a request from a radiation therapist in Cape Town to deliver a large dose of radiation to a malignancy while simultaneously delivering as small a dose as possible to the normal surrounding tissue (7). Hounsfield's inspiration came from pattern recognition studies at the Central Research Laboratories of Electrical and Musical Industries (EMI) [author: please spell out] (8). In 1957 he speculated that a mathematical technique might be used to reconstruct the internal structure of a body from a number of X-ray transmission measurements. Like Cormack, Hounsfield realized that a tomographic approach was the most practical; any three-dimensional body could be divided into slices, with each slice being reconstructed from radiation passing through it. As did Cormack and Oldendorf, Hounsfield initially used a radioactive source; after he substituted an X-ray tube for the source, the data gathering took 9 hours rather than 9 days! With the help of two radiologists, James Ambrose and Louis Kreel, numerous human brains, fresh bullock brains, and pig carcasses were scanned before the first clinical machine was installed at the Atkinson Morley Hospital in Wimbledon in 1971. After a period of about 1½ years for the gathering of clinical data, a presentation was made at the April 1972 meeting of the British Institute of Radiology (9), followed by publication of the seminal papers in December 1973 (10, 11).

In May 1972, CT scanning was demonstrated for the first time in the United States, with the initial clinical results being shown by Dr. James Bull at Dr. M. M. Schechter's postgraduate course on neuroradiology in New York. As an attendee and participant at the course, I remember the excitement the first CT pictures generated. News of the exciting advance spread rapidly, and the first two American-installed EMI scanners were placed in the Mayo Clinic and at the Massachusetts General Hospital in June and July of 1973.

In the original rotate/translate scanner (11), the patient's head was initially positioned in an expanding rubber head cap to reduce the volume of surrounding air. The thickness of the scans was standardized at 13 mm so that 10 scans usually encompassed the patient's head. Eight-millimeter scans were also available and the original matrix was 80 × 80, ie, 3 × 3 mm. Each scanning run took approximately 4 minutes. The results of the scans were shown either as numerical printouts of the Hounsfield values, as a cathode ray display of the processed information from magnetic tape, or as a Polaroid picture of the cathode ray display.

In Ambrose's original article, even with the primitive 80 × 80 matrix, calcified tumors, intracerebral hemorrhage, and necrotic or cystic low-density tumors were depicted. Old infarcts, metastases, craniopharyngiomas, and subdural hematomas were diagnosed also. The value of contrast enhancement was recognized in this seminal paper with the diagnosis of a meningioma after the injection of sodium iothalamate. The limitations imposed by patient movement during the scans and difficulties of examining the skull base were stressed by Dr. Ambrose, who felt that pneumoencephalography was still an important diagnostic tool for lesions causing chiasmatic and optic nerve compression as well as small tumors in the cerebellopontine angle cisterns. With the subsequent rapid advance of improved scanner resolution, however, pneumoencephalography died out as a neuroradiologic diagnostic tool and computed tomography took its place.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 * Similar algorithms have been attributed to an Austrian, Radon, in 1917, and to a Dutch mathematician-physicist, H. A. Lorenz, in 1905.

References

  1. ↵
    Broad WJ. Riddle of the Nobel Debate. Science 1980;207:37-38
    FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Oldendorf WH. The Quest for an Image of the Brain.. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1980
  3. ↵
    Oldendorf WH. Isolated flying spot detection of radiodensity discontinuities—displaying the internal structural patterns of a complex object. IRE Trans Biomed Electronics BME 1961;8:68-72
  4. ↵
    Cormack AM. Representation of a function by its line integrals, with some radiological applications. J Appl Physics 1963;34:2722-2727
    CrossRef
  5. Cormack AM. Representation of a function by its line integrals, with some radiological applications. II. J Appl Physics 1964;35:2908-2913
    CrossRef
  6. ↵
    Barrett HH, Hawkins WG, Joy MLG. Letter to the editor: historical note on computed tomography. Radiology 1983;147:172
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Friedland GW. Allan MacLeod Cormack. In memoriam. Radiology 1998;209:290-291
  8. ↵
    Di Chiro G, Brooks RA. The 1979 Nobel Prize in physiology or medicine. J Comput Assisted Tomogr 1980;4:241-245
    PubMed
  9. ↵
    Ambrose J, Hounsfield G. Computed transverse axial tomography. Proceedings of the British Institute of Radiology. Br J Radiol 1973;46:148-149
    PubMed
  10. ↵
    Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): part 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 1973;46:1016-1022
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Ambrose J. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): part 2. Clinical application. Br J Radiol 1973;46:1023-1047
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 21, Issue 3
1 Mar 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neuroradiology Classics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Samuel M. Wolpert
Neuroradiology Classics
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2000, 21 (3) 605-606;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Neuroradiology Classics
Samuel M. Wolpert
American Journal of Neuroradiology Mar 2000, 21 (3) 605-606;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • In Re: Belliveau JW, Kennedy DN, McKinstry C, et al. Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging.Science 1991 Nov 1;254(5032):716–719
  • Dinner at Keen's: The Founding of the American Society of Neuroradiology
  • In Re: Harnsberger HR, Osborn AG. Differential Diagnosis of Head and Neck Lesions Based on Their Space of Origin. 1. The Suprahyoid Part of the Neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:147–154 and Smoker WRK, Harnsberger HR. Differential Diagnosis of Head and Neck Lesions Based on Their Space of Origin. 2. The Infrahyoid Portion of the Neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:155–159
Show more Historical Article

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire