Perfusion Showdown: Comparison of Multiple MRI Perfusion Techniques in the Grading of Pediatric Brain Tumors

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Jaimes C,
   2. Poussaint TY

   . Primary neoplasms of the pediatric brain. Radiology Clin North Am 2019;57:1163–75 doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2019.06.004 pmid:31582042

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Louis DN,
   2. Perry A,
   3. Wesseling P, et al

   . The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol 2021;23:1231–51 doi:10.1093/neuonc/noab106 pmid:34185076

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Jaremko JL,
   2. Jans LBO,
   3. Coleman LT, et al

   . Value and limitations of diffusion-weighted imaging in grading and diagnosis of pediatric posterior fossa tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1613–16 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2155 pmid:20538820

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Kralik SF,
   2. Taha A,
   3. Kamer AP, et al

   . Diffusion imaging for tumor grading of supratentorial brain tumors in the first year of life. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:815–23 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3757 pmid:24200900

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Seo M,
   2. Choi Y,
   3. Soo Lee Y, et al

   . Glioma grading using multiparametric MRI: head-to-head comparison among dynamic susceptibility contrast, dynamic contrast-enhancement, diffusion-weighted images, and MR spectroscopy. Eur J Radiology 2023;165:110888 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110888 pmid:37257338

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Essig M,
   2. Nguyen TB,
   3. Shiroishi MS, et al

   . Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked clinical questions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201:W495–510 doi:10.2214/AJR.12.9544 pmid:23971482

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Ibrahim M,
   2. Ghazi TU,
   3. Bapuraj JR, et al

   . Contrast pediatric brain perfusion: dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2021;29:515–26 doi:10.1016/j.mric.2021.06.004 pmid:34717842

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Yeom KW,
   2. Mitchell LA,
   3. Lober RM, et al

   . Arterial spin-labeled perfusion of pediatric brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:395–401 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3670 pmid:23907239

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Luo H,
   2. He L,
   3. Cheng W, et al

   . The diagnostic value of intravoxel incoherent motion imaging in differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiology 2021;94:20201321 doi:10.1259/bjr.20201321 pmid:33876653

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Morabito R,
    2. Alafaci C,
    3. Pergolizzi S, et al

    . DCE and DSC perfusion MRI diagnostic accuracy in the follow-up of primary and metastatic intra-axial brain tumors treated by radiosurgery with cyberknife. Radiat Oncol 2019;14:65 doi:10.1186/s13014-019-1271-7 pmid:30992043

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Jalnefjord O,
    2. Andersson M,
    3. Montelius M, et al

    . Comparison of methods for estimation of the intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion coefficient (D) and perfusion fraction (f). MAGMA 2018;31:715–23 doi:10.1007/s10334-018-0697-5 pmid:30116979

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Gustafsson O,
    2. Montelius M,
    3. Starck G, et al

    . Impact of prior distributions and central tendency measures on Bayesian intravoxel incoherent motion model fitting. Magn Reson Med 2018;79:1674–83 doi:10.1002/mrm.26783 pmid:28626964

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Barker PB,
    2. Golay X,
    3. Zaharchuk G

    1. Tofts PS,
    2. Parker GJ

    . DCE-MRI: acquisition and analysis techniques. In: Barker PB, Golay X, Zaharchuk G, eds. Clinical perfusion MRI: techniques and applications. Cambridge University Press; 2013:58–74 doi:10.1017/CBO9781139004053.006

    CrossRef
14. 14.↵
    1. Boxerman JL,
    2. Schmainda KM,
    3. Weisskoff RM

    . Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:859–67 pmid:16611779

    PubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Jenkinson M,
    2. Beckmann CF,
    3. Behrens TE, et al

    . FSL. Neuroimage 2012;62:782–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 pmid:21979382

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Maes F,
    2. Collignon A,
    3. Vandermeulen D, et al

    . Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1997;16:187–98 doi:10.1109/42.563664 pmid:9101328

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Darbar A,
    2. Waqas M,
    3. Enam SF, et al

    . Use of preoperative apparent diffusion coefficients to predict brain tumor grade. Cureus 2018;10:e2284 doi:10.7759/cureus.2284 pmid:29740523

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Ho CY,
    2. Cardinal JS,
    3. Kamer AP, et al

    . Relative cerebral blood volume from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in the grading of pediatric primary brain tumors. Neuroradiology 2015;57:299–306 doi:10.1007/s00234-014-1478-0 pmid:25504266

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Ho CY,
    2. Supakul N,
    3. Patel PU, et al

    . Differentiation of pilocytic and pilomyxoid astrocytomas using dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion and diffusion weighted imaging. Neuroradiology 2020;62:81–88 doi:10.1007/s00234-019-02310-0 pmid:31676961

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Sie M,
    2. de Bont ESJM,
    3. Scherpen FJG, et al

    . Tumour vasculature and angiogenic profile of paediatric pilocytic astrocytoma; is it much different from glioblastoma? Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2010;36:636–47 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2990.2010.01113.x pmid:20704656

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Ho CY,
    2. Cardinal JS,
    3. Kamer AP, et al

    . Contrast leakage patterns from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI in the grading of primary pediatric brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2016;37:544–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4559 pmid:26564438

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Dallery F,
    2. Bouzerar R,
    3. Michel D, et al

    . Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric brain tumors. Neuroradiology 2017;59:1143–53 doi:10.1007/s00234-017-1917-9 pmid:28861622

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Withey SB,
    2. MacPherson L,
    3. Oates A, et al

    . Dynamic susceptibility-contrast magnetic resonance imaging with contrast agent leakage correction aids in predicting grade in pediatric brain tumours: a multicenter study. Pediatr Radiology 2022;52:1134–49 doi:10.1007/s00247-021-05266-7 pmid:35290489

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Welker K,
    2. Boxerman J,
    3. Kalnin A

    ; American Society of Functional Neuroradiology MR Perfusion Standards and Practice Subcommittee of the ASFNR Clinical Practice Committee, et al. ASFNR recommendations for clinical performance of MR dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:E41–51 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4341 pmid:25907520

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Vajapeyam S,
    2. Stamoulis C,
    3. Ricci K, et al

    . Automated processing of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: correlation of advanced pharmacokinetic metrics with tumor grade in pediatric brain tumors. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:170–75 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4949 pmid:27633807

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Gupta PK,
    2. Saini J,
    3. Sahoo P, et al

    . Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in grading of pediatric brain tumors on 3T. Pediatr Neurosurg 2017;52:298–305 doi:10.1159/000479283 pmid:28848203

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Kikuchi K,
    2. Hiwatashi A,
    3. Togao O, et al

    . Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging of pediatric intracranial tumors: correlation with histology and diagnostic utility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2019;40:878–84 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A6052 pmid:31023663

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. She D,
    2. Lin S,
    3. Guo W, et al

    . Grading of pediatric intracranial tumors: are intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusional kurtosis imaging superior to conventional DWI? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021;42:2046–53 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7270 pmid:34556474

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Morana G,
    2. Tortora D,
    3. Staglianò S, et al

    . Pediatric astrocytic tumor grading: comparison between arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI perfusion. Neuroradiology 2018;60:437–46 doi:10.1007/s00234-018-1992-6 pmid:29453753

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Dangouloff-Ros V,
    2. Deroulers C,
    3. Foissac F, et al

    . Arterial spin labeling to predict brain tumor grading in children: correlations between histopathologic vascular density and perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 2016;281:553–66 doi:10.1148/radiol.2016152228 pmid:27257950

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Testud B,
    2. Brun G,
    3. Varoquaux A, et al

    . Perfusion-weighted techniques in MRI grading of pediatric cerebral tumors: efficiency of dynamic susceptibility contrast and arterial spin labeling. Neuroradiology 2021;63:1353–66 doi:10.1007/s00234-021-02640-y pmid:33506349

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Su Y,
    2. Kang J,
    3. Lin X, et al

    . Whole-tumor histogram analysis of diffusion and perfusion metrics for noninvasive pediatric glioma grading. Neuroradiology 2023;65:1063–71 doi:10.1007/s00234-023-03145-6 pmid:37010573

    CrossRefPubMed