Cognitive Control Network and Language Reorganization in Patients with Brain Tumors

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Briganti C,
   2. Sestieri C,
   3. Mattei PA, et al

   . Reorganization of functional connectivity of the language network in patients with brain gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1983–90 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3064 pmid:22555573

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Pasquini L,
   2. Di Napoli A,
   3. Rossi-Espagnet MC, et al

   . Understanding language reorganization with neuroimaging: how language adapts to different focal lesions. insights into clinical applications. Front Hum Neurosci 2022;16:747215 doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.747215 pmid:35250510

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Pasquini L,
   2. Yildirim O,
   3. Silveira P, et al

   . Effect of tumor genetics, pathology, and location on fMRI of language reorganization in brain tumor patients. Eur Radiology 2023;33:6069–78 doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09610-3 pmid:37074422

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Pasquini L,
   2. Jenabi M,
   3. Yildirim O, et al

   . Brain functional connectivity in low- and high-grade gliomas: differences in network dynamics associated with tumor grade and location. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:3327 doi:10.3390/cancers14143327 pmid:35884387

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Pasquini L,
   2. Peck KK,
   3. Tao A, et al

   . Longitudinal evaluation of brain plasticity in low-grade gliomas: fMRI and graph-theory provide insights on language reorganization. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15:836 doi:10.3390/cancers15030836 pmid:36765795

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Pasquini L,
   2. Tao A,
   3. Del Ferraro G, et al

   . Association of lack of speech arrest during cortical stimulation with interhemispheric reorganization of the functional language network in patients with brain tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023;221:806–16 doi:10.2214/AJR.23.29434 pmid:37377358

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Kinno R,
   2. Ohta S,
   3. Muragaki Y, et al

   . Differential reorganization of three syntax-related networks induced by a left frontal glioma. Brain 2014;137:1193–212 doi:10.1093/brain/awu013 pmid:24519977

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Isaacs KL,
   2. Barr WB,
   3. Nelson PK, et al

   . Degree of handedness and cerebral dominance. Neurology 2006;66:1855–58 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000219623.28769.74 pmid:16801650

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Ng S,
   2. Valdes PA,
   3. Moritz-Gasser S, et al

   . Intraoperative functional remapping unveils evolving patterns of cortical plasticity. Brain 2023;146:3088–100 doi:10.1093/brain/awad116 pmid:37029961

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Pasquini L,
    2. Jenabi M,
    3. Peck KK, et al

    . Language reorganization in patients with left-hemispheric gliomas is associated with increased cortical volume in language-related areas and in the default mode network. Cortex 2022;157:245–55 doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.09.014 pmid:36356409

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Quinones A,
    2. Jenabi M,
    3. Pasquini L, et al

    . Longitudinal functional MRI demonstrates translocation of language function in patients with brain tumors. J Neurosurg 2023;139:29–37 doi:10.3171/2022.10.JNS221212 pmid:36433876

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Desmurget M,
    2. Bonnetblanc F,
    3. Duffau H

    . Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity. Brain 2007;130:898–914 doi:10.1093/brain/awl300 pmid:17121742

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Holodny AI,
    2. Schulder M,
    3. Ybasco A, et al

    . Translocation of Broca’s area to the contralateral hemisphere as the result of the growth of a left inferior frontal glioma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:941–43 doi:10.1097/00004728-200211000-00014 pmid:12488739

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Petrovich NM,
    2. Holodny AI,
    3. Brennan CW, et al

    . Isolated translocation of Wernicke’s area to the right hemisphere in a 62-year-man with a temporo-parietal glioma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:130–33

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Li Q,
    2. Dong JW,
    3. Ferraro G. D, et al

    . Functional translocation of Broca’s area in a low-grade left frontal glioma: graph theory reveals the novel, adaptive network connectivity. Front Neurol 2019;10:702–06 doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00702 pmid:31333562

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Gębska-Kośla K,
    2. Bryszewski B,
    3. Jaskólski DJ, et al

    . Reorganization of language centers in patients with brain tumors located in eloquent speech areas–A pre- and postoperative preliminary fMRI study. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2017;51:403–10 doi:10.1016/j.pjnns.2017.07.010 pmid:28780063

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Pasquini L,
    2. Jenabi M,
    3. Graham M, et al

    . Tumors affect the metabolic connectivity of the human brain measured by [18F]FDG PET. Clin Nucl Med 2024;49:822–29 doi:10.1097/RLU.0000000000005227 pmid:38693648

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Cole MW,
    2. Schneider W

    . The cognitive control network: integrated cortical regions with dissociable functions. Neuroimage 2007;37:343–60 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.071 pmid:17553704

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Silvestri E,
    2. Moretto M,
    3. Facchini S, et al

    . Widespread cortical functional disconnection in gliomas: an individual network mapping approach. Brain Commun 2022;4:fcac082–14 doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcac082 pmid:35474856

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Ovsepian SV

    . The dark matter of the brain. Brain Struct Funct 2019;224:973–83 doi:10.1007/s00429-019-01835-7 pmid:30659350

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Pasquini L,
    2. Peck KK,
    3. Jenabi M, et al

    . Functional MRI in neuro-oncology: state of the art and future directions. Radiology 2023;308:e222028 doi:10.1148/radiol.222028 pmid:37668519

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Oldfield RC

    . The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97–113 doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 pmid:5146491

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Nugent AC,
    2. Thomas AG,
    3. Mahoney M, et al

    . The NIMH intramural healthy volunteer dataset: A comprehensive MEG, MRI, and behavioral resource. Sci Data 2022;9:518 doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01623-9 pmid:36008415

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Spreng RN,
    2. Setton R,
    3. Alter U, et al

    . Neurocognitive aging data release with behavioral, structural and multi-echo functional MRI measures. Sci Data 2022;9:119–113 doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01231-7 pmid:35351925

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Kevin F,
    2. Ivan M,
    3. Keith AB

    . Cognitive Control Theoretic Mechanisms of Real-time fMRI-Guided Neuromodulation (CTM). OpenNeuro 2021 doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds003831.v1.0.0

    CrossRef
26. 26.↵
    1. Shahrokhi M,
    2. Asuncion RMD

    . Neurologic exam. In: StatPearls; Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022
27. 27.↵
    1. Fedorov A,
    2. Beichel R,
    3. Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al

    . 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1323–41 doi:10.1016/j.MRI.2012.05.001 pmid:22770690

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Rolls ET,
    2. Huang CC,
    3. Lin CP, et al

    . Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3. Neuroimage 2020;206:116189 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116189 pmid:31521825

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Cox RW

    . AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 1996;29:162–73 doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 pmid:8812068

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
30. 30.↵
    1. Bandettini PA,
    2. Jesmanowicz A,
    3. Wong EC, et al

    . Processing strategies for time‐course data sets in functional MRI of the human brain. Magn Reson Med 1993;30:161–73 doi:10.1002/mrm.1910300204 pmid:8366797

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Fernández G,
    2. Specht K,
    3. Weis S, et al

    . Intrasubject reproducibility of presurgical language lateralization and mapping using fMRI. Neurology 2003;60:969–75 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000049934.34209.2e pmid:12654961

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Seghier ML

    . Laterality index in functional MRI: methodological issues. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:594–601 doi:10.1016/j.MRI.2007.10.010 pmid:18158224

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Cho NS,
    2. Peck KK,
    3. Zhang Z, et al

    . Paradoxical activation in the cerebellum during language fMRI in patients with brain tumors: possible explanations based on neurovascular uncoupling and functional reorganization. Cerebellum 2018;17:286–93 doi:10.1007/s12311-017-0902-5 pmid:29196975

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Smith SM,
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Woolrich MW, et al

    . Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 2004;23 Suppl 1:S208–19 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 pmid:15501092

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. Chen D,
    3. Yang X, et al

    . Group independent component analysis and functional MRI examination of changes in language areas associated with brain tumors at different locations. PLoS One 2013;8:e59657–10 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059657 pmid:23555736

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Du Y,
    2. Fan Y

    . Group information guided ICA for fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage 2013;69:157–97 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.008 pmid:23194820

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Du Y,
    2. Lin D,
    3. Yu Q, et al

    . Comparison of IVA and GIG-ICA in brain functional network estimation using fMRI data. Front Neurosci 2017;11:267 doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00267 pmid:28579940

    CrossRefPubMed
38. 38.↵
    1. Langlois D,
    2. Chartier S,
    3. Gosselin D

    . An introduction to independent component analysis: infoMax and FastICA algorithms. TQMP 2010;6:31–38 doi:10.20982/tqmp.06.1.p031

    CrossRef
39. 39.↵
    1. Himberg J,
    2. Hyvärinen A,
    3. Esposito F

    . Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization. Neuroimage 2004;22:1214–22 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.027 pmid:15219593

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
40. 40.↵
    1. Du Y,
    2. Fu Z,
    3. Sui J

    ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, et al. NeuroMark: an automated and adaptive ICA based pipeline to identify reproducible fMRI markers of brain disorders. Neuroimage Clin 2020;28:102375 doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102375 pmid:32961402

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Uddin LQ,
    2. Yeo BTT,
    3. Spreng RN

    . Towards a universal taxonomy of macro-scale functional human brain networks. Brain Topogr 2019;32:926–42 doi:10.1007/s10548-019-00744-6 pmid:31707621

    CrossRefPubMed
42. 42.↵
    1. Chou EP,
    2. Hsu SM

    . Cosine similarity as a sample size-free measure to quantify phase clustering within a single neurophysiological signal. J Neurosci Methods 2018;295:111–20 doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.12.007 pmid:29247676

    CrossRefPubMed
43. 43.↵
    1. Eelbode T,
    2. Bertels J,
    3. Berman M, et al

    . Optimization for medical image segmentation: theory and practice when evaluating with dice score or Jaccard index. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2020;39:3679–90 doi:10.1109/TMI.2020.3002417 pmid:32746113

    CrossRefPubMed
44. 44.↵
    1. Rubner Y,
    2. Tomasi C,
    3. Guibas LJ

    . A metric for distributions with applications to image databases. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision; 1998
45. 45.↵
    1. Wilson DJ

    . The harmonic mean p-value for combining dependent tests. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019;116:1195–200 doi:10.1073/pnas.1814092116 pmid:30610179

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    1. Yuan B,
    2. Xie H,
    3. Gong F, et al

    . Dynamic network reorganization underlying neuroplasticity: the deficits-severity-related language network dynamics in patients with left hemispheric gliomas involving language network. Cereb Cortex 2023;33:8273–85 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad113 pmid:37005067

    CrossRefPubMed
47. 47.↵
    1. Rivera-Rivera PA,
    2. Rios-Lago M,
    3. Sanchez-Casarrubios S, et al

    . Cortical plasticity catalyzed by prehabilitation enables extensive resection of brain tumors in eloquent areas. J Neurosurg 2017;126:1323–33 doi:10.3171/2016.2.JNS152485 pmid:27203145

    CrossRefPubMed
48. 48.↵
    1. Boccuni L,
    2. Abellaneda-Pérez K,
    3. Martín-Fernández J, et al

    . Neuromodulation-induced prehabilitation to leverage neuroplasticity before brain tumor surgery: a single-cohort feasibility trial protocol. Front Neurol 2023;14:1243857 doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1243857 pmid:37849833

    CrossRefPubMed
49. 49.↵
    1. Botvinick MM,
    2. Carter CS,
    3. Braver TS, et al

    . Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 2001;108:624–52 doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 pmid:11488380

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. 50.↵
    1. Hsu NS,
    2. Novick JM

    . Dynamic engagement of cognitive control modulates recovery from misinterpretation during real-time language processing. Psychol Sci 2016;27:572–82 doi:10.1177/0956797615625223 pmid:26957521

    CrossRefPubMed
51. 51.↵
    1. Bourguignon NJ,
    2. Gracco VL

    . A dual architecture for the cognitive control of language: evidence from functional imaging and language production. Neuroimage 2019;192:26–37 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.043 pmid:30831311

    CrossRefPubMed
52. 52.↵
    1. Brownsett SLE,
    2. Warren JE,
    3. Geranmayeh F, et al

    . Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke. Brain 2014;137:242–54 doi:10.1093/brain/awt289 pmid:24163248

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
53. 53.↵
    1. Radman N,
    2. Mouthon M,
    3. Di Pietro M, et al

    . The role of the cognitive control system in recovery from bilingual aphasia: a multiple single-case fMRI study. Neural Plast 2016;2016:8797086 doi:10.1155/2016/8797086 pmid:27965899

    CrossRefPubMed
54. 54.↵
    1. Erb J,
    2. Obleser J

    . Upregulation of cognitive control networks in older adults’ speech comprehension. Front Syst Neurosci 2013;7:116–13 doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00116 pmid:24399939

    CrossRefPubMed
55. 55.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Hu G,
    3. Yu Y, et al

    . Structural and functional reorganization within cognitive control network associated with protection of executive function in patients with unilateral frontal gliomas. Front Oncol 2020;10:794–12 doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.00794 pmid:32528887

    CrossRefPubMed
56. 56.↵
    1. Draganski B,
    2. Gaser C,
    3. Busch V, et al

    . Changes in grey matter induced by training. Nature 2004;427:311–12 doi:10.1038/427311a pmid:14737157

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
57. 57.↵
    1. Duffau H

    . Repeated awake surgical resection(s) for recurrent diffuse low-grade gliomas: why, when, and how to reoperate? Front Oncol 2022;12:947933–39 doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.947933 pmid:35865482

    CrossRefPubMed