Double Stent Retriever Technique for Mechanical Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Alwahdy AS,
   2. Dongoran RA

   . Double stent retriever technique for rescue recanalization in refractory large vessel occlusions. Radiol Case Rep 2023;18:2860–63 doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2023.05.050 pmid:37334327

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
2. 2.↵
   1. Asadi H,
   2. Brennan P,
   3. Martin A, et al

   . Double stent-retriever technique in endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery saddle embolus. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;25:e9–11 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.10.005

   CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. 3.↵
   1. Crosa R,
   2. Spiotta AM,
   3. Negrotto M, et al

   . “Y-stent retriever”: a new rescue technique for refractory large-vessel occlusions? J Neurosurg 2018;128:1349–53 doi:10.3171/2016.12.JNS161233 pmid:28524799

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
4. 4.↵
   1. Imahori T,
   2. Miura S,
   3. Sugihara M, et al

   . Double stent retriever (SR) technique: a novel mechanical thrombectomy technique to facilitate the device-clot interaction for refractory acute cerebral large vessel occlusions. World Neurosurg 2020;141:175–83 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.268 pmid:32522654

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
5. 5.↵
   1. Jiang C,
   2. Li Y,
   3. Hao F, et al

   . Y-configuration double-stent-retriever thrombectomy for refractory thrombus in middle cerebral artery bifurcation: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021;100:E24993 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000024993 pmid:33725971

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
6. 6.↵
   1. Kato N,
   2. Kinkori T,
   3. Watanabe K, et al

   . Parallel stent retriever technique for a refractory middle cerebral artery embolism: a technical case report. J Neuroendovasc Ther 2020;14:522–27 doi:10.5797/jnet.tn.2020-0009 pmid:37501766

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
7. 7.↵
   1. Moreu M,
   2. Pérez-García C,
   3. Gómez-Escalonilla C, et al

   . Dual SAVE technique for mechanical thrombectomy rescue on MCA bifurcation clots. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:1034 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016061 pmid:32586911

   Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
8. 8.↵
   1. Okada H,
   2. Matsuda Y,
   3. Chung J, et al

   . Utility of a Y-configured stentriever technique as a rescue method of thrombectomy for an intractable rooted thrombus located on the middle cerebral artery bifurcation: technical note. Neurosurg Focus 2017;42:E17 doi:10.3171/2017.1.FOCUS16511 pmid:28366064

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
9. 9.↵
   1. Peker A,
   2. Akgoz A,
   3. Arsava EM, et al

   . Dual mechanical thrombectomy for recanalization of a resistant acute posterior circulation stroke. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2017;19:96–100 doi:10.7461/jcen.2017.19.2.96 pmid:29152468

   CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
10. 10.↵
    1. Sasaki I,
    2. Imahori T,
    3. Yano T, et al

    . Crossing double stent retriever technique for refractory terminal internal carotid artery occlusion. Radiol Case Rep 2022;19:1658 doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2023.12.036 pmid:38463690

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
11. 11.↵
    1. Yoshimoto T,
    2. Hosoki S,
    3. Tanaka K, et al

    . Parallel stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy of an acute internal carotid artery occlusion refractory to standard techniques: a case report. Frontiers in Stroke 2023;2:1066491 doi:10.3389/fstro.2023.1066491

    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. 12.↵
    1. Li Z,
    2. Liu P,
    3. Zhang L, et al

    . Y-stent rescue technique for failed thrombectomy in patients with large vessel occlusion: a case series and pooled analysis. Front Neurol 2020;11:924 doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.00924 pmid:32973671

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
13. 13.↵
    1. Aydin K,
    2. Barburoglu M,
    3. Oztop Cakmak O, et al

    . Crossing Y-Solitaire thrombectomy as a rescue treatment for refractory acute occlusions of the middle cerebral artery. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:246–50 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014288 pmid:30194110

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
14. 14.↵
    1. Cabral LS,
    2. Mont’Alverne F,
    3. Silva HC, et al

    . Device size selection can enhance Y-stentrieving efficacy and safety as a rescue strategy in stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2022;14:558–63 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017751 pmid:34233944

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
15. 15.↵
    1. Klisch J,
    2. Sychra V,
    3. Strasilla C, et al

    . Double Solitaire mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke: Effective rescue strategy for refractory artery occlusions? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:552–56 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4133

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
16. 16.↵
    1. Xu H,
    2. Peng S,
    3. Quan T, et al

    . Tandem stents thrombectomy as a rescue treatment for refractory large vessel occlusions. J Neurointerv Surg 2021;13:33–38 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-015822 pmid:32641417

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
17. 17.↵
    1. Vega P,
    2. Murias E,
    3. Jimenez JM, et al

    . First-line double stentriever thrombectomy for M1/TICA occlusions: initial experiences. Clin Neuroradiol 2022;32:971–77 doi:10.1007/s00062-022-01161-2 pmid:35416489

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
18. 18.↵
    1. Hacke W,
    2. Kaste M,
    3. Fieschi C, et al

    . Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of thrombolytic therapy with intravenous alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (ECASS II). Second European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study Investigators. Lancet 1998;352:1245–51 doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)08020-9 pmid:9788453

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
19. 19.↵
    1. Wells G,
    2. Shea B,
    3. O’Connell J, et al

    . The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analysis. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed November 24, 2023

    Google Scholar
20. 20.↵
    1. Barendregt JJ,
    2. Doi SA,
    3. Lee YY, et al

    . Meta-analysis of prevalence. J Epidemiol Community Health 2013;67:974–78 doi:10.1136/jech-2013-203104 pmid:23963506

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
21. 21.↵
    1. Borenstein M,
    2. Hedges LV,
    3. Higgins JPT, et al

    . A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 2010;1:97–111 doi:10.1002/jrsm.12 pmid:26061376

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
22. 22.↵
    1. Kobeissi H,
    2. Ghozy S,
    3. Adusumilli G, et al

    . Endovascular therapy for stroke presenting beyond 24 hours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e2311768 doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11768 pmid:37140919

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
23. 23.↵
    1. Clarençon F,
    2. Blanc R,
    3. Gallas S, et al

    . Thrombectomy for acute basilar artery occlusion by using double Merci retriever devices and bilateral temporary vertebral artery flow reversal: technical note. J Neurosurg 2009;111:53–56 doi:10.3171/2008.11.JNS081035 pmid:19249927

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
24. 24.↵
    1. Fischer U,
    2. Kaesmacher J,
    3. Strbian D, et al

    ; SWIFT DIRECT Collaborators.Thrombectomy alone versus intravenous alteplase plus thrombectomy in patients with stroke: an open-label, blinded-outcome, randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2022;400:104–15 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00537-2 pmid:35810756

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
25. 25.↵
    1. Kamiya Y,
    2. Suzuki K,
    3. Miyauchi Y, et al

    ; for the SKIP Study Investigators. Intravenous thrombolysis increases the first pass effect for large vessel occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy. Stroke Vasc Interv Neurol.2023;3: doi:10.1161/SVIN.122.000577

    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. 26.↵
    1. Zaidat OO,
    2. Castonguay AC,
    3. Linfante I, et al

    . First-pass effect. Stroke 2018;49:660–66 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020315 pmid:29459390

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
27. 27.↵
    1. Di Maria F,
    2. Kyheng M,
    3. Consoli A, et al

    ; on behalf of the ETIS Investigators. Identifying the predictors of first-pass effect and its influence on clinical outcome in the setting of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: results from a multicentric prospective registry. Int J Stroke 2021;16:20–28 doi:10.1177/1747493020923051 pmid:32380902

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
28. 28.↵
    1. Jang KM,
    2. Choi HH,
    3. Nam TK, et al

    . Clinical outcomes of first-pass effect after mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021;211:107030 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107030 pmid:34823155

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
29. 29.↵
    1. Pilgram-Pastor SM,
    2. Piechowiak EI,
    3. Dobrocky T, et al

    . Stroke thrombectomy complication management. J Neurointerv Surg 2021;13:912–17 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017349 pmid:34158401

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
30. 30.↵
    1. Ngankou EH,
    2. Gory B,
    3. Marnat G, et al

    . Thrombectomy complications in large vessel occlusions: Incidence, predictors, and clinical impact in the ETIS registry. Stroke 2021;52:E764–68 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034865 pmid:34706564

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
31. 31.↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Tiberi R,
    3. Canals P, et al

    . Double stent-retriever as the first-line approach in mechanical thrombectomy: a randomized in vitro evaluation. J Neurointerv Surg 2023;15:1224–28 doi:10.1136/jnis-2022-019887 pmid:36627194

    Abstract/FREE Full TextGoogle Scholar
32. 32.↵
    1. Hofmeister J,
    2. Bernava G,
    3. Rosi A, et al

    . Benchtop evaluation of a double stent retriever thrombectomy technique for acute ischemic stroke treatment. Interv Neuroradiol 2023 Jul 6 [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1177/15910199231179846 pmid:37415424

    CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar