Lesion-Filling Index from Quantitative DSA Correlates with Hemorrhage of Cerebral AVM

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Abecassis IJ,
   2. Xu DS,
   3. Batjer HH, et al

   . Natural history of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 2014;37:E7 doi:10.3171/2014.6.FOCUS14250 pmid:25175445

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Rutledge C,
   2. Cooke DL,
   3. Hetts SW, et al

   . Brain arteriovenous malformations. Handb Clin Neurol 2021;176:171–78 doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-64034-5.00020-1 pmid:33272394

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Spetzler RF,
   2. Hargraves RW,
   3. McCormick PW, et al

   . Relationship of perfusion pressure and size to risk of hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1992;76:918–23 doi:10.3171/jns.1992.76.6.0918 pmid:1588424

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.↵
   1. Stapf C,
   2. Mast H,
   3. Sciacca RR, et al

   . Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurology 2006;66:1350–55 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000210524.68507.87 pmid:16682666

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Burkhardt JK,
   2. Chen X,
   3. Winkler EA, et al

   . Delayed venous drainage in ruptured arteriovenous malformations based on quantitative color-coded digital subtraction angiography. World Neurosurg 2017;104:619–27 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.120 pmid:28457930

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Chen Y,
   2. Chen P,
   3. Li R, et al

   . Rupture-related quantitative hemodynamics of the supratentorial arteriovenous malformation nidus. J Neurosurg 2023;138:740–49 doi:10.3171/2022.6.JNS212818 pmid:35962966

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Li Z,
   2. Chen Y,
   3. Chen P, et al

   . Quantitative evaluation of hemodynamics after partial embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations. J Neurointerv Surg 2021;14:1112–17 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018187 pmid:34872987

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Hu YS,
   2. Lee CC,
   3. Wu HM, et al

   . Stagnant venous outflow predicts brain arteriovenous malformation obliteration after gamma knife radiosurgery without prior intervention. Neurosurgery 2020;87:338–47 doi:10.1093/neuros/nyz507 pmid:31792505

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Lin TM,
   2. Yang HC,
   3. Lee CC, et al

   . Stasis index from hemodynamic analysis using quantitative DSA correlates with hemorrhage of supratentorial arteriovenous malformation: a cross-sectional study. J Neurosurg 2019;132:1574–82 doi:10.3171/2019.1.JNS183386 pmid:31026828

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Lin CJ,
    2. Chen KK,
    3. Hu YS, et al

    . Quantified flow and angioarchitecture show similar associations with hemorrhagic presentation of brain arteriovenous malformations. J Neuroradiol 2023;50:79–85 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2022.01.061 pmid:35120975

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Cooke DL,
    3. Saloner D, et al

    . Higher flow is present in unruptured arteriovenous malformations with silent intralesional microhemorrhages. Stroke 2017;48:2881–84 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017785 pmid:28855391

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Li R,
    2. Chen P,
    3. Han H, et al

    . Association of nidus size and rupture in brain arteriovenous malformations: Insight from angioarchitecture and hemodynamics. Neurosurg Rev 2023;46:216 doi:10.1007/s10143-023-02113-1 pmid:37650957

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Cheng JJ,
    3. Huang KY, et al

    . Quantitative assessment of angiographic perfusion reduction using color-coded digital subtraction angiography during transarterial chemoembolization. Abdom Radiology (NY) 2016;41:545–52 doi:10.1007/s00261-015-0622-6 pmid:27039326

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Atkinson RP,
    2. Awad IA,
    3. Batjer HH, et al

    ; Joint Writing Group of the Technology Assessment Committee American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology; Joint Section on Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery a Section of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Section of Stroke and the Section of Interventional Neurology of the American Academy of Neurology. Reporting terminology for brain arteriovenous malformation clinical and radiographic features for use in clinical trials. Stroke 2001;32:1430–42 doi:10.1161/01.str.32.6.1430 pmid:11387510

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Lv X,
    2. Wu Z,
    3. Jiang C, et al

    . Angioarchitectural characteristics of brain arteriovenous malformations with and without hemorrhage. World Neurosurg 2011;76:95–99 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2011.01.044 pmid:21839959

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Dautry R,
    2. Edjlali M,
    3. Roca P, et al

    . Interest of HYPR flow dynamic MRA for characterization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison with TRICKS MRA and catheter DSA. Eur Radiol 2015;25:3230–37 doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3745-9 pmid:25916388

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Todaka T,
    2. Hamada J,
    3. Kai Y, et al

    . Analysis of mean transit time of contrast medium in ruptured and unruptured arteriovenous malformations: a digital subtraction angiographic study. Stroke 2003;34:2410–14 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000089924.43363.E3 pmid:12970520

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Feghali J,
    2. Yang W,
    3. Xu R, et al

    . R₂eD AVM score. Stroke 2019;50:1703–10 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025054 pmid:31167618

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Han H,
    3. Meng X, et al

    . Development and validation of a scoring system for hemorrhage risk in brain arteriovenous malformations. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e231070 doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1070 pmid:36857052

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Benson JC,
    2. Chiu S,
    3. Flemming K, et al

    . MR characteristics of unruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations associated with seizure as initial clinical presentation. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:186–91 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015021 pmid:31320549

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
21. 21.↵
    1. Scharf J,
    2. Brauherr E,
    3. Forsting M, et al

    . Significance of haemorrhagic lacunes on MRI in patients with hypertensive cerebrovascular disease and intracerebral haemorrhage. Neuroradiology 1994;36:504–08 doi:10.1007/BF00593508 pmid:7845571

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Chen CW,
    2. Wong HF,
    3. Ye YL, et al

    . Quantitative flow measurement after placing a flow diverter for a distal internal carotid artery aneurysm. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:1238–42 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012730 pmid:27932668

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Ma L,
    3. Yang S, et al

    . Quantitative angiographic hemodynamic evaluation after revascularization surgery for moyamoya disease. Transl Stroke Res 2020;11:871–81 doi:10.1007/s12975-020-00781-5 pmid:32056157

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Raoult H,
    2. Bannier E,
    3. Maurel P, et al

    . Hemodynamic quantification in brain arteriovenous malformations with time-resolved spin-labeled magnetic resonance angiography. Stroke 2014;45:2461–64 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006080 pmid:24984747

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Kramer H,
    2. Michaely HJ,
    3. Requardt M, et al

    . Effects of injection rate and dose on image quality in time-resolved magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) by using 1.0M contrast agents. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1394–402 doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0493-x pmid:17115161

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Kim H,
    2. Salman RA,
    3. McCulloch CE, et al

    ; MARS Coinvestigators. Untreated brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurology 2014;83:590–97 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000688 pmid:25015366

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Hernesniemi JA,
    2. Dashti R,
    3. Juvela S, et al

    . Natural history of brain arteriovenous malformations: a long-term follow-up study of risk of hemorrhage in 238 patients. Neurosurgery 2008;63:823 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000330401.82582.5E pmid:19005371

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. 28.↵
    1. Ai X,
    2. Ye Z,
    3. Xu J, et al

    . The factors associated with hemorrhagic presentation in children with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2018;23:343–54 doi:10.3171/2018.9.PEDS18262 pmid:30544349

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Chen Y,
    2. Meng X,
    3. Ma L, et al

    . Contemporary management of brain arteriovenous malformations in mainland China: a Web-based nationwide questionnaire survey. Chin Neurosurg J 2020;6:26 doi:10.1186/s41016-020-00206-0 pmid:32922955

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Kim H,
    2. Su H,
    3. Weinsheimer S, et al

    . Brain arteriovenous malformation pathogenesis: a response-to-injury paradigm. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2011;111:83–92 doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0693-8_14 pmid:21725736

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Frösen J,
    2. Cebral J,
    3. Robertson AM, et al

    . Flow-induced, inflammation-mediated arterial wall remodeling in the formation and progression of intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurg Focus 2019;47:E21 doi:10.3171/2019.5.FOCUS19234 pmid:31261126

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Fry DL

    . Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circ Res 1968;22:165–97 doi:10.1161/01.res.22.2.165 pmid:5639037

    Abstract/FREE Full Text