Optimizing the Definition of Ischemic Core in CT Perfusion: Influence of Infarct Growth and Tissue-Specific Thresholds

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Vagal A,
   2. Wintermark M,
   3. Nael K, et al

   . Automated CT perfusion imaging for acute ischemic stroke: Pearls and pitfalls for real-world use. Neurology 2019;93:888–98 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000008481 pmid:31636160

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.
   1. Bivard A,
   2. Spratt N,
   3. Levi C, et al

   . Perfusion computed tomography: imaging and clinical validation in acute ischaemic stroke. Brain 2011;134:3408–16 doi:10.1093/brain/awr257 pmid:22075524

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Lin L,
   2. Bivard A,
   3. Krishnamurthy V, et al

   . Whole-brain CT perfusion to quantify acute ischemic penumbra and core. Radiology 2016;279:876–87 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015150319 pmid:26785041

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Campbell BC,
   2. Christensen S,
   3. Levi CR, et al

   . Cerebral blood flow is the optimal CT perfusion parameter for assessing infarct core. Stroke 2011;42:3435–40 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.618355 pmid:21980202

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
5. 5.↵
   1. Copen WA,
   2. Yoo AJ,
   3. Rost NS, et al

   . In patients with suspected acute stroke, CT perfusion-based cerebral blood flow maps cannot substitute for DWI in measuring the ischemic core. PLoS One 2017;12:e0188891 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0188891 pmid:29190675

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Boned S,
   2. Padroni M,
   3. Rubiera M, et al

   . Admission CT perfusion may overestimate initial infarct core: the ghost infarct core concept. J Neurointerv Surg 2017;9:66–69 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012494 pmid:27566491

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
7. 7.↵
   1. Cereda CW,
   2. Christensen S,
   3. Campbell BC, et al

   . A benchmarking tool to evaluate computer tomography perfusion infarct core predictions against a DWI standard. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2016;36:1780–89 doi:10.1177/0271678X15610586 pmid:26661203

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Dohmen C,
   2. Kumura E,
   3. Rosner G, et al

   . Adenosine in relation to calcium homeostasis: comparison between gray and white matter ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001;21:503–10 doi:10.1097/00004647-200105000-00004 pmid:11333360

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Payabvash S,
   2. Souza LC,
   3. Wang Y, et al

   . Regional ischemic vulnerability of the brain to hypoperfusion: the need for location specific computed tomography perfusion thresholds in acute stroke patients. Stroke 2011;42:1255–60 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.600940 pmid:21493917

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Hoving JW,
    2. Marquering HA,
    3. Majoie CB, et al

    . Volumetric and spatial accuracy of computed tomography perfusion estimated ischemic core volume in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2018;49:2368–75 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020846 pmid:30355095

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Saver JL

    . Time is brain–quantified. Stroke 2006;37:263–66 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000196957.55928.ab pmid:16339467

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. González RG,
    2. Hakimelahi R,
    3. Schaefer PW, et al

    . Stability of large diffusion/perfusion mismatch in anterior circulation strokes for 4 or more hours. BMC Neurol 2010;10;10:13 doi:10.1186/1471-2377-10-13 pmid:20146800

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Suomalainen OP,
    2. Elseoud Abou A,
    3. Martinez-Majander N, et al

    . Is infarct core growth linear? Infarct volume estimation by computed tomography perfusion imaging. Acta Neurol Scand 2022;145:684–91 doi:10.1111/ane.13601 pmid:35187642

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Psychogios MN,
    2. Schregel K

    . Relativity of ischemic core volume estimation. Stroke 2018;49:2283–84 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022148 pmid:30355131

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Bivard A,
    2. Levi C,
    3. Spratt N, et al

    . Perfusion CT in acute stroke: a comprehensive analysis of infarct and penumbra. Radiology 2013;267:543–50 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120971 pmid:23264345

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Laredo C,
    2. Renú A,
    3. Tudela R, et al

    . The accuracy of ischemic core perfusion thresholds varies according to time to recanalization in stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy: a comprehensive whole-brain computed tomography perfusion study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2020;40:966–77 doi:10.1177/0271678X19855885 pmid:31208242

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Noser EA,
    2. Shaltoni HM,
    3. Hall CE, et al

    . Aggressive mechanical clot disruption: a safe adjunct to thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke? Stroke 2005;36:292–96 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000152331.93770.18 pmid:15625300

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
18. 18.↵
    1. Renú A,
    2. Laredo C,
    3. Montejo C, et al

    . Greater infarct growth limiting effect of mechanical thrombectomy in stroke patients with poor collaterals. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:989–93 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014668 pmid:30814327

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Renú A,
    2. Urra X,
    3. Laredo C, et al

    . Benefit from mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke with fast and slow progression. J Neurointerv Surg 2020;12:132–35 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015064 pmid:31273073

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Campbell BC,
    2. Yassi N,
    3. Ma H, et al

    . Imaging selection in ischemic stroke: feasibility of automated CT-perfusion analysis. Int J Stroke 2015;10:51–54 doi:10.1111/ijs.12381 pmid:25319251

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Benson J,
    2. Payabvash S,
    3. Salazar P, et al

    . Comparison of CT perfusion summary maps to early diffusion-weighted images in suspected acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Eur J Radiol 2015;84:682–89 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.026 pmid:25623829

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Bouslama M,
    2. Ravindran K,
    3. Harston G, et al

    . Noncontrast computed tomography e-stroke infarct volume is similar to RAPID computed tomography perfusion in estimating postreperfusion infarct volumes. Stroke 2021;52:634–41 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031651 pmid:20146800

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Kasasbeh AS,
    2. Christensen S,
    3. Parsons MW, et al

    . Artificial neural network computer tomography perfusion prediction of ischemic core. Stroke 2019;50:1578–81 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022649 pmid:31092162

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Chen C,
    2. Bivard A,
    3. Lin L, et al

    . Thresholds for infarction vary between gray matter and white matter in acute ischemic stroke: a CT perfusion study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2019;39:536–46 doi:10.1177/0271678X17744453 pmid:29172990

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Arakawa S,
    2. Wright PM,
    3. Koga M, et al

    . Ischemic thresholds for gray and white matter: a diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance study. Stroke 2006;37:1211–16 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000217258.63925.6b pmid:16574931

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Bristow MS,
    2. Simon JE,
    3. Brown RA, et al

    . MR perfusion and diffusion in acute ischemic stroke: human gray and white matter have different thresholds for infarction. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005;25:1280–87 doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600135 pmid:15889043

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. 27.↵
    1. Demeestere J,
    2. García-Esperón C,
    3. García-Bermejo P, et al

    . Evaluation of hyperacute infarct volume using ASPECTS and brain CT perfusion core volume. Neurology 2017;88:2248–53 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004028 pmid:28515270

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Angermaier A,
    2. Khaw AV,
    3. Kirsch M, et al

    . Influence of recanalization and time of cerebral ischemia on tissue outcome after endovascular stroke treatment on computed tomography perfusion. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;24:2306–12 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.06.025 pmid:26187789

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Rao VL,
    2. Mlynash M,
    3. Christensen S, et al

    . Collateral status contributes to differences between observed and predicted 24-h infarct volumes in DEFUSE 3. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2020;40:1966–74 doi:10.1177/0271678X20918816 pmid:32423329

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Guenego A,
    2. Marcellus DG,
    3. Martin BW, et al

    . Hypoperfusion intensity ratio is correlated with patient eligibility for thrombectomy. Stroke 2019;50:917–22 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024134 pmid:30168180

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Guenego A,
    2. Mlynash M,
    3. Christensen S, et al

    . Hypoperfusion ratio predicts infarct growth during transfer for thrombectomy. Ann Neurol 2018;84:616–20 doi:10.1002/ana.25320 pmid:30168180

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Qiao Y,
    2. Zhu G,
    3. Patrie J, et al

    . Optimal perfusion computed tomographic thresholds for ischemic core and penumbra are not time dependent in the clinically relevant time window. Stroke 2014;45:1355–62 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003362 pmid:24627117

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. d’Esterre CD,
    2. Boesen ME,
    3. Ahn SH, et al

    . Time-dependent computed tomographic perfusion thresholds for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2015;46:3390–97 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009250 pmid:26514186

    Abstract/FREE Full Text