Detection of Early Ischemic Changes with Virtual Noncontrast Dual-Energy CT in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Noninferiority Analysis

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Wintermark M,
   2. Luby M,
   3. Bornstein NM, et al

   . International survey of acute stroke imaging used to make revascularization treatment decisions. Int J Stroke 2015;10:759–62 doi:10.1111/ijs.12491 pmid:25833105

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Wardlaw JM,
   2. Mielke O

   . Early signs of brain infarction at CT: observer reliability and outcome after thrombolytic treatment—systematic review. Radiology 2005;235:444–53 doi:10.1148/radiol.2352040262 pmid:15858087

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Barber PA,
   2. Demchuk AM,
   3. Zhang J

   , et al. Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy: ASPECTS Study Group—Alberta Stroke Programme. Lancet 2000;355:1670–74 doi:10.1016/S0140-673(00)02237-6 pmid:10905241

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. 4.
   1. Jovin TG,
   2. Chamorro A,
   3. Cobo E, et al

   ; REVASCAT Trial Investigators. Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2296–2306 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1503780 pmid:25882510

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Goyal M,
   2. Demchuk AM,
   3. Menon BK, et al

   . Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1019–30 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 pmid:25671798

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Goyal M,
   2. Menon BK,
   3. van Zwam WH, et al

   ; HERMES Collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 2016;387:1723–31 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X pmid:26898852

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Jovin TG,
   2. Nogueira RG,
   3. Lansberg MG, et al

   . Thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke beyond 6 h from time last known well (AURORA): a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet 2021;399:249–58 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01341-6 pmid:34774198

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Wolman DN,
   2. Patel BP,
   3. Wintermark M, et al

   . Dual-energy computed tomography applications in neurointervention. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2018;42:31–38 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000779 pmid:30052616

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Almqvist H,
   2. Holmin S,
   3. Mazya MV

   . Dual energy CT after stroke thrombectomy alters assessment of hemorrhagic complications. Neurology 2019;93:e1068–75 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000008093 pmid:31409735

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Liu K,
    2. Jiang L,
    3. Ruan J, et al

    . The role of dual energy CT in evaluating hemorrhagic complications at different stages after thrombectomy. Front Neurol 2020;11:583411 doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.583411 pmid:33117268

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Barber PA,
    2. Hill MD,
    3. Eliasziw M, et al

    . Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76:1528–33 doi:10.1136/jnnp.2004.059261 pmid:16227545

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Cohen J

    . Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968;70:213–20 doi:10.1037/h0026256 pmid:19673146

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    1. Roldán-Nofuentes JA

    . Compbdt: an R program to compare two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020;20:143 doi:10.1186/s12874-020-00988-y pmid:32503431

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Lin LI

    . A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989;45:255–68 pmid:2720055

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Morgan CJ,
    2. Aban I

    . Methods for evaluating the agreement between diagnostic tests. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:511–13 doi:10.1007/s12350-015-0175-7 pmid:25995184

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Lehti L,
    2. Söderberg M,
    3. Höglund P, et al

    . Reliability of virtual non-contrast computed tomography angiography: comparing it with the real deal. Acta Radiol Open 2018;7:2058460118790115 doi:10.1177/2058460118790115 pmid:30181911

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Noid G,
    2. Schott D,
    3. Paulson E, et al

    . Technical note: using virtual noncontrast images from dual-energy CT to eliminate the need of precontrast CT for x-ray radiation treatment planning of abdominal tumors. Med Phys 2021;48:1365–71 doi:10.1002/mp.14702 pmid:33386614

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Ferda J,
    2. Novák M,
    3. Mírka H, et al

    . The assessment of intracranial bleeding with virtual unenhanced imaging by means of dual-energy CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2518–22 doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1495-2 pmid:19585123

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.
    1. Jiang XY,
    2. Zhang SH,
    3. Xie QZ, et al

    . Evaluation of virtual noncontrast images obtained from dual-energy CTA for diagnosing subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:855–60 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4223 pmid:25614477

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
20. 20.↵
    1. Bonatti M,
    2. Lombardo F,
    3. Zamboni GA, et al

    . Dual-energy CT of the brain: comparison between DECT angiography-derived virtual unenhanced images and true unenhanced images in the detection of intracranial haemorrhage. Eur Radiol 2017;27:2690–97 doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4658-y pmid:27882426

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Tijssen MP,
    2. Hofman PA,
    3. Stadler AA, et al

    . The role of dual energy CT in differentiating between brain haemorrhage and contrast medium after mechanical revascularisation in acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Radiol 2014;24:834–40 doi:10.1007/s00330-013-3073-x pmid:24258277

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Gariani J,
    2. Cuvinciuc V,
    3. Courvoisier D, et al

    . Diagnosis of acute ischemia using dual energy CT after mechanical thrombectomy. J Neurointerv Surg 2016;8:996–1000 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011988 pmid:26534867

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Ebashi R,
    2. Ogata A,
    3. Nishihara M, et al

    . Significance of simulated conventional images on dual energy CT after endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 2019;11:898–902 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014486 pmid:30670626

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Winklhofer S,
    2. Vittoria De Martini I,
    3. Nern C, et al

    . Dual-energy computed tomography in stroke imaging: technical and clinical considerations of virtual noncontrast images for detection of the hyperdense artery sign. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2017;41:843–48 doi:10.1097/RCT.0000000000000638 pmid:28708725

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Mohammed MF,
    2. Marais O,
    3. Min A, et al

    . Unenhanced dual-energy computed tomography: visualization of brain edema. Invest Radiol 2018;53:63–69 doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000413 pmid:28915161

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Wolman DN,
    2. van Ommen F,
    3. Tong E, et al

    . Non-contrast dual-energy CT virtual ischemia maps accurately estimate ischemic core size in large-vessel occlusive stroke. Sci Rep 2021;11:6745 doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85143-3 pmid:33762589

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Gupta AC,
    2. Schaefer PW,
    3. Chaudhry ZA, et al

    . Interobserver reliability of baseline noncontrast CT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score for intra-arterial stroke treatment selection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1046–49 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2942 pmid:22322602

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. van Horn N,
    2. Kniep H,
    3. Broocks G, et al

    . ASPECTS interobserver agreement of 100 investigators from the TENSION study. Clin Neuroradiol 2021;31:1093–1100 doi:10.1007/s00062-020-00988-x pmid:33502563

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Lansberg MG,
    2. Albers GW,
    3. Beaulieu C, et al

    . Comparison of diffusion-weighted MRI and CT in acute stroke. Neurology 2000;54:1557–61 doi:10.1212/wnl.54.8.1557 pmid:10762493

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. McCollough CH,
    2. Leng S,
    3. Yu L, et al

    . Dual- and multi-energy CT: principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications. Radiology 2015;276:637–53 doi:10.1148/radiol.2015142631 pmid:26302388

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Yu L,
    2. Primak AN,
    3. Liu X, et al

    . Image quality optimization and evaluation of linearly mixed images in dual-source, dual-energy CT. Med Phys 2009;36:1019–24 doi:10.1118/1.3077921 pmid:19378762

    CrossRefPubMed