High-Resolution MRI for Evaluation of the Possibility of Successful Recanalization in Symptomatic Chronic ICA Occlusion: A Retrospective Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Flaherty ML,
   2. Flemming KD,
   3. McClelland R, et al

   . Population-based study of symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusion: incidence and long-term follow-up. Stroke 2004;35:e349–52 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000135024.54608.3f pmid:15232124

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
2. 2.↵
   1. Iwata T,
   2. Mori T,
   3. Tajiri H, et al

   . Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome following stenting by flow reversal technique for chronic occlusions older than 3 months of the cervical carotid or vertebral artery. Neurosurgery 2012;70:82–90 doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822e074c pmid:21778917

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Powers WJ,
   2. Derdeyn CP,
   3. Fritsch SM, et al

   . Benign prognosis of never-symptomatic carotid occlusion. Neurology 2000;54:878–82 doi:10.1212/WNL.54.4.878 pmid:10690980

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Buslovich S,
   2. Hines GL

   . Spontaneous recanalization of chronic internal carotid artery occlusions: report of 3 cases. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2011;45:93–97 doi:10.1177/1538574410380792 pmid:20829242

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Chmayssani M,
   2. Festa JR,
   3. Marshall RS

   . Chronic ischemia and neurocognition. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2007;17:313–24 doi:10.1016/j.nic.2007.03.002 pmid:17826634

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Kao HL,
   2. Hung CS,
   3. Li HY, et al

   . Long-term outcomes after endovascular recanalization in patients with chronic carotid artery occlusion. Am J Cardiol 2018;122:1779–83 doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.07.049 pmid:30244843

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Lin MS,
   2. Chiu MJ,
   3. Wu YW, et al

   . Neurocognitive improvement after carotid artery stenting in patients with chronic internal carotid artery occlusion and cerebral ischemia. Stroke 2011;42:2850–54 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.613133 pmid:21836094

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Chen YH,
   2. Lin MS,
   3. Lee JK, et al

   . Carotid stenting improves cognitive function in asymptomatic cerebral ischemia. Int J Cardiol 2012;157:104–07 doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.086 pmid:22088226

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Huang CC,
   2. Chen YH,
   3. Lin MS, et al

   . Association of the recovery of objective abnormal cerebral perfusion with neurocognitive improvement after carotid revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:2503–09 doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.059 pmid:23563133

   FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Rubiera M,
    2. Ribo M,
    3. Delgado-Mederos R, et al

    . Tandem internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery occlusion: an independent predictor of poor outcome after systemic thrombolysis. Stroke 2006;37:2301–05 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000237070.80133.1d pmid:16888266

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    1. Lee CW,
    2. Lin YH,
    3. Liu HM, et al

    . Predicting procedure successful rate and 1-year patency after endovascular recanalization for chronic carotid artery occlusion by CT angiography. Int J Cardiol 2016;221:772–76 doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.127 pmid:27428320

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Kappelhof M,
    2. Marquering HA,
    3. Berkhemer OA, et al

    . Intra-arterial treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke and internal carotid artery occlusion: a literature review. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:8–15 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011004 pmid:24385555

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Duijsens HM,
    2. Spaander F,
    3. van Dijk LC, et al

    . Endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke and apparent occlusion of the extracranial internal carotid artery on CTA. J Neurointerv Surg 2015;7:709–14 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011297 pmid:25118191

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
14. 14.↵
    1. Morino Y,
    2. Abe M,
    3. Morimoto T, et al

    ; J-CTO Registry Investigators. Predicting successful guidewire crossing through chronic total occlusion of native coronary lesions within 30 minutes: the J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) score as a difficulty grading and time assessment tool. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011;4:213–21 doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2010.09.024 pmid:21349461

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
15. 15.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS,
    2. Sanossian N,
    3. Yong WH, et al

    . CT and MRI early vessel signs reflect clot composition in acute stroke. Stroke 2011;42:1237–43 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605576 pmid:21393591

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    1. Puig J,
    2. Pedraza S,
    3. Demchuk A, et al

    . Quantification of thrombus Hounsfield units on noncontrast CT predicts stroke subtype and early recanalization after intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:90–96 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2878 pmid:22158924

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Mo L,
    2. Ma G,
    3. Dai C, et al

    . Endovascular recanalization for symptomatic subacute and chronically occluded internal carotid artery: feasibility, safety, a modified radiographic classification system, and clinical outcomes. Neuroradiology 2020;62:1323–34 doi:10.1007/s00234-020-02458-0 pmid:32494963

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Chen YH,
    2. Leong WS,
    3. Lin MS, et al

    . Predictors for successful endovascular intervention in chronic carotid artery total occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:1825–32 doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.015 pmid:27609258

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
19. 19.↵
    1. Michel P,
    2. Ntaios G,
    3. Delgado MG, et al

    . CT angiography helps to differentiate acute from chronic carotid occlusion: the “carotid ring sign.” Neuroradiology 2012;54:139–46 doi:10.1007/s00234-011-0868-9 pmid:21484321

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Hugenholtz H,
    2. Elgie RG

    . Carotid thromboendarterectomy: a reappraisal: criteria for patient selection. J Neurosurg 1980;53:776–83 doi:10.3171/jns.1980.53.6.0776 pmid:7441338

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Zanaty M,
    2. Howard S,
    3. Roa JA, et al

    . Cognitive and cerebral hemodynamic effects of endovascular recanalization of chronically occluded cervical internal carotid artery: single-center study and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 2019;132:1158–66 doi:10.3171/2019.1.JNS183337 pmid:30925474

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Wang Z,
    3. Ji Y, et al

    . Enterprise stent in recanalizing non-acute atherosclerotic intracranial internal carotid artery occlusion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2017;162:47–52 doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.06.015 pmid:28926782

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Namba K,
    2. Shojima M,
    3. Nemoto S

    . Wire-probing technique to revascularize subacute or chronic internal carotid artery occlusion. Interv Neuroradiol 2012;18:288–96 doi:10.1177/159101991201800307 pmid:22958767

    CrossRefPubMed
24. 24.↵
    1. Hong JM,
    2. Lee SE,
    3. Lee SJ, et al

    . Distinctive patterns on CT angiography characterize acute internal carotid artery occlusion subtypes. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e5722 doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000005722 pmid:28151850

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. Jia L,
    3. Liu B, et al

    . Evaluation of endarterectomy recanalization under ultrasound guidance in symptomatic patients with carotid artery occlusion. PloS One 2015;10:e0144381 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144381 pmid:26636827

    CrossRefPubMed
26. 26.↵
    1. Jiang Y,
    2. Zhu C,
    3. Peng W, et al

    . Ex-vivo imaging and plaque type classification of intracranial atherosclerotic plaque using high resolution MRI. Atherosclerosis 2016;249:10–16 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.03.033 pmid:27062404

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Bodle JD,
    2. Feldmann E,
    3. Swartz RH, et al

    . High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: an emerging tool for evaluating intracranial arterial disease. Stroke 2013;44:287–92 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.664680 pmid:23204050

    FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Cai JM,
    2. Hatsukami TS,
    3. Ferguson MS, et al

    . Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2002;106:1368–73 doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000028591.44554.f9 pmid:12221054

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Iwata T,
    2. Mori T,
    3. Tajiri H, et al

    . Successful stenting by combination technique of reverse flow and downstream filtering for long chronic total occlusion of the cervical vertebral artery: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2009;65:E378–79 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000348293.01482.0F pmid:19625893

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Zhou Z,
    2. Li R,
    3. Zhao X, et al

    . Evaluation of 3D multi-contrast joint intra-and extracranial vessel wall cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2015;17:41 doi:10.1186/s12968-015-0143-z pmid:26013973

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Liebeskind DS

    . Collateral circulation. Stroke 2003;34:2279–84 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000086465.41263.06 pmid:12881609

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
32. 32.↵
    1. Maas MB,
    2. Lev MH,
    3. Ay H, et al

    . Collateral vessels on CT angiography predict outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2009;40:3001–05 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.552513 pmid:19590055

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. 33.↵
    1. Truong M,
    2. Håkansson C,
    3. HaileMichael M, et al

    . The potential role of T2*-weighted multi-echo data image combination as an imaging marker for intraplaque hemorrhage in carotid plaque imaging. BMC Med Imaging 2021;21:121 doi:10.1186/s12880-021-00652-x pmid:34380454

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Saam T,
    2. Ferguson MS,
    3. Yarnykh VL, et al

    . Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2005;25:234–39 doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000149867.61851.31 pmid:15528475

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
35. 35.↵
    1. Sui B,
    2. Gao P

    . High-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging of carotid and intracranial vessels. Acta Radiol 2019;60:1329–40 doi:10.1177/0284185119826538 pmid:30727746

    CrossRefPubMed
36. 36.↵
    1. Joseph P,
    2. Ishai A,
    3. Mani V, et al

    . Short-term changes in arterial inflammation predict long-term changes in atherosclerosis progression. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2017;44:141–50 doi:10.1007/s00259-016-3524-0 pmid:27738728

    CrossRefPubMed
37. 37.↵
    1. Paraskevas KI,
    2. Mikhailidis DP,
    3. Liapis CD

    . Internal carotid artery occlusion: association with atherosclerotic disease in other arterial beds and vascular risk factors. Angiology 2007;58:329–35 doi:10.1177/0003319707301754 pmid:17626988

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
38. 38.↵
    1. Stone GW,
    2. Kandzari DE,
    3. Mehran R, et al

    . Percutaneous recanalization of chronically occluded coronary arteries: a consensus document: Part I. Circulation 2005;112:2364–72 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.481283 pmid:16216980

    FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Tartari S,
    2. Rizzati R,
    3. Righi R, et al

    . High-resolution MRI of carotid plaque with a neurovascular coil and contrast-enhanced MR angiography: one-stop shopping for the comprehensive assessment of carotid atherosclerosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1164–71 doi:10.2214/AJR.10.4751 pmid:21512087

    CrossRefPubMed
40. 40.↵
    1. Naghavi M,
    2. Libby P,
    3. Falk E, et al

    . From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation 2003;108:1664–72 doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97 pmid:14530185

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
41. 41.↵
    1. Archie JP Jr.

    Carotid endarterectomy when the distal internal carotid artery is small or poorly visualized. J Vasc Surg 1994;19:23–30 doi:10.1016/S0741-5214(94)70117-2 pmid:8301735

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Morais LT,
    2. Leslie-Mazwi TM,
    3. Lev MH, et al

    . Imaging-based selection for intra-arterial stroke therapies. J Neurointerv Surg 2013;5(Suppl 1):i13–20 doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010733 pmid:23572461

    FREE Full Text
43. 43.↵
    1. Furie B,
    2. Furie BC

    . Mechanisms of thrombus formation. N Engl J Med 2008;359:938–49 doi:10.1056/NEJMra0801082 pmid:18753650

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. 44.↵
    1. Marder VJ,
    2. Chute DJ,
    3. Starkman S, et al

    . Analysis of thrombi retrieved from cerebral arteries of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2006;37:2086–93 doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000230307.03438.94 pmid:16794209

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
45. 45.↵
    1. Saha P,
    2. Andia ME,
    3. Modarai B, et al

    . Magnetic resonance T-1 relaxation time of venous thrombus is determined by iron processing and predicts susceptibility to lysis. Circulation 2013;128:729–36 doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001371 pmid:23820077

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
46. 46.↵
    1. U-King-Im JM,
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Aviv RI, et al

    . Characterization of carotid plaque hemorrhage: a CT angiography and MR intraplaque hemorrhage study. Stroke 2010;41:1623–29 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.579474 pmid:20576955

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
47. 47.↵
    1. Trelles M,
    2. Eberhardt KM,
    3. Buchholz M, et al

    . CTA for screening of complicated atherosclerotic carotid plaque: American Heart Association type VI lesions as defined by MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2331–37 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3607 pmid:23868157

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
48. 48.↵
    1. Bitar R,
    2. Moody AR,
    3. Leung G, et al

    . In vivo 3D high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of intraplaque hemorrhage. Radiology 2008;249:259–67 doi:10.1148/radiol.2491071517 pmid:18796681

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. 49.↵
    1. Saba L,
    2. Yuan C,
    3. Hatsukami TS, et al

    ; Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Carotid artery wall imaging: perspective and guidelines from the ASNR Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:E9–31 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5488 pmid:29326139

    Abstract/FREE Full Text