Changes in Ventricular and Cortical Volumes following Shunt Placement in Patients with Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Adams RD,
   2. Fisher CM,
   3. Hakim S, et al

   . Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal-fluid pressure. N Engl J Med 1965;273:117–26 doi:10.1056/NEJM196507152730301 pmid:14303656

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Ishikawa M,
   2. Yamada S,
   3. Yamamoto K

   . Early and delayed assessments of quantitative gait measures to improve the tap test as a predictor of shunt effectiveness in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Fluids Barriers CNS 2016;13:20 doi:10.1186/s12987-016-0044-z pmid:27876063

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Kitagaki H,
   2. Mori E,
   3. Ishii K, et al

   . CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1277–84 pmid:9726467

   PubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Yamashita F,
   2. Sasaki M,
   3. Takahashi S, et al

   . Detection of changes in cerebrospinal fluid space in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus using voxel-based morphometry. Neuroradiology 2010;52:381–86 doi:10.1007/s00234-009-0610-z pmid:19847409

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Hashimoto M,
   2. Ishikawa M,
   3. Mori E, et al

   ; Study of INPH on neurological improvement (SINPHONI), Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is supported by MRI-based scheme: a prospective cohort study. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 2010;7:18 doi:10.1186/1743-8454-7-18] pmid:21040519

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Mori E,
   2. Ishikawa M,
   3. Kato T, et al

   ; Japanese Society of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus. Guidelines for management of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: second edition. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012;52:775–809 doi:10.2176/nmc.52.775 pmid:23183074

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Toma AK,
   2. Papadopoulos MC,
   3. Stapleton S, et al

   . Systematic review of the outcome of shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013;155:1977–80 doi:10.1007/s00701-013-1835-5 pmid:23975646

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Virhammar J,
   2. Laurell K,
   3. Cesarini KG, et al

   . Increase in callosal angle and decrease in ventricular volume after shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 2018;130:130–35 doi:10.3171/2017.8.JNS17547 pmid:29393749

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Yamada S,
   2. Ishikawa M,
   3. Yamaguchi M, et al

   . Longitudinal morphological changes during recovery from brain deformation due to idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after ventriculoperitoneal shunt surgery. Sci Rep 2019;9:17318 doi:10.1038/s41598-019-53888-7 pmid:31754171

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Hiraoka K,
    2. Yamasaki H,
    3. Takagi M, et al

    . Changes in the volumes of the brain and cerebrospinal fluid spaces after shunt surgery in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Sci 2010;296:7–12 doi:10.1016/j.jns.2010.06.021 pmid:20663514

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Vemuri P,
    2. Senjem ML,
    3. Gunter JL, et al

    ; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Accelerated vs. unaccelerated serial MRI based TBM-SyN measurements for clinical trials in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 2015;113:61–69 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.026 pmid:25797830

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Ashburner J,
    2. Ridgway GR

    . Symmetric diffeomorphic modeling of longitudinal structural MRI. Front Neurosci 2012;6:197 doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00197 pmid:23386806

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. Cash DM,
    2. Frost C,
    3. Iheme LO, et al

    . Assessing atrophy measurement techniques in dementia: results from the MIRIAD atrophy challenge. Neuroimage 2015;123:149–64 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.087 pmid:26275383

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Ashburner J,
    2. Friston KJ

    . Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 2005;26:839–51 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018 pmid:15955494

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    1. Avants BB,
    2. Epstein CL,
    3. Grossman M, et al

    . Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med Image Anal 2008;12:26–41 doi:10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004 pmid:17659998

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Schwarz CG,
    2. Gunter JL,
    3. Ward CP, et al

    . The Mayo Clinic adult lifespan template: better quantification across the life span. Alzheimers Dement 2017;13:P792 doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1071

    CrossRef
17. 17.↵
    1. Ishii K,
    2. Kanda T,
    3. Harada A, et al

    . Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2678–83 doi:10.1007/s00330-008-1044-4 pmid:18500524

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Khan QUA,
    2. Wharen RE,
    3. Grewal SS, et al

    . Overdrainage shunt complications in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and lumbar puncture opening pressure. J Neurosurg 2013;119:1498–502 doi:10.3171/2013.7.JNS13484 pmid:23930853

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Crook JE,
    2. Gunter JL,
    3. Ball CT, et al

    . Linear vs volume measures of ventricle size: relation to present and future gait and cognition. Neurology 2020;94:e549–56 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000008673 pmid:31748251

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. McCarty AM,
    2. Jones DT,
    3. Dickson DW, et al

    . Disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus (DESH) in normal pressure hydrocephalus misinterpreted as atrophy: autopsy and radiological evidence. Neurocase 2019;25:151–55 doi:10.1080/13554794.2019.1617319 pmid:31130064

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Jack CR,
    2. Petersen RC,
    3. Xu Y, et al

    . The rate of medial temporal lobe atrophy in typical aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1998;51:993–99 doi:10.1212/WNL.51.4.993 pmid:9781519

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
22. 22.↵
    1. Andersson J,
    2. Rosell M,
    3. Kockum K, et al

    . Prevalence of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective, population-based study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0217705 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217705 pmid:31141553

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Graff-Radford J,
    2. Gunter JL,
    3. Jones DT, et al

    . Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics disorders: relationship to Alzheimer biomarkers and cognition. Neurology 2019;93:e2237–46 doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000008616 pmid:31719134

    Abstract/FREE Full Text