Asynchrony in Peritumoral Resting-State Blood Oxygen Level–Dependent fMRI Predicts Meningioma Grade and Invasion

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Kshettry VR,
   3. Ostrom QT,
   4. Kruchko C, et al

   . Descriptive epidemiology of World Health Organization grades II and III intracranial meningiomas in the United States. Neuro Oncol 2015;17:1166–73 doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov069 pmid:26008603

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   2. Louis DN,
   3. Perry A,
   4. Reifenberger G, et al

   . The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016;131:803–20 doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 pmid:27157931

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Willis J,
   3. Smith C,
   4. Ironside JW, et al

   . The accuracy of meningioma grading: a 10-year retrospective audit. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2005;31:141–49 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2990.2004.00621.x pmid:15771707

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Ostrom QT,
   3. Cioffi G,
   4. Gittleman H, et al

   . CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2012-2016. Neuro Oncol 2019;21:v1–100 doi:10.1093/neuonc/noz150 pmid:31675094

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Coroller TP,
   3. Bi WL,
   4. Huynh E, et al

   . Radiographic prediction of meningioma grade by semantic and radiomic features. PLoS One 2017;12:e0187908 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187908 pmid:29145421

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Kim BW,
   3. Kim MS,
   4. Kim SW, et al

   . Peritumoral brain edema in meningiomas: correlation of radiologic and pathologic features. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2011;49:26–30 doi:10.3340/jkns.2011.49.1.26 pmid:21494359

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Adeli A,
   3. Hess K,
   4. Mawrin C, et al

   . Prediction of brain invasion in patients with meningiomas using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Oncotarget 2018;9:35974–82 doi:10.18632/oncotarget.26313 pmid:30542511

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Wang S,
   3. Kim S,
   4. Zhang Y, et al

   . Determination of grade and subtype of meningiomas by using histogram analysis of diffusion-tensor imaging metrics. Radiology 2012;262:584–92 doi:10.1148/radiol.11110576 pmid:22084207

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   2. Chow DS,
   3. Horenstein CI,
   4. Canoll P, et al

   . Glioblastoma induces vascular dysregulation in nonenhancing peritumoral regions in humans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;206:1073–81 doi:10.2214/AJR.15.14529 pmid:27007449

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Bowden SG,
    3. Gill BJ,
    4. Englander ZK, et al

    . Local glioma cells are associated with vascular dysregulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2018;39:507–14 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A5526 pmid:29371254

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
11. 11.↵
    2. Jiang Z,
    3. Krainik A,
    4. David O, et al

    . Impaired fMRI activation in patients with primary brain tumors. Neuroimage 2010;52:538–48 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.194 pmid:20452442

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. 12.↵
    2. Murphy K,
    3. Birn RM,
    4. Handwerker DA, et al

    . The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced? Neuroimage 2009;44:893–905 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036 pmid:18976716

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. 13.↵
    2. Shmueli K,
    3. van Gelderen P,
    4. de Zwart JA, et al

    . Low-frequency fluctuations in the cardiac rate as a source of variance in the resting-state fMRI BOLD signal. Neuroimage 2007;38:306–20 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.037 pmid:17869543

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    2. Birn RM,
    3. Murphy K,
    4. Bandettini PA

    . The effect of respiration variations on independent component analysis results of resting state functional connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 2008;29:740–50 doi:10.1002/hbm.20577 pmid:18438886

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. 15.↵
    2. Scholvinck ML,
    3. Maier A,
    4. Ye FQ, et al

    . Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:10238–43 doi:10.1073/pnas.0913110107 pmid:20439733

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
16. 16.↵
    2. Power JD,
    3. Plitt M,
    4. Laumann TO, et al

    . Sources and implications of whole-brain fMRI signals in humans. Neuroimage 2017;146:609–25 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.038 pmid:27751941

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Glasser MF,
    3. Coalson TS,
    4. Bijsterbosch JD, et al

    . Using temporal ICA to selectively remove global noise while preserving global signal in functional MRI data. Neuroimage 2018;181:692–717 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.076 pmid:29753843

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Raemaekers M,
    3. Schellekens W,
    4. Petridou N, et al

    . Knowing left from right: asymmetric functional connectivity during resting state. Brain Struct Funct 2018;223:1909–22 doi:10.1007/s00429-017-1604-y pmid:29299691

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Murphy K,
    3. Birn RM,
    4. Bandettini PA

    . Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup. Neuroimage 2013;80:349–59 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.001 pmid:23571418

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
20. 20.↵
    2. Desjardins AE,
    3. Kiehl KA,
    4. Liddle PF

    . Removal of confounding effects of global signal in functional MRI analyses. Neuroimage 2001;13:751–58 doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0719 pmid:11305902

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    2. Jenkinson M,
    3. Beckmann CF,
    4. Behrens TE, et al

    . FSL. Neuroimage 2012;62:782–90 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 pmid:21979382

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science