Tissue at Risk and Ischemic Core Estimation Using Deep Learning in Acute Stroke

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Albers GW,
   2. Marks MP,
   3. Kemp S, et al

   . DEFUSE 3 Investigators. Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 2018;378:708–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713973 pmid:29364767

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Ma H,
   2. Campbell BC,
   3. Parsons MW, et al

   . EXTEND Investigators. Thrombolysis guided by perfusion imaging up to 9 hours after onset of stroke. N Engl J Med 2019;380:1795–1803 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1813046 pmid:31067369

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Campbell BC,
   2. Ma H,
   3. Ringleb PA, et al

   . EXTEND, ECASS-4, and EPITHET Investigators. Extending thrombolysis to 4.5-9 h and wake-up stroke using perfusion imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet 2019;394:139–47 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31053-0 pmid:31128925

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Albers GW,
   2. Lansberg MG,
   3. Kemp S, et al

   . A multicenter randomized controlled trial of endovascular therapy following imaging evaluation for ischemic stroke (DEFUSE 3). Int J Stroke 2017;12:896–905 doi:10.1177/1747493017701147 pmid:28946832

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Nagakane Y,
   2. Christensen S,
   3. Ogata T, et al

   . EPITHET Investigators. Moving beyond a single perfusion threshold to define penumbra: a novel probabilistic mismatch definition. Stroke 2012;43:1548–55 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.643932 pmid:22499579

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. McKinley R,
   2. Hani L,
   3. Gralla J, et al

   . Fully automated stroke tissue estimation using random forest classifiers (FASTER). J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2017;37:2728–41 doi:10.1177/0271678X16674221 pmid:27798267

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Nielsen A,
   2. Hansen MB,
   3. Tietze A, et al

   . Prediction of tissue outcome and assessment of treatment effect in acute ischemic stroke using deep learning. Stroke 2018;49:1394–1401 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019740 pmid:29720437

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. Pinto A,
   2. McKinley R,
   3. Alves V, et al

   . Stroke lesion outcome prediction based on MRI imaging combined with clinical information. Front Neurol 2018;9:1060 doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.01060 pmid:30568631

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. Stier N,
   2. Vincent N,
   3. Liebeskind D, et al

   . Deep learning of tissue fate features in acute ischemic stroke. Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed) 2015;2015:1316–21 doi:10.1109/BIBM.2015.7359869 pmid:28919983

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    1. Winder AJ,
    2. Siemonsen S,
    3. Flottmann F, et al

    . Comparison of classification methods for voxel-based prediction of acute ischemic stroke outcome following intra-arterial intervention. Proceedings of the SPIE 2017;10134:101344B doi:10.1117/12.2254118

    CrossRef
11. 11.↵
    1. Yu Y,
    2. Guo D,
    3. Lou M, et al

    . Prediction of hemorrhagic transformation severity in acute stroke from source perfusion MRI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2018;65:2058–65 doi:10.1109/TBME.2017.2783241 pmid:29989941

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    1. Yu Y,
    2. Xie Y,
    3. Thamm T, et al

    . Use of deep learning to predict final ischemic stroke lesions from initial magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e200772 doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0772 pmid:32163165

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    1. McKinley R,
    2. Hung F,
    3. Wiest R, et al

    . A machine learning approach to perfusion imaging with dynamic susceptibility contrast MR. Front Neurol 2018;9:717 doi:10.3389/fneur.2018.00717 pmid:30233482

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Chilamkurthy S,
    2. Ghosh R,
    3. Tanamala S, et al

    . Deep learning algorithms for detection of critical findings in head CT scans: a retrospective study. Lancet 2018;392:2388–96 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31645-3 pmid:30318264

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Wang K,
    2. Shou Q,
    3. Ma SJ, et al

    . Deep learning detection of penumbral tissue on arterial spin labeling in stroke. Stroke 2020;51:489–97 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027457 pmid:31884904

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    1. Robben D,
    2. Boers AM,
    3. Marquering HA, et al

    . Prediction of final infarct volume from native CT perfusion and treatment parameters using deep learning. Med Image Anal 2020;59:101589 doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.101589 pmid:31683091

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    1. Navab N,
    2. Hornegger J, Well

    1. AN

    1. Ronneberger O,
    2. Fischer P,
    3. Brox T

    . U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Well AN, et al, eds. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer; 2015:9351
18. 18.↵
    1. Howard AG

    . Some Improvements on Deep Convolutional Neural Network Based Image Classification. arXiv e-prints 2013. https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.5402. Accessed December 01, 2013
19. 19.↵
    1. Zaharchuk G,
    2. Marks MP,
    3. Do HM, et al

    . Introducing the Imaging the Collaterals in Acute Stroke (iCAS) multicenter MRI trial. Stroke 2015;46 (Supple 1):AWMP16
20. 20.↵
    1. Thamm T,
    2. Guo J,
    3. Rosenberg J, et al

    . iCAS Study Investigators. Contralateral hemispheric cerebral blood flow measured with arterial spin labeling can predict outcome in acute stroke. Stroke 2019;50:3408–15 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026499 pmid:31619150

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Lansberg MG,
    2. Straka M,
    3. Kemp S, et al

    . DEFUSE 2 Study Investigators. MRI profile and response to endovascular reperfusion after stroke (DEFUSE 2): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:860–67 doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70203-X pmid:22954705

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
22. 22.↵
    1. Albers GW,
    2. Thijs VN,
    3. Wechsler L, et al

    . DEFUSE Investigators. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol 2006;60:508–17 doi:10.1002/ana.20976 pmid:17066483

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
23. 23.↵
    1. Eilaghi A,
    2. Brooks J,
    3. d’Esterre C, et al

    . Reperfusion is a stronger predictor of good clinical outcome than recanalization in ischemic stroke. Radiology 2013;269:240–48 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122327 pmid:23716707

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
24. 24.↵
    1. Cho TH,
    2. Nighoghossian N,
    3. Mikkelsen IK, et al

    . Reperfusion within 6 hours outperforms recanalization in predicting penumbra salvage, lesion growth, final infarct, and clinical outcome. Stroke 2015;46:1582–89 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007964 pmid:25908463

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. 25.↵
    1. Bivard A,
    2. Levi C,
    3. Spratt N, et al

    . Perfusion CT in acute stroke: a comprehensive analysis of infarct and penumbra. Radiology 2013;267:543–50 doi:10.1148/radiol.12120971 pmid:23264345

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Yu Y,
    2. Han Q,
    3. Ding X, et al

    . Defining core and penumbra in ischemic stroke: a voxel- and volume-based analysis of whole brain CT perfusion. Sci Rep 2016;6:20932 doi:10.1038/srep20932 pmid:26860196

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Purushotham A,
    2. Campbell BC,
    3. Straka M, et al

    . Apparent diffusion coefficient threshold for delineation of ischemic core. Int J Stroke 2015;10:348–53 doi:10.1111/ijs.12068 pmid:23802548

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Mukaka MM

    . Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J 2012;24:69–71 pmid:23638278

    PubMedWeb of Science
29. 29.↵
    1. Olivot JM,
    2. Mlynash M,
    3. Thijs VN, et al

    . Optimal Tmax threshold for predicting penumbral tissue in acute stroke. Stroke 2009;40:469–75 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.526954 pmid:19109547

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Murphy BD,
    2. Fox AJ,
    3. Lee DH, et al

    . White matter thresholds for ischemic penumbra and infarct core in patients with acute stroke: CT perfusion study. Radiology 2008;247:818–25 doi:10.1148/radiol.2473070551 pmid:18424687

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. Campbell BC,
    2. Mitchell PJ,
    3. Kleinig TJ, et al

    . Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1009–18 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1414792 pmid:25671797

    CrossRefPubMed
32. 32.↵
    1. Berkhemer OA,
    2. Fransen PS,
    3. Beumer D

    , et al. MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:11–20 doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 pmid:25517348

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
33. 33.↵
    1. Yosinski J,
    2. Clune J,
    3. Bengio Y, et al

    . How transferable are features in deep neural networks? In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, ACM Digital Library 2014:3320–28
34. 34.↵
    1. Tajbakhsh N,
    2. Shin JY,
    3. Gurudu SR, et al

    . Convolutional neural networks for medical image analysis: full training or fine tuning? IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2016;35:1299–1312 doi:10.1109/TMI.2016.2535302 pmid:26978662

    CrossRefPubMed
35. 35.↵
    1. Raghu M,
    2. Zhang C,
    3. Kleinberg J, et al

    . Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imaging. arXiv.org 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.07208. Accessed Februrary 01, 2019
36. 36.↵
    1. Qiao Y,
    2. Zhu G,
    3. Patrie J, et al

    . Optimal perfusion computed tomographic thresholds for ischemic core and penumbra are not time dependent in the clinically relevant time window. Stroke 2014;45:1355–62 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003362 pmid:24627117

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    1. d’Esterre CD,
    2. Boesen ME,
    3. Ahn SH, et al

    . Time-dependent computed tomographic perfusion thresholds for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2015;46:3390–97 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009250 pmid:26514186

    Abstract/FREE Full Text